Center Of Excellence in Digital Forensics Perungudi, Chennai, India
The study explores the victimization of Narikuravar women, a marginalized and semi-nomadic tribal community focusing on access to education, employment, cultural-economic challenges, child marriage, and legal challenges. Conducted in Madurai, Tamil Nadu, the research adopts a quantitative research method approach to explore the various challenges faced by Narikuravar women. The study involves a sample of 102 women from the Narikuravar community and gathering information data on how gender-based violence and remains underreported due to fear of stigma, societal norms, and lack of trust in legal institutions. This study aims to investigate the awareness of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act among the Narikuravars community and their nutrition health. The study highlights the education barriers faced by these women, lack of access to schools and their cultural stigmatization to limit their access to education and employment. Through this research, the study aims to reveal the pressing issues faced by Narikuravar women and offer recommendations to address their challenges, improve their well-being, and break the cycle of exploitation.
Victim
Under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, by virtue of Act 5 of 2009, the definition of “victim” was added by way of section 2(wa) to mean a person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of the act or omission for which the accused person has been charged and the expression “victim” includes his or her guardian or legal heir. [1]
Narikuravargal
The Narikuravars are a semi-nomadic tribal community primarily found in Tamil Nadu. The name Narikuravargal can be divided into two words, Nari (fox) and Kuravar (a nomadic or tribal community) where the fox in their first name connects to the practice of observing animal behavior, especially foxes, to make fortune predictions of the future. Foxes were often considered religious creatures with the ability to sense upcoming events. The Narikuravargal probably evolved from the larger Kuravar tribal community, a group traditionally associated with unsettled lifestyles, hunting, and gathering. Some specific groups of people within this community are proficient in fortune telling, giving a new rise to the Narikuravargal. They play a significant role in predicting natural signs and offer wise guidance an important occasion. Many Narikuravargal might have been Siddhar or spiritual healers who were well-versed in the Siddha medical system. [2]
Occupation
In ancient times, they were skilled in tracking and hunting small animals, birds, and reptiles, using simple tools like traps, slingshots and bows. Implementation of the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 in India, hunting was prohibited to secure the endanger species. Narikuravargal was engaged in traditional systems of education, spiritual practices, and community leadership. They were responsible for the youth by educating philosophy, literature, ethics, religion, and governance. This education was typically through oral traditions, where ancient would teach from religious write like the Thirukkural, Tamil Sangam literature, and some Vedic texts. They often as monks, pastor who led rituals and provide advices to individuals about religious and spiritual leadership. [3,4] Many narikuravars families make sell handmade bead necklaces, bracelets during festival. some are selling the small items such as toys, hair accessories, or household goods in roadside stalls and travelling vendors.
fig.2.
Bead craftmanship by the narikuravar community Narikuravars also act as a daily wage labour in constructing sites, and agriculture. They often taught classical music, dance, and traditional forms of literature. In contemporary society, many Narikuravargal are highly educated and hold positions in educational institutions, either as professors, researchers, or spiritual leaders. They continue to contribute to the development of philosophy, literature, and cultural studies through formal education.
Education
In ancient times, the primary method of education in these early times was oral, where elders learned through discussions, debates, and storytelling. They followed Guru-shishya method of training. Elders teach Children about their history, customs, lifestyle, hunting methods, crafting tools and making bead jewelry. Children learn from their ancestors. In recent times the efforts taken by NGOs and governments have helped them to access schooling by providing scholarships and vocational training. In this modern era, many people from their community pursue degrees in many normed universities. They also connected to digital platforms publishing books and delivering speeches. [5]
Habitat
The Narikuravargal traveled across rural areas and villages in Tamil Nadu. They set huts and made tents using bamboo, thatched and available materials. They settle near forests, open fields, highways and villages. In recent years government has taken initiatives to provide housing schemes for settling in secure places. In Madurai the Narikuravar community first got their permanent house in 1991 under the Indira Gandhi Awas Yojana Scheme, under this scheme they constructed houses in the Sakkimangalam Panchayat.
