Principal of pharmacy Oriental University Indore, (M.P.)
This study reports the formulation and evaluation of a polyherbal topical gel combining extracts of Solanum xanthocarpum and Sarcostemma acidum. The aim was to develop a stable, acceptable gel with enhanced antioxidant and antimicrobial properties for potential wound-care/dermatological application. Extracts were prepared by Soxhlet apparatus, standardized by phytochemical screening and total phenolic content (TPC). Gels were prepared using Carbopol 940 and Sodium CMC as gelling agent with glycerin and propylene glycol as humectants. The final formulations were evaluated for organoleptic properties, pH, viscosity, spreadability, homogeneity, extrudability, in vitro antioxidant , antimicrobial activity (agar-well diffusion), and accelerated stability. Results indicated good physical stability, pH compatible with skin.
Topical Drug Delivery System
Topical drug formulations are designed to exert localized effects at the site of application by allowing the drug to penetrate the skin or mucous membrane layers1. One of the key advantages of this delivery route is the bypassing of first-pass metabolism, which can otherwise reduce drug effectiveness2. Additionally, topical preparations avoid the complications and discomforts associated with intravenous therapy and are not affected by gastrointestinal factors such as pH variation, enzymatic activity, or gastric emptying time3. Among the various types of topical formulations, semisolids—such as creams, gels, and ointments—are most commonly used. However, other forms like foams, sprays, medicated powders, solutions, and medicated adhesive patches are also widely utilized. Topical systems are often employed when other routes of drug delivery are ineffective or unsuitable, particularly in areas such as pain relief, birth control, and treatment of urinary incontinence.
Advantages of Topical Drug Delivery Systems:
Disadvantages of Topical Drug Delivery Systems:
Gels
Gels are semi-solid systems in which a liquid phase is dispersed within a three- dimensional polymer network, formed from natural or synthetic gums. These systems rely on a high degree of physical or chemical cross-linking to maintain their structure. Polymers commonly used in gel formulations include natural gums such as tragacanth, pectin, carrageenan, agar, and alginic acid, as well as synthetic and semi-synthetic agents like methylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, and Carbopols—a class of synthetic vinyl polymers containing ionizable carboxyl groups6.
MATERIAL & METHODS
5.1 Prliminary Investigation
2.1 Collection of Plant Material
Solanum xanthocarpum and Sarcostemma acidum specimens were gathered from the Bhopal region. Dr. S. N. Verma, professor and head of the Department of Botany at SAGE University, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, confirmed the authenticity of the collected plants. A voucher specimen (No. IOS/Bot/SLF-033 and IOS/Bot/SLF-034) has been duly archived in the department for future reference.
2.1.2 Preparation of Plant Powder
After collection, the plant materials were shade-dried to preserve their phytochemical constituents. Once dried, they were coarsely powdered using a mechanical grinder. The powdered material was then passed through a #40 mesh sieve and stored in airtight containers for subsequent experimental procedures7.
2.2 Preparation of Extracts
Approximately 250 g each of Solanum xanthocarpum and Sarcostemma acidum (dried powder) were subjected to Soxhlet extraction. Initially, defatting was performed using petroleum ether, followed by exhaustive extraction using the selected solvents for about 36 hours. The process temperature was maintained between 40°C and 50°C. Ethanol was chosen as the solvent for S. xanthocarpum, while methanol was used for Sarcostemma acidum. After extraction, the solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure. The concentrated extracts were then vacuum dried using a rotary flash evaporator to obtain a semisolid mass. (Reference: Kokate, Gokhale et al., 2005)
Plant Details-
Fig 2.1: Plant of Solanum xanthocarpum.
Solanum xanthocarpum holds a prominent place in Hindu Materia Medica and is traditionally used for its expectorant and antipyretic properties. It is especially valued for treating respiratory conditions such as asthma, persistent cough, and catarrhal fever. Notably, it is one of the key constituents in Dashamula, a renowned Ayurvedic formulation comprising ten medicinal roots
Fig 2.2: Plant of Sarcostemma acidum.
Sarcostemma acidum has been documented to exhibit a broad spectrum of pharmacological effects. These include anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antiarthritic, spasmolytic, tocolytic, anti-asthmatic, antiallergic, bronchospasmolytic, hepatoprotective, and antioxidant activities. Additionally, the plant has shown potential in spermatogenesis regulation, larvicidal activity, immunomodulation, CNS depression, antimicrobial, anti-syphilitic, and anthelmintic properties.
