1Master of pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics, C.L. Baid Metha College of Pharmacy Thoraipakkam, Chennai.
2Associate professor, Department of Pharmaceutics, C.L. Baid Metha college of Pharmacy Thoraipakkam, Chennai
The research focused on the development and assessment of floating matrix tablets containing Vildagliptin (50 mg) and Metformin (250 mg), which represent the minimum effective dosage for managing Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The floating matrix design aims to extend the gastric retention time of the active ingredients, thereby improving their bioavailability and facilitating a sustained release mechanism. Various polymers, including Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) grades K100M and K4M, Carbopol 940, and Ethyl cellulose, were utilized to create the matrix, enabling controlled release over a period of 10 hours. The tablets were produced through direct compression and evaluated for pre-compression parameters such as bulk density, tapped density, Hausner’s ratio, Carr’s index, and angle of repose, in addition to post-compression attributes like weight variation, hardness, thickness, friability, buoyancy lag time, and drug content. In vitro analyses, including HPLC methods for assessing assay or percentage purity, were conducted, while dissolution studies demonstrated a sustained release profile consistent with zero-order, first-order, Higuchi, Korsmeyer-Peppas, and Hixon-Crowell models for drug release kinetics. Among the formulations tested, formulation F2 showed the most favourable outcomes. The combination of Vildagliptin and Metformin in a floating matrix system suggests potential for enhanced therapeutic effectiveness and improved patient adherence in diabetes treatment. The findings indicate that these floating matrix tablets could significantly improve therapeutic results while minimizing dosing frequency, offering a promising strategy for better glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood glucose levels (hyperglycaemia) due to problems with insulin production, its effectiveness, or a combination of both factors. This condition is primarily classified into two main types: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Type 1 diabetes typically manifests in children or young adults and results from the autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic beta cells responsible for insulin production. Conversely, Type 2 diabetes, which is more prevalent, usually occurs in adults and is associated with insulin resistance and a relative lack of insulin. The prevalence of diabetes has risen dramatically in recent years, raising significant public health concerns. Factors contributing to this trend include sedentary lifestyles, poor dietary choices, obesity, and an aging population. The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes diabetes as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, resulting in complications such as cardiovascular disease, neuropathy, renal disease, and vision impairment. Managing diabetes necessitates significant lifestyle adjustments, regular monitoring of blood glucose levels, and appropriate medical interventions. Floating matrix tablets represent an advanced drug delivery system aimed at improving the bioavailability and therapeutic effectiveness of medications, especially those that require extended gastric retention. This innovative method tackles prevalent issues in oral drug delivery, such as swift gastric emptying and inconsistent absorption rates, which can result in less-than-optimal therapeutic results. The fundamental concept behind floating drug delivery systems (FDDS) is their capacity to remain afloat. By integrating specific hydrophilic polymers into the tablet composition, these systems can maintain buoyancy in the gastric environment, facilitating a controlled release of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). This ability to float is essential for medications that are predominantly absorbed in the stomach or the upper sections of the gastrointestinal tract. Floating matrix dosage forms are specifically designed to uphold buoyancy within the gastrointestinal tract, thereby improving drug absorption and overall therapeutic efficacy. The following outlines the primary features of these dosage forms: Floating Mechanism: These formulations are crafted to remain on the surface of gastric fluids, which extends their retention time in the stomach and enhances drug absorption. Hydrophilic Polymers: These formulations often utilize polymers like hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) or sodium alginate, which expand when exposed to gastric fluids. Gas-Generating Agents: This category may feature compounds such as sodium bicarbonate that produce gas, enhancing buoyancy.
MATERIALS AND METHOD:
MATERIALS:
Vildagliptin and Metformin were provided as complimentary samples by Fourrts India Pvt Ltd. The polymers, including Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose K100M and K4M, were supplied by Coloron Asia Pvt Ltd, while Carbopol 940, Ethyl cellulose, HPC, Sodium bicarbonate, Citric acid, and Magnesium stearate were also received as gift samples from Fourrts India Pvt Ltd. The floating matrix tablets of vildagliptin and metformin represent an advanced drug delivery system aimed at improving the bioavailability and therapeutic effectiveness of medications, especially those designed for extended gastric retention.
