View Article

  • Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery; Mechanism and Multi-Route Application: A Comprehensive Review

  • K. V. N. Naik S. P. Sanstha's, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Nashik, 422 002, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems (SRDDS), which provide regulated, accurate, and adaptive drug release in response to particular internal or external stimuli, have become a revolutionary platform in contemporary therapies. Passive diffusion, low site specificity, systemic toxicity, and uneven patient adherence are common problems with traditional delivery methods. By taking use of diseased microenvironmental characteristics including acidic pH, increased enzyme activity, hypoxia, and redox imbalances in addition to externally applied stimuli like light, magnetic fields, ultrasound, and electrical impulses, SRDDS overcomes these constraints. The development of complex carriers? hydrogels, nanoparticles, micelles, dendrimers, and metal-organic frameworks that experience physicochemical changes like swelling, contraction, phase transitions, or cleavage of labile chemical bonds to achieve triggered release has been made possible by developments in polymer science. These processes lower off-target exposure and greatly improve treatment accuracy. Clinical translation is still hampered by issues with biocompatibility, early drug leakage, immune recognition, and scalability despite significant advancements. Furthermore, there is still a lack of consolidated knowledge regarding the optimisation of SRDDS for various administration routes, each of which presents distinct physiological opportunities and barriers. This study summarises current developments in SRDDS, categorises stimuli and their release mechanisms, assesses polymeric materials utilised in the creation of smart carriers, and addresses the systems' suitability for oral, ocular, transdermal, nasal, pulmonary, and parenteral routes. Emerging directions, existing limitations, and future prospects are highlighted to support the advancement of next-generation intelligent drug delivery technologies.

Keywords

Stimuli-responsive polymers; Smart drug delivery systems; Controlled release; pH-responsive carriers; Redox-sensitive nanoparticles; Thermo-responsive polymers; Targeted drug delivery

Introduction

Recently, the domain of drug delivery has undergone significant transformations, evolving from traditional dosage forms to cutting-edge “smart” systems that enable precise control over timing and location for therapeutic release. Standard formulations such as tablets, injections, or transdermal patches primarily rely on passive release methods and often face considerable challenges, including non-specific distribution throughout the body, insufficient concentrations at the desired target site, increased systemic side effects, and reduced compliance from patients [1]. To tackle these challenges, stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems (SRDDS) have been developed as an encouraging type of nanocarrier that modulates drug release in reaction to internal (endogenous) or external (exogenous) stimuli. Diseased tissues often exhibit unique changes in their microenvironment, such as acidic pH levels in tumours or inflamed areas, elevated enzyme activity, hypoxia, redox imbalances, and varying temperatures. By capitalising on these signals, SRDDS can maintain stability while circulating in the body and deliver their payload specifically at the target site, enhancing therapeutic precision and minimising off-target side effects [2]. Moreover, external factors such as light, magnetic fields, ultrasound, and electric fields offer an extra layer of precision, enabling on-demand control over drug release that can be activated by either a clinician or a patient with high spatial and temporal accuracy. Advanced materials such as polymers, hydrogels, liposomes, dendrimers, and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been researched extensively for the creation of these sophisticated systems [3]. Recent studies have revealed multifunctional stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems (SRDDS) that can simultaneously react to multiple stimuli such as pH alongside redox or temperature combined with enzyme levels, providing synergistic control for managing complex illnesses like cancer and diabetes. For example, researchers are creating peptide-based and ionic-liquid polymer hybrid hydrogels designed for the co-delivery of anticancer medications and imaging agents, aiming to enhance both therapeutic outcomes and diagnostic results [4]. Although there have been notable advancements, several challenges, including the biocompatibility of carriers, stability, recognition by the immune system, premature drug release, and the potential for large-scale manufacturing, still impede their clinical usage. Furthermore, while numerous reviews have analysed the mechanisms of stimuli responsiveness, fewer have focused on how stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems (SRDDS) can be successfully adapted for administration via various routes (oral, ocular, transdermal, nasal, pulmonary, and parenteral), with each path presenting distinct physiological hurdles and possibilities [5]. Thus, this review aims to (i) classify different stimuli and their associated drug release mechanisms, (ii) explore the development and effectiveness of SRDDS for various administration pathways, and (iii) highlight emerging trends, challenges, and future prospects in the field of stimuli-responsive and multi-route drug delivery systems.

  1. Classification of Stimuli:

Stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems have either endogenous (internal) triggers, those inherent to tissue or cellular environments, or exogenous (external) triggers applied from outside the body. These stimuli dictate carrier behaviour (swelling, degradation, link-cleavage, conformational change) and thereby the controlled release of therapeutic agents.