BACKGROUND
Narikuravars migrated from Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Maharashtra to south India about 400 years ago. During the British colonial period, Narikuravars were categorized under the “Criminal tribes Act” of 1871 and stigmatized for a long time. They were denotified in 1952, but still, the stigma continues. The Narikuravar community was categorized under the Most Backward Classes (MBC) in Tamil Nadu in 1989. In 2016, the Central government officially recognized Narikuvars communities as Scheduled Tribes (ST). Under this categorization, they get reservation in education, employment, economic schemes and cultural recognition. In December 2022 India Parliament passed the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) order (Second Amendment) bill,2022. [6]
Health and Nutrition
Narikuravars due to their semi-nomadic lifestyle and socioeconomic status lack access to nutrient-rich foods such as fruits, Vegetables, dairy and proteins. Lack of sanitation, poor hygiene and limited access to clean water, no toilet facilities cause infectious diseases like diarrhea, malaria. Lack of awareness of maternal health can affect the mothers during pregnancy and childbirth. Inadequate access to healthcare services during prenatal and postnatal care causes nutritional deficiency in mothers and infants. Discrimination, poverty and social stigmatization of narikuravar community make them into stressful condition like depression and anxiety. [7,8,9,10]
fig.4.
The water facility of narikuravar community in sakkimangalam, madurai district
Challenges
Due to their isolation from formal education and urbanization, many narikuravars remain unaware of their rights. Still, they are stereotyped as criminals most of the companies do not provide jobs for the Narikuravar community. They sell beads, ornaments and handmade goods they earn low income and unreliable sources of livelihood. Lack of access to schools near the surroundings. The literacy rate among the narikuravars is very low, especially among women and children. Lack of awareness about hygiene, nutrition and preventive healthcare. [11]
Significance:
The study will help raise awareness about education, employment, and reservations quota, with the involvement of NGOs, for Narikuravar women. It will also emphasize the need for greater access to resources and support, contributing to the empowerment of the community and promoting gender equality.
Need of Study
This study will provide valuable insights into the root causes of the issues faced by Narikuravar women and assess the effectiveness of existing legal protections. It will help identify the socio-cultural and economic factors contributing to the victimization of women.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:
The aim of the research is to explore the victimization of women among narikuravars on Madurai district.
RESEARCH METHOD
Sample of this case was taken on women from narikuravar community. Minimum of 102 samples are taken for this study in Madurai, Tamil Nadu. Quantitative method research for an in-depth understanding of the victimization faced by Narikuravar women.
Data Collection Methods
Sampling technique: snowball sampling.
Interviews: Semi-structured interviews with Narikuravar women to gather personal narratives.
Target Population
Primary Participants: Women from the Narikuravar community across various age groups.
Method of Data Analysis
Structured questions will be implemented in SPSS software used for static value of the collected data.
PROCEDURE:
The samples were collected from the womens in the Narikuravar Community. The researcher obtained consent from each individual sample. Data were collected using a questionnaire method. After collecting the samples the data were analysed, coded and the SPSS software was used for data analysis and interpretation.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Gender |
||||
Female |
102 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Age |
||||
Under 18 |
7 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
18 - 30 |
52 |
51.0 |
51.0 |
57.8 |
30 - 35 |
35 |
34.3 |
34.3 |
92.2 |
Above 50 |
8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
100.0 |
Marital Status |
||||
Married |
82 |
80.4 |
80.4 |
80.4 |
Unmarried |
20 |
19.6 |
19.6 |
100.0 |
Living Condition |
||||
House |
87 |
85.3 |
85.3 |
85.3 |
Roadside Dwelling |
15 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
100.0 |
Religion |
||||
Hinduism |
102 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Educational Qualification |
||||
Not Educated |
98 |
96.1 |
96.1 |
96.1 |
Primary Education |
1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
97.1 |
Higher Secondary |
2 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
99.0 |
Degree Holder |
1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
Annual Income |
||||
Below 1,00,000 |
102 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Primary Education |
||||
0 - 25% |
102 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Identity Proof |
||||
|
102 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Social economic condition
Table 1
According to the data, all of the people who were surveyed were female, and the majority of them (51%) were in the 18–30 age range. The majority of respondents (80.4%) are married and reside in homes (85.3%), whereas a smaller proportion (14.7%) live on the side of the road. With only a small percentage obtaining higher secondary or degree levels and 96.1% lacking any formal education, educational attainment is incredibly low. All responders, however, have identity documentation, which could facilitate their access to necessary services. Furthermore, the group as a whole earns less than ?1,00,000 annually, which suggests financial difficulties. Overall, the results show that this community faces serious socioeconomic difficulties.