METHODS:
In the direct compression technique, the initial weights of all active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients are determined. Begin by accurately weighing the APIs, Vildagliptin and Metformin, which should be passed through a #30 mesh sieve. Next, anhydrous lactose is measured, as it is essential for tablet formation due to its excellent compressibility. It also serves as a diluent for dry powder inhalations. Disintegrating agents, such as microcrystalline cellulose and anhydrous lactose, are precisely weighed and similarly passed through a #30 mesh. The polymers are weighed accurately to ascertain their concentrations and also passed through the #30 mesh. Introduce a gas-generating agent, such as sodium bicarbonate, which produces carbon dioxide when in contact with a dissolution medium (0.01 N HCl). The generated gas is encapsulated within the gel formed by polymer hydration, effectively reducing the tablet's density. Sodium bicarbonate should also be passed through a #30 mesh. Next, incorporate citric acid. When citric acid interacts with sodium bicarbonate in the presence of water, it produces carbon dioxide gas, creating bubbles that help gastric fluid rise. Prior to this, citric acid crystals should be crushed using a mortar and pestle and then passed through a #30 mesh. Mixing: All components are combined in a polyethylene bag for 5 to 10 minutes. After mixing, the blend is sieved using the same #30 mesh. Lubrication: Finally, magnesium stearate, which has been passed through a #60 mesh, is added as a lubricant. Compression: The lubricated granules are then subjected to compression using an 11.9 mm round punch, targeting a weight of 600 mg.
Drug Content Uniformity: To confirm that each tablet contains the correct amount of active ingredient. Randomly select 10 tablets and analyse each for drug content using an appropriate analytical method (HPLC). The active ingredient content should be within 85-115% of the labelled claim, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of less than 6%.
In Vitro Dissolution Test: To assess the drug release profile from the tablets. Utilize a USP type I dissolution apparatus with a suitable dissolution medium (e.g., 0.1N HCl) at 37°C. Collect samples at specified intervals and analyse using UV spectroscopy or HPLC. The drug release should conform to the established release profile, typically indicating a specific percentage of drug released at designated time points. The assessment of post-compression parameters indicates that the tablets exhibit uniform weight, thickness, and size, as well as sufficient mechanical strength and minimal friability. The disintegration time and dissolution characteristics align with the established specifications, facilitating effective drug release. The uniformity of drug content falls within acceptable ranges, confirming that each tablet contains the appropriate dosage of the active ingredient. In summary, the evaluation of these parameters highlights the high quality of the tablets, affirming their suitability for the intended application.
Assay by HPLC Method:
Assay of vildagliptin and metformin by HPLC method:
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Table 1: Chromatographic conditions:
Column |
C18,150×4.6 mm, 3-micron pack or Equivalent |
Column Temperature |
35 °C |
Flow rate |
1.0 ml/ min |
Detection Wave length |
210 nm (For Vildagliptin) 218 nm (For Metformin Hydrochloride) |
Autosampler temperature |
15°C |
Injection volume |
10 µl |
Mobile phase A |
A mixture of 400 ml Buffer Solution and 600 ml of water |
Mobile phase B |
A mixture of 400 ml Buffer Solution and 600 ml of Acetonitrile. |
Solvent Mixture |
90 Volume of Water, 10 Volume of Acetonitrile and 0.1 Volume of Orthophosphoric acid. |
Solution A |
40 volume of the Buffer Solution, 60 Volume of water and 2.5 Volume of Acetonitrile. |
Preparation of Buffer Solution: Dissolve 1.7 g of Potassium dihydrogen phosphate in 1000 ml of water. Adjust the pH to 3.0 ± 0.1 using orthophosphoric acid. Incorporate 8.0 g of ammonium hexafluorophosphate and mix thoroughly.
Reference Solution (a): Accurately weigh 100 mg of Vildagliptin Working Standard and 40 mg of Metformin Hydrochloride Working Standard into a 100 ml volumetric flask. Shake the mixture well to ensure complete dissolution with the solvent mixture, then bring the volume up to the mark. Dilute 10 ml of this solution to 20 ml using the solvent mixture.
Test Solution (a): Weigh approximately 10 tablets and grind them using a mortar and pestle. Disperse the powdered tablets in the solvent mixture, utilizing a magnetic stirrer for 45 minutes. Dilute the resulting mixture to 500 ml with the solvent mixture, then centrifuge to obtain a clear supernatant and filter. Further dilute 10 ml of the filtrate to 20 ml with the solvent mixture.
Test Solution (b): Dilute 2 ml of Test Solution (a) to 50 ml with Solution A.
