The emergence of digital technology has drastically altered the landscape of entrepreneurship, bringing in a new era of digital sustainable entrepreneurship. As the digital revolution proceeds, entrepreneurs are increasingly leveraging the potential of digital tools and platforms to promote innovation while addressing important sustainability issues. The epidemic of 2019-COVID accelerated the usage of digital technologies, with physical distancing measures forcing firms to embrace online platforms and remote labour. This digital shift has created new opportunities for entrepreneurs to pursue, notably in the field of sustainability. Digital technologies like social media, Data analytics, the IoT, and cloud computing have enabled entrepreneurs to create new solutions to environmental and social challenges. These digital tools have allowed entrepreneurs to swiftly develop their businesses, reach worldwide markets, and engage with a varied range of stakeholders, all while reducing their environmental impact. This assumption builds on the power of digitalization to transform and alter the nature of entrepreneurship. Researchers and academics can increasingly use digital platforms to more efficiently commercialize their inventions, develop partnerships, and connect with industry partners. As the field of digital sustainable entrepreneurship evolves, academics and policymakers must investigate the dynamics and implications of this phenomenon. The most significant finding revealed that no entrepreneur considered digitalization as an individual goal for their organization, demonstrating the importance of businesses having an appropriate digitalization strategy that considers the opportunities and risks presented by the external business environment. Entrepreneurship has been identified as an important driver of economic development, and additional research is needed to determine how digital technologies improve entrepreneurship performance. Sustainable entrepreneurship is the integration of two words, sustainability & entrepreneurship. in particular, it integrates traditional entrepreneurship with the goal of sustainability. The specific concept of sustainable entrepreneurship is currently unknown. It takes a broader approach to encompass entrepreneurship. Sustainable entrepreneurship can be viewed as a subset of social entrepreneurship that focuses on overconsumption and climate change. A sustainable entrepreneurship enterprise, for example, will assess the sustainability of the products used in production (that is, whether the materials are eco-friendly, free of plastic, and/or biodegradable), the impact of the products and their business on the ecosystem and ecological resources, and the business's social value and profitability. However, it is easy to discover social entrepreneurs that are not completely sustainable; for example, a firm that works with local workers but uses plastic in product packaging. According to environmentalists, sustainable business must strike a balance between economic well-being, social justice, and environmental resilience. This entrepreneurship is the process of launching a business in which entrepreneurial goals are linked to social and environmental goals that promote the creation of long-term value. It is defined as an organization's ongoing commitment to moral behaviour, promoting economic advancement, and enhancing the standard of living for people worldwide as well as future generations. In the context of sustainable entrepreneurship research, some scholars have shifted their attention to the triple bottom line—the value provided by economic, ecological, and social factors—from a sustainability standpoint. Elkington developed the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) concept in 1994 to measure sustainability. Currently, many scholars employ the TBL concept to describe "sustainability" to the global sustainability strategy. In practice, TBL is used not only for conceptual explanations or descriptions of sustainability, but it is also an important tool for quantifying sustainability. Businesses are critical to achieving social goals, improving the environment, and promoting economic progress. In a nutshell, sustainable entrepreneurship in the digital age is a tremendous driver of innovation, development, and positive impact. As entrepreneurs, policymakers, and consumers, we must work together to address the challenges and embrace the opportunities presented by the intersection of technology and sustainability. We can all benefit from practicing sustainable enterprise.
LITERATURE REVIEW
1. Xu, Hou, & Zhang (2022). The paper highlights the importance of leveraging digital capabilities for sustainable entrepreneurship and emphasizes the role of innovation orientation in creating social and environmental value. Digital capabilities contribute to achieving net positive environmental impacts and driving sustainable value creation.
2. Gregori, & Holzmann, (2020). This paper highlights the importance of integrating sustainability and digital technology through a business model view and provides a comprehensive framework for recognizing that digital technologies can be used to promote sustainable entrepreneurship and create a positive social and environmental impact. The paper provides a solid foundation for exploration in the field of digital sustainable entrepreneurship, ultimately contributing to the theory and practice of sustainable entrepreneurship in the digital age.
