View Article

  • Formulation and Evaluation of Rubia Cardifolia L. And Ocimum Sanctum L. Wound Healing Emulgel

  • 1Dr. D. Y. Patil Educational Complex, Sector 29, Nigdi Pradhikaran, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India -411044
    2Department of Pharmacology, Sandip University, Nashik, Maharashtra, India -411044
     

Abstract

The present research focuses on the formulation and evaluation of an herbal wound-healing emulgel containing Rubia cardifolia L. (Manjishtha) and Ocimum sanctum L. (Tulsi) extracts. The study aimed to develop a stable, non-greasy, and effective topical delivery system that promotes wound repair by combining the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties of both plant extracts. The emulgel was formulated using Carbopol 940 as a gelling agent, Tween 80 and Span 20 as emulsifiers, and propylene glycol and liquid paraffin as solvents. Preformulation studies, including UV and FTIR analyses, confirmed compatibility between the extracts and excipients. Thirteen formulations (F1–F13) were prepared and evaluated for physicochemical parameters such as pH, viscosity, spreadability, drug content, and stability. The pH values ranged from 4.04 ± 0.15 to 6.60 ± 0.21, indicating skin compatibility. The viscosity varied between 1578 ± 0.06 cP and 2152 ± 0.3 cP, while the formulations exhibited excellent homogeneity without phase separation. In vitro drug release studies revealed sustained release profiles, with maximum drug diffusion of Ocimum sanctum and Rubia cardifolia observed at 93.67% and 94.63%, respectively, after 6 hours. Antimicrobial testing using the well diffusion method against E. coli showed a mean inhibition zone of 10.43 mm, confirming significant antibacterial potential. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) demonstrated the model’s reliability, with R² = 0.9970. Overall, the optimized emulgel exhibited desirable physicochemical and biological properties, supporting its potential as a natural wound-healing agent with improved therapeutic efficacy and patient compliance.

Keywords

Rubia cardifolia, Ocimum sanctum, Emulgel, Wound healing, Herbal formulation

Introduction

Modern medicine has achieved remarkable progress; however, several diseases and disorders still lack effective therapies. Since ancient times, medicinal plants have played a crucial role in human health management. They provide a rich source of bioactive compounds such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, tannins, terpenoids, and alkaloids that possess antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties, contributing to wound healing and tissue repair [1]. Traditional medicine systems like Ayurveda and Siddha have long used herbal formulations for treating wounds, skin ailments, and infections. The increasing resistance of pathogens to synthetic drugs and the side effects of modern therapeutics have renewed global interest in herbal-based medicines [2]. A wound is defined as a disruption of the normal structure and function of skin tissue caused by physical, chemical, thermal, microbial, or immunological injury [3]. Wounds are broadly classified as open or closed based on tissue damage, and as acute or chronic based on the healing process [4]. Acute wounds, such as surgical cuts, heal within a predictable period, whereas chronic wounds, like diabetic ulcers, fail to proceed through the normal phases of healing [5]. The wound healing process involves three overlapping and highly coordinated phases—inflammatory, proliferative (fibroblast), and remodeling. Initially, the inflammatory phase involves vasoconstriction and platelet aggregation to stop bleeding, followed by migration of neutrophils and macrophages to remove debris. The proliferative phase is characterized by fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and angiogenesis. Finally, in the remodeling phase, collagen crosslinking increases the tensile strength of the tissue, leading to scar formation [6,7]. Various factors such as infection, age, diabetes, poor nutrition, and medications (like corticosteroids and NSAIDs) can impair wound healing [8]. Topical drug delivery systems are designed to deliver drugs directly to the affected skin site, offering localized action while minimizing systemic side effects. This route bypasses first-pass metabolism and provides a patient-friendly approach to treating skin infections, wounds, and inflammatory conditions [9,10]. Several dosage forms—ointments, creams, gels, and lotions—are used, but each has limitations. For instance, ointments are greasy, creams may lack stability, and gels alone are unsuitable for hydrophobic drugs [11]. Emulgels, an advanced hybrid system combining the properties of emulsions and gels, have emerged as a superior vehicle for topical delivery. They offer dual advantages—enhanced solubility of lipophilic drugs due to the emulsion phase and improved stability, spreadability, and aesthetic appeal due to the gel matrix [12]. Emulgels are thixotropic, non-greasy, easily spreadable, and washable, with improved bioavailability and controlled drug release [13]. This makes them particularly suitable for incorporating herbal extracts like Rubia cordifolia and Ocimum sanctum, which possess wound healing and antimicrobial activities. Ocimum sanctum (family: Lamiaceae), commonly known as Tulsi or Holy Basil, is an aromatic herb renowned for its therapeutic versatility. The plant contains bioactive constituents such as eugenol, ursolic acid, rosmarinic acid, orientin, and vicenin, which possess antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties [14]. Studies have demonstrated that aqueous extracts of O. sanctum accelerate wound contraction, increase tensile strength, and enhance epithelialization in excision wound models, possibly by modulating cytokines such as TNF-α [15]. The herb is also known to improve local blood circulation and reduce microbial load, facilitating faster tissue regeneration. Rubia cordifolia (family: Rubiaceae), commonly known as Manjishtha or Indian Madder, is a perennial climbing herb traditionally used for treating skin diseases, inflammation, and wounds. The root contains anthraquinones (rubiadin, alizarin, purpurin), mollugin, and triterpenoids, which exhibit potent antioxidant, antibacterial, and collagen-promoting properties [16]. Research indicates that ethanolic root extracts of R. cordifolia significantly enhance wound closure, fibroblast proliferation, and tissue granulation [17]. Its phytochemicals stimulate fibroblast activity and angiogenesis, essential for granulation tissue formation, thereby accelerating wound repair. Conventional wound healing formulations, such as synthetic creams and antibiotics, often cause side effects including pigmentation and delayed healing. The need for biocompatible, non-toxic, and affordable alternatives has driven interest in herbal-based topical preparations [18]. Combining O. sanctum and R. cordifolia in a single formulation is scientifically justified, as their synergistic effects may enhance antimicrobial action, antioxidant defense, and tissue regeneration. However, both extracts are partially hydrophobic, which limits their solubility in simple gel formulations. Incorporating them into an emulgel system allows for uniform dispersion, improved drug release, and enhanced skin permeation [19]. Thus, the formulation of a herbal emulgel containing R. cordifolia and O. sanctum provides a novel and efficient approach for promoting wound healing while maintaining cosmetic acceptability. Emulgels possess multiple advantages, such as easy application, patient compliance, non-greasy texture, controlled drug release, and high stability. They enhance both hydrophilic and lipophilic drug penetration and provide sustained therapeutic action at the wound site [20]. Additionally, the formulation can be easily terminated by washing and avoids systemic side effects associated with oral therapy. The combination of O. sanctum and R. cordifolia in an emulgel base may therefore serve as a promising natural therapeutic option for managing wounds.The present research aims to formulate and evaluate an herbal wound-healing emulgel containing Rubia cordifolia L. and Ocimum sanctum L. extracts. The formulation is expected to exhibit enhanced wound contraction rate, antimicrobial activity, and stability while providing both medicinal and cosmetic benefits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MATERIALS

