View Article

Abstract

Drug?drug interactions (DDIs) pose a significant clinical challenge, contributing to adverse drug events (ADEs), hospitalizations, and increased healthcare costs. Conventional DDI detection methods such as in vitro assays, in vivo studies, and post-marketing surveillance?provide valuable mechanistic insights but are limited by high cost, time requirements, and incomplete coverage of possible drug combinations. The rapid expansion of available pharmaceuticals has intensified the need for scalable, accurate, and timely predictive approaches. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools capable of integrating large, heterogeneous datasets spanning chemical structures, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, electronic health records (EHRs), and biomedical literature to uncover complex interaction patterns that may not be evident through traditional methods. This review provides a comprehensive overview of AI-based predictive modeling techniques for DDI identification, encompassing traditional ML algorithms, deep learning architectures, graph-based models, and natural language processing (NLP) approaches. It examines key data sources, including structured databases (e.g., DrugBank, ChEMBL, KEGG), real-world clinical data, and literature mining, and discusses strategies for data preprocessing, feature engineering, and model evaluation. Special attention is given to challenges such as data sparsity, class imbalance, lack of interpretability, and limited generalizability to novel drug combinations. Emerging solutions?including explainable AI (XAI), transfer learning, multimodal data integration, and federated learning?are highlighted as promising directions to enhance transparency, robustness, and clinical applicability. Applications of AI-driven DDI prediction span clinical decision support systems, drug development pipelines, and pharmacovigilance frameworks, with case studies demonstrating reductions in medication errors and improvements in patient safety. The review also addresses regulatory perspectives, ethical considerations, and integration challenges in clinical workflows. Ultimately, AI-based predictive modeling offers a powerful, adaptive, and scalable approach to mitigating DDI risks, supporting precision medicine, and advancing drug safety across healthcare systems.

Keywords

Drug drug interactions, Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Deep learning, Predictive modeling , Pharmacovigilance, Explainable AI

Introduction

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) occur when the pharmacological effect or pharmacokinetic profile of one drug is altered by the presence of another, potentially resulting in diminished efficacy or increased toxicity (1). These interactions can be pharmacokinetic, involving changes in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion, or pharmacodynamic, where drugs influence each other's effects at the receptor or cellular level (2). DDIs represent a significant challenge in clinical practice, contributing substantially to adverse drug reactions, hospitalizations, and increased healthcare costs worldwide (3). Early and accurate prediction of DDIs is crucial for enhancing drug safety and improving patient outcomes. Proactively identifying potential interactions before clinical manifestation can prevent adverse drug events (ADEs), reduce hospital admissions, and lower the burden on healthcare systems (4). Predictive tools assist clinicians in making informed decisions during drug prescribing and facilitate regulatory agencies in evaluating drug safety profiles. Consequently, early DDI prediction plays an essential role in personalized medicine by optimizing therapeutic regimens tailored to individual patients’ medication profiles (5). Traditional approaches for DDI detection primarily rely on in vitro experiments, animal studies, and clinical trials. Although these methods provide valuable mechanistic insights, they are often time-consuming, costly, and limited in scope due to ethical and practical constraints (6). Post-marketing surveillance and spontaneous reporting systems capture real-world interaction data but suffer from underreporting and delayed identification of rare or complex interactions (7). Additionally, manual curation and rule-based systems, while effective for known DDIs, struggle to scale with the rapidly growing number of drugs and novel compounds, limiting their predictive capacity (8). The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has revolutionized healthcare by enabling data-driven, scalable, and efficient analysis of complex biomedical datasets (9). AI-based predictive modeling leverages large volumes of heterogeneous data—including chemical structures, biological pathways, electronic health records, and pharmacovigilance reports—to uncover hidden patterns and predict potential DDIs with greater accuracy (10). Machine learning algorithms, such as deep learning, support vector machines, and ensemble methods, have demonstrated promising results in modeling nonlinear interactions and integrating multi-modal data sources (11). These technologies not only enhance prediction accuracy but also offer interpretability and adaptability, making them powerful tools in drug safety assessment. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of AI-based predictive modeling approaches for drug-drug interactions. It explores the current state-of-the-art AI and ML techniques, the types of data utilized, and the challenges encountered in model development and validation. The review further discusses the integration of AI tools into clinical workflows and regulatory frameworks, emphasizing their potential to transform drug safety monitoring and personalized medicine. Finally, it highlights future directions and emerging trends in this rapidly evolving field.