3. Fuerst, Dominguez & Montes (2023) The paper focuses on the role of digital technologies in value enhancement, their delivery, and capture within the business models of sustainable entrepreneurship. The paper underscores the need for entrepreneurs to strategically leverage digital technologies to drive innovation, enhance operational efficiency, and create positive social and environmental impact in their ventures.
4. Avelar, Tiago, Almeida & Tiago (2024). The authors developed a model named Generalized Structural Equation Model (GSEM) to study the interactions between three essential variables: innovation, digitalization, and sustainability. This model was created to investigate how these variables affect a firm's reported growth Specifically, the combination of these factors can result in improved performance and competitive advantage. These variables influence the dynamics of sustainable entrepreneurship and its integration with innovation and digitization, affecting SMEs' growth and success in a competitive global market.
5. Gu, Pan, Hu, and Liu (2022). The study highlights the relationship between entrepreneurship and sustainability in 22 countries from 2005 to 2018, shedding light on how economic policy uncertainty affects sustainable practices. The study thereafter makes a distinction between innovative and business entrepreneurship, in which innovative entrepreneurship is divided into green and non-green spirits. It discovers that in high Human Development Index (HDI) countries, a green innovation spirit can greatly reduce environmental pollution, but this effect is less noticeable in lower HDI countries.
6. Petersen, Fuerst, and Torkkeli (2023) the authors study the nexus of sustainable entrepreneurship and digitization, emphasizing the transformative issues confronting today's entrepreneurs and managers and underlining the need to respond to these changes and create value in novel ways. This concept seeks to simplify the process of generating regenerative growth possibilities while addressing the difficulties of sustainability.
7. George, Merrill, and Schillebeeckx (2020). The study focuses on how digital technologies are transforming the battle against climate change while promoting sustainable development. The research aims to spark new ideas and opinions in entrepreneurship, enterprise models, and ecosystems, eventually leading to a positive impact on society as well. The study underlines the importance of including socioecological value as a basic component of business models that prioritize environmental and social results, to promote sustainable practices. Observing firms that are actively involved with digital sustainability can provide insights into creative business approaches and methods that effectively include sustainability into their main business activities.
8. Usman, Kess-Momoh, Ibeh, Elufioye, Ilojianya, and Oyeyem (2024.) The study provides a comprehensive overview of how globalization and technological advancements are changing entrepreneurship. It identifies new trends, analyzes the transformative influence of technology developments, and investigates the complex consequences of globalization on business practices. An organization's potential to modernize and adapt in an economic environment that is rapidly changing is studied in this study. Entrepreneurs must adapt to technology improvements, embrace globalization's potential, along with its drawbacks.
Previous research suggests that new technologies can accelerate and expand national development while also positively impacting entrepreneurship. Scholars argue that the use of digital technologies in entrepreneurship signals a new digital revolution as well and digital transformation plays a crucial role in achieving sustainability. It may also lead to the development of new methods to preserve natural resources.
Research Gap
While there is a general study on the role of digital technologies in business, there is a scarcity of detailed studies that focus on specific technologies (e.g., IoT, AI, blockchain) and their direct impact on sustainable entrepreneurship. Few studies look at the barriers and challenges that entrepreneurs experience when implementing digital technology for sustainability. Understanding these hurdles is critical for creating effective support systems.
1.3 Objectives of the study
- To assess the awareness and usage of emerging digital technologies among entrepreneurs.
- To identify the barriers and challenges faced by entrepreneurs in adopting emerging digital technologies.
- To evaluate the potential of emerging digital technologies in enhancing sustainable entrepreneurship.
- To analyse the perception and attitude of entrepreneurs towards sustainable entrepreneurship.
- To investigate the relationship between the adoption of digital technologies and sustainable entrepreneurship outcomes.