The present study utilized Rubia cardifolia L. (Manjishtha) and Ocimum sanctum L. (Tulsi) extracts, procured from Amsar Pvt. Ltd., Indore, India. All chemicals and reagents used in the formulation and evaluation were of analytical reagent (AR) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade. The excipients used included Carbopol 940, Tween 80, Span 20, Propylene glycol, Liquid paraffin, Methyl paraben, and Propyl paraben, all sourced from Merck and Analab Fine Chemicals, Mumbai. Karanja oil was used as a natural emollient.

Table no. 2.1. List of excipients and Chemicals with source

Sr. No.

Ingredients

Supplier

1

Ocimum sanctum L. extract

Amsar Pvt. Ltd., Indore

2

Rubia cardifolia L. extract

Amsar Pvt. Ltd., Indore

3

Carbopol 940

Analab Fine Chemicals, Mumbai

4

Karanja oil

Analab Fine Chemicals, Mumbai

5

Tween 80

Analab Fine Chemicals, Mumbai

6

Span 20

Analab Fine Chemicals, Mumbai

7

Propylene glycol

Merck, Mumbai

8

Liquid paraffin

Merck, Mumbai

9

Methyl paraben

Merck, Mumbai

10

Propyl paraben

Merck, Mumbai

All the glassware used were of borosilicate grade. Equipment used included an electronic balance (Shimadzu AX200), UV–Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV1700), pH meter (Equiptronics EQ-614), Brookfield Viscometer (LVDV), Franz diffusion cell (Orchid Scientific, India), FTIR (Shimadzu IRAffinity-1s), and stability chamber (Biomedica BMC-2122)

METHODS

2.2.1 Preformulation Studies

The preformulation studies included organoleptic evaluation, solubility analysis, UV and FTIR spectroscopy, and phytochemical characterization of both extracts to ensure compatibility and stability. UV spectral analysis was performed to determine the maximum absorbance wavelength (λmax) of the extracts, found to be 271 nm for Rubia cardifolia L. and 288 nm for Ocimum sanctum L. FTIR spectra were recorded to identify characteristic functional groups and to confirm the absence of chemical interaction between drug and excipients [30].

2.2.2 Preparation of Emulgel

The emulgel was prepared by the emulsification method followed by gel incorporation, as described by Mohamed and Modi and Patel [31]

Step 1: Preparation of Emulsion Phase

The oil phase consisted of liquid paraffin, Span 20, and the respective plant extracts, while the aqueous phase contained Tween 80, propylene glycol, and methyl paraben. Both phases were heated separately to approximately 70°C and then combined with continuous stirring using a mechanical stirrer (Remi RQ-121/D) until a uniform emulsion was obtained.

Step 2: Preparation of Gel Base

Carbopol 940 was dispersed in distilled water with continuous stirring and allowed to swell overnight. Triethanolamine was added dropwise to neutralize the pH and form a transparent gel base [32].

