View Article

Abstract

Buccal drug delivery has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional drug administration routes due to its ability to enhance bioavailability and provide rapid onset of action. The buccal mucosa, owing to its rich vascularization and relatively permeable nature, enables efficient transmucosal drug absorption while bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism. Among various buccal dosage forms, buccal spray formulations have gained significant attention as an innovative and patient-friendly drug delivery system. These formulations allow precise dosing, ease of administration, and improved patient compliance, particularly in pediatric, geriatric, and dysphagic populations. Recent advancements in formulation strategies, including the incorporation of mucoadhesive polymers, permeation enhancers, and nanocarrier systems, have further enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of buccal sprays. Despite these advantages, challenges such as limited absorption surface area, salivary washout, taste masking, and formulation stability remain critical considerations in product development. Furthermore, the design of appropriate spray devices plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal drug deposition and uniform dosing. This review highlights the anatomical and physiological aspects of the buccal mucosa, principles of buccal drug delivery, formulation components, preparation methods, and evaluation parameters specific to buccal sprays. It also discusses current applications, marketed products, recent innovations, and regulatory perspectives. Overall, buccal spray formulations represent a rapidly evolving drug delivery platform with substantial potential to improve therapeutic outcomes and expand the scope of transmucosal drug delivery in modern medicine.

Keywords

Buccal spray, transmucosal delivery, mucoadhesion, rapid onset, bioavailability, novel drug delivery, oral mucosa

Introduction

The development of efficient drug delivery systems has become a fundamental aspect of modern pharmaceutical research, aiming to optimize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. Conventional routes of drug administration, particularly oral delivery, remain the most widely utilized due to their convenience and patient acceptance. However, oral drug delivery is often associated with several limitations, including variable gastrointestinal absorption, enzymatic degradation, and extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism, which significantly reduce the bioavailability of many therapeutic agents [1]. These challenges have prompted the exploration of alternative delivery routes, among which transmucosal drug delivery has gained considerable attention. Transmucosal routes, including buccal, sublingual, nasal, and rectal pathways, offer distinct advantages by enabling direct drug absorption into the systemic circulation, thereby bypassing hepatic metabolism and providing rapid onset of action [2]. Among these, the buccal route has emerged as a particularly promising approach due to its accessibility, relatively large surface area, and rich vascularization. The buccal mucosa, lining the inner cheek, provides a favorable environment for drug absorption, characterized by a non-keratinized epithelium and moderate permeability that allows both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs to permeate under suitable conditions [3]. Buccal drug delivery systems are designed to facilitate the retention of the drug formulation in the buccal cavity for a sufficient duration, enabling controlled and efficient drug absorption. Various dosage forms, such as buccal tablets, films, gels, and patches, have been developed to exploit this route [4]. In recent years, buccal spray formulations have emerged as an innovative and patient-centric dosage form, offering several advantages over traditional systems. These sprays enable rapid drug administration without the need for water, provide accurate dosing, and ensure uniform drug distribution across the buccal mucosa [5]. The growing interest in buccal sprays is driven by advancements in formulation technologies, including the use of mucoadhesive polymers, permeation enhancers, and nanocarrier systems that improve drug residence time and absorption efficiency [6]. Additionally, the integration of sophisticated spray devices has further enhanced the precision and reproducibility of drug delivery. Buccal sprays are particularly beneficial in clinical conditions requiring rapid therapeutic action, such as pain management, cardiovascular emergencies, and central nervous system disorders [7]. Despite their promising potential, buccal spray formulations face several formulation and physiological challenges, including limited drug loading capacity, salivary dilution, and variability in mucosal permeability. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive understanding of buccal physiology, drug transport mechanisms, and formulation design principles [8]. Therefore, this review aims to provide a detailed overview of innovative buccal spray formulations, focusing on their design, development, evaluation, and therapeutic applications, along with recent advancements and future perspectives in this rapidly evolving field.