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Importance of Traditional Customs |
||||
Important |
14 |
13.7 |
13.7 |
13.7 |
Neutral |
81 |
79.4 |
79.4 |
93.1 |
Not Very Important |
7 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
100.0 |
Women's Participation in Community Decision-Making |
||||
Yes |
91 |
89.2 |
89.2 |
89.2 |
No |
11 |
10.8 |
10.8 |
100.0 |
Women Expected to Follow Strict Cultural Norms |
||||
No |
102 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Age of Girls When They Get Married |
||||
19 - 22 |
42 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
41.2 |
Above 22 |
60 |
58.8 |
58.8 |
100.0 |
Child Marriage in the Community |
||||
Rarely |
88 |
86.3 |
86.3 |
86.3 |
Sometimes |
14 |
13.7 |
13.7 |
100.0 |
cultural factors and traditional practices
Table 2
According to the data, only 13.7% of respondents think traditional customs are important, while the majority (79.4%) are neutral. None are expected to adhere to rigid cultural norms, and a sizable majority (89.2%) of women participate in community decision-making. The community reports that child marriage is uncommon (86.3%), with 58.8% of marriages taking place after the age of 22.
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Primary Responsible for Earning Income in the Family |
||||
Both Equally |
102 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Are Girls Encouraged to Pursue Higher Education |
||||
Never |
98 |
96.1 |
96.1 |
96.1 |
Sometimes |
4 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
100.0 |
Women Allowed to Work Outside the Community Without Restriction |
||||
Very Unlikely |
75 |
73.5 |
73.5 |
73.5 |
Gender roles
Table 3
According to the data, income responsibility is distributed equally among all families surveyed. Gender-based societal limitations are highlighted by the fact that a sizable majority (96.1%) say that girls are never encouraged to pursue higher education and 73.5% think it is extremely unlikely for women to work outside the community without restrictions.
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Ever faced discrimination from outsiders based on your community? |
||||
Rarely |
2 |
2.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
Sometimes |
51 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
52.0% |
Often |
35 |
34.3% |
34.3% |
86.3% |
Always |
14 |
13.7% |
13.7% |
100.0% |
Ever faced difficulties in accessing education because of your community? |
||||
Never |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Any women in your community being denied job opportunities due to societal stigma? |
||||
Sometimes |
4 |
3.9% |
3.9% |
3.9% |
Often |
22 |
21.6% |
21.6% |
25.5% |
Always |
76 |
74.5% |
74.5% |
100.0% |
Rate the level of discrimination faced by Narikuravar |
||||
High |
82 |
80.4% |
80.4% |
80.4% |
Moderate |
20 |
19.6% |
19.6% |
100.0% |
Societal stigmatization and discrimination
Table 4
According to the data, half (50%) said they had occasionally experienced discrimination from outsiders, 34.3% said they frequently experienced it, and 13.7% said they always experienced it. All respondents (100%) said they had never encountered any obstacles when it came to access to education, suggesting that educational accessibility may have improved. Women's employment prospects continue to be a significant concern, as 74.5% of respondents said they were consistently turned down because of social stigma. Furthermore, 80.4% of respondents gave their community's discrimination a high rating, underscoring the pressing need for social reforms.
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
The nearest school from your home |
||||
1-3 km |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Reason for stopping school |
||||
Lack of interest in studies |
25 |
24.5% |
24.5% |
24.5% |
Discrimination or social stigma |
20 |
19.6% |
19.6% |
44.1% |
Financial issues |
57 |
55.9% |
55.9% |
100.0% |
Faced discrimination in school |
||||
Never |
89 |
87.3% |
87.3% |
87.3% |
Rare |
1 |
1.0% |
1.0% |
88.2% |
Sometimes |
12 |
11.8% |
11.8% |
100.0% |
Age do most girls in your community stop going to school |
||||
10-12 |
21 |
20.6% |
20.6% |
20.6% |
12-15 |
81 |
79.4% |
79.4% |
100.0% |
School of studying |
||||
Government school |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Received scholarships or financial aid |
||||
No |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Regular employment |
||||
One or two |
89 |
87.3% |
87.3% |
87.3% |
More than two |
13 |
12.7% |
12.7% |
100.0% |
Primary source of income |
||||
Traditional occupation (bead selling) |
78 |
76.5% |
76.5% |
76.5% |
Daily wage labor |
11 |
10.8% |
10.8% |
87.3% |
Unemployment |
13 |
12.7% |
12.7% |
100.0% |
Education and Employment
Table 5
According to the data, the majority of students (87.3%) have never encountered discrimination at school, while a tiny minority (11.8%) have occasionally done so. Just 1% of respondents said they had occasionally experienced discrimination. This suggests that although discrimination is not pervasive, a sizeable minority of students still experience it on occasion. With 55.9% of students citing financial difficulties as a barrier, it seems to be the most common cause of school dropouts. Additionally, none of the students received financial aid or scholarships despite attending government schools. This implies that in order to increase school retention rates, financial assistance programs are desperately needed.
