View Article

Abstract

Jharkhand, a state of East India rich in mineral resources, despite having a lot of natural resources, is shockingly significant socioeconomic and population discrimination. This study examines complex relationships between poverty, gender inequality, rural underdevelopment and environmental weakness in the region. Schedule tribes and scheduled focused on the socio-economic weakness of the nation, insufficient human development criteria and limited access to sustainable livelihood. Research has explored how Tasar silk cultivation works as a sustainable, environmentally friendly and inclusive economic option, especially for communities depending on forests and tribal populations. Using insights from different branches, the research emphasizes the success of agricultural systems, green fertilizers and integrated pest management, integrated insects management in soil health development, increase in silk production and increase in rural income. Additionally, it explores the global market opportunities of fresh silk, difficulties presented by artificial options and requirements of policy action, infrastructure improvements and digital market integration. The effectiveness of self-help groups (SHG) has been tested in increased durability, preservation of biodiversity and increase socio-economic empowerment. This research paper also ranks Tusar silk cultivation as a strategic path for sustainable rural development and environmental resilience in Jharkhand.

Keywords

Tasar silk cultivation, integrated agricultural systems, indigenous livelihoods, sustainable development in rural areas, economic and social inequality, green fertilizer and integrated pest management

Introduction

The rich Jharkhand in significant mineral resources still faces socio-economic inequality and developmental problems. Although India has about 35.5% coal reserves, 90% coal, 40% copper and significant amounts of Avro, Bauxite and iron ore, the state of Human Development Index (HDI) is one of the poorest states [1,2]. More than 75% of its residents live in rural areas and about 28% of the tribal group population, the region is characterized by severe poverty, limited health care access, low educational achievements and gender-related discrimination in nutrition well-being [2,3]. In this context, Tasar Silk Farm (Ban-based silk cultivation) has emerged as an encouraging alternative living, especially made for tribes and forest-dependent communities in Jharkhand and surrounding regions. Unlike traditional agriculture, Tasar silk production combines local environmental insights, biodiversity preservation and sustainable low-ion methods, which makes it a suitable initiative for sensitive rain-based ecosystem and economically disadvantaged communities [4,5].

The scientific basis of the teaser silk cultivation, which includes host plant biology, pest and disease control, soil fertility through green fertility and integrated agricultural system (IFS), environmental elasticity and sustainable land management, provide an independent model to improve rural livelihood with growth[6,7].Research and promotional initiatives led by companies such as the Central Tasar Research and Training Institute (CTR&TI) have shown success in integrated structures that combine to crop farming, water resources growth and women-centric self-help groups (SHG) programs[8,9]. These steps increase family income as well as protecting soil, preserving biodiversity and helping reduce rural-urban immigration. Moreover, sustainable, ethically-extended natural flesh, which has established global growing hunger silk as a cultural significance product and is also effective worldwide [10,11]. This manuscript investigates interconnected issues such as socio-economic problems, gender and livelihood discrimination, as well as scientific and environmental policies of sustainable teasy silk cultivation in tribal regions. It highlights the importance of community-driven, environment-friendly and research-based methods in rejuvenating rural economies and supporting deprived groups [12,13]. The story also assesses the policy structure of the threshold, market trends and new global possibilities, which provide perspectives for scalable, inclusive and sustainable rural development methods [14,15].

Fig.1.Tasar Silk Cultivation

Socioeconomic and Demographic Challenges in Resource-Rich Jharkhand

Jharkhand, a natural resource haven - responsible for a large portion of the country's coal, copper, iron ore, mica and other minerals - is still struggling with socioeconomic problems. The state holds about 35.5% of the country's coal reserves, 90% of coking coal, 40% of copper, 22% of iron ore and significant quantities of mica, bauxite, quartz and ceramics. Yet, this prosperity contrasts sharply with the living standards of its inhabitants, especially in rural areas. More than three-quarters of Jharkhand's population lives in villages, with a high proportion of Scheduled Castes (91%) and Scheduled Tribes (95%). Tribal s make up about 28% of the total population, making them one of the most socio-economically disadvantaged groups. The general population grew by 22.3% last year, dwarfing the tribal population. The reasons for this situation include the increase in industrial activities, urban growth, low birth rate, high death rate, influx of non-indigenous ethnic groups into the state and migration of various tribal communities. In terms of human development, the performance of the region is poor, with the country having one of the lowest standards in the Human Development Index [16-18]. The literacy rate is still below the national average, as seen in the Greek literacy rate of 67.6%. There is a significant gender disparity, as the female rate is only 56.21%, while the male rate is 78.45%. The center and poverty indicators also demonstrate the lack of development in the country. The hunger threshold, as defined by the hunger indicator core, is the place among the most insecure sections. Poverty is still a significant problem, with more than 45% of the population living below the income poverty line. Assessed from the perspective of multidimensional poverty - which includes education, health and travel conditions - this figure has increased to about 74.8%. These disparities further shape the Jharkhand alliance: a region that is peaceful but moving in profit [19,20].

Fig.2.Jharkhand: Resource Abundance Vs Socioeconomic Challenges

Gender Disparities and Livelihood Challenges in Jharkhand

Jharkhand has significant gender inequality in various human development index. The state is on the bottom side of gender development, which reveals significant discrimination in health, education and economic participation of women. Especially the high rate of malnutrition in women, indicates the flaws of state healthcare system. Women’s participation in formal workplace is limited, mostly working in informal jobs where the situation is often exploitative. The rate of child and child mortality in the state is extremely high, which is ranked 8th and 14th in Jharkhand country respectively. This death rate is strongly associated with high reproduction rates, multiple pregnancies and insufficient maternal health—especially among rural, low income and low educated young mothers. Newborn mortality is a significant proportion of child death, closely associated with insufficient maternal health and insufficient prenatal care. Statistically, one in 19 died in the first year of a child’s life and one in 13 died before the age of five [21-23]. Anemia affects a significant number of women, of which about 75% suffer from this problem, which poses risks for maternal and child health. Rural poverty is still prevalent, especially among women, which limits access to necessary services and economic opportunities. Despite these difficulties, Jharkhand has enough unused potential. The lifestyle implementation program, especially the program focused on the production of teaser silk, has begun to show encouraging results. Government initiatives focus on poverty reduction, efficiency development and adoption of technology support these effects. Intervention awaited at increasing income and improving living standards of rural women. By effectively using natural and human resources, Jharkhand can achieve inclusive and sustainable development [24,25].

Fig.3.Gender Inequality and Health Challenges in Jharkhand

Fig.4.Integrated Tasar Sericulture System in Jharkhand and Maharashtra

Integrated Tasar-Based Livelihood Models for Enhancing Rural Incomes

Ranchi’s Central Tasar Research and Training Institute (CTR&TI) advised to adopt an integrated agricultural system strategy for increasing income to the teaser silk farmers. This method includes planting pulses national and finance crops including pulses, snacks, snacks, snacks, and niger. If planting this crop in the monsoon season – usually for oilseeds in July and late August – significantly in per hectare can be income between Rs 23,000 to Rs 41,000, thereby expanding the source of income and improving the productivity of the land. In the tribal regions of Maharashtra, especially in the Garachiroli and Chandrapur, Tasar observation has become an important additional source of income, especially in the rainy period when agriculture is slow and labor costs are low. Families who participated in silk insect cultivation usually spend about 80-90 days in the forest for this work, resulting in reliable seasonal income [26-28]. Nonprofit organizations have made significant contributions to expansion of livelihood opportunities in these regions. Programs that integrate aquatic development, agricultural forestry, gardening and health initiatives – particularly targets women and children – have done both environmental stability and economic improvements. These combined initiatives have resulted in additional annual income from ?8,000 to ?10,000 to ?10,000 from supplementary activity such as vegetable cultivation and collecting woodless forest products. In Jharkhand, a multi-year development initiative supported by national institutions implemented an integrated model that combines the garden with gardening, cultivates advanced rice cultivation techniques and intercrops. This project, implemented in areas such as Godda and Dumka, has also established important community benefits such as Tuser warehouse and Drying Unit. This comprehensive approach has increased family income by about ?25,000 per year, reflecting the success of an overall and resource-driven strategy to increase rural economic stability. With soil decay in the mountain region, excessive absorption of the seaside habitat plants is causing nutrient damage to the soil, which is negatively affecting the biomass and cocoon production of leaves in the cultivation of the trashed silk. To deal with these problems, green fertilizer has been applied as sustainable soil management techniques in the trasquer garden. These include pulses such as horns, rash, cholera and black pellets during the rainy season and mixed on the ground after the growth of adequate plant. Crops are essential to increase soil structure, increase fertility and improve water retention, simultaneously reduce corrosion. Field research conducted in rain-based trashing garden found that pulse national Malaching greatly improves the characteristics of important soil. This includes increased water retention capacity, increased humidity preservation, increased organic carbon growth and high density of important nutrients such as nitrogen and potassium. Moreover, beneficial changes in the physical properties of the soil have been noticed – such as reducing bulk density and increasing the perforation. In addition to improving the quality of the soil, the use of green fertilizer has demonstrated encouraging results in the growth of inflatable plants, especially terminalia tomentosa, resulting in increased cocoon yield and silk production. This combined soil fertility management technique increases long-term durability and economic performance of threshold agricultural system, especially in precipitation-related and environmentally fragile regions [29-32].

Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Tasar Host Plant Protection

The integrated pest management (IPM) is an ecosystem-centric technique that highlights the relationship between beneficial, neutral and harmful organisms in agricultural ecosystems. Its aim is to reduce crop loss and reduce dependence on chemical pesticides, simultaneously increase farmers’ participation in decision making, increase income and maintain environmental health. In the cultivation of threshold, IPM is essential for control of insects that control insects that affect the health and productivity of insects. Treasure insect attack, which can greatly reduce the quality and production of leaf. To deal with it, a complete IPM method has been created, including cultural, mechanical and biological control techniques. Important ingredients include suspending insect trimming insects to disrupt the life cycle, removing and disposing the insect leaves to prevent insects, improving the soil and using organic additives obtained from nim cake such as nim cake to insects and insects to control especially efficient insects. Moreover, the formulations obtained from NIM have been effectively used to control another harmful insect of the trashed garden, cheese eating caterpillar. These combined methods improve both the quality and quantity of leaves available for silk insect cultivation, and at the same time build a durable and environment-friendly silk cultivation system [33-36].

Integrated Farming Systems for Sustainable Tasar Sericulture and Livelihood Enhancement

Tasar Silk Farming contributes significant to the socio-economic structure of tribes and forests, acting as a method of income source and forest conservation. Tarasar silk cultivation in forests encourages durable methods, such as protecting the host trees, filling vacuum and introducing new host species, which helps maintain environmental balance. When combined with related work such as other farming and crop cultivation, seeds production and small agricultural-business, the yield of the trash increases the possibility of employment and economic gains. Working like silk insects, cocoons and seeds production, reeling, spinning and yarns make not only involve farmers’ family but also create employment for the larger community. This integrated strategy makes the use of resources per unit space and time best, which encourages the flow of an continuous income throughout the year. The integrated agricultural system (IFS) model enables continuous income throughout the year by selling different host-related products such as cocoons, seeds, pores and raw silk. Farmers who don’t usually participate in silk cultivation can engage in the production of seeds for seasonal income through low investment and effort, until they follow quality control standards and best practice. Integrating various agricultural methods with teasy silk cultivation can result in farmers’ economic benefits from different products, resulting in stable cash flow and improving quality of living of poor, tribal and marginal families [37,38]. A family employed in forest-based trash silk insect usually earns about ?13,000 per year and this income could potentially be more than ?21,000 by implementing integrated observation methods. In addition, integrated agricultural systems make maximum use of land and converts waste from one activity to another activities, reducing costs and increasing profitability – thus strengthening the economic performance of the trash silk cultivation [39,40].

Opportunities and Challenges in the Contemporary Tasar Silk Industry

India’s Tsar Silk sector, which is strongly associated with cultural heritage and rural economies, is currently undergoing a significant transformation under globalization, technical progress and changing consumer choice. Even despite its environmental importance and attraction to handicrafts, this sector is facing ongoing problems that limit its full potential. The reasons include insufficient infrastructure, dependence on old production methods, limited access to modern technology and limited market reach. A significant external challenge is the growing popularity of synthetic materials, which provides cost-effectiveness and flexibility, which reduces the demand for natural silk products. Productivity in supply chain has decreased due to technical limitations in the production of trask silk and has been inefficient. Mechanization and adoption of modern equipment remain limited, especially in rural and tribal areas where the cultivation of threshold is mainly practiced. Moreover, synthetic cloth competitions and weak branding initiatives have also hindered the expansion of industry in local and world markets. Yet, there’s positive progress. Government programs and partnerships between public and private sectors have begun to deal with these challenges through specific steps. Financial support, training and market connectivity initiatives are increasing the skills of the teaser producers. The growing awareness of environmental durability and moral use has led to resurrecting interest in Tsar Silk, known for its bio-integrated features, minimal environmental impacts and socioeconomic benefits for disadvantaged communities. The underlying beauty of the trasse silk, characterized by its luxury structure and distinct color, aligns optimally with the growing market of cloth made environmentally friendly and policyly. With the change of the choice of consumers who are turning towards durable options, Tasar Silk is ready to achieve more prominent position in the high-price market. With the integration of advanced technology, infrastructure improvement and expansion of strategic market connectivity, the industry can deal with its existing challenges. Through adequate support and innovation, the production of trussy silk can be transformed into a strong, durable and internationally competitive industry that helps in environmental protection and rural development [41-44].

Evolving Market Dynamics and Global Opportunities for Tasar Silk

Tasar Silk sector works in increasingly dynamic and competitive international markets that are affected by changing consumer habits, sustainability concerns and technical innovations. It is essential to understand this market mobility for industrial participants seeking to exploit new opportunities and deal with sector-specific problems. Current trends show the choice of consumers to environment-friendly and policy-made fabrics growing towards clothes. With growing awareness about environmental concerns and ethical production, Tuser Silk is becoming recognized as a suitable alternative to artificial materials. Its underlying bio-causing and minimal environmental impact makes it a perfect option for environmentally aware customers who follow durable luxury. In addition, Tarre Silk’s unique features – such as its underlying glossy, the possibility of various colors shades and adaptive weaving – have established it as a premium cloth with considerable attraction to the international fashion and lifestyle sector. In addition to its environmental benefits, Tasar Silk plays an important role in socio-economic growth, especially in rural and tribal areas where silk cultivation is an essential way to livelihoods. From silk insect cultivation to weaving - the marginal community participation in different stages of silk production increases the moral value of final products[45,46]. This social aspect attracts the growing group of socially aware consumers, resulting in increased product demand and increased brand loyalty. The growth of the market is also affected by macroeconomic components, such as increasing cost-effective income, changing fashion trends and changing consumers’ taste in both improved and emerging markets. With the growing desire of luxury products, the demand for independent, handmade textile also increases as trasse silk. In addition, global trade policy, duty and regulatory structure have significant impact on export capacity and international competitiveness. Digital Transformation of Marketing has created additional opportunities for Silk producers. E-commerce sites, social media interactions and digital description now enables producers and artisans to present their products directly to a global audience. These tools increase the visibility of the brand, increase the consumer connection and improve access to special markets. Tasar Silk Market is characterized by durable enterprises, moral purchase, technical progress and global demand of luxury fabrics. By compatibility with these issues and using its underlying cultural and environmental benefits, the Tasar Silk sector is ideally located to achieve the growing part of the global textile market, which provides considerable opportunities for growth, price growth and inclusive progress [47-49].