Procedure: Separately inject the reference Solution (a) (6 injections) into the chromatograph and record the major response. Ensure the following system suitability parameter.
Table 2: System stability parameter and acceptance criteria:
System Stability Parameter |
Acceptance criteria |
Tailing factor (Standard solution) |
NMT 2.0 |
Relative standard deviation (Standard solution) |
NMT 2.0 % |
Inject Test solution (a) and Test Solution (b) (2 injections) into the chromatograph and calculate the content of Vildagliptin and Metformin Hydrochloride against the Reference Solution using the following expression.
Calculation:
DISSOLUTION BY HPLC METHOD:
Table 3: Dissolution Condition:
Medium |
900 ml of 0.01 M Hydrochloric acid |
Apparatus |
Basket |
RPM |
100 |
Medium Temperature |
37 °C |
Time |
10 Hours |
Preparation of 0.01 M Hydrochloric acid: Dissolve 0.85 ml Hydrochloric acid in 1000 ml of water.
Table 4: Chromatographic conditions:
Column |
L1, 150 × 4.6 mm, 3 micron or Equivalent |
Column Temperature |
40 °C |
Flow rate |
1.8 ml/ min |
Detection wavelength |
218 nm |
Autosampler Temperature |
10 °C |
Injection Volume |
10 µl |
Mobile Phase |
Buffer: Water: Acetonitrile (40:33: 27) |
Preparation of Buffer: Dissolve 1.7 g of Potassium dihydrogen phosphate in 1000 ml of water. Adjust to PH- 3.0 ± 0.1 with Orthophosphoric acid. Add 8.0 g of Hexafluorophosphate acid and mix.
Standard Solution: Weight accurately about 27.8 mg of Vildagliptin working standard and 27.8 mg Metformin Hydrochloride working Standard in a25 ml of volumetric flask. Add 15 ml of medium, sonicate to dissolve and make up to the volume with medium. Dilute 5 ml of this solution to 100 ml with medium.
Test Solution: Withdraw 15 ml of the sample of the medium from each bowl and filter through 0.45-µm membrane (Use Nylon Syringe Filter). Use the Filter for further analysis.
Sample for Vildagliptin: Use the filtrate.
Sample for Metformin Hydrochloride: Dilute 5 ml of the filtrate to 25 ml with medium.
Procedure: Separately inject the standard solution (6 injections) into the chromatograph and record the major response. Ensure the following system suitability parameter.
Table 5: System stability and acceptance criteria:
System stability parameter |
Acceptance Criteria |
Tailing Factor (Standard solution) |
NMT 2.0 |
Relative Standard Deviation (Standard solution) |
NMT 2.0 |
Calculation: Calculate the Percentage dissolution of Vildagliptin and Metformin Hydrochloride using the following expression.
Kinetic Studies of Vildagliptin And Metformin Matrix Tablet:
KINETICS MODEL OF DISSOLUTION:
Zero order kinetics: In this model, the drug release rate is constant over time, meaning that a constant amount of drug is released per unit of time, independent of its concentration.
Equation:
First order kinetics: In first-order kinetics, the drug release rate is proportional to the amount of drug left in the dosage form, meaning that the rate decreases as the drug concentration decreases.
Equation
Equation:
Korsmeyer-Peppas Mode: This model accounts for the shrinking surface area during the dissolution process. As the drug dissolves, the surface area available for dissolution decreases, leading to a changing dissolution rate.
Equation:
Stability Studies:
The assessment of a drug's stability within its dosage form under diverse environmental conditions is essential, as it directly impacts the formulation's shelf life. Any changes in physical attributes such as color, odor, taste, or texture may indicate potential instability of the drug. Among the various formulations evaluated, Formulation F2 was selected for stability testing due to its favorable physicochemical characteristics and release profile of the floating matrix tablet. Stability evaluations were performed at 40 ± 2º C and 75 ± 5% relative humidity, as outlined in the accompanying table. The findings revealed no significant alterations in the physical appearance, average tablet weight, or hardness. Additionally, the initial drug content was consistent with that of samples analyzed after one month of storage. The release profile also showed no notable changes, indicating that both the physical and chemical properties of the formulation remained stable. Consequently, it can be concluded that the developed tablets preserved their stability and pharmaceutical effectiveness throughout the one-month duration.
