1Research Scholar, Department of Pharmacy, University Institute of Pharmacy
2Associate Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Institute of Pharmacy
3Professor& Principal, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Institute of Pharmacy
The current study was designed for the preparation of a gastro-retentive floating tablet of Ranitidine HCL by using combination of natural polymer Tara gum and synthetic polymer hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose in an attempt to delay its gastric retention time and the side effects which occurs in marketed preparataion. The tablet was manufactured by the direct compression method. The outcome of varying concentrations of HPMC, Tara gum with sodium bicarbonate and citric acid for gas generating agent and magnesium stearate and talc. The preparation was augmented on the basis of adequate tablet qualities, total duration of floating, floating lag time, and in vitro drug release. The prepared tablet was found to have optimal hardness, low friability, consistent weight uniformity, and thickness. Dissolution study and floating lag time result indicated that formulation F6 showed better and controlled release of a drug. The floating lag time was 03min 30second and the total floating time was 6 hours. FTIR spectroscopy studies showed no interaction between the used polymer and the drug. The result indicated that a combination of synthetic and natural polymers reduces side effects and shows the best result[4,5].
Gastric emptying for dosage forms is a highly variable process, specifically for those dosage forms that have a stomach stay for more than that of conventionally prepared dosage forms. For controlled release, drugs were designed in such dosage form to drug release at the programmed rate for maintaining the particular concentration of drug-specific time period with minimal side effects. The gastric retentive system is so formulated in an attempt to retain GIT for a longer time period ultimately enhancing the retention time of the drugs in the gastric region hence increasing their potential for absorption. Many different approaches are available that protect gastric retention, including a floating drug delivery system. A floating system, a dense density- controlled them, increases the retention time of a drug in GIT. For this, we use several approaches like muco-adhesion, gas generating, high-density, and low-density systems [1,2]. Floating improves the efficacy of tablets by controlling the rate of drug release and reducing dose frequency. Floating systems can be either non-effervescent or effervescent floating drug delivery systems. The effervescent approach utilizes various polymers in providing the floating drug delivery system Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose is a cellulose ether polymer of non-ionic nature. It may be fibrous or in granular powder form which is soluble in cold water and is. In soluble in hot water (Higuchi&Hussain,1978). HPMC has been in use as a tablet binder, as a film coater, and also to produce matrix tablets of extended-release. It is also used for the synthesis of the oral controlled drug delivery system. It has excellent characteristics of compression and good swelling properties, which helps in the formation of a gel layer (external) that further control the release of the drug [4]. Floating effervescent tablets of Ranitidine HCl were formulated in this study. Pre-compression parameters such as repose angle, tapped density, bulk density, and compressibility index and after- compression parameters such as thickness, weight variation, friability, hardness, drug content, and in vitro drug release were investigated. Dissolution studies were performedin0.1N HCl solution. Moreover, FTIR was performed to investigate the drug-polymer interaction.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
Extraction and purification of Tara gum:
Table No. 01: Physiochemical Characterization of Tara gum
|
S. No. |
Parameter |
Result{N=3} |
|
1. |
Loss on drying |
12% |
|
2. |
Swelling index |
18 |
|
3. |
Solubility |
Soluble in cold and hot water & insoluble in ethanol |
|
4 |
Bulk density |
0.42 |
|
5. |
Tapped density |
0.59 |
|
6. |
Compressibility index |
17.85 |
|
7. |
Hausner’s ratio |
1.12 |
|
8. |
Angle of repose |
20º.52 |
|
9. |
Percentage yield |
20% |
7. 2 Preformulation Parameter:
• Organoleptic properties
The sample of Ranitidine was identified for color, odor and taste which were found to be same as that standard parameters.
Table No. 02: Organoleptic properties of Ranitidine HCl
|
S. No. |
Parameter |
Sample |
|
1 |
Color |
Brownish |
|
2 |
Form |
Crystalline powder |
|
3 |
Odor |
Odorless |
|
4 |
Test |
Bitter |
Identification of Drug
Figure 01: Ranitidine HCL Spectrum by UV Spectroscopy
Melting Point determination is one of the formulation properties in which the temperature at which it changes state from solid to liquid at atmospheric pressure. During the melting process, the solid and liquid can exist in equilibrium. The Melting point of the Ranitidine HCL drug is determined by using Melting Point Apparatus. [11]
Table No.3: Melting Point of Ranitidine HCL
|
Drug |
Observed |
|
Ranitidine HCL |
134?±0.25º |
Measurement of the spectrum of Ranitidine HCl by using UV Visible1800 Shimadzu double beam spectrophotometer. Absorbance was observed at 310nm.