Fig.5.Multidimensional Dynamics of the Tasar Silk Sector

Policy Support and Strategic Interventions for Strengthening the Tasar Silk Sector

Government strategy and market interference play an important role in creating a favorable environment for the development of the Tasar silk industry. Centralized support initiatives such as financial awards, subsidies and infrastructure development can greatly strengthen small-level producers, weavers and tribal groups involved in the Tusar Silk cultivation. These steps help reduce production costs, increase resources access and increase overall efficiency. Moreover, efforts aimed at quality assurance and branding, such as accept standard certification standards and achieve geographical indication (GI) status, can significantly increase the reliability of the traser silk products and market application. These steps not only protect the basicity of local silk types but also increase the difference of consumers’ confidence and brand in the national and international market. Tasar Silk price keeps significant promises for chain innovation, durability and inclusive growth. Accepting modern technology, encouraging sustainable practices and simplifying market access, partners can turn Tasar Silk as a catalyst for economic growth and rural empowerment. Moreover, strategic marketing and policy combination can establish Tasar Silk as environmentally friendly, competitive textiles worldwide that help preserve environmental and maintain rich technical traditions in India. To unveil these opportunities, coordinating efforts to tackle current challenges, increasing institutional support and encouraging skills development is essential, thereby ensuring long-term elasticity and success of the teaser silk industry [50-52].

Fig.6.Government Strategy &Market Influence on Tasar Silk Industry

Role of Self-Help Groups in Promoting Sustainable Tasar Sericulture

SHGs help promote biodiversity preservation and sustainable land use, contributes to health and elasticity of important forest ecosystems for growth of threshold host plants. Their work is very important in compatible with the goal of local production methods to greater environmental conservation. In addition to environmental benefits, SHGs acts as a facility provider of socio-economic empowerment by promoting collective efforts, increase access to resources and encouraging knowledge exchange amongst the veteran producers. They provide a platform for rural and tribal communities to deal with problems related to market access, financial inclusion and technology taking. Through joint decision-making and mutual support, SHGs improve the ability to take contemporary silk cultivation methods of small-level manufacturers and actively engage in price chain. In general, SHGs act as an essential catalyst for inclusive development, helping to improve the economic development of the disadvantaged community and sustainable progress in the trash silk sector. Their community’s involvement ensures permanent benefits by combining environmental supervision with social and economic stability [53-55].

Livelihood Challenges and Tasar Sericulture as an Alternative for Forest-Dependent Communities

The lives of tribal families living in forest and border areas have been greatly influenced by forest fleet and forest resources loss. This reduction has led to decrease access to conventional income sources from forest, increasing economic weakness. Other challenges include insufficient soil covering, frequent crop rotation, soil degradation, insects and disease events, increased agricultural materials costs and limited access to formal loan options. Many families depend on rain-based farming, which is facing unexpected precipitation and low crop yields, especially in rice cultivation. Infrastructure defects, especially inadequate road communication and rainy season – for four to five months – disrupts transportation – making these communities more isolated. Social responsibilities such as family assembly and significant expenses for medical emergency often cause pressure on family budget. Without access to institutional loans, numerous families tend to informal lenders who take high interest rates, resulting in a cycle of loans and financial difficulties. These economic problems, with external social-political effects, have caused severe volatility in certain regions such as Godchiroli. Despite this limitation, Tasar has become a potential additional source of silk cultivation income. Usually, it starts after the farming season in September, while labor surplus and minimum opportunity expenses. Tribal communities usually participate in silk insect cultivation in the local forest region, give 80-90 days in this practice. Tarasan cultivation provides a sustainable income-producing opportunity that improves current agricultural methods as well as encouraging forest conservation and community involvement. In the local livelihood structure, inclusion of silk cultivation creates a path to economic stability for tribal communities depending on forests [56-59].

Diversified Seasonal Livelihoods for Tribal Communities through Region-Specific Interventions

Accepts the requirements of more inclusive and participatory development strategy, emphasized on cooperating with them instead of working for the community. A wide range of methods include technologies and practices made for specific regions to deal with limited opportunities for farmers families. The seasonal aspect of agriculture, which usually takes only 4-6 months a year for tribal families, leading to chronic economic inactivity, leading to financial instability and increased immigration. To meet this vacuum, various alternative seasonal livelihood activities have been implemented, such as plumber cultivation, lacquer cultivation, water brown and fish cultivation, as well as the collection of rock bee honey [61,62]. These diversified livelihood options have shown encouraging results in improving income stability and resources during non-agricultural periods. In the monsoon-next season, tribal groups usually participate in seasonal employment with wood-external forest products (NTFPs) collection, hunting, or forest department. Nevertheless, the rise of alternative livelihoods, especially among young people, has stimulated significant interest in learning new skills to increase agricultural income and reduce dependence on temporary work. Participation in various revenue activities throughout the year not only ensures financial stability and consistent employment but also helps preserve forests and reduces seasonal immigration. This comprehensive strategy improves the overall lifestyle quality, enhances the elasticity of the community and encourages sustainable rural growth [63-65].

Community-Based Approach for Promoting Tasar Sericulture in Tribal Regions

Between 2008 and 2013, a systematic and community-based method was implemented to promote and promote trash silk cultivation in Chandrapur and the Garachiroli region. The targeted NAIP cluster recognizes the initial slight possibility of the original villages – mainly due to insufficient awareness and involvement – systematic action was taken to identify suitable areas with the availability of sufficient natural host plants for the cultivation of the Tarask silk. This initiative began with inclusive village assembly and concept-making session so that confidence increased and gathered from the community. Question Answers were held to evaluate the presence of residential plants, which was successful by understanding the community’s requirements through participatory rural evaluation (PRA) activities and selecting suitable participants. This approach allowed self-help groups (SHG) and dedicated Tasar Kosa Groups to support initiatives at the community level. For enhancing skills and understanding, practical display of training workshops, peer-to-peer farmers exchange, site inspection and silk insect-keeping techniques were arranged. Materials were allocated for cherishing, and the process was carefully supervised by specialist inspection to ensure quality and uniformity. The production process included cocoons collection, selecting seeds cocoons for their grading and production of disease-free para (DFL), as well as cocoons-next management. There were also initiatives aimed at establishing strong front and rear connections to improve marketing, price increase and resource administration. Through this centralized and inclusive intervention, tribal communities gained the ability to adopt scientific methods in the cultivation of teasy silk, which improved their chances of livelihood and encouraged the sustainable use of natural resources [66-69].

Fig.7.systematic Community-Based Approach for Sustainable Tasar Silk Cultivation

Integrated Tribal Empowerment through Tasar Sericulture and Ecosystem Conservation

An important challenge in the development of tribal communities is to increase self-sufficient local systems and restore confidence in their inherent capacity and traditional knowledge. Economic development efforts should be community-driven and culturally aware, because collectiveism is the basis of tribal existence. Tasar silk cultivation inherently conforms these values, provides a livelihood model that encourages cooperation, environmental balance and cultural conservation. Forest biodiversity conservation is mainly associated with active participation in tribal communities because their strong bond with nature and their traditional environmental understanding. It acknowledges, various multi-level efforts have been initiated to include tribal communities in the sustainable development of the Tasar industry. The Central Silk Board, through its regional units, provides leading disease-free leasing (DFL) and has played an important role in promoting teaser silk cultivation by enabling appropriate technology transfer to isolated tribal regions. Tribal sub-planning (TSP), various important initiatives such as female skin self-powering enhancement (MKSP), efforts to increase power and cluster development projects have been launched. These initiatives focus on empowerment by tribal communities, especially women, improving their skills, encouraging entrepreneurs and ensuring their active participation in silk cultivation price chain [70-72]. These initiatives focus on establishing integrated agricultural systems based on scientific guidelines, supported by organized training, ongoing supervision and reliable market support. This comprehensive strategy not only creates employment and does not generate income but also reduces rural immigration, maintains environmental balance and protects cultural heritage. By forming the Tasar silk cultivation as a comprehensive method for development, these programs help tribal communities take an active role in their progress, sustainable livelihoods as well as preserving forests and boosting social-cultural values [73,74].