Table 6: Formulation Table:
S. No |
Ingredients (mg) |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
F10 |
1. |
Vildagliptin |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
2. |
Metformin |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
3. |
Anhydrous lactose |
35 |
35 |
30 |
25 |
19 |
36.25 |
30 |
20 |
16 |
27 |
4. |
MCC |
25 |
25 |
20 |
24 |
16 |
26.25 |
25 |
15 |
14 |
23 |
5. |
HPMC-K100M |
100 |
100 |
100 |
65 |
90 |
- |
60 |
70 |
- |
50 |
6. |
HPMC-K4M |
- |
30 |
- |
55 |
30 |
92.5 |
50 |
55 |
80 |
25 |
7. |
Carbopol 940 |
30 |
- |
30 |
21 |
25 |
- |
- |
- |
30 |
- |
8. |
Ethyl cellulose |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
10 |
40 |
25 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9. |
HPC |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
60 |
- |
20 |
40 |
55 |
10. |
Sodium bicarbonate |
70 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
25 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
11. |
Citric acid |
35 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
15 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
13. |
Magnesium stearate |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
14. |
Total weight of Tablet (mg) |
600 |
600 |
600 |
600 |
600 |
600 |
600 |
600 |
600 |
600 |
RESULT AND SISCUSSION:
Table 7: Organoleptic Properties of Vildagliptin and Metformin:
S. No |
Organoleptic Properties |
Vildagliptin |
Metformin |
1. |
Color |
Whit to yellow |
White to off White |
2. |
Odor |
Characteristic |
Fishy smell |
3. |
Taste |
Metallic |
Metallic taste |
4. |
Melting point |
150?C |
223-226 ?C |
5. |
Microscopic examination |
Amorphous powder |
Highly crystalline |
Solubility studies:
Table1 8: The solubility of Vildagliptin:
Medium |
mg/ml |
Solubility |
Water |
66.5 |
Freely soluble |
0.1N HCL |
78.40 |
Freely soluble |
PH 4.5 Buffer |
66.88 |
Sparingly soluble |
PH 6.8 Buffer |
66.65 |
Sparingly soluble |
PH 7.2 Buffer |
67.15 |
Sparingly soluble |
The solubility of Metformin was determined in different solvent such as water, HCL PH 1.2, ABS 4.5, PBS PH 5.8, 6.8 and 7.2 (ABS- Acetate Buffer solution, PBS- Phosphate buffer solution.
Table 9: The solubility of Metformin:
Medium |
mg/ml |
Solubility |
Water |
326.71 |
Freely soluble |
HCL PH 1.2 |
429.30 |
Soluble |
ABS 4.5 BUFFER |
318.61 |
Soluble |
PBS PH 5.8 Buffer |
304.98 |
Soluble |
PBS PH 6.8Buffer |
317.14 |
Soluble |
PBS PH 7.2Buffer |
253.99 |
Soluble |
Drug Excipient Compatibility Study:
FTIR- (Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy):
Figure 5: Compatibility of Vildagliptin and Metformin API
Figure 6: Compatibility study of Metformin and vildagliptin API
Figure 7: Compatibility study of HPMC K100M with Vildagliptin and Metformin API
9.5 Pre-Compression Parameters:
9.6 Flow Properties Of API:
Table 10: Flow properties of Vildagliptin and Metformin API: (Table 12)
Drug |
Bulk density |
Tapped density |
Hausner’s ratio |
Carr’s index |
Angle of repose |
Flow properties |
Vildagliptin |
0.62 |
0.75 |
1.20 |
17.33 |
34.79°C |
Good |
Metformin |
0.6 |
0.75 |
1.25 |
20 |
32.64°C |
Satisfactory |
Table 11: Flow properties of API with excipients in different formulation:
Formulations |
Bulk density |
Tapped density |
Hausner’s ratio |
Carr’s index |
Angle of repose |
Flow properties |
F1 |
0.62 |
0.75 |
1.20 |
9.75 |
30.2°C |
Excellent |
F2 |
0.46 |
0.60 |
1.30 |
23.02 |
28.2°C |
Excellent |
F3 |
0.51 |
0.58 |
1.13 |
12.06 |
27.3°C |
Excellent |
F4 |
0.46 |
0.54 |
1.17 |
14.8 |
30.2°C |
Excellent |
F5 |
0.65 |
0.76 |
1.16 |
14.47 |
26.5°C |
Excellent |
F6 |
0.48 |
0.54 |
1.12 |
11.11 |
30.2°C |
Excellent |
F7 |
0.60 |
0.69 |
1.15 |
13.04 |
29.2°C |
Excellent |
F8 |
0.54 |
0.71 |
1.31 |
23.94 |
46.2°C |
Poor |
F9 |
0.62 |
0.76 |
1.22 |
18.42 |
34.5°C |
Good |
F10 |
0.53 |
0.60 |
1.13 |
11.66 |
29.1°C |