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Sanitized drinking water |
||||
Always |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Aware of government nutrition programs |
||||
Aware |
26 |
25.5% |
25.5% |
25.5% |
Very aware |
76 |
74.5% |
74.5% |
100.0% |
Food through government welfare scheme |
||||
Often |
11 |
10.8% |
10.8% |
10.8% |
Always |
91 |
89.2% |
89.2% |
100.0% |
The nearest healthcare facility from your home |
||||
1-3 km |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Prenatal care |
||||
Government hospital |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Birth giving |
||||
Government hospital |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Postnatal care |
||||
Never |
63 |
61.8% |
61.8% |
61.8% |
Rarely |
35 |
34.3% |
34.3% |
96.1% |
Sometimes |
4 |
3.9% |
3.9% |
100.0% |
Family planning |
||||
Yes |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Toilet facility in home |
||||
Yes |
7 |
6.9% |
6.9% |
6.9% |
No |
95 |
93.1% |
93.1% |
100.0% |
Where usually go |
||||
Open defecation |
97 |
95.1% |
95.1% |
95.1% |
Shared community toilet |
5 |
4.9% |
4.9% |
100.0% |
Usage of public toilet |
||||
Occasionally |
6 |
5.9% |
5.9% |
5.9% |
Rarely |
81 |
79.4% |
79.4% |
85.3% |
Never |
15 |
14.7% |
14.7% |
100.0% |
Faced safety issue in public toilet |
||||
Yes |
72 |
70.6% |
70.6% |
70.6% |
No |
30 |
29.4% |
29.4% |
100.0% |
Toilet facility during menstruation |
||||
Yes |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Government support for toilet construction |
||||
Yes |
18 |
17.6% |
17.6% |
17.6% |
No |
84 |
82.4% |
82.4% |
100. |
Health and Nutrition Conditions
Table 6
According to the data, there are notable gaps in postnatal care and sanitation, even though all respondents have access to sanitized drinking water and local medical facilities. 61.8% of women never receive postnatal care, despite the fact that all births take place in government hospitals. Furthermore, 95.1% of households are forced to use open defecation because only 6.9% of them have a private toilet. Given that 70.6% of people report problems using public restrooms, this lack of sanitation raises safety concerns. Even though government programs encourage menstrual hygiene, only 17.6% of people have benefited from aid for building toilets, underscoring the pressing need for better sanitation facilities.