Step 3: Incorporation of Emulsion into Gel Base

The prepared emulsion was slowly incorporated into the gel base under mechanical stirring to obtain a smooth, homogeneous emulgel. The final formulation was stored in air-tight containers at room temperature

2.3 Evaluation of Emulgel

The prepared formulations were subjected to various physicochemical and biological evaluations to determine their performance, stability, and efficacy [33].

2.3.1 Physical Appearance and Homogeneity

The prepared emulgel was inspected visually for color, consistency, and phase separation. Homogeneity was assessed by simple visual observation.

2.3.2 pH Determination

The pH of the emulgel was measured using a calibrated pH meter (Equiptronics EQ-614). Measurements were performed in triplicate, and the average was reported to ensure skin compatibility.

2.3.3 Viscosity

Viscosity was determined using a Brookfield Viscometer (LVDV) at room temperature using spindle number 64 at 10 rpm. The readings ensured appropriate rheological behavior for topical application [34].

2.3.4 Spreadability

The spreadability of the emulgel was evaluated using a glass slide method, where the time required for two slides to separate under a specific weight was recorded. Spreadability was calculated using the formula:

S=M×LTS = \frac {M \times L} {T}S=TM×L?

where M = weight tied to upper slide, L = length moved, and T = time in seconds.

2.3.5 Drug Content Determination

The drug content was analyzed spectrophotometrically by dissolving 1 g of emulgel in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), followed by suitable dilution and absorbance measurement at respective λmax values [35].

2.3.6 In Vitro Drug Release

The drug release profile was determined using a Franz diffusion cell fitted with an egg membrane. The receptor compartment was filled with phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) maintained at 37 ± 2°C and stirred magnetically. Samples were withdrawn at predetermined intervals, filtered, and analyzed by UV spectrophotometry.

2.3.7 Antimicrobial Activity

The antibacterial activity of the formulated emulgel was determined using the well diffusion method on E. coli using Muller Hinton agar medium. The diameter of the inhibition zone was measured in millimeters and compared with a standard antibiotic (Amikacin) as a positive control. Methanol served as the negative control. The average inhibition zone was found to be 10.43 mm, indicating promising antimicrobial potential [36]

2.3.8 Stability Studies

Stability testing was carried out at 37°C, 45°C, and 60°C for three months in a stability chamber. The formulations were observed for color change, phase separation, viscosity variation, and drug content degradation at intervals of 15 days [37].

2.4 Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate, and data were analyzed using Design of Experiment (DOE) and ANOVA for optimization of formulation parameters. Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation [38].

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Pharmacognostic study of extract

Table No. 3.1: Pharmacognostic study of Ocimum Sanctum L. and Rubia Cardifolia L. extract

Sr.No.

Parameters

Ocimum Sanctum L. exract.

Rubia Cardifolia L. extract

1

Loss on drying

4.23%

3.33%

2

Alcohol soluble extractive

2.11%

1.21%

3

soluble extractive

5.13%

4.83%

4

Total ash

3.12%

2.32%

5

Acid insoluble ash

0.0435%

0.067%

 3.2. Phytochemical tests –

3.2.1. Phytochemical tests of Ocimum Sanctum extract:

Table No.3.2: Phytochemical test of Ocimum Sanctum L.

Sr. No

Phytoconstituents

Test performed

Result

1.

Alkaloids

  1. Dragondroff’s test
  2. Mayer’s test
  3. Hagger’s test
  4. Wagner’s test

-

-

-

-

2.

Glycosides

  1. Borntrager’s test

+

3.

Carbohydrates

  1. Molish test
  2. Benedict’s test

-

4.

Terpenoids

  1. Test for terpenoids

+

5.

coumarins

  1. Test for coumarins

+

6.

Flavonoids Polyphenols

  1. Flavonoids Test

+

(+) =present of constituent, (-) = constituent not present  

The results of preliminary phytochemicals tests are shown in above table. The phytochemicals screening of the extract of Ocimum Sanctum L. Extract indicates the presence of glycosides, Saponins, and terpenoids.

 3.2.2. Phytochemicals test of Rubia Cardifolia extract:

Table No.3.3: Phytochemicals test of Rubia cardifolia L.

Sr.No.

Phytoconstituents

Test performed

Result

1.

Alkaloids

  1. Dragondroff’s test
  2. Mayer’s test
  3. Hagger’s test
  4. Wagner’s test

+

+

+

+

2.

Glycosides

  1. Borntrager’s test

-

3.

Saponins

  1. Froth test
  2. Haemolytic test

-

-

4.

Carbohydrates

  1. Molisch test
  2. Benedict’s test

+

+

5.

Tannins

  1. Gelatin test

+

6.

Proteins

  1. Biuret test

+

7.

Flavonoids

  1. Flavonoids Test

+

(+) = present of constituent, (-) = constituent not present  

The results of preliminary phytochemicals tests are shown in above table. The phytochemicals screening of the extract of indicates the presence of glycosides, Saponins, and carbohydrates. 

