Department of Pharmacy, JES's SND College of Pharmacy, Babulgaon (Yeola), India
Technology transfer is a critical process that facilitates the movement of innovations and knowledge from research institutions to industry, thereby driving economic growth and technological advancement. This review provides an in-depth analysis of various models of technology transfer, including linear, interactive, and network models, and examines their effectiveness in different contexts. The role of intellectual property rights (IPR) is highlighted as a fundamental aspect in protecting innovations and ensuring fair value distribution among stakeholders. Furthermore, the paper explores the impact of digital transformation on technology transfer processes, emphasizing how advancements in digital tools, such as artificial intelligence, big data, and blockchain, have redefined traditional mechanisms. Digital platforms are enabling faster and more efficient knowledge dissemination, fostering global collaborations, and providing new opportunities for startups and small enterprises. However, challenges related to data security, privacy, and regulatory compliance are also discussed. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of technology transfer, offering insights into future directions and potential areas for policy intervention to maximize the benefits of technology diffusion in the digital age.
Technology Transfer:
It is a sensible procedure that comprises professional experience, the transfer of a process, and the associated paperwork between the locations of different manufacturers and the same manufacturer [1]. In the current corporate environment, there is a greater interest in the successful utilization of a company's technological assets through technology transfer. Globalization of commerce, the liberalization of many nations' economic systems, and the push for intellectual property protection.
following the World Trade Organization's (WTO) founding are some of the factors that have made international technology transfer easier. Due to the combined effects of these variables, technology commercial transfer has grown in importance within the context of international business3.Organizations are beginning to recognize the value of technology and how to manage it as a critical strategic component. Organizations should employ technology to help them compete in the global economy. As a result, organizations need to manage technology and its related issues well. The transfer of the best technology to the organization is one of the crucial factors to be taken into account while managing technology. The technology must be moved from a developer environment to a user environment as a result. Decision-makers may benefit from knowing about the technology that an organization uses, the technologies that other organizations have access to, and the technologies that rival organizations utilize. But from a development standpoint, technology transfer has always been important. Mansfield (1975), more than three decades ago, noted that technology transfer is one of the fundamental processes that influences the economic performance of nations and firms.
In order to the successful transfer the following requirement should be met:
Both the sending unit (SU) and the receiving unit (RU) should have comparable facilities and equipment. It is necessary to communicate protocols, reports, specifications, critical process parameters, and supporting data from the sending unit [SU] to the receiving unit [RU].
Terminology: An active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, is any chemical or combination of substances that, when consumed, becomes an active ingredient of that pharmaceutical action and is meant to treat, prevent, or otherwise alter the body's structure and function. [2]
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP):
A component of quality assurance that guarantees the regular production and control of pharmaceutical products to the proper standards of quality for the intended purposes.
Process validation: This is the verified evidence that provides a high degree of confidence that a particular procedure will consistently result in a product that meets its defined action and quality requirement.
Quality Assurance (QA): This is a catch-all word encompassing a range of problems that could negatively impact a product's quality in one or more ways.It is the culmination of all efforts made to ensure that pharmaceutical goods meet the standards necessary for the uses for which they are intended [3].
Quality control (QC): This process confirms that pharmaceutical products adhere to specified requirements for identity, potency, purity, and other characteristics. It includes requirements setting, testing, sampling, and gaining analytical clearance for packing materials, finished goods, intermediates and raw materials.
Quality risk management (QRM): The systematic process of identifying, addressing, sharing, and evaluating threats to the quality of pharmaceutical products throughout their life cycle.
Sending unit [SU]: The disciplines inside an organization that are necessary for the transmission of a specific product, procedure, or method are known as the sending unit.
Receiving unit (RU): The disciplines involved at the organisation where the transfer of a specific product, process, or method is anticipated [4]
Standard Operating Procedure [SOP]: a formal, authorized protocol that is in writing and offers instructions on how to carry out duties that aren't necessarily connected to a specific material or product.
Technology Transfer Report. formal document that details the procedures, requirements, conclusions, and conclusion of a specific technology transfer project. Validation is the process of proving and documenting that a method, process, or strategy genuinely and reliably produces the intended results.
Acceptance criteria: quantifiable criteria that show whether test findings are satisfactory.
Bracketing: An experimental setup wherein only the extremes of, say, dosage strength, are tested. It is assumed by the design that the extremes will accurately represent any samples that fall between them [5].
Change Control [C/C]: Change control (C/C) is a formal process in which qualified representatives of pertinent disciplines assess changes that are being considered or that may have an effect on a validated state. Finding out what has to be done to make sure the system is maintained in a validated form is the aim.
A critical control point: A critical control point, or CCP, is a point in time when control measures can be put in place to eliminate, reduce, or eliminate a risk to a level appropriate for pharmaceutical quality.
Drug Master File [DMF]: A drug master file (DMF) provides comprehensive information about a specific facility, process, or product to the drug regulatory authority. This information is intended to be included in the application for marketing authorization. [6]
Gap analysis: Finding the crucial elements of a process that are present in the transmitting unit but not in the receiving unit is known as gap analysis. Inter-company transfer: The sharing of technology among multiple companies' sites.
