View Article

Abstract

The advent of precision medicine has instigated a paradigm shift in disease treatment, emphasizing the customization of therapies based on individual molecular profiles. Central to this transformation is the integration of multi-omics data encompassing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, and more to elucidate the complex biological networks that influence drug response. This review synthesizes the current landscape of multi-omics approaches in precision pharmacology, concentrating on their application in understanding and predicting variability in therapeutic efficacy and toxicity. We commence by examining the individual omics layers pertinent to pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, highlighting how their integration yields synergistic insights that surpass the limitations of single-omics strategies. The challenges posed by heterogeneous data types, technical variability, and integration complexity are critically assessed. In response, we evaluate computational methodologies developed to manage and analyse multi-omics datasets, including advanced machine learning and AI-driven platforms. Tools such as iCluster, MOFA, and DeepMO are discussed for their role in enhancing the accuracy of drug response predictions. We underscore key case studies demonstrating the clinical impact of multi-omics, such as in EGFR-targeted therapy and BRCA-mutated cancers, and explore emerging areas like the role of the microbiome and single-cell multi-omics in revealing intra-tumour heterogeneity. Finally, we address ethical considerations, data privacy, and the necessity for standardization. This review envisions a future where multi-omics-guided precision medicine optimizes drug efficacy and democratizes personalized care across diverse populations.

Keywords

Multi-omics, drug response, precision medicine, data integration, pharmacogenomics, machine learning, single-cell analysis

Introduction

Precision medicine, a transformative shift in healthcare, aspires to tailor medical treatment to each patient's individual characteristics. Central to this approach is the understanding that drug responses are not universally predictable but are modulated by a constellation of genetic, molecular, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Despite the promise of “the right drug for the right patient,” inter-individual variability in drug efficacy and adverse reactions continues to challenge clinicians. Bridging this knowledge gap necessitates a deeper, more holistic exploration of the biological determinants of therapeutic response[1]. Enter the era of multi-omics, an integrative framework that harnesses diverse layers of molecular information genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics to provide a comprehensive view of biological systems. Each omics layer captures a distinct facet of cellular function: DNA mutations and structural variants (genomics), mRNA expression profiles (transcriptomics), protein abundance and modifications (proteomics), metabolite fluxes (metabolomics), and regulatory changes such as DNA methylation or histone modification (epigenomics). Together, they constitute a high-resolution map of the molecular landscape influencing drug behaviour[2]. While each individual omics modality has yielded valuable insights, the integration of these data types holds the greatest promise for understanding drug mechanisms, identifying biomarkers of response or resistance, and uncovering new therapeutic targets. This multidimensional approach enables the dissection of complex drug response phenotypes that single-layer analyses often oversimplify or overlook[3]. In recent years, technological advancements have exponentially increased the throughput and affordability of omics profiling, enabling the generation of massive datasets across populations and disease states. However, these developments have also introduced computational and interpretive challenges. Multi-omics data are inherently high-dimensional, noisy, and heterogeneous, requiring sophisticated algorithms and robust statistical frameworks for effective integration and interpretation[4]. This review aims to critically evaluate the current state of multi-omics in drug response mapping within the context of precision medicine. We begin by dissecting the unique contributions of each omics layer to pharmacological understanding and then delve into the challenges of integrating these diverse data sources. We examine computational strategies—ranging from early data concatenation models to advanced AI and network-based frameworks—that facilitate the extraction of meaningful patterns from complex datasets. In addition, we explore the emerging applications of multi-omics in precision oncology, pharmacogenomics, microbiome research, and single-cell biology, showcasing case studies where integrative omics has led to actionable clinical insights. We also address the ethical, legal, and social considerations intrinsic to handling sensitive multi-omics data, particularly in the context of data sharing and patient privacy. Ultimately, this review aspires to provide a comprehensive, yet critical, examination of how multi-omics reshapes drug development and therapy personalisation. By highlighting current innovations and unmet needs, we aim to chart a roadmap toward a future where multi-omics enhances our mechanistic understanding of drugs and accelerates the delivery of safer, more effective treatments for all patients.