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Awareness of Government Welfare Schemes |
||||
Very Unaware |
68 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
Unaware |
18 |
17.6 |
17.6 |
84.3 |
Neither Aware nor Unaware |
15 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
99.0 |
11.00 |
1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
Knowledge About Free Healthcare Services |
||||
Unaware |
5 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
Neither Aware nor Unaware |
9 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
13.7 |
Aware |
69 |
67.6 |
67.6 |
81.4 |
Strongly Aware |
19 |
18.6 |
18.6 |
100.0 |
Awareness of Free Educational Opportunities |
||||
Unaware |
57 |
55.9 |
55.9 |
55.9 |
Neither Aware nor Unaware |
24 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
79.4 |
Aware |
21 |
20.6 |
20.6 |
100.0 |
Awareness of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006 |
||||
Unaware |
5 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
Neither Aware nor Unaware |
6 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
10.8 |
Aware |
18 |
17.6 |
17.6 |
28.4 |
Strongly Aware |
73 |
71.6 |
71.6 |
100.0 |
Knowledge About Women's Rights and Legal Protection |
||||
Never |
70 |
68.6 |
68.6 |
68.6 |
Rarely |
19 |
18.6 |
18.6 |
87.3 |
Sometimes |
13 |
12.7 |
12.7 |
100.0 |
Challenges in Accessing Government Support |
||||
Lack of Awareness |
90 |
88.2 |
88.2 |
88.2 |
Others |
12 |
11.8 |
11.8 |
100.0 |
Access to Financial Support |
||||
Never |
67 |
65.7 |
65.7 |
65.7 |
Rarely |
7 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
72.5 |
Sometimes |
9 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
81.4 |
Often |
19 |
18.6 |
18.6 |
100.0 |
Awareness and Accessibility
Table 7
According to the data, 66.7% of the community is "Very Unaware" of government welfare programs, and 17.6% is "Unaware." This indicates a serious lack of knowledge about these programs. Only 20.6% of respondents said they were aware of free educational opportunities, despite 67.6% saying they were "Aware" of free healthcare services. Furthermore, 68.6% of respondents say they have "Never" come across information about women's rights and legal protection, despite a high awareness of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (71.6%). The pervasive "Lack of Awareness" (88.2%) is a major obstacle to obtaining government assistance.
Educational Qualification |
Lack of Interest in Studies |
Discrimination or Social Stigma |
Other Reasons |
Never Faced Discrimination |
Rarely Faced Discrimination |
Sometimes Faced Discrimination |
Not Educated |
22 |
20 |
56 |
86 |
1 |
11 |
Primary Education |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Higher Secondary |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Degree Holder |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Total |
25 |
20 |
57 |
89 |
1 |
12 |
Crosstabulation Educational Qualification and Experiences of Discrimination
Table 8
According to the Cross-tabulation data, the majority of uneducated people stopped going to school because they were uninterested in learning (22) and because they were subjected to discrimination or social stigma (20), with many (77) dropping out between the ages of 12 and 15. Although some (11) of the uneducated group reported occasionally experiencing discrimination, a sizable portion (86) said they had never encountered it. Few people achieve higher secondary (2) or degree level (1), indicating early dropout trends in the community.
Educational Qualification |
Studied in Government School |
Received No Scholarships/Financial Aid |
Never Faced Difficulties in Accessing Education |
Not Educated |
98 |
98 |
98 |
Primary Education |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Higher Secondary |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Degree Holder |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Total |
102 |
102 |
102 |
Cross tabulation Educational Qualification and Access to Education
Table 9
According to the cross-tabulation data, all 102 respondents attended government schools and did not receive financial aid or scholarships. Furthermore, none of them said that their community had ever made it difficult for them to get an education. Even so, the vast majority (98) do not have an education, pointing to structural obstacles that go beyond simple institutional or financial access.
Age Group |
Bead Selling |
Daily Wage |
Unemployment |
Income Responsibility |
Women Working Outside (Very Unlikely) |
Women Working Outside (Unlikely) |
Job Opportunities Lost Due to Stigma |
Under 18 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
18 - 30 |
38 |
8 |
6 |
52 |
39 |
13 |
2 |
30 - 35 |
27 |
3 |
5 |
35 |
24 |
11 |
2 |
Above 50 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
Total |
78 |
11 |
13 |
102 |
75 |
27 |
4 |
Cross Tabulation of Age Group and Employment-Related Factors
Table 10
According to the cross-tabulation data, traditional occupations (78) are the main source of income, particularly for people in the 18–30 age range (38) and 30-35 age range (27). Working outside the community is severely restricted for women; 75 respondents said it is "very unlikely." Furthermore, social stigma often prevents 76 women from obtaining employment, especially among those aged 18 to 30 (44). All age groups share equal income responsibility in spite of these obstacles.