Fig no.3.1 phytochemicals test

UV Spectra of Ocimum Sanctum extract – Standard calibration curve of Ocimum Sanctum extract was Drawn by plotting absorbance V/S concentration. Maximum of Ocimum Sanctum was found to be 282nm. The absorbance value is given in table.

Table no. 3.4 UV Absorbance of Ocimum Sanctum L.

Sr.no

Con. (ug/ml)

Absorbance

1

2

0.138

2

4

0.292

3

6

0.412

4

8

0.559

5

10

0.682

6

12

0.792

Fig 3.2 Standard calibration curve of Ocimum sanctum in Water

IR spectrum of Ocimum sanctum:

Fig.3.3 IR graph of Osmium sanctum L.

Table no. 8.5 IR Interpretation of Osmium Sanctum L.

Wave Number(cm-1)

Observed Groups

Probable Photochemical

1460

Aromatic C-H Bending

Polyphenols

1735

C=O Stretching

Ester

1292

Alkyl Halide C-F stretching

Alkyl halide

UV Spectra of Rubia Cardifolia:

Standard calibration curve of Rubia Cardifolia extract was Drawn by plotting absorbance V/S concentration. Maximum of Rubia Cardifolia was found to be 271nm. The absorbance value is given in table.3.4.

Absorbance-

Table 3.6 UV absorbance Rubia Cardifolia L.

Sr.no

Con. (ug/ml)

Absorbance

1

2

0.03

2

4

0.133

3

6

0.23

4

8

0.325

5

10

0.434

6

12

0.533

7

14

0.64

8

16

0.73

9

18

0.83

10

20

0.89

Fig 3.5 Standard calibration curve of Rubia Cardifolia in Water

IR spectra of drugs Rubia Cardifolia –

Fig.no 3.6 IR graph of Rubia Cardifolia

Interpretation of IR graph -                            

Table 3.7 IR identification of Rubia Cardifolia L.

Wave Number (cm)

Observed Groups

Probable

Phytochemicals

3290cm-1

N-Stretching

Alkaloids and flavonoids

2108cm-1

?C stretching

Alkaloids, Flavonoids and Polyphenols

1384cm-1

O-H Bending

Polyphenols

1000-1100cm-1

O-Stretching, N-H in amines

Alkaloids, plyphenols

3.3. Evaluation of Emulgel-

3.3.1. Appearance of Emulgel:

Colour, Homogeneity, phase separations and texture were found to be acceptable limit. The phase separation does not occur in any Formulation and have a good Consistency and excellent homogeneity, which is indicates the good and very stable Formulations.                  

TableNo.3.8: color, homogeneity and phase separations of Emulgel.

Batch

Color

Homogeneity

Phase separations

F1

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F2

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F3

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F4

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F5

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F6

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F7

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F8

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F9

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F10

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F11

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F12

Brown

Excellent

No separation

F13

Brown

Excellent

No separation

3.3.2. Viscosity: The viscosity of Emulgel formulation is done as per standard procedure. It indicates increases the concentration of Carbopol 940 results in increase in the viscosity. The viscosity of Emulgel was found as shown in table no 8.9

Table No. 3.9: Viscosity of Emulgel

Batch

Viscosity (Cp.) ± S.D.

F1

1987 ±0.3

F2

2145 ±0.5

F3

1753 ±0.12

F4

2062 ±0.32

F5

1612 ±0.4

F6

1578 ±0.06

F7

1898 ±0.71

F8

1945 ±0.26

F9

1949 ±0.12

F10

1768 ±0.6

F11

2152 ± 0.3

F12

1618 ±0.7

F13

2129 ±0.01

Values as shown, Mean ± SD. (N=3)

Fig.no.3.7 3D Graph of viscosity and rheological property

Fig.no 3.10 viscosity parameter as per dependent factors

 St. Deviation.

18.84

0.9955

Mean

1913.29

Adjusted R²

0.9897

C.V. %

0.9847

Predicted R²

0.9280

 

 

Adeq. Precision

42.5973

  • The model value F 172.12 implies that model is significant, there is only 0.01% chance of F value due to noise can occur value is also less than 0.005 which shows model is significant. 
  • Viscosity = +1987.00+202.75A-105.00B-49.25C+87.75AB-52.25AC+32.75BC-35.38A² 

3.3.3. pH: The pH evaluations of topical dosage form are very important as it may cause irritation to skin if varied from the normal the pH of the skin condition. The pH of all batch formulation is done as per standard procedure. It indicates more polymers like Carbopol give consistency and having acidic nature. The pH range of all the formulation was found to be within acceptable range. The pH of all batches was found as shown in table 8.11.

Table No. 3.11 pH of Emulgel

Batch

Ph (S.D)

F1

4.04±0.15

F2

5.03±0.07

F3

4.70±0.07

F4

4.39±0.22

F5

5.32±0.05

F6

5.71±1.1

F7

5.68±0.8

F8

6.60±0.21

F9

6.00±0.7

F10

4.47±0.3

F11

6.21±0.16

F12

5.91±0.4

F13

4.8±0.8

Values as shown, Mean ± SD. (N=3)

3.3.4. Spreadability: The Spreadability of Emulgel batches was done as per standard procedure.                   

The Spreadability was how in table 8.12.