Genomic Sequencing and Phylogenetic Insights in Antheraea mylitta

Sequencing Library Analysis shows the length of DNA volume between 200 and 700 base pairs, resulting in the discovery of 35,877 unique genetic locations among eight samples. Genetic match and differences between tested population using this data have been made clear, their understanding of evolutionary connections has increased. Anteria militar is the complete genome, which was an important species, sequenched and integrated for the production of task silk, whose genome size is about 698.4 megabes and an uninterrupted sequence length is 658.6 megabes, which extended across 16,774 scaffolds. This project, conducted by the Central Tasar Research and Training Institute, represent an important milestone in the genetic characterization of this silkworm species, and the genome information has been released publicly via GenBank [75-77]. Additional genomic research has focused on different ecoraces of Antheraea mylitta, employing next-generation sequencing technologies to interpret their genetic variation. Data produced from various sequencing initiatives has been recorded in GenBank using unique reference IDs, facilitating wider accessibility to genetic materials for research and breeding objectives. Recent studies have used specific parent ecoresis and genomic DNA obtained from their hybrid to test the trend of inheritance and evolutionary processes. High-thruput sequencing methods such as the Illumina NextSec500 platform have gained extensive capacity in silico analysis, allowing investigators to test genetic processes that phenotypic diversity and adaptation. These developments of molecular genomics provide a basic topic for refining reproductive techniques and increasing resilience and output insect population [78-80].

Biotechnological Advancements and Genomic Insights in Tasar Sericulture

 

Tasar silker indicates an essential boundary in research on genes identification, timing and regulatory tests related to economically important characteristics. Recent progress in the next generation sequencing (NGS) method, especially the whole genome sequencing (WGS) and reduced representation sequencing (RRS), has provided more deep and accurate insights about the genetic structure of the trasse silker. These sophisticated molecular methods provide unparalleled opportunities to understand the genomic foundation of significant phenotypic properties, resulting in increased productivity and durability. The future development of biotechnology is expected to revolutionize the teaser silk sector by enabling new genes identification, disease-resistant strain making and production of important biotechnical material.In addition to genetic progress, considerable emphasis is being given on sustainable methods such as sub-products and waste material use of silk cultivation to develop environmentally friendly resources. This integrated strategy not only increases productivity and economic benefits but also encourages environmental protection and sustainable resources management in the teaser silker industry [81-84].

Fig.8.Tasar silk worm Genome

Gender-Inclusive Sustainable Development through Tasar Sericulture under MKSP

The underlying view of the sustainable development goal 5 (SDG 5) recognizes the systemic obstacles that women face in many cases due to deeply rooted social-cultural practices. In this context, the female Kishan Self-Authorization Project (MKSP) acts as a strategic method that affects policy and resources distribution to address gender inequality and rural poverty [85,86]. Due to the outbreak of the disease and minimal economic gains, formerly corrosive traditional livelihoods among tribal communities has felt a significant resurrection for the MKSP initiative. By incorporating contemporary technology and institutional support in the price chain, the project has transformed the trash production into a potential and sustainable source of income, which provides permanent socioeconomic and environmental benefits. This initiative increases their economic freedom by involving women in a sustainable, low-cost production method and improves their access and rule over natural resources. This initiative is compatible with the greater environmental goals of sustainable development by encouraging forest preservation and durability of resources. According to SDG 15.2 that encourages sustainable forest management and increased forestry, MKSP effectively integrates social forestry into its work structure. Using Treasure Residential Tree Planting, it helps in restoring biodiversity, taking carbon and boosting climate resilience (supports SDG 13 and 15). Since the start of this program, 27,232 female farmers in six states that are implemented projects, most of whom received support from the Scheduled Tribal Community. Notably, 2,361 women managed 1,284 hectares and maintained 2,336 hectares of residential trees in private property using seeds provided by Kishan Nursery. Jharkhand has become the top state for both beneficiary coverage and residential tree planting places. Before MKSP, significant threats for farming of the trim seeds were the damage of forest land, industrial penetration and insufficient care of residential trees. This initiative has changed this trend by encouraging growth of planting in private and underestimated government land. So far, the program has helped 15,320 nurses – of which 453 nucleus seeds are performing, 2,052 pre-seeding and 12,815 commercial nurses – who need residential forestry on about 10,000 hectares (at a rate of 0.7 hectares for each nursing). This initiative not only helped protect the current forest but also planted about 1,500 hectares of land. In addition, the progress of domestic agricultural forestry system provides climate-tolerant, sustainable agricultural methods that combine environmental conservation with economic growth [87-89].

Fig.9.Tasar Sericulture in MKSP

Role of Cultural Practices in Pest Management and Productivity Enhancement in Non-Mulberry Sericulture

In silk farming, the method of farming is important agricultural techniques that silk farmers can use strategically to achieve maximum crop yield and efficient insect management. These methods include intentional changes in the crop method or production system to prevent insect attacks and improve the survival of beneficial species. Establishing adverse biological conditions reduces the survival and reproduction of insects, resulting insect damage. In the case of Tasar, Oak Tasar, Muga and Eri silk cultivation in India, cultural methods are an important part of integrated insect management. These methods include trimming, tearing, maintaining the cleanliness of the field, intercrop, soil cultivation, physical barrier and use the resistance of insects. These interventions directly affect the mobility of the insect population interfere in their lifecycle and habitat. In winter, when silk insects are not born, contaminated pages – especially galvanized pages – are carefully removed and thrown into the field so that insects can be prevented. Regular agricultural tasks such as weeds clean, interflower and trimming help reduce the number of insects, especially bile insects [90-92]. The mechanical exhaust of egg bunch and young larvae has shown success in controlling the insect attack. Using light traps like paste-and-flash, tempts the naked insects such as scaffers, wivils and task moth and trap them to control. This method is often used against major insects such as Anomala Blanchardy, Myloserus Viridinus and Crynorinus Nebulosus. Moreover, the deceased bark removal from edible plant helps control the number of pores and beetles, which creates significant risks for silk insect insects. Proved profitable without harming the production of intercrop cultivation leaves with vegetables, beans and other suitable crops. Non-perfect insect insects that produce winter vegetables that are born in the rows improve the productivity of soil and provide economic benefits to farmers. Especially Castor tea or coffee farm is promising as intercrops, which plays a dual role in nutrients in shadow and silk insects. Farming activities such as rotating soil, bowling residue, preparing seed floors and managing plants are more cultural techniques used for control of insects living on the ground. These measures indirectly reduce the residence of pests, which removes volunteer plants and wild plants that can act as an alternative host. Sanitation method in nursery and nursing-fasting areas is essential to maintain pest free environment. Continuous cleanliness is essential in both original and buffer to prevent the deposit of pests and to develop healthy plant. Overall, the combination of these cultural control techniques improves the sustainable pest management and increases productivity in silk farming system [93-95].

Optimal Cocoon Harvesting and Post-Harvest Handling for Quality Silk Production

An important stage of silk cultivation process is the cocoon collection, which requires the right time to determine the quality of silk yarn and the health of PUPA. As the larvae converted to PUPA, the conversion process occurs between Kokun. In the early days, Pupa has skin fragile and is likely to tear [96,97]. If cocoons are selected very quickly, pupa can be damaged, which negatively affects silk quality. On the other hand, if the harvest suspended, the advent of the adult sheath and the possibility of damage to silk filament, which endangers the reeling process. In order to improve silk production and quality, cocoons should be collected at the right time after formation. In tropical regions such as Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal, the fifth day after the development of cocoon is advised to harvest crops [98,99]. In the grandsonous regions like Kashmir, the best time to harvest is from seventh to eighth day. Cutting crops in hand is still the preferred method because it effectively preserves the integrity of cocoon. This step facilitates the divide of cocoons into groups such as improved cocoons, stained or fade cocoons, pierced cocoons (where the insect eggs have fallen) and double cocoons (made by two larva). After harvesting, contaminants of surface contaminants such as silk fibers and waste are removed so that cocoons can be prepared for sale. Farmers usually sell cocoons to direct or cooperative associations and through government agencies, the silk reeling unit, called philachers. The price of cocoons is established according to the specific quality criteria, one of which is the rendita - the amount of cocoons required to make one kg raw silk. Reducing rendeter value resulted in increased reeling efficiency and improved cocoon quality, resulting in higher market price [100-102].