1.4 Theoretical Framework
i) Digitalisation and Sustainable Entrepreneurship
Digitalization is the acceptance or use of digital technology by various stakeholders in a variety of contexts, such as applications and services. It applies to the sociotechnical method used for applying digitizing techniques to larger social and institutional contexts, transforming digital technologies into infrastructure. Research on employing digital technology for capitalizing on electronic opportunities began with the broad availability of the Internet. The rise of digital start-ups such as Airbnb, Uber, and Twitter has recently boosted the entrepreneurship movement. Recent research explores the potential benefits of digital artifacts for businesses, such as quick scalability and co-creation. Scholars have begun to explore how digital technologies impact sustainable entrepreneurship, laying the groundwork for future research. Digital sustainability is described as organizations that use technology to achieve sustainable development goals. In a word, digital sustainable entrepreneurship study focuses on how digital technology might help the creation of entrepreneurial activities that promote sustainability.
ii) The Contribution of Digital Technology in Sustainable Entrepreneurship
Digital technology improves efficiency, a key factor in promoting sustainable business performance. Automation and data analytics improve procedures in supply chain, manufacturing, and operations. This optimization reduces resource use and waste, promoting sustainable resource use.
- Data-driven decision-making: Data-driven decision-making is now important for long-term business growth. By collecting and analysing huge amounts of data, firms can acquire insights into their environmental impact. This information helps firms make informed decisions that promote sustainability, including energy efficiency and responsible sourcing.
- Supply Chain Transparency: Digital innovation is vital for developing accountable and transparent supply chains. Blockchain provides an immutable and decentralized database for documenting transactions, ensuring traceability across the supply chain. Transparency in the supply chain helps evaluate sustainability claims, promote fair labour standards, and improve overall ethics.
- Renewable Energy Integration: Integrating the Internet of Things (IoT) allows for real-time monitoring and management of energy consumption, leading to more sustainable practices. Companies may optimize energy usage and incorporate renewable energy sources like solar and wind into their operations. This decreases environmental impact and aligns businesses with the worldwide trend towards renewable and clean energy solutions.
- Improved communication and stakeholder engagement: Digital platforms enable communication and involvement between organizations and their stakeholders, such as consumers, employees, and communities. Social media, online collaboration tools, and e-commerce platforms enable firms to promote sustainability objectives, get feedback, and engage stakeholders in environmental and social goals. Connectivity promotes a culture of shared responsibility and sustainable consumption.
- Cost Savings and Innovation: Adopting digital technology for sustainable business development can result in significant cost reductions over time. Increasing efficiency, optimizing resources, and automating processes can lead to lower operating costs. Adopting digital technologies can boost sustainable practices, giving organizations a competitive advantage.
- Global Competitiveness: In a world increasingly focused on Businesses that use digital technology to foster sustainable practices, improve their worldwide competitiveness. Addressing environmental and socioeconomic accountability norms not only attracts environmentally diligent buyers. Digital transformation allows firms to experiment with and adopt new technology, leading to innovation. This covers AI, machine learning, IoT, and blockchain technologies, among others. Integrating these technologies enables firms to reinvent their products, services, and operations continuously.
1.5 Hypotheses of the Study
Based on the theoretical framework following hypotheses are proposed by the researcher
- H1: There is a significant positive relationship between the awareness of emerging digital technologies and the level of sustainable entrepreneurship.
- H2: Barriers and challenges in adopting digital technologies negatively affect sustainable entrepreneurship.
- H3: The potential of emerging digital technologies significantly enhances sustainable entrepreneurship.
- H4: Entrepreneurs with a positive perception and attitude towards emerging digital technologies are more likely to engage in sustainable entrepreneurship.
Sustainable entrepreneurs prioritize environmental and social causes, showing empathy, ethical integrity, and a forward-thinking mindset. They blend creativity, resilience, risk-taking, and adaptability to lead with a global perspective, learn continuously, and maintain a long-term commitment to positively impacting the world.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study adopted a quantitative research design to examine the relationship between digital technologies and sustainable entrepreneurship. The research aimed to explore underlying constructs, test hypothesized relationships, and assess entrepreneurs' perceptions through statistical analysis.
i) Sampling Technique and Data Collection
A purposive sampling technique was used to target entrepreneurs who actively engage in or are aware of digital technologies in their business operations. A total of 250 entrepreneurs were approached across various sectors. Out of these, 205 respondents returned completed questionnaires. After rigorous data cleaning—including checks for completeness, response bias, and outliers—136 valid responses were retained for analysis.