Reference

  1. Percha B, Altman RB. Informatics confronts drug–drug interactions. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2013 Mar 1;34(3):178-84.
  2. Tatonetti NP, Ye PP, Daneshjou R, Altman RB. Data-driven prediction of drug effects and interactions. Science translational medicine. 2012 Mar 14;4(125):125ra31-.
  3. Li AP, Jurima-Romet M. Overview: pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Advances in pharmacology. 1997 Jan 1; 43:1-6.
  4. Rombolà L, Scuteri D, Marilisa S, Watanabe C, Morrone LA, Bagetta G, Corasaniti MT. Pharmacokinetic interactions between herbal medicines and drugs: their mechanisms and clinical relevance. Life. 2020 Jul 4;10(7):106.
  5. Das S, Manjunath K, Biswas A, Sekar K. Therapeutic target identification and evaluation using machine learning. In Therapeutic Protein Targets for Drug Discovery and Clinical Evaluation: Bio-Crystallography and Drug Design 2023 (pp. 73-101).
  6. Sudsakorn S, Bahadduri P, Fretland J, Lu C. 2020 FDA drug-drug interaction guidance: a comparison analysis and action plan by pharmaceutical industrial scientists. Current drug metabolism. 2020 May 1;21(6):403-26.
  7. Hazell L, Shakir SA. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions. Drug safety. 2006 May;29(5):385-96.
  8. Vilar S, Friedman C, Hripcsak G. Detection of drug–drug interactions through data mining studies using clinical sources, scientific literature and social media. Briefings in bioinformatics. 2018 Sep;19(5):863-77.
  9. Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, Kuleshov V, DePristo M, Chou K, Cui C, Corrado G, Thrun S, Dean J. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nature medicine. 2019 Jan;25(1):24-9.
  10. Ryu JY, Kim HU, Lee SY. Deep learning improves prediction of drug–drug and drug–food interactions. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2018 May 1;115(18):E4304-11.
  11. Zhang W, Chen Y, Liu F, Luo F, Tian G, Li X. Predicting potential drug-drug interactions by integrating chemical, biological, phenotypic and network data. BMC bioinformatics. 2017 Jan 5;18(1):18.
  12. Neuvonen PJ, Niemi M, Backman JT. Drug interactions with lipid?lowering drugs: mechanisms and clinical relevance. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2006 Dec;80(6):565-81.
  13. Tanaka H, Mizojiri K. Drug-protein binding and blood-brain barrier permeability. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1999 Mar 1;288(3):912-8.
  14. Guengerich FP. Cytochrome p450 and chemical toxicology. Chemical research in toxicology. 2008 Jan 21;21(1):70-83.
  15. Levy G. Pharmacokinetics of salicylate elimination in man. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1965 Jul 1;54(7):959-67.
  16. Zanger UM, Schwab M. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 2013 Apr 1;138(1):103-41.
  17. Chen J, Raymond K. Roles of rifampicin in drug-drug interactions: underlying molecular mechanisms involving the nuclear pregnane X receptor. Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials. 2006 Jan;5(1):3.
  18. Zhou S, Chan E, Lim LY, Boelsterli UA, Li SC, Wang J, Zhang Q, Huang M, Xu A. Therapeutic drugs that behave as mechanism-based inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4. Current drug metabolism. 2004 Oct 1;5(5):415-42.
  19. Rawlins MD, Thompson JW, Davies DM. Textbook of adverse drug reactions. by DM Davies. 1977:95.
  20. Katzung BG, Trevor AJ, Pacheco MD. Farmacologia. El Manual Moderno; 1991.
  21. Droogan C, Patel C, Yan GX, Kowey PR. Role of antiarrhythmic drugs: frequent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, risk of proarrhythmia, and new drug therapy. Heart Failure Clinics. 2011 Apr 1;7(2):195-205.
  22. Watanabe JH, McInnis T, Hirsch JD. Cost of prescription drug–related morbidity and mortality. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Sep;52(9):829-37.
  23. Al-Ghazaly ZM, Jassim NA. Polypharmacy and potential drug–drug interactions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Medical Journal of Babylon. 2022 Jul 1;19(3):396-403.
  24. Trissel LA. Handbook on injectable drugs. InHandbook on Injectable Drugs 2007 (pp. 1720-1720).
  25. Newton DW. Drug incompatibility chemistry. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2009 Feb 15;66(4):348-57.
  26. Bourget P, Fernandez H. Incompatibilities and interactions of injectable drugs. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33(3):347–354. doi:10.1345/aph.17217.
  27. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18,820 patients. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):15–19. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.15.
  28. Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):2002–2012. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1103053.
  29. Nobili A, Garattini S, Mannucci PM. Multiple diseases and polypharmacy in the elderly: challenges for the internist of the third millennium. J Comorb. 2011; 1:28–44. doi:10.15256/joc.2011.1.13.
  30. Juurlink DN, Mamdani M, Kopp A, et al. Drug–drug interactions among elderly patients hospitalized for drug toxicity. JAMA. 2003;289(13):1652–1658. doi:10.1001/jama.289.13.1652.
  31. Wysowski DK, Nourjah P, Swartz L. Bleeding complications with warfarin use: a prevalent adverse effect resulting in regulatory action. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1414–1419. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.13.1414.