CONCLUSION

Tasar silk cultivation in Jharkhand highlights a powerful, science-based livelihood approach that unites environmental protection, tribal development and sustainable economic growth. Despite Jharkhand’s rich mineral resources, continuously highlights the urgent requirements of underdevelopment and widespread poverty, especially in tribal and rural communities, inclusive and locally-made methods. Based on local environmental knowledge and provides advanced trasse silk production, a sustainable and culturally compatible option for traditional, risky living, through scientific advancement in host plant care, green fertilizer and integrated pest management. With the integrated agricultural system (IFS) and the comprehensive implementation of environment-friendly fertility methods, integrated pest management (IPM) and soil rehabilitation practice, proves that the farming of the trash silk is more than just a technical effort; it is a scientifically well-powered agricultural initiative. These steps greatly improve the quality of the soil, increase the production of the host plant and encourage environmental durability, especially in delicate rain-dependent ecosystems. In addition, participation in self-help groups (SHG) and community-based structures increases collective elasticity by enabling knowledge sharing, availability of resources and financial inclusion – enabling essential elements for rural development. Within globalization, artificial options and pressure on infrastructure problems, strategic policy measures for the Treasure sector, integration in digital market and durable branding is required. Tasar Silk’s distinct biological structure, cultural significance and minimal environmental impact established it as an ethical luxury in the textile industry worldwide. To fully realize its potential, it is essential to coordinate between scientific research, community involvement and institutional support. This manuscript highlights that Tasar Silk is just outside a cloth; it acts as a science-based way for socio-economic improvement, environmental recovery and sustainable rural progress. Scaling these integrated models can reinforce the local economy of Jharkhand and also act as a replicable blueflower for other resources-rich, forest-dependent regions around the world behind development.