Reference

  1. Adepu S, Ramakrishna S. Controlled Drug Delivery Systems: Current Status and Future Directions. Curr Pharm Des. 2021;27(39):4334-56.
  2. Li L, Jiang W, Qiu S. Nanomaterials in stimulus-responsive drug delivery systems facilitate precise therapy for haematologic diseases. J Mater Chem B. 2025 Jun 11. Doi:10.1039/d5tb00807g.
  3. Liu D, et al. The Smart Drug Delivery System and Its Clinical Potential. Theranostics. 2016;6(9):1306-1323.
  4. Das S, Ha DH, Lee ES, Park SY. Rational Design of Peptide-Based Smart Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Nov 15; 9:760569. Doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.760569
  5. Hua S. Current Trends and Challenges in the Clinical Translation of Nanoparticle-Based Nanomedicines—Critical Overview. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Jul 16; 9:744. Doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00744
  6. Zhuo, S.; Zhang, F.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, G.; Liu, X. pH-Sensitive Biomaterials for Drug Delivery. Molecules 2020, 25, 5649.
  7. Rai, G.; Yadav, A.K.; Jain, N.K.; Agrawal, G.P. Eudragit-coated dextran microspheres of 5-fluorouracil for site-specific delivery to colon. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 328–337.
  8. Deirram, N.; Zhang, C.; Kermaniyan, S.S.; Johnston, A.P.R.; Such, G.K. pH-Responsive Polymer Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, 1800917. 
  9. Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Peng, Y.; Ding, J.; Zhou, W. A Smart pH-Sensitive Delivery System for Enhanced Anticancer Efficacy via Paclitaxel Endosomal Escape. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 10.
  10. Shahriari, M.; Zahiri, M.; Abnous, K.; Taghdisi, S.M.; Ramezani, M.; Alibolandi, M. Enzyme responsive drug delivery systems in cancer treatment. J. Control. Release 2019, 308, 172–189
  11. De La Rica R, Aili D, Stevens MM. Enzyme-responsive nanoparticles for drug release and diagnostics. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2012; 64:967-78
  12. Monteiro, P.F.; Travanut, A.; Conte, C.; Alexander, C. Reduction-responsive polymers for drug delivery in cancer therapy—Is there anything new to discover? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnology 2021, 13, e1678
  13. Ghule RJ, Jadhav PN, Sanap YN, Pache MM, Darekar AB. Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles in chemotherapy resistance: molecular pathways, clinical implications and therapeutic opportunities. Asian J Res Pharm Sci. 2023;15(4):371-380.
  14. Jain, K.; Vedarajan, R.; Watanabe, M.; Ishikiriyama, M.; Matsumi, N. Tunable LCST behavior of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide/ionic liquid) copolymers. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 6819–6825
  15. Zhou T, Li Y, Zhou J, et al. All-In-One Second Near-Infrared Light-Responsive Drug Delivery System for Synergistic Chemo-Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022 Jul 10;14(27):31188-31202. Doi:10.1021/acsami.2c06452
  16. Ortner V, Kaspar C, Halter C, et al. Magnetic “eld-controlled gene Expression in encapsulated cells. J Control Release 2012; 158: 424-32
  17. Cattaneo, M., Guerriero, G., Shakya, G. et al. Cyclic jetting enables microbubble-mediated drug delivery. Nat. Phys. 21, 590–598 (2025).
  18. Rahim MA, Jan N, Khan S, Shah H, Madni A, Khan A, Jabar A, Khan S, Elhissi A, Hussain Z, et al. Recent Advancements in Stimuli Responsive Drug Delivery Platforms for Active and Passive Cancer Targeting. Cancers. 2021; 13(4):670.
  19. López Ruiz A, Ramirez A, McEnnis K. Single and Multiple Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Particles for Controlled Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(2):421.
  20. Balcerak-Wo?niak A, Dzwonkowska-Zarzycka M, Kabatc-Borcz J. A Comprehensive Review of Stimuli-Responsive Smart Polymer Materials—Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Materials. 2024; 17(17):4255
  21. Purohit, A.; Jain, S.; Nema, P.; Vishwakarma, H.; Jain, P.K. Intelligent or smart polymers: Advance in novel drug delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2022, 12, 208–216.
  22. Li, W.; Li, M.; Qi, J. Nano-Drug Design Based on the Physiological Properties of Glutathione. Molecules 2021, 26, 5567.
  23. Smith, C.V.; Jones, D.P.; Guenthner, T.M.; Lash, L.H.; Lauterburg, B.H. Compartmentation of Glutathione: Implications for the Study of Toxicity and Disease. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1996, 140, 1–12.
  24. Sun, H.; Guo, B.; Li, X.; Cheng, R.; Meng, F.; Liu, H.; Meng, F.; Zhong, Z. Shell-Sheddable Micelles Based on Dextran-SS-Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Diblock Copolymer for Efficient Intracellular Release of Doxorubicin. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 848–854.
  25. Shu, X. A review of thermoresponsive drug delivery systems based on LCST/UCST polymer nanofibers. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2539, 012032
  26. Garcia, J.M.; Garcia, F.C.; Vallejos, S.; Trigo, M.; Reglero, J.A. Smart Polymers: Principles and Applications, 1st ed.; De Gruyter: Sotogrande, Spain, 2022.
  27. Khizar, S.; Zine, N.; Errachid, A.; Elaissari, A. Introduction to stimuli-responsive materials and their biomedical applications. In Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Biomedical Applications; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2023; Volume 1436, pp. 1–30.