  32. Patel JP, Desai NR, Huang ES. Risk of hospitalization for bleeding with warfarin and NSAID co-administration. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014;39(6):576–581. doi:10.1111/jcpt.12147.
  33. Bellosta S, Paoletti R, Corsini A. Safety of statins: focus on clinical pharmacokinetics and drug interactions. Circulation. 2004;109(23 Suppl 1): III50-57.
  34. Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(1):57–65. doi:10.1517/14740338.2013.827660.
  35. Mangoni AA, Jackson SHD. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: basic principles and practical applications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57(1):6–14. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.02007. x.
  36. Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, et al. Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimized? Lancet. 2007;370(9582):173–184. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61091-0.
  37. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the Investigation of Drug Interactions. EMA/CHMP/ICH/572198/2012; 2012.
  38. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Drug Interaction Studies — Study Design, Data Analysis, Implications for Dosing, and Labeling Recommendations. FDA; 2020.
  39. Flockhart DA. Drug Interactions: Cytochrome P450 Drug Interaction Table. Indiana University School of Medicine; 2007. Available from: https://drug-interactions.medicine.iu.edu/.
  40. Vilar S, Harpaz R, Uriarte E, Santana L, Rabadan R, Friedman C. Drug-drug interaction through molecular structure similarity analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6):1066–1074. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000942.
  41. Ryu JY, Kim HU, Lee SY. Deep learning improves prediction of drug-drug and drug-food interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(18):E4304–E4311. doi:10.1073/pnas.1803294115.
  42. FDA. Use of Computational Modeling and Simulation in Regulatory Review. Guidance for Industry. FDA; 2021.
  43. Lin JH, Lu AYH. Role of pharmacokinetics and metabolism in drug discovery and development. Pharmacol Rev. 1997;49(4):403–449.
  44. Houston JB. Utility of in vitro drug metabolism data in predicting in vivo metabolic clearance. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994;47(11):1823–1831.
  45. Rendic S, Di Carlo FJ. Human cytochrome P450 enzymes: a status report summarizing their reactions, substrates, inducers, and inhibitors. Drug Metab Rev. 1997;29(1-2):413–580.
  46. LeCluyse EL, Witek RP, Andersen ME, Powers MJ. Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2012;42(6):501–548. doi:10.3109/10408444.2012.682115.
  47. Fahmi OA, Kharasch ED, Thummel KE. The cytochrome P450 3A inhibitor ketoconazole selectively inhibits intestinal CYP3A in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85(6):573-579.
  48. Lin JH, Lu AYH. Role of pharmacokinetics and metabolism in drug discovery and development. Pharmacol Rev. 1997;49(4):403–449.
  49. Kuepfer L, Niederalt C, Wendl T, et al. Applied concepts in PBPK modeling: how to build a PBPK/PD model. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016;5(10):516–531. doi:10.1002/psp4.12110.
  50. Bailey DG, Dresser GK. Interactions between grapefruit juice and cardiovascular drugs. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2004;4(5):281–297. doi:10.2165/00129784-200404050-00002.
  51. Temple R. Clinical drug interaction studies — study design, data analysis, and clinical implications. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(6):718–720. doi:10.1038/clpt.2010.64.
  52. Vilar S, Harpaz R, Uriarte E, et al. Drug-drug interaction through molecular structure similarity analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6):1066–1074. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000942.
  53. Tatonetti NP, Ye PP, Daneshjou R, Altman RB. Data-driven prediction of drug effects and interactions. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(125):125ra31. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003377.
  54. Preissner SC, Hoffmann MF, Preissner R. Computational approaches to predict drug-drug interactions: a review. Brief Bioinform. 2020;21(6):1802–1817. doi:10.1093/bib/bbz147.
  55. Zhang W, Chen Y, Liu F, et al. Predicting potential drug-drug interactions by integrating chemical, biological, phenotypic and network data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1422-9.
  56. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7.
  57. Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, Olivecrona M, Blaschke T. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23(6):1241–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039.
  58. Zhang W, Chen Y, Liu F, et al. Predicting potential drug-drug interactions by integrating chemical, biological, phenotypic and network data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1422-9.
  59. Beam AL, Kohane IS. Big data and machine learning in health care. JAMA. 2018;319(13):1317–1318. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18391.
  60. Deo RC. Machine learning in medicine. Circulation. 2015;132(20):1920–1930. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593.