Reference

  1. Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 1998;1(1):15–30.
  2. Rathbone MJ, Hadgraft J, Roberts MS. Modified-release drug delivery technology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003.
  3. Squier CA, Wertz PW. Structure and function of the oral mucosa and implications for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1996;12(2-3):1–26.
  4. Khairnar GA, Sayyad FJ. Buccal drug delivery system: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2010;1(6):1–9.
  5. Boateng JS, Ayensu I. Buccal drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101(6):1–20.
  6. Patel VF, Liu F, Brown MB. Advances in oral transmucosal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2011;153(2):106–116.
  7. Senel S, Hincal AA. Drug permeation enhancement via buccal route: possibilities and limitations. J Control Release. 2001;72(1-3):133–144.
  8. Dixit RP, Puthli SP. Oral strip technology: overview and future potential. J Control Release. 2009;139(2):94–107.
  9. Squier CA. The permeability of oral mucosa. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1991;2(1):13–32.
  10. Wertz PW, Squier CA. Cellular and molecular basis of barrier function in oral epithelium. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1991;8(3):237–269.
  11. Harris D, Robinson JR. Drug delivery via the mucous membranes of the oral cavity. J Pharm Sci. 1992;81(1):1–10.
  12. Hoogstraate JA, Wertz PW. Drug delivery via the buccal mucosa. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 1998;1(7):309–316.
  13. Edgar WM. Saliva: its secretion, composition and functions. Br Dent J. 1992;172(8):305–312.
  14. Veuillez F, Kalia YN, Jacques Y. Factors influencing buccal absorption. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2001;51(2):93–109.
  15. Rathbone MJ, Drummond BK, Tucker IG. Oral cavity as a site for systemic drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1994;13(1-2):1–22.
  16. Senel S. Buccal drug delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9(6):1–12.
  17. Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;71(3):505–518.
  18. Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 1998;1(1):15–30.
  19. Smart JD. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1556–1568.
  20. Semalty A, Semalty M. Buccal drug delivery system: current trends. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011;3(3):1–8.
  21. Repka MA, Gutta K. Buccal drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2012;38(3):1–15.
  22. Gavini E, Hegge AB. Buccal spray technology: formulation and evaluation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;27(1):1–9.
  23. Bernkop-Schnürch A. Thiomers: a new generation of mucoadhesive polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1569–1582.
  24. Bhalodia R, Basu B. Spray drug delivery systems: recent trends. Int J Pharm Sci. 2013;5(2):1–10.
  25. Andrews GP. Mucoadhesion in drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2009;1(1):1–15.
  26. Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 1998;1(1):15–30.
  27. Darwish M, Kirby M. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal formulations. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46(9):1–10.
  28. Patel VF. Advances in oral transmucosal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2011;153(2):106–116.
  29. Senel S. Buccal drug delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9(6):1–12.
  30. Repka MA. Buccal delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2012;38(3):1–15.
  31. Andrews GP. Mucoadhesive polymers in drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;71(3):505–518.
  32. Hoogstraate JA. Buccal drug delivery. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 1998;1(7):309–316.
  33. Smart JD. Mucoadhesion fundamentals. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1556–1568.
  34. Veuillez F. Buccal absorption limitations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2001;51(2):93–109.
  35. Edgar WM. Salivary influence on drug delivery. Br Dent J. 1992;172(8):305–312.
  36. Dixit RP. Taste masking technologies. J Control Release. 2009;139(2):94–107.
  37. Harris D. Oral mucosal variability. J Pharm Sci. 1992;81(1):1–10.
  38. Rathbone MJ. Stability of transmucosal systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1994;13(1-2):1–22.
  39. Senel S. Dose limitations in buccal delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9(6):1–12.
  40. Bernkop-Schnürch A. Mucoadhesive polymers safety. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1569–1582.
  41. Gavini E. Spray system evaluation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;27(1):1–9.
  42. Patel VF. Buccal formulation components. J Control Release. 2011;153(2):106–116.
  43. Shojaei AH. Drug selection for buccal delivery. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 1998;1(1):15–30.
  44. Repka MA. Solvent systems in buccal delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2012;38(3):1–15.
  45. Andrews GP. Mucoadhesive excipients. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;71(3):505–518.
  46. Senel S. Permeation enhancers. J Control Release. 2001;72(1-3):133–144.
  47. Dixit RP. Taste masking approaches. J Control Release. 2009;139(2):94–107.
  48. Rathbone MJ. Preservatives in oral systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1994;13(1-2):1–22.
  49. Bhalodia R. Spray formulation components. Int J Pharm Sci. 2013;5(2):1–10.
  50. Patel VF, Liu F, Brown MB. Advances in oral transmucosal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2011;153(2):106–116.