An accurately weighed quantity of Ranitidine HCl(10mg) was dissolved in 0.1N HCl to make a10 ml Solution (1000µg\ml).
From the standard stock solution of Ranitidine HCl different dilutions were prepared. Five different dilutions of 5(µg\ml),10(µg\ml), 15(µg\ml), 20(µg\ml), 25(µg\ml), 30(µg\ml) was prepared from 1000 (µg\ml) standard stock solution.
Procedure: After preparation of standard and sample solutions, measurement of the absorbance of different dilutions 5 (µg\ml), 10(µg\ml), 15 (µg\ml), 20(µg\ml), 25(µg\ml) in 1cm cuvette by using UV visible Spectrophotometer.
Table No.04: Absorbance of Ranitidine HCL in 0.1N HCL at λ 310nm
|
S. No. |
Concentration. (ug/ml) |
Absorbance |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
5 |
0.161 |
|
3 |
10 |
0.325 |
|
4 |
15 |
0.432 |
|
5 |
20 |
0.572 |
|
6 |
25 |
0.733 |
Figure 02: Calibration graph of Ranitidine in 0.1 N HCL Solution
Table No.05: Absorbance of Ranitidine HCL in Distilled Water at λ 310nm
|
S.NO. |
Concentration (ug/ml) |
Absorbance |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
2 |
0.171 |
|
3 |
4 |
0.282 |
|
4 |
6 |
0.371 |
|
5 |
8 |
0.501 |
|
6 |
10 |
0.635 |
Figure 03: Calibration graph of Ranitidine HCL in Distilled water
The Term Solubility is defined as the maximum amount of solute that can be dissolved in a given amount of solvent to form a homogenous system at the specified temperature and Specific
Procedure: To Prepare different solutions Water, HCL, Ethanol, and Chloroform. The drug material is added to the above solutions till Supersaturated Solution from the Mixture is shaken for 10 min till 2hours and after 24 to 72 hrs. Filter the mixture Take Filtrate and Give Absorbance to detect the Concentration of the Drug is Soluble in Different Solutions Pressure from a Saturated Solution.
Table No. 06: Determination of solubility of Ranitidine HCL in various solvent:
|
S. No. |
Solvent |
Inference |
|
01 |
Water |
Freely soluble |
|
02 |
Methanol |
Soluble |
|
03 |
Ethanol |
Sparingly soluble |
|
04 |
Chloroform |
Very slightly soluble |
The raw material pure drug, a physical mixture of excipient, as well as polymer and formulation powder samples, were characterized by FTIR spectroscopy in the range of 4000– 400 cm- 1usingthe KBr pellet method. The different formulations of Excipients, drug and their physical mixtures were found to be stable under refrigerated conditions, and room temperature. As there were no changes in physical characteristics. Hence it was in referred that the selected excipients are compatible with the drug [7].
Figure 04: IR spectrum of the Floating Tablet of Ranitidine HCl. FT-IR spectra
Figure 05:IR spectrum of the Floating Tablet of Ranitidine HCl. With HPMCK4M
Figure 06: IR spectrum of the Floating tablet of Ranitidine HCl With Tara Gum
Table No.: 07
|
S. No |
Ingredients in mg |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
|
1. |
Ranitidine HCL |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
|
2. |
HPMC K4M |
70 |
72 |
74 |
76 |
78 |
80 |
82 |
84 |
|
3. |
Carbapol 934 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
|
4. |
NaHCO3 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
|
5. |
Tartaric acid |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
|
6. |
Tara Gum |
80 |
78 |
76 |
74 |
72 |
70 |
68 |
66 |
|
7. |
Magnesium sterate |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
8. |
Talc |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total weight |
450 |
450 |
450 |
450 |
450 |
450 |
450 |
450 |
|
The procedure of floating tablet of Ranitidine HCL
|
? = tan−1(2H/D) |
|
Db=M/Vb |
Whereas, Db depicts bulk density, M for mass, and Vb is bulk volume. The unit of bulk density is g/ml
|
Dt=M/Vt |
Where as Dt depicts tapped density, M is for mass and Vt is for tapped volume.