2.3 Phytochemical Screening
The extracts obtained were analyzed for the presence of different classes of phytochemicals through standard qualitative tests.
2.3.1 Tests for Carbohydrates and Glycosides
Molisch’s Test:
A few drops of 1% alcoholic α-naphthol solution were added to the sample, followed by gentle addition of concentrated sulfuric acid along the side of the test tube. Formation of a violet or brown ring at the junction indicates the presence of carbohydrates.
Borntrager’s Test:
The extract was mixed with chloroform, and the chloroform layer was separated. An equal amount of dilute ammonia was added. Development of a pink hue in the ammoniacal layer indicates glycosides9.
2.3.2 Test for Alkaloids
A small quantity of the extract was treated with dilute hydrochloric acid and then subjected to various reagents (e.g., Mayer's, Dragendorff’s, Wagner’s) to detect the presence of alkaloids.
The reagents are: -
2.3.3 Test for Proteins and Free Amino Acids
2.3.4 Test for Tannins
2.3.5 Test for Flavonoids
2.3.6 Tests for Fixed Oils and Fats
2.3.7 Tests for Steroids and Triterpenoids
Libermann-Burchard Test:
A few drops of acetic anhydride were added to the sample, followed by gentle heating and subsequent cooling. Then, concentrated sulfuric acid was carefully introduced along the sides of the test tube. The presence of a brown ring at the interface of the layers and a greenish tint in the upper layer indicates steroids. A deep red coloration signifies the presence of triterpenoids21.
2.3.8 Test for Mucilages and Gums
A small amount of the sample was slowly introduced into 25 ml of absolute alcohol under constant stirring. The mixture was then filtered, and the precipitate was dried in oil. The dried mass was observed for swelling behavior, which helps confirm the presence of mucilage and gum.
2.3.9 Test for Waxes
To the test solution, an alcoholic alkali reagent was added. The formation of soap-like substances due to saponification indicates the presence of waxes34.
2.4 Formulation of A Suitable Topical Therapeutic System
2.4.1 Preparation of Hydrogel Containing Plant Extracts:
For hydrogel preparation, different ratios of Carbopol 934 and Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC)—including 3:0, 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 0:3, 1:2, and 1:3—were dispersed in 50 ml of distilled water with constant stirring. Separately, 5 ml of distilled water was used to dissolve the necessary quantities of methyl and propyl parabens by heating on a water bath. After cooling, 5% w/v of propylene glycol was added to this solution and mixed with the polymer dispersion. Plant extracts of Solanum xanthocarpum (1 g) and Sarcostemma acidum (1 g) were dissolved in a minimal quantity of ethyl alcohol and then incorporated into the polymer solution. The total volume was adjusted to 100 ml with distilled water. All components were thoroughly blended to form a uniform gel base. To achieve the desired pH (between 6.8 and 7) and optimal consistency, triethanolamine was added gradually. Some batches (F1, F2, F6,) showed turbidity and clumping and were therefore discarded. Only stable and clear batches (F3, F4, F5 and FH) were selected for further evaluation. A control gel was prepared following the same procedure but without incorporating any plant extract37.
RESULT -
3.0 Characterization and Evaluation of Formulation
Table 3.1 (a): Preliminary phytochemical screening of different extract of Solanum xanthocarpum
|
Sr. No. |
Constituents |
Test |
Aqueous Extract |
Ethanolic Extract |
Methanol
|
Petroleum ether Extract |
Chloroform Extract |
|
1. |
Alkaloids |
Mayer’s test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Dragendroff’ test |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
||
|
Hager’s test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
Wagner’s test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
2. |
Carbohydrates |
Molisch’s test |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
|
Fehling’s test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
3. |
Glycosides |
Molisch’s test |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
|
Legal’s test |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
||
|
Keller-Killani Test |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
||
|
4. |
Tannins |
FeCl3 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
|
Lead acetate test |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
||
|
Alkaline reagent |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
5.. |
Protein and amino acid |
Million’s test |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Ninhydrin test |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
Biuret test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
6. |
Flavanoids |
With NaOH |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Shinoda test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
7. |
Steroids and triterpenoids |
Libermann’s Burchard test |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Salkowski’s test |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
||
|
8. |
Mucilage and gum |
With 90% alcohol |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
9. |
Waxes |
With alc. KOH |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(+ Present, - Absent)
Table 3.2(b): Preliminary phytochemical screening of different extract of S. acidum.