  1.  Overview of Omics Layers Relevant to Drug Response

Understanding the molecular determinants of drug response requires dissecting multiple layers of biological regulation. Each omics layer contributes unique insights into how drugs interact with the human system. When integrated, these layers offer a synergistic and mechanistic understanding that can drive personalised treatment strategies.

Genomics: Blueprint of Drug Response

Genomic variation plays a foundational role in drug efficacy and toxicity. Germline polymorphisms in drug-metabolising enzymes, such as CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and TPMT, can significantly affect pharmacokinetics, leading to overexposure or underexposure to therapeutic agents. For example, polymorphisms in CYP2C19 influence the activation of clopidogrel, an antiplatelet agent, resulting in poor therapeutic outcomes in specific genotypes[5]. In oncology, somatic mutations in genes like EGFR, KRAS, or BRAF have emerged as predictive biomarkers for targeted therapies. For instance, non-small cell lung cancer patients harbouring EGFR mutations show robust responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as erlotinib and gefitinib. Thus, genomic profiling has become a clinical cornerstone in cancer precision medicine[6].

Transcriptomics: Functional Readout of Gene Activity

Transcriptomics provides a dynamic snapshot of gene expression under specific physiological or pathological conditions. Unlike the static nature of the genome, transcriptomic changes can reflect immediate cellular responses to drugs. Pharmacotranscriptomics studies have revealed how expression changes in transporter or efflux pump genes, like ABCB1 or SLCO1B1, can modulate drug distribution and clearance[7]. Gene expression profiles have also been used to classify responders versus non-responders to chemotherapy. The development of the Oncotype DX and MammaPrint assays, which predict breast cancer recurrence risk and chemotherapy benefit, underscores the translational power of transcriptomic data[8].

Proteomics: Bridging Genotype and Phenotype

Proteins, the primary executors of cellular function, represent direct drug targets and mediators of pharmacologic effects. Quantitative proteomics measures protein abundance, turnover, and post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation or ubiquitination—key drug activity and resistance regulators[9]. For example, phosphorylation of the estrogen receptor can influence sensitivity to hormonal therapies in breast cancer. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has also identified differential protein expression patterns that correlate with cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer, facilitating predictive biomarker discovery[10].

Metabolomics: Snapshot of Biochemical Activity

Metabolomics captures the small-molecule metabolites that serve as substrates, intermediates, and products of cellular metabolism. Since drugs are metabolised into active or inactive compounds, metabolomics directly informs on drug bioavailability and toxicity[11]. For instance, metabolomic profiling has identified specific metabolic signatures associated with doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, potentially allowing for early risk stratification. Additionally, changes in tryptophan metabolism have been implicated in immune checkpoint therapy responses, highlighting metabolomics as a tool for immunotherapy optimisation[12].

Epigenomics: Regulatory Modulators of Drug Response

Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation dynamically regulate gene expression without altering the DNA sequence. Aberrant methylation of promoter regions can silence tumour suppressor genes, contributing to drug resistance. For example, hypermethylation of the MGMT gene is associated with increased sensitivity to temozolomide in glioblastoma[13]. Epigenomic drugs like DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (e.g., azacitidine) are now used to reverse resistant phenotypes in hematologic malignancies, demonstrating the therapeutic potential of targeting the epigenome[14].

Synergy Across Omics Layers:

Individually, each omics domain offers partial insights into drug response. However, these data layers can reveal complex regulatory networks that control cellular fate under pharmacologic intervention. For instance, integrating epigenomic and transcriptomic data can clarify whether gene silencing arises from DNA methylation or transcriptional repression. Similarly, linking proteomic and metabolomic data can illuminate how altered enzyme levels affect drug metabolism[15]. Thus, multi-omics integration represents a paradigm shift from single-biomarker models to systems-level therapeutic efficacy and safety predictors.