|
C.I = (Dt−Db)/Dt ×100 |
|
H.R = DtÚDb |
|
F=WInitial–WFinal/WInitialX100 |
|
%SI=(W2-W1) /W1X100 |
RESULT:
Table No.08: Pre-Compression parameters of the blend.
|
Formulation code |
Angle of repose (°) ±S.E.M |
Bulk density (g/cm²) ±S.E.M |
Tapped Density (g/cm²) ± S.E.M |
Compressibility index (%) |
Hausner´s ratio±S.E.M |
|
F1 |
38.78±0.06 |
0.51±0.13 |
0.66±0.05 |
15.52 |
1.15±0.19 |
|
F2 |
30.35±0.05 |
0.43±0.01 |
0.45±0.08 |
14.54 |
1.14±0.18 |
|
F3 |
29.45±0.12 |
0.31±0.18 |
0.38±0.10 |
16.12 |
1.17±0.06 |
|
F4 |
27.35±0.02 |
0.40±0.05 |
0.42±0.18 |
20.15 |
1.16±0.12 |
|
F5 |
26.20±0.22 |
0.44±0.14 |
0.47±0.14 |
18.16 |
1.18±0.05 |
|
F6 |
24.30±0.21 |
0.18±0.05 |
0.20±0.15 |
12.21 |
1.12±0.10 |
|
F7 |
27.12±0.15 |
0.32±0.18 |
0.33±0.12 |
16.45 |
1.16±0.12 |
|
F8 |
26.41±0.16 |
0.25±0.20 |
0.26±0.10 |
17.12 |
1.17±0.19 |
Table No.09: Post-compression Parameters of Ranitidine HCl floating tablets.
|
Batch |
Thickness (mm) ±S.E.M |
Hardness (K gcm-2) ±S.E.M |
Friability (%) ±S.E.M |
Average weight ±S.E.M |
Content uniformity ( %) ±S.E.M |
Floating Lag time(min) |
Floating Time (h) |
|
F1 |
3.98±0.15 |
5.3±0.15 |
0.71±0.09 |
449±0.63 |
81.46±0.03 |
1min |
3 |
|
F2 |
3.96±0.06 |
4.8±0.13 |
0.60±0.10 |
445±0.26 |
79.56±0.02 |
3min |
5 |
|
F3 |
3.96±0.03 |
6.6±0.09 |
0.50±0.07 |
451±0.63 |
80.85±0.01 |
2min56sec |
4.5 |
|
F4 |
3.97±0.17 |
6.5±0.05 |
0.66±0.06 |
452±0.25 |
78.12±0.03 |
2min |
4 |
|
F5 |
3.94±0.19 |
6.5±0.05 |
0.53±0.08 |
450±0.25 |
86.16±0.02 |
1.5min |
3 |
|
F6 |
3.91±0.19 |
6.2±0.19 |
0.5±0.10 |
454±0.23 |
88.63±0.01 |
3min 30sec |
6 |
|
F7 |
3.90±0.18 |
7.5±0.06 |
0.45±0.09 |
450±0.25 |
76.56±0.02 |
2min 83sec |
5 |
|
F8 |
3.90±0.17 |
9.6±0.05 |
0.4±0.05 |
452±0.33 |
85.23±0.02 |
3min |
4 |
Table No.10: Swelling index:
|
Time (Hrs) |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
|
1 |
21±0.50 |
18±0.33 |
28±0.34 |
21±0.21 |
25±0.66 |
36±0.12 |
29±0.12 |
30±0.66 |
|
2 |
65±0.50 |
75±0.64 |
70±0.56 |
69±0.32 |
70±0.32 |
164±0.13 |
45±0.65 |
65±0.32 |
|
3 |
80±0.56 |
120±0.25 |
80±0.65 |
130±0.24 |
120±0.45 |
212±0.12 |
120±0.25 |
90±0.45 |
|
4 |
90±0.60 |
135±0.24 |
112±0.33 |
165±0.34 |
135±0.12 |
235±0.15 |
126±0.23 |
120±0.12 |
|
5 |
135±0.30 |
145±0.30 |
130±0.66 |
177±0.54 |
156±0.21 |
255±0.24 |
135±0.34 |
135±0.21 |
|
6 |
166±0.20 |
165±0.12 |
145±0.55 |
185±0.34 |
170±0.33 |
265±0.32 |
145±0.15 |
165±0.34 |
|
7 |
190±0.30 |
180±0.12 |
160±0.66 |
195±0.12 |
185±0.33 |
280±0.22 |
165±0.22 |
180±0.32 |
Table No.11: Cumulative Drug Release Profile of F1-F8
|
Time(h) |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0.5 |
6.54 |
8.54 |
7.56 |
6.54 |
7.45 |
6.12 |
7.56 |
6.45 |
|
1 |
18.6 |
11.9 |
9.74 |
15.6 |
12 |
13.89 |