  51. Date AA, Hanes J, Ensign LM. Nanoparticles for oral delivery: design and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016; 91:1–12.
  52. Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;71(3):505–518.
  53. Siepmann J, Siepmann F. Mathematical modeling of drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2008;364(2):328–343.
  54. Peppas NA, Buri PA. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion. J Control Release. 1985;2(4):257–275.
  55. Sinko PJ. Martin’s physical pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  56. Hickey AJ. Pharmaceutical inhalation aerosol technology. 2nd ed. New York: CRC Press; 2004.
  57. Aulton ME, Taylor K. Aulton’s pharmaceutics: the design and manufacture of medicines. 4th ed. London: Elsevier; 2013.
  58. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. 6th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2009.
  59. Lieberman HA, Lachman L. Pharmaceutical dosage forms: dispersed systems. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996.
  60. Florence AT, Attwood D. Physicochemical principles of pharmacy. 5th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2011.
  61. Allen LV. Pharmaceutical calculations. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  62. Banker GS, Rhodes CT. Modern pharmaceutics. 4th ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002.
  63. Carstensen JT. Pharmaceutical principles of solid dosage forms. Lancaster: Technomic Publishing; 1993.
  64. ICH. Q1A(R2): Stability testing of new drug substances and products. Geneva: ICH; 2003.
  65. United States Pharmacopeia (USP 43–NF 38). Rockville: USP Convention; 2020.
  66. European Pharmacopoeia. 10th ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 2020.
  67. FDA. Guidance for industry: nasal spray and inhalation solution. Silver Spring: US FDA; 2002.
  68. ICH. Q6A: Specifications for new drug substances. Geneva: ICH; 1999.
  69. Franz TJ. Percutaneous absorption studies. J Invest Dermatol. 1975;64(3):190–195.
  70. Smart JD. Drug delivery using buccal-adhesive systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1556–1568.
  71. ICH. Q1B: Photostability testing. Geneva: ICH; 1996.
  72. WHO. Guidelines on pharmaceutical microbiology. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
  73. Rathbone MJ. Oral mucosal drug delivery. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996.
  74. Darwish M, Kirby M. Fentanyl buccal formulations. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46(9):1–10.
  75. Mahmood I. Clinical pharmacokinetics of hormones. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36(6):1–15.
  76. Abrams J. Nitroglycerin in angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70(10):1–7.
  77. Patsalos PN. Antiepileptic drug pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(11):1–18.
  78. Benowitz NL. Nicotine replacement therapy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(7):1–7.
  79. Kyd JM, Cripps AW. Mucosal vaccine delivery. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008;7(4):1–10.
  80. Sweetman SC. Martindale: the complete drug reference. 36th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2009.
  81. FDA. Fentanyl buccal spray label. Silver Spring: US FDA; 2012.
  82. EMA. Nitroglycerin spray product information. London: EMA; 2010.
  83. WHO. Tobacco cessation guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
  84. FDA. Testosterone buccal system. Silver Spring: US FDA; 2011.
  85. Samaranayake LP. Oral microbiology. 4th ed. London: Elsevier; 2012.
  86. IMS Health. Global pharmaceutical market report. 2015.
  87. Torchilin VP. Nanoparticulate drug delivery systems. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(2):145–160.
  88. Zhang L, Pornpattananangkul D, Hu CMJ. Nanoparticles in medicine. ACS Nano. 2010;4(7):1–12.
  89. Qiu Y, Park K. Environment-sensitive hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012; 64:49–60.
  90. Bernkop-Schnürch A. Thiolated polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1569–1582.
  91. Hamburg MA, Collins FS. Personalized medicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(4):301–304.
  92. Dolovich MB, Dhand R. Aerosol drug delivery devices. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):1032–1045.
  93. Leader B, Baca QJ. Protein therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(1):21–39.
  94. FDA. Guidance for industry: oral transmucosal products. Silver Spring: US FDA; 2015.
  95. ICH. Q7: Good manufacturing practice guide. Geneva: ICH; 2000.
  96. OECD. Toxicological evaluation guidelines. Paris: OECD; 2008.
  97. EMA. Bioavailability and bioequivalence guideline. London: EMA; 2010.
  98. ISO. Medical device standards ISO 10993. Geneva: ISO; 2009.
  99. ICH. Q1C: Stability testing for new dosage forms. Geneva: ICH; 1996.
  100. FDA. Labeling requirements for drug products. Silver Spring: US FDA; 2013.
  101. Langer R. Drug delivery and targeting. Nature. 1998; 392:5–10.
  102. Patra JK, Das G, Fraceto LF. Nano based drug delivery systems. J Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16(1):71.
  103. Stuart MAC, Huck WTS. Stimuli-responsive polymers. Nat Mater. 2010;9(2):101–113.
  104. Ventola CL. Mobile health technologies. P T. 2014;39(5):356–364.
  105. Peppas NA, Huang Y. Hydrogels in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2000; 50:27–46.
  106. Hickey AJ. Inhalation aerosols. Pharm Res. 2008;25(3):559–564.
  107. Woodcock J. FDA drug innovation perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(3):420–424.
  108. Jain KK. Drug delivery systems. Methods Mol Biol. 2008; 437:1–50.