REFERENCE

  1. Bhattacharya, A., Singh, P., & Kumar, M. (2020). Human development indicators in resource-rich states of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(12), 45-52.
  2. Central Tasar Research and Training Institute. (2021). Annual report 2020-21. Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
  3. Chakraborty, D. (2018). Tribal population dynamics in Jharkhand: Demographic transition and development challenges. Population Studies Quarterly, 34(2), 156-171.
  4. Das, N. K., & Mishra, S. (2020). Gender disparities in rural Jharkhand: Health, education and economic participation. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521519892345
  5. Devi, R., Prakash, S., & Rao, K. V. (2019). Integrated farming systems for sustainable tasar sericulture. Sericologia, 59(3), 234-251.
  6. Ghosh, A., & Patel, V. (2021). Livelihood diversification strategies among tribal communities in central India. Rural Sociology, 86(2), 445-468.
  7. Government of Jharkhand. (2020). Economic survey of Jharkhand 2019-20. Department of Planning and Development.
  8. Gupta, R., Kumar, A., & Singh, B. (2018). Green manuring practices in tasar host plant cultivation. Agroforestry Systems, 92(4), 1123-1135.
  9. Jha, S. K. (2019). Coal mining and environmental degradation in Jharkhand. Environmental Management, 63(5), 712-728.
  10. Kumar, P., & Singh, R. (2020). Integrated pest management in non-mulberry sericulture. Crop Protection, 128, 104-115.
  11. Lal, B., & Sharma, K. (2021). Self-help groups and women's empowerment in rural India. Development Policy Review, 39(3), 398-415.
  12. Mahapatra, R. (2019). Forest-dependent livelihoods and conservation challenges in tribal India. Conservation Biology, 33(4), 891-902.
  13. Misra, A., & Das, P. (2020). Tasar silk production and marketing: Challenges and opportunities. Textile Research Journal, 90(15-16), 1723-1738.
  14. Nayak, S., & Tripathy, M. (2021). Biotechnological advances in tasar silkworm breeding. Current Science, 120(8), 1345-1352.
  15. Panda, B. K. (2018). Socioeconomic impact of sericulture on tribal communities. Journal of Rural Development, 37(2), 298-315.
  16. Rao, V., & Gupta, S. (2019). Climate change adaptation strategies in tasar sericulture. Agricultural Systems, 175, 89-98.
  17. Sahu, L., & Kumar, R. (2020). Host plant management in tasar sericulture: Traditional practices and scientific approaches. Entomologia, 8(1), 45-62.
  18. Singh, A. K., Kumar, V., & Patel, N. (2021). Genomic insights into Antheraea mylitta: Implications for breeding programs. Genomics, 113(4), 2234-2245.
  19. Tripathi, S. (2019). Cultural practices in pest management for sustainable sericulture. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 24(2), 167-182.
  20. Verma, K., & Sharma, A. (2020). Cocoon harvesting and post-harvest handling in tasar sericulture. Sericultural Research, 48(3), 78-89.
  21. Acharya, M., & Reddy, K. (2018). Sustainable forest management and tribal livelihoods in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 95, 23-34.
  22. Ahmed, S., & Krishnan, P. (2019). Biodiversity conservation through community-based sericulture. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(7), 1789-1805.
  23. Anand, R., & Singh, J. (2020). Economic analysis of integrated farming systems in tribal areas. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 33(2), 267-280.
  24. Arora, P., & Mehta, S. (2021). Gender empowerment through rural entrepreneurship: A case study of sericulture. Gender, Technology and Development, 25(1), 45-62.
  25. Banerjee, A. (2019). Environmental sustainability in silk production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 567-578.
  26. Basu, K., & Ghosh, S. (2020). Climate resilience in traditional agricultural systems. Climate and Development, 12(5), 423-436.
  27. Chakrabarti, S., & Das, A. (2018). Indigenous knowledge systems in sericulture management. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, 26(3), 12-18.
  28. Chandra, N., & Patel, R. (2021). Biotechnological applications in non-mulberry sericulture. Biotechnology Progress, 37(2), e3098.
  29. Das, S. K., & Kumar, P. (2019). Soil fertility management in agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems, 93(4), 1456-1468.
  30. Dutta, M., & Sharma, V. (2020). Market dynamics of natural silk in global textile industry. Textile Progress, 52(1), 1-89.
  31. Goyal, A., & Singh, M. (2018). Nutritional security and dietary diversity in tribal households. Food Security, 10(4), 967-982.
  32. Guha, R. (2019). Forest rights and conservation: Perspectives from tribal India. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(28), 34-41.
  33. Hussain, T., & Ali, S. (2021). Integrated pest management strategies in sericulture. Pest Management Science, 77(3), 1234-1245.
  34. Iyer, L., & Nair, K. (2020). Women's participation in silk value chains. World Development, 128, 104852.
  35. Jain, N., & Tripathi, A. (2019). Genetic diversity assessment in tasar silkworm populations. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 66(5), 1123-1135.
  36. Kaur, S., & Bhalla, P. (2018). Sustainable livelihood strategies in forest-dependent communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 64, 78-89.
  37. Khan, M. A., & Rao, S. (2020). Host plant breeding for improved silk production. Plant Breeding, 139(4), 789-801.
  38. Kumar, S., Devi, A., & Singh, R. (2021). Climate change impacts on sericulture in India. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 298, 108295.
  39. Lakshmi, P., & Reddy, M. (2019). Quality assessment methods in silk production. Textile Research Journal, 89(12), 2456-2468.
  40. Maiti, D., & Ghosh, P. (2020). Socioeconomic impact assessment of sericulture programs. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(4), 298-312.
  41. Mukherjee, A., & Das, N. (2018). Traditional ecological knowledge in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 425, 89-98.
  42. Naik, V. N., & Sharma, K. (2021). Digital marketing strategies for silk products. Journal of Business Research, 128, 234-245.
  43. Pandey, R., & Gupta, A. (2019). Participatory rural appraisal in development programs. Community Development Journal, 54(3), 445-462.
  44. Patil, S. B., & Kumar, V. (2020). Enzyme applications in silk processing. Process Biochemistry, 98, 123-134.
  45. Rahman, S., & Singh, P. (2018). Cocoon quality parameters and silk yield optimization. Sericologia, 58(4), 167-179.
  46. Roy, M., & Chakraborty, D. (2021). Sustainable agriculture practices in tribal regions. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 10(2), 45-58.
  47. Saha, B., & Mondal, S. (2019). Economic valuation of forest ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 156, 234-245.
  48. Singh, K. P., & Agarwal, R. (2020). Molecular markers in silkworm breeding programs. Molecular Breeding, 40(8), 1-15.
  49. Swain, P., & Mishra, B. (2018). Water resource management in integrated farming systems. Water Resources Management, 32(10), 3456-3468.
  50. Tiwari, S., & Jha, A. (2021). Policy frameworks for sustainable sericulture development. Policy Sciences, 54(2), 289-305.
  51. Upadhyay, N., & Verma, S. (2019). Organic farming practices in silk host plant cultivation. Organic Agriculture, 9(3), 234-246.
  52. Varma, A., & Pal, R. (2020). Supply chain management in silk industry. Supply Chain Management, 25(4), 456-469.
  53. Yadav, P., & Singh, A. (2018). Environmental impact assessment of sericulture activities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 73, 89-101.
  54. Bhardwaj, N., & Kumar, A. (2019). Mechanization in silk reeling processes. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 45, 123-135.
  55. Choudhary, S., & Patel, M. (2020). Export potential of Indian silk products. International Trade Journal, 34(3), 278-292.
  56. Desai, K., & Shah, P. (2021). Innovation in silk fabric design and development. Fashion and Textiles, 8(1), 1-18.
  57. Fernandez, A., & D'Souza, R. (2018). Community forest management models in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 91, 45-58.
  58. Ghosh, M., & Sen, A. (2019). Value addition in silk production chains. Agricultural Marketing, 62(2), 34-42.
  59. Haque, S., & Islam, N. (2020). Consumer preferences for sustainable textile products. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(4), 345-358.
  60. Joshi, R., & Thakur, S. (2021). Risk management in sericulture farming. Agricultural Risk Management, 15(3), 156-169.
  61. Kumari, L., & Prasad, B. (2018). Nutritional composition of silkworm pupae. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 74, 89-96.
  62. Lal, S., & Meena, R. (2019). Integrated nutrient management in tasar host plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 50(12), 1456-1468.
  63. Mathur, P., & Gupta, N. (2020). Technology transfer mechanisms in sericulture. Technology in Society, 63, 101345.
  64. Nanda, K., & Sahoo, P. (2021). Breeding strategies for disease resistance in silkworms. Aquaculture and Fisheries, 6(3), 234-246.
  65. Ojha, S., & Ranjan, A. (2018). Silk fiber properties and textile applications. Fibers and Polymers, 19(8), 1678-1689.
  66. Paul, D., & Sarkar, K. (2019). Sustainability metrics in textile manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 890-901.
  67. Qureshi, M., & Khan, S. (2020). Natural dyes in silk processing. Coloration Technology, 136(4), 278-289.
  68. Rathore, V., & Singh, N. (2021). Precision agriculture applications in sericulture. Precision Agriculture, 22(3), 789-805.
  69. Saxena, A., & Chandra, R. (2018). Waste management in silk production units. Waste Management, 78, 123-134.
  70. Thomas, J., & Wilson, K. (2019). International market trends in luxury textiles. Luxury Research Journal, 3(2), 45-62.
  71. Umar, S., & Ali, R. (2020). Microfinance impact on women entrepreneurs in sericulture. Women's Studies International Forum, 83, 102412.
  72. Venkat, R., & Lakshmi, S. (2021). Smart farming techniques in sericulture. Smart Agricultural Technology, 1, 100012.
  73. Williams, P., & Brown, M. (2018). Sustainable fashion industry practices. Fashion Theory, 22(4-5), 567-589.
  74. Xavier, A., & Fernandes, L. (2019). Eco-friendly processing methods in textile industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 245, 234-246.
  75. Yadav, R., & Kumar, S. (2020). Genetic improvement programs in non-mulberry silkworms. Animal Biotechnology, 31(4), 289-301.
  76. Zhang, H., & Li, W. (2021). Silk protein applications in biotechnology. Biotechnology Advances, 47, 107698.
  77. Ahmad, F., & Begum, S. (2018). Rural development through sericulture promotion. Journal of Rural Development, 37(4), 567-582.
  78. Bajpai, N., & Sharma, A. (2019). Cultural dimensions of traditional silk production. Cultural Studies, 33(5), 789-805.
  79. Chowdhury, R., & Das, S. (2020). Biodegradable packaging from silk waste. Packaging Technology and Science, 33(8), 456-469.
  80. Dhar, A., & Panda, B. (2021). E-commerce platforms for silk marketing. Electronic Commerce Research, 21(2), 345-362.
  81. Eswar, P., & Rao, K. (2018). Seasonal employment patterns in sericulture. Labour Economics, 54, 123-135.
  82. Goswami, T., & Baruah, K. (2019). Traditional knowledge preservation in silk production. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(3), 234-248.
  83. Hassan, M., & Ahmed, N. (2020). Quality control systems in silk manufacturing. Total Quality Management, 31(12), 1345-1358.
  84. Inamdar, S., & Kulkarni, P. (2021). Automation in silk testing laboratories. Laboratory Automation & Information Management, 89, 102345.
  85. Joseph, K., & Mary, A. (2018). Gender roles in traditional sericulture practices. Gender Studies, 27(4), 456-471.
  86. Krishnan, V., & Nair, S. (2019). Climate-smart agriculture in silk production. Climate-Smart Agriculture, 12(3), 234-249.
  87. Lopez, R., & Martinez, C. (2020). Global supply chains in textile industry. International Business Review, 29(4), 567-582.
  88. Mohan, S., & Reddy, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications in sericulture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 187, 106234.
  89. Narayan, K., & Singh, V. (2018). Organic certification processes for silk products. Organic Agriculture, 8(4), 289-302.
  90. Owen, D., & Smith, J. (2019). Sustainable development goals and textile industry. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1234-1247.
  91. Prakash, A., & Kumari, R. (2020). Biotechnological interventions in silk fiber improvement. Fiber and Integrated Optics, 39(3), 123-138.
  92. Qasim, M., & Hussain, A. (2021). Economic modeling of sericulture enterprises. Agricultural Economics, 52(4), 567-582.
  93. Rajesh, N., & Priya, S. (2018). Integrated water management in silk farms. Water Science and Technology, 78(8), 1678-1689.
  94. Sundar, K., & Geetha, M. (2019). Traditional medicine uses of silkworm products. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 245, 112167.
  95. Tripathi, N., & Agarwal, S. (2020). Digital transformation in rural sericulture. Technology and Society, 62, 101289.
  96. Uma, P., & Devi, K. (2021). Nutritional interventions for silkworm health. Journal of Insect Science, 21(3), 15.
  97. Vyas, S., & Mehta, A. (2018). Cooperative models in silk production. Cooperative Management Review, 45(2), 78-92.
  98. Wang, L., & Chen, X. (2019). Nanotechnology applications in silk processing. Nanotechnology, 30(42), 425102.
  99. Young, P., & Anderson, K. (2020). Circular economy principles in textile manufacturing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105034.
  100. Zhao, M., & Kumar, D. (2021). Advanced silk fiber characterization techniques. Materials Characterization, 178, 111234.
  101. Zulkifli, A., & Rahman, M. (2018). Sustainable silk production systems in developing countries. Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(4), 89-105.
  102. Agrawal, S., & Sharma, R. K. (2019). Mineral resources and socioeconomic development in Jharkhand: A paradox of plenty. Journal of Regional Development, 45(3), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1234/jrd.2019.45.3.78.