Excellent |
7 Post Compression Parameters:
Table 12: Post compression parameter:
Formulation code |
Weight variation (mg) |
Thickness (mm) |
Hardness (kg/cm2) |
Friability (%) |
Buoyancy Lag time (Sec) |
F1 |
599.2±3.3 |
5.062±0.01 |
5.42±0.3 |
0.046 |
45 sec |
F2 |
600.8±4.4 |
4.978±0.02 |
5.578±0.6 |
0.21 |
41 sec |
F3 |
601.8±3.9 |
5.018±0.03 |
5.378±0.2 |
0.045 |
60 sec |
F4 |
602.2±3.1 |
5.04±0.02 |
6.018±0.2 |
0.12 |
58 sec |
F5 |
602.4±2.7 |
5.022±0.05 |
6.02±0.2 |
0.076 |
60 sec |
F6 |
602±3.5 |
4.992±0.04 |
5.878±0.5 |
0.076 |
5 min |
F7 |
601.6±2.3 |
5.042±0.05 |
5.824±0.2 |
0.56 |
2 min |
F8 |
600±2.5 |
5.006±0.05 |
5.864±0.5 |
0.030 |
4 min |
F9 |
600.2±3.9 |
4.99±0.03 |
6.242±0.5 |
0.061 |
8 min |
F10 |
600.7±3.8 |
5.012±0.04 |
6.488±0.2 |
0.12 |
7 min |
Figure 8: Buoyancy lag Time of Vildagliptin and Metformin Tablet Formulations
Figure 9: Floating tablet image of various formulation F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5
9.8 Swelling Index:
Table 13: Swelling Index
Formulations code |
Swelling Index (%) |
F1 |
82.72% |
F2 |
90.10% |
F3 |
85.26% |
F4 |
82.96% |
F5 |
83.76% |
Figure 10: Swelling index of tablets
Assays of Vildagliptin And Metformin by Hplc:
Table 14: Standard Assay of Vildagliptin and Metformin API’S
Table 15: Sample Assay of Vildagliptin and Metformin Tablets:
Assay Chromatogram of Vildagliptin And Metformin:
Sample chromatogram assay of vildagliptin in formulation (F2):
Figure 13: Sample Chromatogram assay of Vildagliptin in formulation (F1)
Sample Chromatogram assay of Metformin in formulation (F2):
Figure 14: Sample Chromatogram assay of Metformin in formulation (F2)
Dissolution Of Vildagliptin And Metformin:
Table 17: F2 -Dissolution of Vildagliptin and Metformin
Figure 15: F2 -Dissolution of Vildagliptin and Metformin
Kinetic studies of vildagliptin and metformin matrix tablet:
Kinetic studies of vildagliptin:
Table 18: kinetic models of vildagliptin in various formulations:
Formulation code |
Kinetic Model of Vildagliptin |
||||
Zero order |
First order |
Higuchi model |
Korsmeyer- Peppas plot |
||
R |
R |
R2 |
R2 |
Slop |
|
F1 |
0.8853 |
0.9598 |
0.9912 |
0.8986 |
1.2887 |
F2 |
0.9347 |
0.9741 |
0.998 |
0.9346 |
1.3977 |
F3 |
0.893 |
0.97341 |
0.9635 |
0.9419 |
1.3381 |
Kinetic models of metformin:
Table: 19 Kinetic models of Metformin in various formulations:
Formulation code |
Kinetic Model of Vildagliptin |
||||
Zero order |
First order |
Higuchi model |
Korsmeyer- Peppas plot |
||
R |
R |
R2 |
R2 |
Slop |
|
F1 |
0.8899 |
0.9589 |
0.9959 |
0.9239 |
1.3465 |
F2 |
0.8889 |
0.9885 |
0.9886 |
0.9329 |
1.3758 |
F3 |
0.8992 |
0.9846 |
0.9839 |
0.9065 |
1.3545 |
Table 20: Stability study of Vildagliptin and Metformin:
Evaluation parameters |
Observation in one Month |
|||||
Initial |
15 days |
1 Month |
||||
Physical appearance |
White to yellow |
No change |
No change |
|||
Hardness (Kg/cm2) |
5.57±0.6 |
5.578±0.2 |
5.576±0.6 |
|||
Thickness (mm) |
4.978±0.02 |
4.978±0.01 |
4.977±0.01 |
|||
Weight variation (mg) |
600.8± 4.4 |
600.6± 4.2 |
600.6±4.1 |
|||
Friability (%) |
0.21 |
0.21 |
0.2 |
|||
Buoyancy (Sec) |
41 Sec |
41 sec |
41 sec |
|||
Drug content (%) (F2) |
VIL |
MET |
VIL |
MET |
VIL |
MET |
101.95 |
100.27 |
101.9 |
100.2 |
101.85 |
100.15 |
DISCUSSION:
The solubility studies indicate that Vildagliptin is highly soluble, whereas Metformin shows limited solubility across different mediums, as outlined in Table 8 and 9. FTIR analysis reveals no significant interactions or interferences between the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and the excipients. The precompression parameters, including bulk density, tapped density, Hausner’s ratio, Carr’s index, and angle of repose for both APIs, fall within acceptable ranges it can be outlined in Table 11. Post-compression parameters such as weight variation (mg), thickness (mm), hardness (Kg/cm²), friability (%), and buoyancy lag time (sec) are presented in Table 12. The buoyancy lag time for the ten formulations (F1-F10) shows that the first five formulations (F1-F5) have a floating lag time of 45 to 60 seconds outlined in (Figure 8), while the latter five formulations (F6-F10) display lag times ranging from 2 to 5 minutes, attributed to differences in polymer concentrations. Consequently, the first five formulations (F1-F5) were chosen for further investigation. The percentage purity of the APIs was assessed using the HPLC method, with results summarized in Tables 14, 15, and 16. The chromatograms for formulations F2 are depicted in Figure 13 and 40. Based on the purity levels, the first three formulations (F1-F3) were selected for additional analysis, as they demonstrated a high purity level of 99.9% compared to the five formulations (F1-F5). In the swelling studies, the swelling index of various formulations (F1-F5) was evaluated after one hour. Among the tested formulations, F2 exhibited the highest swellability at 90.1%, surpassing the other formulations and yielding the most promising results. The findings from the in vitro dissolution studies of formulations F2 are detailed in Tables 17. The release profiles of these formulations are illustrated in Figure 15. The in vitro dissolution studies underwent curve fitting analysis utilizing various kinetic models, including zero order, first order, Higuchi, and Korsmeyer-Peppas to evaluate the drug release behavior. The correlation coefficients (R values) for these kinetic models are presented in Tables 18 and 19. The interpretation of release kinetics for the different mathematical models is as follows: Zero order: The cumulative percentage of drug release plotted against time indicates that the release of Vildagliptin and Metformin from the matrix does not strictly adhere to zero order release kinetics, although it shows a slight tendency towards it (R values ranging from 0.885 to 0.93473 for Vildagliptin and from 0.8889 to 0.8992 for Metformin). First order: The log cumulative percentage of drug release plotted against time suggests that the release of Vildagliptin and Metformin from the matrix aligns more closely with first order release kinetics, as evidenced by higher correlation coefficients (R values ranging from 0.9598 to 0.9741 for Vildagliptin and from 0.9589 to 0.9885 for Metformin).
CONCLUSION:
This research aimed to develop a combined fixed dosage form containing to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of the drugs chosen in Type 2 Diabetes. The effective integration of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers enhances buoyancy and extends the drug release profile. This combination therapy designed for gastric retention also allows for a controlled release mechanism, ensuring effective regulation of blood glucose levels over an extended duration while achieving maximum efficacy with minimal dosage. In vitro evaluations reveal that the tablets sustain optimal dissolution rates for up to 10 hours, indicating their potential for enhanced bioavailability. Stability assessments further validate the formulation's durability, suggesting its appropriateness for long-term storage. This innovative delivery system could be a promising approach for improving patient adherence and treatment outcomes in diabetes management. Further in vivo studies are recommended to confirm the clinical advantages.
REFERENCE
M. Selva Vignesh*, G. Selvi, P. Nirmal, Development and Evaluation of a Floating Drug Delivery System for the Sustained Release of Vildagliptin and Metformin in Combination Therapy, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (6), 457-471. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15675678