Reference

  1. Di Nicolantonio F, Vitiello PP, Marsoni S, et al (2021) Precision oncology in metastatic colorectal cancer — from biology to medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 18:506–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-021-00495-z
  2. Wörheide MA, Krumsiek J, Kastenmüller G, Arnold M (2021) Multi-omics integration in biomedical research – A metabolomics-centric review. Analytica Chimica Acta 1141:144–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.10.038
  3. Periyasamy M (2025) AI-Driven Multi-Omics Integration for Enhanced Drug Discovery Pipelines. In: 2025 International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems for Collaborative Intelligence (ICMSCI). IEEE, Erode, India, pp 1553–1558
  4. Madrid-Márquez L, Rubio-Escudero C, Pontes B, et al (2022) MOMIC: A Multi-Omics Pipeline for Data Analysis, Integration and Interpretation. Applied Sciences 12:3987. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083987
  5. Sánchez-Bayona R, Catalán C, Cobos MA, Bergamino M (2025) Pharmacogenomics in Solid Tumors: A Comprehensive Review of Genetic Variability and Its Clinical Implications. Cancers 17:913. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17060913
  6. Malone ER, Oliva M, Sabatini PJB, et al (2020) Molecular profiling for precision cancer therapies. Genome Med 12:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0703-1
  7. Xicota L, De Toma I, Maffioletti E, et al (2022) Recommendations for pharmacotranscriptomic profiling of drug response in CNS disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology 54:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.10.005
  8. Guevara-Nieto HM, Parra-Medina RS, Zabaleta J, et al (2024) Abstract 7609: Potential gene expression meta-signatures predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in invasive breast cancer. Cancer Research 84:7609–7609. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2024-7609
  9. Zou M, Zhou H, Gu L, et al (2024) Therapeutic Target Identification and Drug Discovery Driven by Chemical Proteomics. Biology 13:555. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080555
  10. Knutson TP, Lange CA (2014) Tracking progesterone receptor-mediated actions in breast cancer. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 142:114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.11.010
  11. Bowen TJ, Southam AD, Hall AR, et al (2023) Simultaneously discovering the fate and biochemical effects of pharmaceuticals through untargeted metabolomics. Nat Commun 14:4653. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40333-7
  12. Rawat PS, Jaiswal A, Khurana A, et al (2021) Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: An update on the molecular mechanism and novel therapeutic strategies for effective management. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 139:111708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111708
  13. Yang L, Jin M, Jeong KW (2021) Histone H3K4 Methyltransferases as Targets for Drug-Resistant Cancers. Biology 10:581. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070581
  14. Tao F, Zhang Z (2023) Editorial: Epigenetic drugs and therapeutic resistance for epithelial malignancies. Front Pharmacol 14:1208518. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1208518
  15. Liu Y, Lian G, Chen T (2024) A novel multi-omics data analysis of dose-dependent and temporal changes in regulatory pathways due to chemical perturbation: a case study on caffeine. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods 34:164–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2023.2265462
  16. Chai H, Zhou X, Zhang Z, et al (2021) Integrating multi-omics data through deep learning for accurate cancer prognosis prediction. Computers in Biology and Medicine 134:104481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104481
  17. Ba R, Geffard E, Douillard V, et al (2022) Surfing the Big Data Wave: Omics Data Challenges in Transplantation. Transplantation 106: e114–e125. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003992
  18. Zhang Z, Zhang X (2024) Data-driven batch detection enhances single-cell omics data analysis. Cell Systems 15:893–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2024.09.011
  19. Krassowski M, Das V, Sahu SK, Misra BB (2020) State of the Field in Multi-Omics Research: From Computational Needs to Data Mining and Sharing. Front Genet 11:610798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.610798
  20. Ciceri S, Carenzo A, Iannó MF, et al (2022) Gene expression-based dissection of inter-histotypes, intra-histotype and intra-tumor heterogeneity in pediatric tumors. Sci Rep 12:17837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20536-6
  21. Santorsola M, Lescai F (2023) The promise of explainable deep learning for omics data analysis: Adding new discovery tools to AI. New Biotechnology 77:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2023.06.002