Table No.3.12: Spreadability of Emulgel

Batch

Spreadability

F1

10.78±0.12

F2

8.025±0.4

F3

33.65±0.71

F4

46.032±0.33

F5

12.68±0.21

F6

43.74±0.53

F7

9.42±0.43

F8

38.36±0.11

F9

5.38±0.32

F10

13.44±0.13

F11

19.06±0.4

F12

54.08±0.41

F13

11.34±0.21

Values as shown, Mean ± SD. (N=3)

3.3.5. Drug diffusion study- In vitro drug diffusion is studied using standard IP procedure of Drug diffusion cell up to 6 hr time.  

TableNo.3.13: Drug diffusion of Emulgel at 360 min.

Batch

%Drug release D1

%Drug release D2

F1

63.08

93

F2

72.98

86

F3

72.66

82

F4

61.01

94.63

F5

93.67

85

F6

76.61

88.94

F7

81.76

81.76

F8

81.31

87.78

F9

85.63

76.68

F10

83.45

86.85

F11

81.32

80.69

F12

82.97

73.96

F13

63.08

83.74

Fig.3.9 Drug release counter plot graph

Fig.no.3. 10 Drug release 3D Graph

Fit Statistics as per ANNOVA-

TableNo.3.14: ANNOVA statistics for drug release

Std. Dev.

0.5178

0.9970

Mean

86.88

Adjusted R²

0.9932

C.V. %

0.5960

Predicted R²

0.9527

 

 

Adel. Precision

50.8423

The Predicted R² of 0.9527 is in reasonable agreement with the Adjusted R² of 0.9932; i.e. the difference is less than 0.2 and Adel. Precision measures the signal to noise ratio. A ratio greater than 4 is desirable. ratio of 50.842 indicates an adequate signal. This model can be used to navigate the design space. 

? Drug release Equation = +93.00-1.07A-1.08B-4.10C-0.8550AB+1.76AC+2.00BC-

6.81A²+0.4212B²-7.11C² 

3.3.6. Antimicrobial study- The well diffusion method was used to evaluate the antibacterial activity to determine the antimicrobial action and efficacy of formulation comparing marketed antibiotic activity drug.  

Fig.no. 3.11 antimicrobial study by zone inhibition method

3.3.6.1. Antimicrobial study parameters-

Table no.3.15 parameters of antimicrobial study

Sr. No.

Parameters

Result

1.

Name of method

Well diffusion method

2.

Bacterial stain

E.Coli

3.

Agar media

Muller hington agar medium

4.

Zone of Inhibition observed

10-11mm

3.3.6.1. Zone of inhibition calculation –

Table no.3.16 calculation of zone inhibition

Diameters of zone inhibited measured as

D1= 9.8mm

D2 = 10.6mm

D3 = 10.9mm

Average zone inhibited calculated

10.43 mm

DISCUSSION

The formulated emulgel containing Rubia cordifolia L. and Ocimum sanctum L. demonstrated significant potential for wound healing, as evidenced by its physicochemical and biological evaluations. The prepared formulations were brown, homogenous, and stable without any phase separation, confirming the compatibility of the ingredients. The pH of all batches ranged from 4.04 to 6.60, within the acceptable skin pH range, ensuring non-irritancy and suitability for topical application. Viscosity measurements indicated good consistency, with values increasing alongside higher Carbopol concentrations, providing optimal spreadability and ease of application. The spreadability results confirmed that the formulations were easily applicable with desirable rheological properties. In vitro diffusion studies revealed a sustained and controlled drug release pattern, with maximum cumulative release of Ocimum sanctum and Rubia cordifolia extracts reaching up to 94.63% within 360 minutes. Furthermore, antimicrobial activity evaluated using the well diffusion method exhibited a mean inhibition zone of 10.43 mm against E. coli, confirming notable antibacterial efficacy. Stability studies conducted over three months showed no significant variation in physical or chemical characteristics, ensuring formulation robustness. Thus, the developed herbal emulgel effectively combined the therapeutic benefits of both extracts, providing a stable, skin-compatible, and efficient topical wound-healing formulation.