14.2 |
13.65 |
|
1.5 |
26.4 |
27.4 |
16.4 |
25.6 |
18.6 |
18.56 |
19.6 |
20.65 |
|
2 |
31.5 |
39.9 |
25.4 |
37.5 |
24.5 |
24.26 |
24.67 |
26.32 |
|
2.5 |
53 |
58.4 |
36.45 |
45 |
35.12 |
34.95 |
35.45 |
37.65 |
|
3 |
59.4 |
59.9 |
50.12 |
56.7 |
45.9 |
40.99 |
41.23 |
45.23 |
|
3.5 |
68.2 |
70.4 |
56.26 |
70.5 |
56.5 |
45.52 |
46.25 |
47.25 |
|
4 |
75.5 |
80 |
62.13 |
78.7 |
72.6 |
50.32 |
51.32 |
55.45 |
|
4.5 |
79.3 |
84.6 |
71.65 |
86.3 |
74.5 |
52.46 |
56.12 |
58.56 |
|
5 |
84 |
85 |
80.32 |
88.6 |
80.5 |
57.74 |
58.23 |
59.36 |
|
5.5 |
89.4 |
90.2 |
86.23 |
93.5 |
85.6 |
68.5 |
70.56 |
74.35 |
|
6 |
90.5 |
91.8 |
88.56 |
94.2 |
89.5 |
74.3 |
86.12 |
88.65 |
CONCLUSION:
Ranitidine HCL is an antihistaminic drug (antiulcer drug), used for the treatment of gastric. It is widely prescribed in active duodenal ulcers, gastric ulcers, Zollinger- Ellison syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux disease, erosive esophagitis. It was formulated as a floating tablet by using combination of different polymers like synthetic and natural polymer HPMC K4M, Tara Gum, and use of tartaric acid& sodium bicarbonate as a gas-generating agent& Carbopol 940 as a film former in a combination of suitable excipients. The characterization of the drug sample was done by using spectrophotometric analysis and melting point determination. All the observations and recorded data were identical to the values reported in the literature of Ranitidine HCL in 0.1 N HCL, were prepared using a double-beam UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 1800). It is easy for the administration to afford and decreased frequency of administration resulting the better patient compliance and acceptance. Therefore, thought worthwhile to develop an oral dosage form, a floating tablet using a suitable polymer to effectively deliver the drug with sustained and prolonged release and the drug before it reaches the absorption window enhanced drug bioavailability and due to the combined polymer of natural &synthetic it reduces the side effect which is found in marketed preparation of tablet, like confusion, constipation, vomiting. It is observed from formulation F6 which shows a better effect than other batches. Thus, it can be concluded that the drug given in the form of a floating tablet provides better patient compliance and an effective mode of treatment.
REFERENCE
Abhisek Kumar Patel*, Jeevan Patel, Sudha Vengurlekar, Sachin Kumar Jain, Effect of Natural Polymer and Excipients on Gastro Retentive Behavior of Floating Ranitidine Tablet, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (3), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18852130
10.5281/zenodo.18852130