  61. Zhang W, Chen Y, Liu F, et al. Predicting potential drug-drug interactions by integrating chemical, biological, phenotypic and network data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1422-9.
  62. Liu Y, Wei Q, Yu G, Gai L. An overview of computational methods for drug–drug interaction prediction. Curr Drug Metab. 2021;22(6):462–474. doi:10.2174/1389200222666210323122946.
  63. Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine learning in medicine. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(14):1347–1358. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1814259.
  64. Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, Olivecrona M, Blaschke T. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23(6):1241–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039.
  65. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, et al. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(6):463–477. doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5.
  66. Liu Y, Wei Q, Yu G, Gai L. An overview of computational methods for drug–drug interaction prediction. Curr Drug Metab. 2021;22(6):462–474. doi:10.2174/1389200222666210323122946.
  67. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5-32.
  68. Vilar S, Uriarte E, Santana L, et al. Detection of drug–drug interactions through data mining studies using clinical sources, scientific literature and social media. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(4):693-710.
  69. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20(3):273-297.
  70. Yamanishi Y, Kotera M, Kanehisa M, Goto S. Drug-target interaction prediction from chemical, genomic and pharmacological data in an integrated framework. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(12):i246-i254.
  71. Rogers D, Hahn M. Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J Chem Inf Model. 2010;50(5):742-754.
  72. Keiser MJ, Roth BL, Armbruster BN, et al. Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(2):197-206.
  73. Kuhn M, Letunic I, Jensen LJ, Bork P. The SIDER database of drugs and side effects. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D1075-D1079.
  74. Ching T, Himmelstein DS, Beaulieu-Jones BK, et al. Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. J R Soc Interface. 2018;15(141):20170387.
  75. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep Learning. MIT Press; 2016.
  76. Rifaioglu AS, Atas H, Martin MJ, et al. Recent applications of deep learning and machine intelligence on in silico drug discovery: methods, tools and databases. Brief Bioinform. 2020;21(6):1878-1912.
  77. Duvenaud DK, Maclaurin D, Aguilera-Iparraguirre J, et al. Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2015; 28:2224-2232.
  78. Lee I, Keum J, Nam H. DeepConv-DTI: prediction of drug-target interactions via deep learning with convolution on protein sequences. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(6): e1007129.
  79. Gilmer J, Schoenholz SS, Riley PF, et al. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. Proc Mach Learn Res. 2017; 70:1263-1272.
  80. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997;9(8):1735-1780.
  81. Zhang W, Liu F, Zhang C, et al. Predicting drug–drug interactions using a novel graph neural network with feature attention. BMC Bioinformatics. 2021;22(1):1-12.
  82. Wang F, Nie F, Huang H, et al. Drug–drug interaction extraction via convolutional neural networks. J Biomed Inform. 2017; 76:125-135.
  83. Lee H, Kang J, Hwang S, et al. Predicting drug–drug interactions using deep autoencoders. Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11:273.
  84. Wu Z, Pan S, Chen F, et al. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2021;32(1):4-24.
  85. Zitnik M, Agrawal M, Leskovec J. Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(13): i457-i466.
  86. Huang K, Xiao C, Glass LM, Sun J. MolRNN: molecular graph neural networks with recurrent neural networks for DDI prediction. J Chem Inf Model. 2021;61(2):647-659.
  87. Saito T, Rehmsmeier M. The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118432.
  88. Chicco D, Jurman G. The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics. 2020;21(Suppl 1):6. doi:10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.
  89. Arlot S, Celisse A. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat Surv. 2010; 4:40–79. doi:10.1214/09-SS054.
  90. Japkowicz N, Stephen S. The class imbalance problem: A systematic study. Intell Data Anal. 2002;6(5):429–49. doi:10.3233/IDA-2002-6504.
  91. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr. Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 69:245–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.005.
  92. Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Guo AC, Lo EJ, Marcu A, Grant JR, et al. DrugBank 5.0: A major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1): D1074–82. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1037.
  93. Tatonetti NP, Ye PP, Daneshjou R, Altman RB. Data-driven prediction of drug effects and interactions. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(125):125ra31. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003377.
  94. Kuhn M, Letunic I, Jensen LJ, Bork P. The SIDER database of drugs and side effects. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1): D1075–9. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1075.