|
Sr. No |
Constituents |
Test |
Aqueous Extract |
Ethanolic Extract |
Methanol
|
Petroleum ether Extract |
Chloroform Extract |
|
1. |
Alkaloids |
Mayer’s test |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
Dragendroff’ test |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
||
|
Hager’s test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
Wagner’s test |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
||
|
2. |
Carbohydrates |
Molisch’s test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Fehling’s test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
3. |
Glycosides |
Molisch’s test |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
|
Legal’s test |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
||
|
Keller-Killani Test |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
||
|
4. |
Tannins |
FeCl3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Lead acetate test |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
||
|
5. |
Protein and amino acid |
Million’s test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Ninhydrin test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
Biuret test |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
||
|
6. |
Flavanoids |
With NaOH |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Shinoda test |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
||
|
7. |
Steroids and triterpenoids |
Libermann’s Burchard test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Salkowski’s test |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
8. |
Mucilage and gum |
With 90% alcohol |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
9. |
Waxes |
With alc. KOH |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(+ Present, - Absent)
Table 3.3(a): Extractive values of Solanum xanthocarpum.
|
Sr. No. |
Solvents |
Extractive values (%w/w) |
|
1. |
Pet-ether |
2.62 |
|
2. |
Water |
17.2 |
|
3. |
Chloroform |
6. 9 |
|
4. |
Ethanol |
15.5 |
|
5. |
Methanol |
14.5 |
Table 3.4(b): Extractive values of Sarcostemma acidumr
|
Sr. No. |
Solvents |
Extractive values (%w/w) |
|
1. |
Pet-ether |
0.60 |
|
2. |
Water |
1.6 |
|
3. |
Chloroform |
1.2 |
|
4. |
Ethanol |
1.8 |
|
5. |
Methanol |
2.7 |
Since the major active constituents are present in extract of Solanum xanthocarpum and extract of S. acidum,
4. Evaluation of Gel Formulation
4.1 Physical Assessment
Each gel formulation was examined visually for its organoleptic properties, including color, consistency, and overall appearance.
4.2 pH Determination
The pH of each formulation was assessed using a calibrated digital pH meter. For this, one gram of gel was mixed with 100 mL of distilled water and allowed to stand for two hours to equilibrate. Measurements were taken three times for each sample, and the mean value was recorded for accuracy.
Table 6.4: Formulations of Gel containing Plants extract.
|
Ingredient |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
FH |
|
Carbopol 934 (gm) |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Sodium CMC (gm) |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
S. xanthocarpum (% w/w) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Sarcostemma acidum (% w/w) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Propylene glycol 400 (5%) |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Methyl Paraben (0.5%) (ml) |
0.2ml |
0.2 ml |
0.2 ml |
0.2 ml |
0.2 ml |
0.2 ml |
0.2 ml |
0.2 ml |
|
Propyl Paraben (0.2%) (ml) |
5 ml |
5 ml |
5 ml |
5 ml |
5 ml |
5 ml |
5 ml |
5 ml |
|
Triethanolamine (ml) |
q.s. |
q.s. |
q.s. |
q.s. |
q.s. |
q.s. |
q.s. |
q.s. |
|
Distilled water (ml) |
q.s. to 100ml |
q.s. to 100ml |
q.s. to 100ml |
q.s. to 100ml |
q.s. to 100ml |
q.s. to 100ml |
q.s. to 100ml |
q.s. to 100ml |
Each formulation contains distilled water up to 100 ml.
FE = Ethosome gel containing S. xanthocarpum and S. acidum plant extract
F1, to F7 = Hydrogel, FH = Hydroalcohalic gel
5. Formulation Characterization and Evaluation of Topical Therapeutic System
5.1 Evaluation of Gel Formulation
During the formulation trials, varying concentrations of Carbopol and Sodium CMC were tested. As the concentrations were increased or decreased, issues related to uniformity, spreadability, and viscosity emerged in certain batches (F1, F2, F5, and FH) containing both plant extracts. Due to these inconsistencies, those specific batches were excluded from further analysis. The remaining batches (F3, F4, and F6) demonstrated acceptable physical and performance characteristics and were selected for continued evaluation41. Among them, batch FH exhibited favorable results, showing a greenish, semi-transparent appearance with smooth texture and no lumps. It also had optimal spreadability, consistent viscosity, appropriate pH, and satisfactory drug content. Furthermore, the formulation remained stable in terms of appearance, spreadability, pH, and active content during accelerated stability testing. Based on these results, a hydroalcoholic gel was prepared using the FH formulation, which also showed promising physicochemical properties.