In-Process Control [IPC]: In-process control, or IPC, refers to audits conducted during manufacturing to keep an eye on and uphold quality standards. The procedure ought to be modified as necessary to guarantee that the final result meets its requirements. A component of process control could alternatively be thought of as equipment or environment control. Testing is the process of ensuring that the installations used in a manufacturing process—such as machinery, measurement tools, utilities, and production spaces—are appropriately selected, installed, and operational in accordance with established standards.
Performance Qualification [PQ]: Documented evidence that the device or system operates consistently and reliably over a prolonged period of time within predetermined parameters and requirements.
Technology transfer [TOT]: A methodical process that manages the transfer of an established process, along with its documentation and expert knowledge, to a location that can replicate the process and its supporting operations at a predefined degree of capability.
The VMP, or validation master plan:
This is an extensive document that functions as the project's overall validation approach. It also gives a summary of the approach and mindset of the company, which is used to decide if performance is sufficient. It describes the scope of the validation work to be done, provides information on the manufacturer's validation work program, and includes the completion timelines. It also describes the responsibilities of those executing the plan [9].
Methodology [or plan] for validation [VP]: A summary of the actions to be performed in the course of a validation, together with the prerequisites for approving a manufacturing process—or a component for regular usage.
IMPORTANCE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY:
GOALS OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER:
IMPORTANCE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER:
For research and development to continue to benefit society, technology transfer is essential.
1) In the pharmaceutical sector, dosage form design must be scaled up at multiple stages. For example, a pilot batch weighing between 0.5 and 2 kg can be scaled up to 5/10 kg rather than 20/100 kg. Usually, the production scale is between 200 and 1000 kilogram. It entails using bigger equipment to manufacture pharmaceutical items in batches larger than before.
2) Technology and expertise acquired during the small-scale development of products and processes are transferred as part of the scale-up process. Typically, research is conducted in small batches prior to production for a larger commercial batch. Technology transfer is essential for research endeavors to become large-scale commercial products, particularly when creating pharmaceuticals.
3) To clarify the information required to move technology from research and development to actual manufacturing by organizing the diverse data gathered during the process; To clarify the information required to move technology of current goods between different manufacturing locations.
4) The commercialization of innovations developed at universities is a crucial factor in economic growth, and universities have been instrumental in bringing novel concepts and products to the market. Technology transfer has the potential to boost regional economic development and growth, produce income for universities, and establish links between academia and business for research. Thus, advancement and dissemination of technology and knowledge have been and will be essential for success in a variety of industries. [12]
The importance of technology transfer an appropriate transfer of manufacturing technologies to improve drug quality as intended during research and development to be a final product during manufacture is becoming more widely recognized in recent years. It also ensures stable quality transfer for a variety of reasons between the contract giver and contract acceptor during manufacture. [13]
ORGANIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER:
Since the most effective way to complete a technology transfer project successfully is always in a team environment. The core technology transfer team ought to be put into action as soon as executive management decides to move forward with the drug candidate's commercialization. The members of a typical technology transfer core team will probably represent various business divisions.
STEPS INVOLVED IN THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROCESS:
Understanding the process of the operations used, the critical and non-critical parameters of each operation, the production environment, the equipment, and the availability of the excipients should all be considered in the early stages of formulating a formulation.
(A) Development of technology by Research Phase
Figure 1: Technology Transfer Process
The product development laboratory receives a technology transfer dossier (TTD) document from R&D that includes all of the following formulation and drug product information:
(a) Validation Research: Production commences following validation research that demonstrates the process's ability to stable the product using the transferred manufacturing formula. Validation, including performance certification, cleaning, and process validation, should be handled by the R&D department transmitting technology, not the production department receiving it.
Generally understood to be a document outlining the technology transfer contents for the parties that are being transferred and transferred. Every stage of the technology transfer process, from R&D to production, needs to be recorded. Task assignments and responsibilities should also be made clear, as should the acceptance standards for any specific technology that is to be transferred. All technology transfer methods must have their documentation reviewed and approved by the quality assurance department.
Figure 2: Flow Chart Technology Transfer
MODELS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER:
1. Qualitative Models:
a) The Bar-Zakay Model: Bar-Zakay (1971) created a fairly thorough TT model using a project management methodology. He separated the Search, Adaptation, Implementation, and Maintenance phases of the TT process. As seen in Figure 1, he illustrated the tasks, checkpoints, and decision-making moments in each of these phases. Bar-Zakay refers to the transferer as the "donor," and the lower half of the figure shows the activities and requirements of the transferee, or "recipient." This model outlines the tasks that must be completed in great detail and emphasizes the significance of both the transferor and the transferee developing the necessary skills to engage in technology forecasting, long-term planning, and the collection of project- related intelligence. The transferor is referred to in the model as a "donor," creating the impression that the owner of the technology is donating a priceless asset for charitable purposes! It is obvious that this is untrue, and using phrases like this has to be avoided. Another drawback of the Bar-Zakay model is that it is no longer very relevant because so many of the terms, activities, and ideas it expressed were part of the late 1960s and early 1970s, a time when most technology buyers were passive recipients who heavily relied on aid programs. It was also a time when the pace, direction, and extent of technology transfers were all determined in part by government constraints.