CONCLUSION

The present study successfully formulated and evaluated a novel herbal wound healing emulgel containing Rubia cordifolia L. and Ocimum sanctum L., aimed at providing an effective, stable, and patient-compliant topical delivery system. The phytochemical screening confirmed the presence of bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, terpenoids, glycosides, and alkaloids, which are known to contribute to antioxidant, antimicrobial, and wound healing properties. The optimized emulgel exhibited excellent physicochemical characteristics, including desirable pH, viscosity, homogeneity, and spreadability suitable for dermal application. In vitro diffusion studies demonstrated sustained and controlled drug release from the formulation, with the drug release pattern indicating effective permeation through the skin barrier. Furthermore, antimicrobial testing against E. coli revealed a significant zone of inhibition, confirming the synergistic antibacterial potential of both extracts in the emulgel matrix. Stability studies confirmed the physical and chemical integrity of the formulation under accelerated conditions, indicating good formulation robustness. Hence, the developed emulgel provides a promising, natural, and safe alternative for wound management, combining the therapeutic efficacy of R. cordifolia and O. sanctum in a modern pharmaceutical dosage form. Future research can explore in vivo wound healing efficacy and large-scale production for clinical applications.                                          

REFERENCE

  1. Jaggi R et al. Evaluation of Ocimum sanctum for its pharmacological properties. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;88(2):293–296.
  2. Gogte VVM et al. Ayurvedic medicinal uses of Rubia cordifolia. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2000;9(1):31–37.
  3. Zhu F-B, Fang X-J, Liu D-W, Shao Y, Zhang H-Y, Peng Y, Zhong Q, Li Y, De-ming L. 2016 Substance P combined with epidermal stem cells promotes wound healing and nerve regeneration in diabetes mellitus. Neural Regen. Res. 11, 493–501.
  4. Cecv G, Mazgareanu S, Rother M. Preclinical characterisation of NSAIDs in ultra-deformable carriers or conventional topical gels. Int J Pharm 2008; 360:29-39. ed. Vol. 1. Informa Healthcare; 2007. p. 1311-23
  5. Kalia YN, Guy RH. Modeling transdermal drug release. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2001; 48:159-72.
  6. 9. Ayub AC, Gomes AD, Lima MV, Vianna-Soares CD, Ferreira LA. Topical delivery of fluconazole: in vitro skin penetration and permeation using emulsions as dosage forms. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2007; 33:273-80
  7. Subramanian N, Ghosal SK, Moulik SP. Enhanced in vitro percutaneous absorption and in vivo anti-inflammatory effect of a selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor using microemulsion. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2005; 31:405-16.
  8. Elias PM, Menon GK. Structural and lipid biochemical correlates of the epidermal permeability barrier. Adv Lipid Res 1991; 24:1-26.
  9. Kanikkannan N, Kandimalla K, Lamba SS, Singh M, Structure activity relationship of chemical penetration enhancers in transdermal drug delivery. Current med chem,6:593 608, (1999).
  10. Singh PB. Choudhary PK, Penetration enhancers for transfer drug delivery of systemic agents, J Pharm Res, 6:44 50, (2007).
  11. 10. Tortora GJ, Derrickson B. Principles of anatomy and physiology. 11th 11. 2 ed. John Wiley and Sons; 2007. p. 144-7012.
  12. Gaur PK, Mishra S, Purohit S, Dave K. Transdermal drug delivery system: a review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2009; 2:14-20
  13. Gupta K, Tripathi YB. Wound healing activity of Rubia cordifolia root extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 1997;56(2):239–244.
  14. Poulsen BJ. Influence of vehicle composition on drug release. J Pharm Sci. 1968;57(3):357–361.
  15. Arellano A et al. Effect of propylene glycol on drug permeation. Int J Pharm. 1998;168(2):119–126.
  16. Patel MM et al. Formulation of transdermal gels. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1993;19(13):1439–1451.
  17. Patel RP et al. Optimization of mometasone furoate gel. AAPS Pharm SciTech. 2009;10(3):693–698.
  18. Gondaliya DP et al. Co-solvent effect on gel penetration. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(5):427–432.
  19. Sanghavi NM et al. Evaluation of piroxicam topical formulations. Indian Drugs. 1988;25(3):97–102.
  20. Amine PD et al. Emulgel formulation of ketorolac tromethamine. Indian J Pharm Sci. 1998;60(4):233–236.
  21. Khalil Al-Khamis K et al. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo skin absorption. J Pharm Sci. 1987;76(7):450–454.
  22. Rajashree P.A., Chaudhari P. Formulation and Evaluation of Rubia cordifolia and Ocimum sanctum Wound Healing Emulgel. M.Pharm Thesis, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Pharmacy, Pune; 2022.
  23. Mohamed MI. Optimization of chlorphenesin emulgel formulation. AAPS J. 2004;6(3):1–7.
  24. Modi J, Patel J. Nanoemulsion-based gel formulation of Aceclofenac for topical delivery. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci Res. 2011;1(1):6–12.
  25. Bonacucina G, Cespi M, Palmieri G. Characterization and stability of emulsion gels based on acrylamide/sodium acryloyldimethyl taurate copolymer. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10(2):368–375.
  26. Masmoudi H, Piccerelle P, Le D Y, Kister J. A rheological method to evaluate the physical stability of highly viscous pharmaceutical oil-in-water emulsions. Pharm Dev Technol. 2006;11(1):47–56.
  27. Anonymous. Quality control methods of medicinal plant materials. WHO; 2002. p. 28–46.
  28. Anonymous. Quality control methods of medicinal plant materials. WHO.2002; 28-29, 46.
  29. J.B. Harbone. Phytochemicals Methods, A Guide to Modern Technique of Plant Analysis. 1984; 4-8
  30. Ashutosh Kar, Pharmaceutical Drug Analysis. New Age International, 2007; 22- 25.
  31. Wagner, H.X.S., Bladt, Z. and Gain E. M. Plant Biuret Reagent Negative drug analysis. Springer Veralag.Berlin. Germany, 1996; 2: 3-51.
  32. William Charles Evans, Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. Saunders Elsevier, London, 2009; 16: 194, 247, 356.
  33. Raaman, N., Phytochemicals techniques. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, 2006; 19 – 22.
  34. James O. Schreck, William M. Loffredo, Qualitative testing for carbohydrates. Modular Laboratory Programme in Chemistry, 1994; 3 – 8.
  35. Mohamed MI. Optimization of chlorphenesin emulgel formulation. AAPS J. 2004;6(3):1–7.
  36. J Modi, J Patel. Nanoemulsion-Based Gel Formulation of Aceclofenac for Topical Delivery. International Jourmacy and Pharmaceutical Science Research, 2011; 1(1): 6-12.
  37. G Bonacucina, M Cespi, G Palmieri. Characterization and Stability of Emulsion Gels Based on Acrylamide/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer. American Association of Pharmaceutical Science Pharm SciTech, 2009; 10(2): 368-375.
  38. H Masmoudi, P Piccerelle, Yveline Le D, Jacky kister A Rheological Method to Evaluate the Physical Stability of Highly Viscous Pharmaceutical Oil-In-Water Emulsions. Pharmaceutical Research, 2006; 23(8): 1937-1947.