Photo
Pranali Jadhav
Corresponding author

Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India

Photo
Vikram Garale
Co-author

Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India

Photo
Adesh Ghanwat
Co-author

Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India

Photo
Vaibhav Gunjvate
Co-author

Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India

Photo
Sushma Garud
Co-author

Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India

Photo
Bhagyesh Janugade
Co-author

Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India

Pranali Jadhav*, Vikram Garale, Adesh Ghanwat, Vaibhav Gunjvate, Sushma Garud, Bhagyesh Janugade, A Comprehensive Review on Design, Development, And Evaluation of Buccal Spray Drug Delivery Systems, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (4), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19393782

More related articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Rubia Cardifolia L. ...
Rajashree Ahire, Dr. Pallavi Chaudhari, Sagar Daitkar, ...
The Needle Era...
Muskan Harit , Soni Srivastava, ...
Edge Detection Using Fuzzy C-Means: A Comparative ...
S. K. Srimonishaa, Dr. Muthukumar P., ...
Marine Pharmacognosy...
E. Naga Deepthi, K. Sujatha, ...
Nutritional and Functional Properties of Tamarind (Tamarindus Indica) Leaves: A ...
Prachi Lokhande, Aman Paigambar Mujawar , Ayeshabano Fahim Hawaldar, Afrin Abdul Shaikh , ...
More related articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Rubia Cardifolia L. And Ocimum Sanctum L. Wound He...
Rajashree Ahire, Dr. Pallavi Chaudhari, Sagar Daitkar, ...
The Needle Era...
Muskan Harit , Soni Srivastava, ...
Edge Detection Using Fuzzy C-Means: A Comparative Study...
S. K. Srimonishaa, Dr. Muthukumar P., ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Rubia Cardifolia L. And Ocimum Sanctum L. Wound He...
Rajashree Ahire, Dr. Pallavi Chaudhari, Sagar Daitkar, ...
The Needle Era...
Muskan Harit , Soni Srivastava, ...
Edge Detection Using Fuzzy C-Means: A Comparative Study...
S. K. Srimonishaa, Dr. Muthukumar P., ...