Age |
Prenatal Care: Government Hospital |
Food Through Government Welfare Scheme |
Postnatal Care: Never |
Postnatal Care: Rarely |
Postnatal Care: Sometimes |
Total |
Under 18 |
7 |
Often: 1, Always: 6 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
18 - 30 |
52 |
Often: 4, Always: 48 |
33 |
17 |
2 |
52 |
30 - 35 |
35 |
Often: 4, Always: 31 |
20 |
13 |
2 |
35 |
Above 50 |
8 |
Often: 2, Always: 6 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
8 |
Total |
102 |
Total (Often: 11, Always: 91) |
63 |
35 |
4 |
102 |
Cross Tabulation of Age and Health Care
Table 11
According to the cross-tabulation data, 91 respondents—particularly those between the ages of 18 and 30—frequently depend on government welfare programs for their food needs (48). There is a significant reliance on public healthcare, as evidenced by the fact that government hospitals provide nearly all prenatal and delivery care (102 cases). However, 63 respondents—mostly from the 18–30 (33) and 30-35 (20) age groups—never received postnatal care, highlighting gaps in maternal health support. The results show that even with sufficient prenatal and delivery support, access to postnatal care needs to be improved.
Living Condition |
Toilet Facility at Home (Yes) |
Toilet Facility at Home (No) |
Usually Go for Open Defecation |
Use Shared Community Toilet |
Faced Safety Issues in Public Toilets (Yes) |
Faced Safety Issues in Public Toilets (No) |
Toilet Facility During Menstruation (Yes) |
House |
6 |
81 |
83 |
4 |
63 |
24 |
87 |
Roadside Dwelling |
1 |
14 |
14 |
1 |
9 |
6 |
15 |
Total |
7 |
95 |
97 |
5 |
72 |
30 |
102 |
Cross Tabulation of Living Condition and Toilet Facility Data
Table 12
According to the cross-tabulation data, 97 people must rely on open defecation because 95 households lack toilets. With 72 respondents experiencing problems using public restrooms, particularly those residing in homes (63 cases), safety is a major concern. A significant gap in sanitation infrastructure was highlighted by the fact that only 18 people received government assistance for the construction of toilets, even though 102 people had access to menstrual hygiene facilities. The results highlight how urgently vulnerable communities need better restrooms and government assistance.
Logistic regression
Classification Table
Observed |
Predicted: yes |
Predicted: no |
Percentage Correct |
Toilet facility in home = yes |
5 |
2 |
71.4% |
Toilet facility in home = no |
0 |
95 |
100.0% |
Overall Percentage |
|
|
98.0% |
Variables in the Equation
Variable |
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
Where usually go |
-12.532 |
8987.421 |
0.000 |
1 |
0.999 |
0.000 |
Constant |
16.393 |
8987.422 |
0.000 |
1 |
0.999 |
13158019.207 |
Regression Table: Toilet Facility in Home
Table 13
According to the logistic regression the dependent variable "toilet facility in home" is significantly influenced by the predictor "where usually go," according to the regression analysis. With a p-value of 0.000 and an F-value of 232.843, the model is statistically significant, suggesting that the predictor accounts for a sizable amount of the variation in the availability of restroom facilities. The unstandardized coefficient for "where usually go" is -0.490, which indicates that the availability of a toilet facility in the home decreases by 0.490 units for every unit increase in this predictor. The findings imply that the absence of a toilet facility at home is associated with the places where people typically go (presumably referring to open defecation). Because of the inverse relationship between these two factors, places where people lack access to restrooms.
Aware of prohibition of child marriage act 2006 Table 14 |
Chart 1
The chart data shows that a majority (71.6%) are strongly aware of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, while 17.6% are aware to some extent. However, 10.8% remain unaware or uncertain, indicating gaps in legal awareness. Strengthening community education and outreach efforts can help ensure universal awareness and enforcement of the law.
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Very Unaware |
68 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
Unaware |
18 |
17.6 |
17.6 |
84.3 |
Neither Aware or Unaware |
15 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
99.0 |
11.00 |
1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
Total |
102 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Aware of government welfare schemes
Table 15
Chart 2
According to the chart data, 84.3% of respondents lack adequate awareness of government welfare programs, with the majority (66.7%) being very unaware and 17.6% being unaware. Nearly none of the respondents (1%) reported higher awareness, and only a small percentage (14.7%) are neutral. In order to guarantee that communities can access and profit from government assistance programs, this reveals a serious awareness gap and highlights the necessity of improved outreach, education, and communication initiatives.
|
Aware of government welfare schemes
Table 15
Chart 3
According to the chart data, 23.5% of respondents are neither aware nor unaware of free educational opportunities, while 55.9% of respondents are unaware of them, suggesting a lack of precise knowledge. There is a notable awareness gap, as only 20.6% are aware. To guarantee that more people can take advantage of free educational opportunities, this points to the necessity of more robust outreach initiatives, community involvement, and educational campaigns.