Photo
Sudarshan Gite
Corresponding author

B. Pharm, Gawande College of Pharmacy S. Kherda, Buldhana, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Umesh Zanak
Co-author

B. Pharm, Gawande College of Pharmacy S. Kherda, Buldhana, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Sakshi Bharate
Co-author

B. Pharm, Gawande College of Pharmacy S. Kherda, Buldhana, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Pooja Rathod
Co-author

B. Pharm, Gawande College of Pharmacy S. Kherda, Buldhana, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Vaishali Mawal
Co-author

B. Pharm, Gawande College of Pharmacy S. Kherda, Buldhana, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Poonam Dalve
Co-author

B. Pharm, Gawande College of Pharmacy S. Kherda, Buldhana, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Shivshankar Nagrik
Co-author

M. Pharm, Department of Pharmaceutics, Rajarshi Shahu College of Pharmacy Buldhana, Maharashtra, India

Sudarshan Gite*, Umesh Zanak, Sakshi Bharate, Pooja Rathod, Vaishali Mawal, Poonam Dalve, Shivshankar Nagrik, Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Modeling of Drug?Drug Interactions: Advances, Applications, and Future Directions, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (8), 172-201. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16834759

More related articles
Exploring Drug for Cancer Management...
Supriya Kore, Srushti Yadav, Sarang Nirmale, Ashish Bhole, Shradd...
Formulation and Evaluation of Stavudine Floating T...
Wakde Ashwini, Shubham Wakchaure, Dr. Megha Salve, ...
A Review on The Latest Advances in Food and Cosmet...
Akshay Kumar, Dr. Bhavini Gharia , ...
Review on: Strategies for Preventing and Controlling Rabies Disease...
Dipali Pagar, Roshani More, Bhavisha Chaudhari, ...
Formulation and Characterization of a Polyherbal Nanogel for Acne Management...
Pratiksha Gore , Pawan Nimbalkar, Vikas Kakde, Shivam Patekar , Rushikesh Veer , Arti Gadekar, Gulsh...
Related Articles
Exploring Drug for Cancer Management...
Supriya Kore, Srushti Yadav, Sarang Nirmale, Ashish Bhole, Shraddha Konda, Sanjana Kamble, Aniket K...
More related articles
Exploring Drug for Cancer Management...
Supriya Kore, Srushti Yadav, Sarang Nirmale, Ashish Bhole, Shraddha Konda, Sanjana Kamble, Aniket K...
Formulation and Evaluation of Stavudine Floating Tablet...
Wakde Ashwini, Shubham Wakchaure, Dr. Megha Salve, ...
Exploring Drug for Cancer Management...
Supriya Kore, Srushti Yadav, Sarang Nirmale, Ashish Bhole, Shraddha Konda, Sanjana Kamble, Aniket K...
Formulation and Evaluation of Stavudine Floating Tablet...
Wakde Ashwini, Shubham Wakchaure, Dr. Megha Salve, ...