  22. Subramanian I, Verma S, Kumar S, et al (2020) Multi-omics Data Integration, Interpretation, and Its Application. Bioinform Biol Insights 14:117793221989905. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177932219899051
  23. Picard M, Scott-Boyer M-P, Bodein A, et al (2021) Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19:3735–3746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.030
  24. Pierre-Jean M, Deleuze J-F, Le Floch E, Mauger F (2020) Clustering and variable selection evaluation of 13 unsupervised methods for multi-omics data integration. Briefings in Bioinformatics 21:2011–2030. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz138
  25. Argelaguet R, Arnol D, Bredikhin D, et al (2020) MOFA+: a statistical framework for comprehensive integration of multi-modal single-cell data. Genome Biol 21:111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02015-1
  26. Demirel HC, Arici MK, Tuncbag N (2022) Computational approaches leveraging integrated connections of multi-omic data toward clinical applications. Mol Omics 18:7–18. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MO00158B
  27. Guarino V, Gliozzo J, Clarelli F, et al (2023) Intrinsic-Dimension Analysis for Guiding Dimensionality Reduction in Multi-Omics Data: In: Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 243–251
  28. Pache MM, Pangavhane RR, Jagtap MN, Darekar AB (2025) The AI-Driven Future of Drug Discovery: Innovations, Applications, and Challenges. Asian J Res Pharm Sci 15:61–67. https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5659.2025.00009
  29. Gschwind A, Ossowski S (2025) AI Model for Predicting Anti-PD1 Response in Melanoma Using Multi-Omics Biomarkers. Cancers 17:714. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17050714
  30. Sharma A, Lysenko A, Boroevich KA, Tsunoda T (2023) DeepInsight-3D architecture for anti-cancer drug response prediction with deep-learning on multi-omics. Sci Rep 13:2483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29644-3
  31. Malik V, Kalakoti Y, Sundar D (2021) Deep learning assisted multi-omics integration for survival and drug-response prediction in breast cancer. BMC Genomics 22:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07524-2
  32. Rashid MM, Selvarajoo K (2024) Advancing drug-response prediction using multi-modal and -omics machine learning integration (MOMLIN): a case study on breast cancer clinical data. Briefings in Bioinformatics 25: bbae300. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbae300
  33. Mitra S, Saha S, Hasanuzzaman M (2020) Multi-view clustering for multi-omics data using unified embedding. Sci Rep 10:13654. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70229-1
  34. Degenhardt F, Seifert S, Szymczak S (2019) Evaluation of variable selection methods for random forests and omics data sets. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20:492–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx124
  35. Wang Z, Li H, Carpenter C, Guan Y (2020) Challenge-Enabled Machine Learning to Drug-Response Prediction. AAPS J 22:106. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-020-00494-5
  36. Petrelli F, Borgonovo K, Cabiddu M, Barni S (2012) Efficacy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 13 Randomized Trials. Clinical Lung Cancer 13:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2011.08.005
  37. Lukashchuk N, Armenia J, Tobalina L, et al (2022) BRCA reversion mutations mediated by microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) as a mechanism of resistance to PARP inhibitors in ovarian and breast cancer. JCO 40:5559–5559. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5559
  38. Heo YJ, Hwa C, Lee G-H, et al (2021) Integrative Multi-Omics Approaches in Cancer Research: From Biological Networks to Clinical Subtypes. Molecules and Cells 44:433–443. https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2021.0042
  39. Jariwala PB, Pellock SJ, Goldfarb D, et al (2020) Discovering the Microbial Enzymes Driving Drug Toxicity with Activity-Based Protein Profiling. ACS Chem Biol 15:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.9b00788
  40. M. Pache M, R. Pangavhane R (2025) Immunotherapy in Autoimmune Diseases: Current Advances and Future Directions. AJPR 183–191. https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5691.2025.00030
  41. Zimmermann M, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, Goodman AL (2019) Separating host and microbiome contributions to drug pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Science 363: eaat9931. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat9931
  42. Cheng X, Wang J, Gong L, et al (2022) Composition of the Gut Microbiota Associated with the Response to Immunotherapy in Advanced Cancer Patients: A Chinese Real-World Pilot Study. JCM 11:5479. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185479
  43. Yan G, Song D, Li JJ (2023) scReadSim: a single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq read simulator. Nat Commun 14:7482. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43162-w