Reference

  1. Jaggi R et al. Evaluation of Ocimum sanctum for its pharmacological properties. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;88(2):293–296.
  2. Gogte VVM et al. Ayurvedic medicinal uses of Rubia cordifolia. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2000;9(1):31–37.
  3. Zhu F-B, Fang X-J, Liu D-W, Shao Y, Zhang H-Y, Peng Y, Zhong Q, Li Y, De-ming L. 2016 Substance P combined with epidermal stem cells promotes wound healing and nerve regeneration in diabetes mellitus. Neural Regen. Res. 11, 493–501.
  4. Cecv G, Mazgareanu S, Rother M. Preclinical characterisation of NSAIDs in ultra-deformable carriers or conventional topical gels. Int J Pharm 2008; 360:29-39. ed. Vol. 1. Informa Healthcare; 2007. p. 1311-23
  5. Kalia YN, Guy RH. Modeling transdermal drug release. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2001; 48:159-72.
  6. 9. Ayub AC, Gomes AD, Lima MV, Vianna-Soares CD, Ferreira LA. Topical delivery of fluconazole: in vitro skin penetration and permeation using emulsions as dosage forms. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2007; 33:273-80
  7. Subramanian N, Ghosal SK, Moulik SP. Enhanced in vitro percutaneous absorption and in vivo anti-inflammatory effect of a selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor using microemulsion. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2005; 31:405-16.
  8. Elias PM, Menon GK. Structural and lipid biochemical correlates of the epidermal permeability barrier. Adv Lipid Res 1991; 24:1-26.
  9. Kanikkannan N, Kandimalla K, Lamba SS, Singh M, Structure activity relationship of chemical penetration enhancers in transdermal drug delivery. Current med chem,6:593 608, (1999).
  10. Singh PB. Choudhary PK, Penetration enhancers for transfer drug delivery of systemic agents, J Pharm Res, 6:44 50, (2007).
  11. 10. Tortora GJ, Derrickson B. Principles of anatomy and physiology. 11th 11. 2 ed. John Wiley and Sons; 2007. p. 144-7012.
  12. Gaur PK, Mishra S, Purohit S, Dave K. Transdermal drug delivery system: a review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2009; 2:14-20
  13. Gupta K, Tripathi YB. Wound healing activity of Rubia cordifolia root extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 1997;56(2):239–244.
  14. Poulsen BJ. Influence of vehicle composition on drug release. J Pharm Sci. 1968;57(3):357–361.
  15. Arellano A et al. Effect of propylene glycol on drug permeation. Int J Pharm. 1998;168(2):119–126.
  16. Patel MM et al. Formulation of transdermal gels. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1993;19(13):1439–1451.
  17. Patel RP et al. Optimization of mometasone furoate gel. AAPS Pharm SciTech. 2009;10(3):693–698.
  18. Gondaliya DP et al. Co-solvent effect on gel penetration. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(5):427–432.
  19. Sanghavi NM et al. Evaluation of piroxicam topical formulations. Indian Drugs. 1988;25(3):97–102.
  20. Amine PD et al. Emulgel formulation of ketorolac tromethamine. Indian J Pharm Sci. 1998;60(4):233–236.
  21. Khalil Al-Khamis K et al. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo skin absorption. J Pharm Sci. 1987;76(7):450–454.
  22. Rajashree P.A., Chaudhari P. Formulation and Evaluation of Rubia cordifolia and Ocimum sanctum Wound Healing Emulgel. M.Pharm Thesis, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Pharmacy, Pune; 2022.
  23. Mohamed MI. Optimization of chlorphenesin emulgel formulation. AAPS J. 2004;6(3):1–7.
  24. Modi J, Patel J. Nanoemulsion-based gel formulation of Aceclofenac for topical delivery. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci Res. 2011;1(1):6–12.
  25. Bonacucina G, Cespi M, Palmieri G. Characterization and stability of emulsion gels based on acrylamide/sodium acryloyldimethyl taurate copolymer. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10(2):368–375.
  26. Masmoudi H, Piccerelle P, Le D Y, Kister J. A rheological method to evaluate the physical stability of highly viscous pharmaceutical oil-in-water emulsions. Pharm Dev Technol. 2006;11(1):47–56.
  27. Anonymous. Quality control methods of medicinal plant materials. WHO; 2002. p. 28–46.
  28. Anonymous. Quality control methods of medicinal plant materials. WHO.2002; 28-29, 46.
  29. J.B. Harbone. Phytochemicals Methods, A Guide to Modern Technique of Plant Analysis. 1984; 4-8
  30. Ashutosh Kar, Pharmaceutical Drug Analysis. New Age International, 2007; 22- 25.
  31. Wagner, H.X.S., Bladt, Z. and Gain E. M. Plant Biuret Reagent Negative drug analysis. Springer Veralag.Berlin. Germany, 1996; 2: 3-51.
  32. William Charles Evans, Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. Saunders Elsevier, London, 2009; 16: 194, 247, 356.
  33. Raaman, N., Phytochemicals techniques. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, 2006; 19 – 22.
  34. James O. Schreck, William M. Loffredo, Qualitative testing for carbohydrates. Modular Laboratory Programme in Chemistry, 1994; 3 – 8.
  35. Mohamed MI. Optimization of chlorphenesin emulgel formulation. AAPS J. 2004;6(3):1–7.
  36. J Modi, J Patel. Nanoemulsion-Based Gel Formulation of Aceclofenac for Topical Delivery. International Jourmacy and Pharmaceutical Science Research, 2011; 1(1): 6-12.
  37. G Bonacucina, M Cespi, G Palmieri. Characterization and Stability of Emulsion Gels Based on Acrylamide/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer. American Association of Pharmaceutical Science Pharm SciTech, 2009; 10(2): 368-375.
  38. H Masmoudi, P Piccerelle, Yveline Le D, Jacky kister A Rheological Method to Evaluate the Physical Stability of Highly Viscous Pharmaceutical Oil-In-Water Emulsions. Pharmaceutical Research, 2006; 23(8): 1937-1947.