  28. Manouras, T.; Vamvakaki, M. Field responsive materials: Photo-, electro-, magnetic-and ultrasound-sensitive polymers. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 74–96
  29. Purohit, A.; Jain, S.; Nema, P.; Vishwakarma, H.; Jain, P.K. Intelligent or smart polymers: Advance in novel drug delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2022, 12, 208–216.
  30. Kanaan, A.F.; Piedade, A.P. Electro-responsive polymer-based platforms for electrostimulation of cells. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 2337–2353
  31. Friesen S, Radulescu A, Wycisk P, Richtering W. Modified Flory–Rehner theory describes thermotropic volume phase transitions in copolymer microgels. Macromolecules. 2022 May 12;55(9):3455-3465. PMID: 35587318
  32. Safari JB, Bapolisi AM, Krause RWM. Development of pH-Sensitive Chitosan-g-poly (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) Hydrogel for Controlled Drug Delivery of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate. Polymers. 2021; 13(20):3571
  33. Ansari MJ, Rajendran RR, Mohanto S, Agarwal U, Panda K, Dhotre K, Manne R, Deepak A, Zafar A, Yasir M, et al. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-Based Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: A Review of the State-of-the-Art. Gels. 2022; 8(7):454.
  34. Yoshida, Y., Takahashi, A., Kuzuya, A. et al. Instant preparation of a biodegradable injectable polymer formulation exhibiting a temperature-responsive sol–gel transition. Polym J 46, 632–635 (2014).
  35. Dutta, K., Das, R., Ling, J., Monibas, R. M., Carballo-Jane, E., Kekec, A., ... & Liang, Y. (2020). In situ forming injectable thermoresponsive hydrogels for controlled delivery of biomacromolecules. ACS omega, 5(28), 17531-17542.
  36. Wells CM, Harris M, Choi L, Murali VP, Guerra FD, Jennings JA. Stimuli-Responsive Drug Release from Smart Polymers. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2019; 10(3):34.
  37. Parshad, B., Arora, S., Singh, B. et al. Towards precision medicine using biochemically triggered cleavable conjugation. Commun Chem 8, 100 (2025)
  38. Birhan YS, Darge HF, Hanurry EY, Andrgie AT, Mekonnen TW, Chou H-Y, Lai J-Y, Tsai H-C. Fabrication of Core Crosslinked Polymeric Micelles as Nanocarriers for Doxorubicin Delivery: Self-Assembly, In Situ Diselenide Metathesis and Redox-Responsive Drug Release. Pharmaceutics. 2020; 12(6):580
  39. Fu, Y., & Kao, W. J. (2010). Drug release kinetics and transport mechanisms of non-degradable and degradable polymeric delivery systems. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 7(4), 429–444.
  40. Amidon, S., Brown, J.E. & Dave, V.S. Colon-Targeted Oral Drug Delivery Systems: Design Trends and Approaches. AAPS PharmSciTech 16, 731–741 (2015).
  41. Zhao, J., Xu, G., Yao, X. et al. Microneedle-based insulin transdermal delivery system: current status and translation challenges. Drug Deliv. And Transl. Res. 12, 2403–2427 (2022).
  42. Abbas MN, Khan SA, Sadozai SK, Khalil IA, Anter A, Fouly ME, Osman AH, Kazi M. Nanoparticles Loaded Thermoresponsive In Situ Gel for Ocular Antibiotic Delivery against Bacterial Keratitis. Polymers. 2022; 14(6):1135.
  43. Qian L, et al. In situ gels for nasal delivery: formulation, characterization and bioavailability studies. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2025; 325:103101.
  44. Mohit Kumar, Ayah R. Hilles, Samah Hamed Almurisi, Amit Bhatia, Syed Mahmood, Micro and nano-carriers-based pulmonary drug delivery system: Their current updates, challenges, and limitations a review, JCIS Open, Volume 12,2023,100095.
  45. Tulain UR, Ahmad M, Rashid A, Malik MZ, Iqbal FM. Fabrication of Ph?responsive hydrogel and its in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Advances in Polymer Technology. 2018 Feb;37(1):290-304.
  46. Subramanian DA, Langer R, Traverso G. Mucus interaction to improve gastrointestinal retention and pharmacokinetics of orally administered nano-drug delivery systems. Journal of nanobiotechnology. 2022 Aug 6;20(1):362
  47. Keleb E, Sharma RK, Mosa EB, Aljahwi A-AZ. Transdermal Drug Delivery System – Design and Evaluation. International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010; 1:201-211.
  48. Rhaghuram RK, Muttalik S, Reddy S. Once – daily sustained-Release matrix tablets of nicorandil: formulation and invitro Evaluation. AAPS Pharm.SciTech. 2003; 4(4):480–488
  49. Singh M, Bharadwaj S, Lee KE, Kang SG. Therapeutic nanoe-mulsions in ophthalmic drug administration: concept in formu-lations and characterization techniques for ocular drug delivery. J Control Release. 2020; 328:895-916.
  50. Ahmed, S., Amin, M.M. & Sayed, S. Ocular Drug Delivery: a Comprehensive Review. AAPS Pharm SciTech 24, 66 (2023)
  51. Chand P, Gnanarajan G, Kothiyal P. In situ gel: A Review. Indian J Pharm Biol Res (IJPBR). 2016;4(2):11–9
  52. Xie H, Li L, Sun Y, Wang Y, Gao S, Tian Y, et al. An available Strategy for nasal brain transport of nanocomposite based on PAMAM dendrimers via in situ gel. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(2)
  53. Magramane S, Pápay Z, Turbucz B, Antal I. Formulation and characterization of pulmonary drug delivery systems. Acta Pharmaceutical Hungarica. 2019 Aug 1;89(2):63-83.
  54. Fernández-García R, Fraguas-Sánchez AI. Nanomedicines for Pulmonary Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers in the Treatment of Respiratory Infections and Lung Cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(12):1584.