Table 5.2: Physical evaluation of all formulation
|
Batch |
Color |
Appearance |
Spreadibility (gm.cm/sec) |
Consistency (60 mm) |
Viscosity (cps) |
Ph |
Drug content (%) |
|
F3 |
Greenish |
Homogeneous |
23.81 |
8 |
16915 |
7.00 |
99.95 |
|
F4 |
Greenish |
Homogeneous |
24.22 |
8 |
16995 |
7.00 |
99.97 |
|
F6 |
Greenish |
Homogeneous |
24.34 |
8 |
16924 |
7.00 |
99.95 |
|
FH |
Greenish |
Homogeneous |
24.96 |
8 |
16974 |
7.00 |
99.95 |
Compatibility studies:
FTIR Spectral Analysis and Standard Calibration Curve
The Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy method was employed to assess any potential physical or chemical interactions between the plant extracts and the excipients used in the gel formulation. As illustrated in Figures, no significant shifts or disappearance of characteristic peaks were observed in the IR spectra of the extract-polymer combinations. This suggests that there were no notable interactions between the active compounds and the excipients. The spectral peaks of the formulation matched those of the individual plant extracts, confirming their compatibility within the formulation.
Standard Calibration Curve of Solanum xanthocarpum Extract
A standard calibration curve for the Solanum xanthocarpum extract was established by measuring absorbance at 206 nm across different concentrations, in accordance with Beer’s Law. The results of this calibration are presented in Table
5.4: Standard calibration curve of S. xanthocarpum at 206 nm
Table 5.5: Standard calibration curve of S. xanthocarpum at 206 nm
|
S. No |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Absorbance |
|
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. |
Blank 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 |
0.000 0.059 0.141 0.212 0.283 0.341 |
Figure 5.7: Standard calibration curve of S. xanthocarpum at 206 nm.
Table 5: Standard calibration curve of S. xanthocarpum at 206 nm.
|
S. No. |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Absorbance |
|
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. |
Blank 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 |
0.000 0.059 0.141 0.212 0.283 0.341 |
Standard calibration curve of S. acidum plant extract for its active constituent
Standard calibraction curve of S. acidum extract was determined by plotting absorbace vs concentraction at 359 nm and it follow the beer’s law. The results are shown in Table.
|
Time Interval (Min) |
% Drug release of Formulation |
|
|
F6 |
FH |
|
|
15 30 45 60 90 120 180 |
8.31 14.56 20.91 28.38 38.23 46.15 50.21 |
11.23 17.31 27.56 35.91 46.38 54.23 62.15 |
Table Percentage Drug release of Formulated Hydroalcohalic Gel at 206 nm.
Figure: Release profile of Hydrogel F-6 and Hydroalcohalic gel FH
Figure First order kinetics of formulation FH through fabricated diffusion cell.
Figure 6.: Higuchi model of formulation FH through fabricated diffusion cell
6.15 Stability Study
The formulated gels were subjected to stability studies. No colour fading was observed for all prepared gels. The pH of all formulations remained unchanged and was within the range of 6.2-7.2. The viscosity and spreadability of all gels remained unaltered and were found to be within the range. The drug content was within the 90% -103% limit for all gel formulations.
Table: Accelerated Stability study of formulated gel
|
Batch |
Color |
Appearance |
Spreadibility (gm.cm/sec) |
Consistency (60 Sec) |
Viscosity (cps) |
Ph |
Drug content (%) |
|
F6 |
Greenish |
Homogeneous |
19.53 |
5 |
22230 |
6.98 |
99.77 |
|
FH |
Greenish |
Homogeneous |
22.13 |
8 |
16951 |
7.01 |
99.86 |
(F6= Hydrogel, FH=Hydroalcohalic gel)
CONCLUSION
The present investigation focused on the formulation, characterization, and evaluation of a topical therapeutic system using extracts from Solanum xanthocarpum and Sarcostemma acidum. Various gel formulations—including hydrogel and hydroalcoholic gel—were developed and optimized for enhanced effectiveness.
Key outcomes of the study include:
Key findings from the study include:
REFERENCE
Dr. Sachin Jain, Tushar Prajapati*, Formulation and Evaluation of a Polyherbal Gel Containing Solanum Xanthocarpum and Sarcostemma Acidum Plant Extracts, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (10), 180-192. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17328257
10.5281/zenodo.17328257