  44. Quek C, Pratapa A, Bai X, et al (2024) Single-cell spatial multiomics reveals tumor microenvironment vulnerabilities in cancer resistance to immunotherapy. Cell Reports 43:114392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114392
  45. Pache M, Nikam S (2025) Antibiotic Resistance: Current Challenges and Future Directions. Int J of Pharm Sci 3:1600–1622. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14690670
  46. Milosavljevi? F, Leucht S (2024) Living systematic review and meta-analysis of plasma-concentrations of antipsychotic drugs in carriers and non-carriers of variant CYP450 genotypes: Living systematic review protocol. F1000Res 13:452. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.147794.2
  47. Pache MM, Pangavhane RR, Nikam SV, et al (2025) CRISPR-Cas9 in Pharmaceutical Research: Applications, Challenges, Ethical Considerations and Future Directions. RJST 296–304. https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5713.2025.00045
  48. Kabbani D, Akika R, Wahid A, et al (2023) Pharmacogenomics in practice: a review and implementation guide. Front Pharmacol 14:1189976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1189976
  49. Relling MV, Klein TE (2011) CPIC: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium of the Pharmacogenomics Research Network. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:464–467. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.279
  50. Gaedigk A, Whirl?Carrillo M, Pratt VM, et al (2020) PharmVar and the Landscape of Pharmacogenetic Resources. Clin Pharma and Therapeutics 107:43–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1654
  51. Pache M, Kedar H, Kond S, Jadhav P (2025) Pharmacological Management of Neurodegenerative Disorders: Current and Future Approaches. Int J Sci R Tech 2:405–520. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15074000
  52. Eisfeldt J, Higginbotham EJ, Lenner F, et al (2024) Resolving complex duplication variants in autism spectrum disorder using long-read genome sequencing. Genome Res 34:1763–1773. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.279263.124
  53. Che G, Yin J, Wang W, et al (2024) Circumventing drug resistance in gastric cancer: A spatial multi-omics exploration of chemo and immuno-therapeutic response dynamics. Drug Resistance Updates 74:101080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2024.101080
  54. Zafari N, Bathaei P, Velayati M, et al (2023) Integrated analysis of multi-omics data for the discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer. Computers in Biology and Medicine 155:106639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106639
  55. Kaur P, Singh A, Chana I (2021) Computational Techniques and Tools for Omics Data Analysis: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Future Directions. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28:4595–4631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09547-0
  56. Levy E, Milani P, Navarro F, et al (2021) 75 Comprehensive profiling of the tumor-immune microenvironment using an augmented transcriptome. J Immunother Cancer 9: A83–A83. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-SITC2021.075
  57. Ruiz-Perez D, Lugo-Martinez J, Bourguignon N, et al (2021) Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Integrating Multi-omics Time Series Microbiome Data. mSystems 6:10.1128/msystems.01105-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01105-20
  58. Dupras C, Bunnik EM (2021) Toward a Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases. The American Journal of Bioethics 21:46–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1863516
  59. Wiertz S, Boldt J (2022) Evaluating models of consent in changing health research environments. Med Health Care and Philos 25:269–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10074-3
  60. Mohr AE, Ortega-Santos CP, Whisner CM, et al (2024) Navigating Challenges and Opportunities in Multi-Omics Integration for Personalized Healthcare. Biomedicines 12:1496. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12071496
  61. Ewald JD, Zhou G, Lu Y, et al (2024) Web-based multi-omics integration using the Analyst software suite. Nat Protoc 19:1467–1497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00950-4
  62. Tong L, Shi W, Isgut M, et al (2024) Integrating Multi-Omics Data With EHR for Precision Medicine Using Advanced Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 17:80–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2023.3324264
  63. Newman NK, Macovsky MS, Rodrigues RR, et al (2024) Transkingdom Network Analysis (TkNA): a systems framework for inferring causal factors underlying host–microbiota and other multi-omic interactions. Nat Protoc 19:1750–1778. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-00960-w
  64. Yang G, Mishra M, Perera MA (2023) Multi?Omics Studies in Historically Excluded Populations: The Road to Equity. Clin Pharma and Therapeutics 113:541–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2818.