ii) Instruments and Measures
The questionnaire comprised multiple items measuring awareness, adoption, and impact of digital technologies, perceived benefits, and barriers related to sustainable entrepreneurship. All items were assessed using a five-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.”
iii) Data Analysis Techniques
The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to summarize the demographic and response patterns. To identify the underlying constructs and reduce dimensionality, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted using Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation. Subsequently, regression analysis was employed to examine the influence of extracted factors on sustainable entrepreneurship outcomes. All analyses were performed using SPSS software.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 1: Demographic Profile
|
Variable |
Attribute |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Gender |
Male |
97 |
71.3 |
|
Female |
36 |
28.7 |
|
|
Age |
Under 25 |
55 |
40.4 |
|
25-40 |
51 |
37.5 |
|
|
41-50 |
20 |
14.7 |
|
|
51-60 |
7 |
5.1 |
|
|
61 and above |
3 |
2.2 |
|
|
Experience
|
Less Than 1 Year |
45 |
33.1 |
|
1-5 Year |
46 |
37.5 |
|
|
5-10 Years |
22 |
14.7 |
|
|
More Than 10 Years |
23 |
5.1 |
|
|
Education
|
No Formal Education |
7 |
5.1 |
|
Primary Education |
4 |
2.9 |
|
|
Secondary Education |
2 |
1.5 |
|
|
Higher Education |
5 |
3.7 |
|
|
Undergraduate |
66 |
48.5 |
|
|
Postgraduate |
52 |
38.2 |
Source: Author Compilation
The demographic profile of respondents in the study "Exploring the Role of Digital Technologies in Promoting Sustainable Entrepreneurship" provides valuable insight into the diversity and characteristics of the sample. Out of 133 participants, a majority were male (71.3%), indicating a gender imbalance in either participation or engagement in sustainable entrepreneurship initiatives. In terms of age distribution, most respondents (77.9%) were under 40 years of age, suggesting that younger individuals are more inclined toward digital entrepreneurship or are more familiar with digital tools. Regarding experience, 70.6% of the respondents had less than five years of professional involvement, reflecting a predominance of early-stage or emerging entrepreneurs in the sample. This aligns with the observed trend of digital technologies attracting newer entrants to the entrepreneurial ecosystem due to their accessibility and innovation potential. Educationally, a substantial proportion of respondents held undergraduate (48.5%) or postgraduate (38.2%) qualifications, indicating a highly educated sample. The relatively small number of participants with only primary or secondary education suggests that digital entrepreneurship is more prevalent among those with higher academic attainment. Overall, the demographic analysis indicates that digital technologies are primarily adopted by young, educated, and relatively less experienced individuals in the realm of sustainable entrepreneurship. This insight is critical for designing inclusive and targeted digital support programs.
i) Reliability and Validity
Table 2. Reliability Statistics
|
Constructs |
No. of items |
Alpha (α) |
|
AU |
10 |
0.956 |
|
BC |
4 |
0.878 |
|
PEDT |
3 |
0.856 |
|
PAE |
5 |
0.917 |
|
SE |
8 |
0.955 |
Source: Compilation through SPSS Software
The reliability analysis of the constructs using Cronbach’s Alpha reveals high internal consistency across all measures. AU (α = 0.956) and SE (α = 0.955) demonstrate excellent reliability, indicating that their items are highly cohesive. PAE (α = 0.917) and BC (α = 0.878) also show strong reliability, suggesting consistent measurement within these constructs. Even PEDT, with only three items, achieves a solid alpha value of 0.856, reflecting good reliability. Overall, the results confirm that all five constructs—AU, BC, PEDT, PAE, and SE—are reliably measured and suitable for further statistical analysis within the context of the study.
ii) Exploratory Factor Analysis
We used EFA to assess the scale's consistency by evaluating the factor loadings of observed variables within the study's concept analysis. Factor loadings higher than 0.5 in all the above variables are being observed, hence all these variables show good Goodness of fit with their corresponding latent variables as well.
Table 3. KMO and Bartlett's test
Nidhi Gupta* 1
Gautam Kumar Jha 2
10.5281/zenodo.15586316