The following are some of the lessons that can be drawn from the Bar-Zakay model:
(b) The Behrman and Wallender Model: Multinational firms may find greater relevance in the seven-stage approach for foreign technology transfer put forward by Behrman and Wallender (1976).
These current phases are:
Offering outside assistance to improve the transferor-transferee connection. This model's shortcoming is that the transferor designs the technology transfer project in the first three stages with the transferee's minimal input, which reinforces dependency. Nonetheless, there is a great deal of room for the transferee to absorb and advance both process and product technology in the fifth and sixth stages. This serves to highlight the fact that technology transfer is continuous and that a project cannot be deemed successful unless a system is in place to promote assimilation. The following are the things that this paradigm teaches us:
Dahlman and Westphal (1981) conducted extensive research in the Republic of Korea and, drawing from their knowledge of rapidly industrializing Far Eastern nations in the 1980s, created a nine-stage process model that looks like this:
This model, which places a strong focus on transferee involvement throughout the entire TT project, can be seen as an upgrade over the Behrman and Wallender model. The assumption that the transferee will have access to advanced engineering abilities is its main flaw. In a lot of poor nations, this could not be the case. Additionally, it gives negotiators and post-implementation integration initiatives relatively little thought. The following are some of the key lessons this paradigm imparts:
A sequential process view is the most effective way to study a TT project.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER:
Since it is impossible to stop someone from using fresh knowledge even without the creator's permission, knowledge is usually non-excludable. A new technology's value increases the likelihood that it will be copied or mimicked, which could lessen the original inventor's prospective earnings and possibly eliminate the motivation to pursue inventive endeavors. By giving prosperous creators a brief monopoly over their creations, intellectual property rights, or IPRs, promote innovation. The returns on successful R&D investments are provided by the monopoly profits that follow; nevertheless, these returns must be substantial enough to offset the significant amount of unsuccessful R&D.
The non-rival nature of an innovation implies that its advantages will be maximized if it is made available to everyone at a marginal cost. Free access policies may assist society in the near term, but they will seriously undermine the motivation for new invention. However, overly restrictive intellectual property rights (IPRs) may prevent new knowledge from being shared effectively, which could impede growth to the point that more innovation is required to obtain access to current technology. IPR protection that is too lax has, in fact, encouraged knowledge spillovers from transnational companies (TNCs) and other domestic firms, which has boosted R&D activity in many nations. Overprotecting innovators can potentially result in a long-term monopoly even though it's not the best, aims to bring back the motivation to develop, which should promote long-term expansion and higher-quality products. Developed nations, which have a large pool of prospective innovators, have a tendency to choose IPR regimes that are reasonably robust in order to foster innovative and creative endeavors, which are viewed as a key driver of long-term economic progress. However, because R&D spending is concentrated in a small number of the richest nations in the world, most developed and developing nations have limited opportunities for truly innovative activities. Instead, most have adopted a different strategy, offering little to no intellectual property rights protection in order to facilitate the rapid diffusion of knowledge. Imitation has been a major source of technological growth for several of these countries. Stronger IPR protection is perceived as limiting output in the home economy and moving profits from native imitative enterprises to foreign firms, as opposed to promoting domestic inventive activity. The counterargument posits that enhanced intellectual property rights (IPR) protection can incentivize innovation and risk-taking, particularly in emerging economies. Conversely, nations with inadequate IPR ii protection are still reliant on inefficient, dynamic businesses that engage in imitation and counterfeiting. To enhance the global IPR regime, the Uruguay Round (1986– 1994) trade negotiations produced the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). IPR protection is governed by the first worldwide and all-inclusive set of regulations, TRIPS. TRIPS lays out minimal requirements that must be fulfilled by a specific date. Copyrights and related rights, trademarks, geographical indications, industrial designs, patents, integrated circuit layout designs, and concealed information, such as test data and trade secrets, are among the topics covered.
CONCLUSION
Appropriate technology transfer is important to upgrade the quality of manufacturing products and ensure stable and high quality of the product. The technology transfer does not mean one- time actions taken by the transferring party toward the transferred party but means continuous information exchange between both parties to maintain the product manufacturing. In conclusion, this review underscores the intricate relationships between technology transfer models, intellectual property rights, and digital transformation. Effective technology transfer necessitates balanced models, robust intellectual property protection, and adaptability to digital advancements. Digital transformation has revolutionized technology transfer, enabled global collaboration and efficiency but introduced data security and privacy concerns. Future directions include developing adaptive models, strengthening intellectual property frameworks, and fostering industry-academia-government partnerships. Policymakers, businesses, and researchers must prioritize clarity, protection, and innovation to harness technology transfer's potential for economic growth and societal progress.
REFERENCE
Dipali Aher*, Nitin Damale, Dr. Amol U. Gayke, Advancements In Technology Transfer: Analyzing Models, IP Rights and Digital Disruption, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2024, 1 (11), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14173409