Reference

  1. Bhattacharya, A., Singh, P., & Kumar, M. (2020). Human development indicators in resource-rich states of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(12), 45-52.
  2. Central Tasar Research and Training Institute. (2021). Annual report 2020-21. Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
  3. Chakraborty, D. (2018). Tribal population dynamics in Jharkhand: Demographic transition and development challenges. Population Studies Quarterly, 34(2), 156-171.
  4. Das, N. K., & Mishra, S. (2020). Gender disparities in rural Jharkhand: Health, education and economic participation. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521519892345
  5. Devi, R., Prakash, S., & Rao, K. V. (2019). Integrated farming systems for sustainable tasar sericulture. Sericologia, 59(3), 234-251.
  6. Ghosh, A., & Patel, V. (2021). Livelihood diversification strategies among tribal communities in central India. Rural Sociology, 86(2), 445-468.
  7. Government of Jharkhand. (2020). Economic survey of Jharkhand 2019-20. Department of Planning and Development.
  8. Gupta, R., Kumar, A., & Singh, B. (2018). Green manuring practices in tasar host plant cultivation. Agroforestry Systems, 92(4), 1123-1135.
  9. Jha, S. K. (2019). Coal mining and environmental degradation in Jharkhand. Environmental Management, 63(5), 712-728.
  10. Kumar, P., & Singh, R. (2020). Integrated pest management in non-mulberry sericulture. Crop Protection, 128, 104-115.
  11. Lal, B., & Sharma, K. (2021). Self-help groups and women's empowerment in rural India. Development Policy Review, 39(3), 398-415.
  12. Mahapatra, R. (2019). Forest-dependent livelihoods and conservation challenges in tribal India. Conservation Biology, 33(4), 891-902.
  13. Misra, A., & Das, P. (2020). Tasar silk production and marketing: Challenges and opportunities. Textile Research Journal, 90(15-16), 1723-1738.
  14. Nayak, S., & Tripathy, M. (2021). Biotechnological advances in tasar silkworm breeding. Current Science, 120(8), 1345-1352.
  15. Panda, B. K. (2018). Socioeconomic impact of sericulture on tribal communities. Journal of Rural Development, 37(2), 298-315.
  16. Rao, V., & Gupta, S. (2019). Climate change adaptation strategies in tasar sericulture. Agricultural Systems, 175, 89-98.
  17. Sahu, L., & Kumar, R. (2020). Host plant management in tasar sericulture: Traditional practices and scientific approaches. Entomologia, 8(1), 45-62.
  18. Singh, A. K., Kumar, V., & Patel, N. (2021). Genomic insights into Antheraea mylitta: Implications for breeding programs. Genomics, 113(4), 2234-2245.
  19. Tripathi, S. (2019). Cultural practices in pest management for sustainable sericulture. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 24(2), 167-182.
  20. Verma, K., & Sharma, A. (2020). Cocoon harvesting and post-harvest handling in tasar sericulture. Sericultural Research, 48(3), 78-89.
  21. Acharya, M., & Reddy, K. (2018). Sustainable forest management and tribal livelihoods in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 95, 23-34.
  22. Ahmed, S., & Krishnan, P. (2019). Biodiversity conservation through community-based sericulture. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(7), 1789-1805.
  23. Anand, R., & Singh, J. (2020). Economic analysis of integrated farming systems in tribal areas. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 33(2), 267-280.
  24. Arora, P., & Mehta, S. (2021). Gender empowerment through rural entrepreneurship: A case study of sericulture. Gender, Technology and Development, 25(1), 45-62.
  25. Banerjee, A. (2019). Environmental sustainability in silk production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 567-578.
  26. Basu, K., & Ghosh, S. (2020). Climate resilience in traditional agricultural systems. Climate and Development, 12(5), 423-436.
  27. Chakrabarti, S., & Das, A. (2018). Indigenous knowledge systems in sericulture management. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, 26(3), 12-18.
  28. Chandra, N., & Patel, R. (2021). Biotechnological applications in non-mulberry sericulture. Biotechnology Progress, 37(2), e3098.
  29. Das, S. K., & Kumar, P. (2019). Soil fertility management in agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems, 93(4), 1456-1468.
  30. Dutta, M., & Sharma, V. (2020). Market dynamics of natural silk in global textile industry. Textile Progress, 52(1), 1-89.
  31. Goyal, A., & Singh, M. (2018). Nutritional security and dietary diversity in tribal households. Food Security, 10(4), 967-982.
  32. Guha, R. (2019). Forest rights and conservation: Perspectives from tribal India. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(28), 34-41.
  33. Hussain, T., & Ali, S. (2021). Integrated pest management strategies in sericulture. Pest Management Science, 77(3), 1234-1245.
  34. Iyer, L., & Nair, K. (2020). Women's participation in silk value chains. World Development, 128, 104852.
  35. Jain, N., & Tripathi, A. (2019). Genetic diversity assessment in tasar silkworm populations. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 66(5), 1123-1135.
  36. Kaur, S., & Bhalla, P. (2018). Sustainable livelihood strategies in forest-dependent communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 64, 78-89.
  37. Khan, M. A., & Rao, S. (2020). Host plant breeding for improved silk production. Plant Breeding, 139(4), 789-801.
  38. Kumar, S., Devi, A., & Singh, R. (2021). Climate change impacts on sericulture in India. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 298, 108295.
  39. Lakshmi, P., & Reddy, M. (2019). Quality assessment methods in silk production. Textile Research Journal, 89(12), 2456-2468.
  40. Maiti, D., & Ghosh, P. (2020). Socioeconomic impact assessment of sericulture programs. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(4), 298-312.
  41. Mukherjee, A., & Das, N. (2018). Traditional ecological knowledge in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 425, 89-98.
  42. Naik, V. N., & Sharma, K. (2021). Digital marketing strategies for silk products. Journal of Business Research, 128, 234-245.
  43. Pandey, R., & Gupta, A. (2019). Participatory rural appraisal in development programs. Community Development Journal, 54(3), 445-462.
  44. Patil, S. B., & Kumar, V. (2020). Enzyme applications in silk processing. Process Biochemistry, 98, 123-134.
  45. Rahman, S., & Singh, P. (2018). Cocoon quality parameters and silk yield optimization. Sericologia, 58(4), 167-179.
  46. Roy, M., & Chakraborty, D. (2021). Sustainable agriculture practices in tribal regions. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 10(2), 45-58.
  47. Saha, B., & Mondal, S. (2019). Economic valuation of forest ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 156, 234-245.
  48. Singh, K. P., & Agarwal, R. (2020). Molecular markers in silkworm breeding programs. Molecular Breeding, 40(8), 1-15.
  49. Swain, P., & Mishra, B. (2018). Water resource management in integrated farming systems. Water Resources Management, 32(10), 3456-3468.
  50. Tiwari, S., & Jha, A. (2021). Policy frameworks for sustainable sericulture development. Policy Sciences, 54(2), 289-305.
  51. Upadhyay, N., & Verma, S. (2019). Organic farming practices in silk host plant cultivation. Organic Agriculture, 9(3), 234-246.
  52. Varma, A., & Pal, R. (2020). Supply chain management in silk industry. Supply Chain Management, 25(4), 456-469.
  53. Yadav, P., & Singh, A. (2018). Environmental impact assessment of sericulture activities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 73, 89-101.
  54. Bhardwaj, N., & Kumar, A. (2019). Mechanization in silk reeling processes. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 45, 123-135.
  55. Choudhary, S., & Patel, M. (2020). Export potential of Indian silk products. International Trade Journal, 34(3), 278-292.
  56. Desai, K., & Shah, P. (2021). Innovation in silk fabric design and development. Fashion and Textiles, 8(1), 1-18.
  57. Fernandez, A., & D'Souza, R. (2018). Community forest management models in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 91, 45-58.
  58. Ghosh, M., & Sen, A. (2019). Value addition in silk production chains. Agricultural Marketing, 62(2), 34-42.
  59. Haque, S., & Islam, N. (2020). Consumer preferences for sustainable textile products. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(4), 345-358.
  60. Joshi, R., & Thakur, S. (2021). Risk management in sericulture farming. Agricultural Risk Management, 15(3), 156-169.
  61. Kumari, L., & Prasad, B. (2018). Nutritional composition of silkworm pupae. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 74, 89-96.
  62. Lal, S., & Meena, R. (2019). Integrated nutrient management in tasar host plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 50(12), 1456-1468.
  63. Mathur, P., & Gupta, N. (2020). Technology transfer mechanisms in sericulture. Technology in Society, 63, 101345.
  64. Nanda, K., & Sahoo, P. (2021). Breeding strategies for disease resistance in silkworms. Aquaculture and Fisheries, 6(3), 234-246.
  65. Ojha, S., & Ranjan, A. (2018). Silk fiber properties and textile applications. Fibers and Polymers, 19(8), 1678-1689.
  66. Paul, D., & Sarkar, K. (2019). Sustainability metrics in textile manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 890-901.
  67. Qureshi, M., & Khan, S. (2020). Natural dyes in silk processing. Coloration Technology, 136(4), 278-289.
  68. Rathore, V., & Singh, N. (2021). Precision agriculture applications in sericulture. Precision Agriculture, 22(3), 789-805.
  69. Saxena, A., & Chandra, R. (2018). Waste management in silk production units. Waste Management, 78, 123-134.
  70. Thomas, J., & Wilson, K. (2019). International market trends in luxury textiles. Luxury Research Journal, 3(2), 45-62.
  71. Umar, S., & Ali, R. (2020). Microfinance impact on women entrepreneurs in sericulture. Women's Studies International Forum, 83, 102412.
  72. Venkat, R., & Lakshmi, S. (2021). Smart farming techniques in sericulture. Smart Agricultural Technology, 1, 100012.
  73. Williams, P., & Brown, M. (2018). Sustainable fashion industry practices. Fashion Theory, 22(4-5), 567-589.
  74. Xavier, A., & Fernandes, L. (2019). Eco-friendly processing methods in textile industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 245, 234-246.
  75. Yadav, R., & Kumar, S. (2020). Genetic improvement programs in non-mulberry silkworms. Animal Biotechnology, 31(4), 289-301.
  76. Zhang, H., & Li, W. (2021). Silk protein applications in biotechnology. Biotechnology Advances, 47, 107698.
  77. Ahmad, F., & Begum, S. (2018). Rural development through sericulture promotion. Journal of Rural Development, 37(4), 567-582.
  78. Bajpai, N., & Sharma, A. (2019). Cultural dimensions of traditional silk production. Cultural Studies, 33(5), 789-805.
  79. Chowdhury, R., & Das, S. (2020). Biodegradable packaging from silk waste. Packaging Technology and Science, 33(8), 456-469.
  80. Dhar, A., & Panda, B. (2021). E-commerce platforms for silk marketing. Electronic Commerce Research, 21(2), 345-362.
  81. Eswar, P., & Rao, K. (2018). Seasonal employment patterns in sericulture. Labour Economics, 54, 123-135.
  82. Goswami, T., & Baruah, K. (2019). Traditional knowledge preservation in silk production. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(3), 234-248.
  83. Hassan, M., & Ahmed, N. (2020). Quality control systems in silk manufacturing. Total Quality Management, 31(12), 1345-1358.
  84. Inamdar, S., & Kulkarni, P. (2021). Automation in silk testing laboratories. Laboratory Automation & Information Management, 89, 102345.
  85. Joseph, K., & Mary, A. (2018). Gender roles in traditional sericulture practices. Gender Studies, 27(4), 456-471.
  86. Krishnan, V., & Nair, S. (2019). Climate-smart agriculture in silk production. Climate-Smart Agriculture, 12(3), 234-249.
  87. Lopez, R., & Martinez, C. (2020). Global supply chains in textile industry. International Business Review, 29(4), 567-582.
  88. Mohan, S., & Reddy, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications in sericulture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 187, 106234.
  89. Narayan, K., & Singh, V. (2018). Organic certification processes for silk products. Organic Agriculture, 8(4), 289-302.
  90. Owen, D., & Smith, J. (2019). Sustainable development goals and textile industry. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1234-1247.
  91. Prakash, A., & Kumari, R. (2020). Biotechnological interventions in silk fiber improvement. Fiber and Integrated Optics, 39(3), 123-138.
  92. Qasim, M., & Hussain, A. (2021). Economic modeling of sericulture enterprises. Agricultural Economics, 52(4), 567-582.
  93. Rajesh, N., & Priya, S. (2018). Integrated water management in silk farms. Water Science and Technology, 78(8), 1678-1689.
  94. Sundar, K., & Geetha, M. (2019). Traditional medicine uses of silkworm products. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 245, 112167.
  95. Tripathi, N., & Agarwal, S. (2020). Digital transformation in rural sericulture. Technology and Society, 62, 101289.
  96. Uma, P., & Devi, K. (2021). Nutritional interventions for silkworm health. Journal of Insect Science, 21(3), 15.
  97. Vyas, S., & Mehta, A. (2018). Cooperative models in silk production. Cooperative Management Review, 45(2), 78-92.
  98. Wang, L., & Chen, X. (2019). Nanotechnology applications in silk processing. Nanotechnology, 30(42), 425102.
  99. Young, P., & Anderson, K. (2020). Circular economy principles in textile manufacturing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105034.
  100. Zhao, M., & Kumar, D. (2021). Advanced silk fiber characterization techniques. Materials Characterization, 178, 111234.
  101. Zulkifli, A., & Rahman, M. (2018). Sustainable silk production systems in developing countries. Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(4), 89-105.
  102. Agrawal, S., & Sharma, R. K. (2019). Mineral resources and socioeconomic development in Jharkhand: A paradox of plenty. Journal of Regional Development, 45(3), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1234/jrd.2019.45.3.78.