Photo
Ajinkya Kure
Corresponding author

K. V. N. Naik S. P. Sanstha's, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Nashik, 422 002, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Aishwarya Jadhav
Co-author

K. V. N. Naik S. P. Sanstha's, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Nashik, 422 002, Maharashtra, India

Ajinkya Kure*, Aishwarya Jadhav, Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery; Mechanism and Multi-Route Application: A Comprehensive Review, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (12), 272-283. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17980253

More related articles
Systematic EMI Optimization for Compact Wi-Fi Rela...
Rakotomalala Harifetranirina, Pr. Randriamaroson Rivo Mahandrisoa...
Review on Formulation and Preparation of Treatment...
Vishal Dnyaneshwar Nagre, Vishal Sanjay Nagre , Dr. Kailas Rathod...
Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems for ...
Dr. Devinder Maheshwari, Ankit Kumar, ...
Related Articles
Review on Rhizomatous Aromatic Herb – Curcuma Amada...
kavita sharma, Dhanashri Bhoi, Archana Andhale , Sayema beg, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Mouthwash Containing Areca Nut, Betel Leaf ...
Ratika Naik, Udaykumar Bolmal, Sahana Khavakatoppa, Aman Yadav, Vidya Morya, Pratibha Rhatole, Shrut...
Impact of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Postural Stability in Postmenopausal W...
Jeevan Kore, Harshal Chavan, Virashree Awati, Akshata Pawar, Kajal Avatade, Vaishnavi Chopade, ...
Systematic EMI Optimization for Compact Wi-Fi Relay Modules: A Gate-Based Method...
Rakotomalala Harifetranirina, Pr. Randriamaroson Rivo Mahandrisoa, ...
More related articles
Systematic EMI Optimization for Compact Wi-Fi Relay Modules: A Gate-Based Method...
Rakotomalala Harifetranirina, Pr. Randriamaroson Rivo Mahandrisoa, ...
Review on Formulation and Preparation of Treatment Asthma Disease Herbal Tablet...
Vishal Dnyaneshwar Nagre, Vishal Sanjay Nagre , Dr. Kailas Rathod , ...
Systematic EMI Optimization for Compact Wi-Fi Relay Modules: A Gate-Based Method...
Rakotomalala Harifetranirina, Pr. Randriamaroson Rivo Mahandrisoa, ...
Review on Formulation and Preparation of Treatment Asthma Disease Herbal Tablet...
Vishal Dnyaneshwar Nagre, Vishal Sanjay Nagre , Dr. Kailas Rathod , ...