Photo
Rajashree Ahire
Corresponding author

Dr. D. Y. Patil Educational Complex, Sector 29, Nigdi Pradhikaran, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India -411044

Photo
Dr. Pallavi Chaudhari
Co-author

Dr. D. Y. Patil Educational Complex, Sector 29, Nigdi Pradhikaran, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India -411044

Photo
Sagar Daitkar
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, Sandip University, Nashik, Maharashtra, India -411044

Rajashree Ahire*, Dr. Pallavi Chaudhari, Sagar Daitkar, Formulation and Evaluation of Rubia Cardifolia L. And Ocimum Sanctum L. Wound Healing Emulgel, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (11), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17549029

More related articles
Explainable Chronic Kidney Disease Prediction Usin...
Govardan Sai Palla, Dr. I. Kullayamma, ...
Review on Various Activities Exhibited by Coccinia...
Mathew George, Lincy Joseph, Ann Mary V. A., Ashin Joseph, Liyama...
A Review on RP-HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Es...
Ajit Pawar, Deepak Ambhore, Kailash Biyani, ...
Pharmaceutical Assessment of Aloe Vera Skin Gel: A Herbal Formulation and its Po...
Prachi Lokhande, Akshay Rupnawar, Aman Mujawar, Ayeshabano Hawaldar, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Aloevera Lotion...
Tushar Wadekar , Dr. Jayashri Bairagi, Pandurang Pisal, Harshal Hire, Sahil Pawar, ...
Related Articles
Preparation and Evolution of Herbal Anti-Fungal Shampoo...
Sourav Bhowmick, Souvik Singha, MD Asif Iqbal, Dipa Ganguly, Ranabir Chanda, ...
A Comprehensive Review on High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): Introdu...
Deep Jyoti Shah, Supriya Hazra, Sourav Bhowmick, Amisha Kumari, Bhumika Kumari, Dibya Kumari, Neha K...
Impurity Profiling and its Significance Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients...
Prathamesh Bhagyavant, Swapnil Ade, Sayyad J. H., ...
More related articles
Review on Various Activities Exhibited by Coccinia Grandis...
Mathew George, Lincy Joseph, Ann Mary V. A., Ashin Joseph, Liyamary N. J., Muhamad Ashif P. S., Shah...
Review on Various Activities Exhibited by Coccinia Grandis...
Mathew George, Lincy Joseph, Ann Mary V. A., Ashin Joseph, Liyamary N. J., Muhamad Ashif P. S., Shah...