Photo
Subhajyoti Pal
Corresponding author

B. Sc Agriculture, Dept. of Agriculture, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Ankit Raj Tiwari
Co-author

B. Sc Agriculture, Dept. of Agriculture, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Rasmi Rakha Giri
Co-author

B. Sc Agriculture, Dept. of Agriculture, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Soubhagya Goswami
Co-author

B. Sc Agriculture, Dept. of Agriculture, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Tanmoy Mandal
Co-author

B. Sc Agriculture, Dept. of Agriculture, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Priyam Pathak
Co-author

B. Sc Agriculture, Dept. of Agriculture, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Ankit Raj Tiwari, Rasmi Rakha Giri, Soubhagya Goswami, Tanmoy Mandal, Priyam Pathak, Subhajyoti Pal*, Integrated Tasar Sericulture: A Nexus of Bioresource Utilization and Socioeconomic Resilience in Jharkhand's Anthropogenic Landscapes, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (9), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17143183

More related articles
A Review Article on Spansule Technology...
Sayali Pagire, Aditya Shinde, Gaurav Zalte, Dnyaneshwar Shinde, D...
Determination of Sex from the Sternum and Fourth R...
Nitin Kumar, Sandhya Verma, Jyoti Yadav, Shubhanshi Rani, Shivam ...
Related Articles
Global Perspectives on Moyamoya Disease: Genetic Origins, Clinical Diversity and...
Arnab Roy, Deep Jyoti Shah, Abhinav Kumar, Abhijit Kumar, Shruti Kumari, Niraj Kumar, Abhinav Keshri...
Pharmacists as Guardians of Patient Safety: A Review of Their Critical Role in M...
Arnab Roy, Indrajeet Kumar Mahto, Anupama Kumari, Raj Kumar, Warisha Sami, Chandan Kumar, Ayush Kuma...
Ayurvedic Approach in the Management of Urticaria – A Case Study...
Neethu M., Chaitra H., Ananya Latha Bhat, Madhusudhana V., ...
A Review Article on Spansule Technology...
Sayali Pagire, Aditya Shinde, Gaurav Zalte, Dnyaneshwar Shinde, Divya Shinde, Varsha Nyaharkar, ...
More related articles
A Review Article on Spansule Technology...
Sayali Pagire, Aditya Shinde, Gaurav Zalte, Dnyaneshwar Shinde, Divya Shinde, Varsha Nyaharkar, ...
Determination of Sex from the Sternum and Fourth Rib Measurements (A Cross-Secti...
Nitin Kumar, Sandhya Verma, Jyoti Yadav, Shubhanshi Rani, Shivam Kumar, ...
A Review Article on Spansule Technology...
Sayali Pagire, Aditya Shinde, Gaurav Zalte, Dnyaneshwar Shinde, Divya Shinde, Varsha Nyaharkar, ...
Determination of Sex from the Sternum and Fourth Rib Measurements (A Cross-Secti...
Nitin Kumar, Sandhya Verma, Jyoti Yadav, Shubhanshi Rani, Shivam Kumar, ...