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Lack of awareness |
90 |
88.2% |
88.2% |
88.2% |
Others |
12 |
11.8% |
11.8% |
100.0% |
Total |
102 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
|
Challenges in accessing government support
Table 17
Chart 4
According to the chart data reveals that 88.2% of respondents face challenges in accessing government support due to a lack of awareness, while only 11.8% cite other reasons. This indicates that awareness is the primary barrier preventing people from benefiting from government programs. Improving information dissemination, conducting awareness campaigns, and enhancing accessibility can help bridge this gap and ensure better utilization of government support services.
Category |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Never |
67 |
65.7 |
65.7 |
65.7 |
Rarely |
7 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
72.5 |
Sometimes |
9 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
81.4 |
Often |
19 |
18.6 |
18.6 |
100.0 |
Total |
102 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Access to financial support
Table 18
Chart 5
According to the chart data, over 72% of respondents face significant financial barriers, with 65.7% reporting never having access to financial support and 6.9% reporting receiving it infrequently. The fact that only 8.8% occasionally and 18.6% frequently apply for financial aid suggests that funding is scarce and erratic. In order to better assist those in need, financial assistance programs must be made more widely available, more widely known, and more widely distributed.
DISCUSSION:
The result of the project is aims to analyse the socio-economic status of women within the Narikuravar community, focusing on the cultural factors, traditional practices, gender roles, and societal stigmatization that contribute to their victimization. By understanding the impact of these deeply rooted practices, the project highlights how they limit the opportunities and freedoms of Narikuravar women. One significant objective is to identify the difficulties these women face in accessing education and employment, which are crucial for breaking the cycle of poverty. The study also investigates the pressing health and nutrition issues within the community, including inadequate postnatal care, poor sanitation, and limited access to essential healthcare services. However, collecting data on such sensitive topics presents several challenges, including cultural barriers and societal prohibitions, which may result in hesitation among community members to openly discuss issues such as discrimination, and health problems. Additionally, lack of awareness about government schemes and educational opportunities complicates the data collection process. Socio-economic factors such as financial difficulties and illiteracy further hinder participation in surveys or interviews. Despite these difficulties, the research aims to propose effective remedies to address the challenges faced by Narikuravar women in education, employment, nutrition, and healthcare, with a focus on cultural sensitivity and community involvement. The findings are expected to inform interventions that can improve the living standards of the Narikuravar community and also provide vocational training and entrepreneurial support to help women ain financial independence and self-sufficiency. Conduct regular legal workshops and awareness sessions to educate women about their rights, legal protections, and available support systems. Encourage non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and self-help groups to work with the community, creating a support for women. Create legal support systems to guarantee efficient victimization prevention and easily accessible legal aid. The Government has provided fund and assistance to construct restrooms for the narikuravar community. This initiative aims to improve sanitation and enhance their quality of life
CONCLUSION:
The study provides a comprehensive analysis of the socio-economic status of women in the Narikuravar community, like on various cultural, social, and economic challenges they face. The findings indicate that traditional practices, gender roles, and societal stigmatization significantly contribute to the victimization of women, limiting their access to education, employment, and essential resources. The lack of awareness regarding government welfare schemes and legal rights further increase their struggles difficulties in accessing education and employment are evident, with many women facing financial constraints, discrimination, and societal norms that discourage them from seeking opportunities beyond their community. Health and nutrition issues are also prominent, as poor access to healthcare services and inadequate nutritional support contribute to the community’s vulnerability. The prevalence of child marriage, limited financial support, and lack of proper sanitation facilities further highlight the urgent need for intervention. To improve the living standards of the Narikuravar community, effective remedies must be implemented. These include enhancing educational opportunities, increasing awareness about government welfare programs, providing skill-based employment training, improving access to healthcare, and addressing societal barriers that restrict women's empowerment. Collaborative efforts from governmental and non-governmental organizations are crucial in ensuring sustainable development and empowerment for the Narikuravar women
REFERENCE
Aruneshwari*, Priyadharshini Jayabalan, A Study on The Victimization of The Women in The Narikuravar Community of Madurai District, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (4), 591-605. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15277148