Photo
Gargi Bachhav
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmacology, K. V. N. Naik S. P. Sanstha’s, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Canada Corner, Nashik, 422002, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Samruddhi Avhad
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, K. V. N. Naik S. P. Sanstha’s, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Canada Corner, Nashik, 422002, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Janhavi Bhalerao
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, K. V. N. Naik S. P. Sanstha’s, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Canada Corner, Nashik, 422002, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Mukund Pache
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, K. V. N. Naik S. P. Sanstha’s, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Canada Corner, Nashik, 422002, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Akshat Bhamare
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, K. V. N. Naik S. P. Sanstha’s, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Canada Corner, Nashik, 422002, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Sakshi Ahirrao
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, K. V. N. Naik S. P. Sanstha’s, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Canada Corner, Nashik, 422002, Maharashtra, India

Gargi Bachhav*, Akshat Bhamare, Sakshi Ahirrao, Samruddhi Avhad, Janhavi Bhalerao, Mukund Pache, Mapping Drug Responses Through Multi-Omics: A New Era of Bioinformatics in Precision Medicine, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (8), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16914606

More related articles
Assessment of Phthalate Esters in the Sediment of ...
Adedosu Haleema Omolola, Ayodele Esther Ibironke , Ayoola Paul Ba...
Olaparib: A Magic Bullet in the Treatment of Ovari...
Bhagyashri Randhawan, Javane Nalini, Chaudhari Gauri, Damale Anja...
A Review on Thuja Plant Species...
Sakshi Shejwal , Vrushali Baisane , Pritam Sawant, Sanika Chavan...
Related Articles
Optimizing Oral Contraceptives: Role of Immediate Release Formulations in Reprod...
Shivshankar Nagrik, Ashwini Verulkar , Aishwarya Ade , Rutuja Gaikwad , Mayuri Shelke , Khushbu Aktu...
Biodegradable Polymers in Formulation...
Borse Komal, Deore Ruchika, Pagar Sarla, Nikam Sakshi, Dode Raj, Bairagi Vinod, ...
Assessment of Phthalate Esters in the Sediment of OBA River and the Associated E...
Adedosu Haleema Omolola, Ayodele Esther Ibironke , Ayoola Paul Babatunde , Akinleye Haleemat Adeboyi...
More related articles
Assessment of Phthalate Esters in the Sediment of OBA River and the Associated E...
Adedosu Haleema Omolola, Ayodele Esther Ibironke , Ayoola Paul Babatunde , Akinleye Haleemat Adeboyi...
Olaparib: A Magic Bullet in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer...
Bhagyashri Randhawan, Javane Nalini, Chaudhari Gauri, Damale Anjali, Munot Navinya, Mule Gayatri, Bh...
A Review on Thuja Plant Species...
Sakshi Shejwal , Vrushali Baisane , Pritam Sawant, Sanika Chavan, Priya Salunke, ...
Assessment of Phthalate Esters in the Sediment of OBA River and the Associated E...
Adedosu Haleema Omolola, Ayodele Esther Ibironke , Ayoola Paul Babatunde , Akinleye Haleemat Adeboyi...
Olaparib: A Magic Bullet in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer...
Bhagyashri Randhawan, Javane Nalini, Chaudhari Gauri, Damale Anjali, Munot Navinya, Mule Gayatri, Bh...
A Review on Thuja Plant Species...
Sakshi Shejwal , Vrushali Baisane , Pritam Sawant, Sanika Chavan, Priya Salunke, ...