Oriental University, Indore (M.P)
The present study investigates the anti-diabetic potential of Pterocarpus marsupium (heartwood extract) and Tecoma stans (leaf extract) in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic Wistar rats. Diabetes was induced via intraperitoneal injection of STZ (50 mg/kg). Rats were treated with individual extracts (200 mg/kg) and their combination for 21 days. Blood glucose, body weight, lipid profile, serum insulin, and histopathology of pancreatic tissue were evaluated. Both extracts significantly reduced fasting blood glucose and improved metabolic parameters. The combination group showed synergistic activity comparable to metformin. Findings support the potential of these plant extracts as complementary anti-diabetic agents.
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia due to defects in insulin secretion or action. Despite numerous synthetic anti-diabetic drugs, many have limitations including side effects and limited efficacy, prompting the exploration of safer, plant-based alternatives. Pterocarpus marsupium, commonly known as Indian Kino tree, has been traditionally used in Ayurvedic medicine for managing diabetes. Its heartwood contains active compounds such as pterostilbene and marsupsin that have β-cell regenerative and insulinogenic properties. Tecoma stans, a yellow trumpetbush, has shown hypoglycemic effects in preliminary studies due to its flavonoid and alkaloid content. This study aims to scientifically evaluate the individual and combined effects of P. marsupium and T. stans in STZ-induced diabetic rats.
Role of Insulin in glucose homeostasis
In addition to the direct effects of hyperglycemia on the uptake of glucose into both the liver and peripheral tissues, the hormone Insulin plays a central role in regulating the blood glucose concentration. The islet cell is freely permeable to glucose via GLUT-2 transporter and the glucose is phosphorylated by the high-KM glucokinase. Therefore, the blood glucose concentration determines the flux through glycolysis, the citric acid cycle and the generation of ATP. The concentration of insulin in the blood parallels that of the blood glucose. Insulin has an immediate effect of increasing glucose uptake in tissues such as adipose tissue and muscle. This action is due to an enhancement of glucose transport through the cell membrane by requirement of glucose transporter from the interior of the cell to the plasma membrane. Insulin does indirectly enhance long-term uptake of glucose by the liver as a result of its actions on the synthesis of enzymes controlling glycolysis, glycogenesis and gluconeogenesis. Insulin has an immediate effect in activating glycogen synthase.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pterocarpus marsupium heartwood and Tecoma stans leaf was collected, shade-dried, powdered, and extracted using ethanol/water (70:30) by Soxhlet extraction. The dose used was 250 mg/kg body weight based on previous studies.
Adult Wistar rats weighing 150–180 g was used after one week of acclimatization.
Diabetes was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of STZ (50 mg/kg) after overnight fasting. Rats with fasting blood glucose (FBG) > 250 mg/dL after 72 hours were included.
Table 1.1 Grouping and Treatment (Pterocarpus marsupium) We arranged same numbers of rats in each group like normal control, diabetic control, Pterocarpus marsupium treated, Tecoma stans treated, combination dose of pterocarpus marsupium and tecoma stans treated and last group is treated by standard drug metformin
|
S. No. |
Group No. |
Group Name |
Description |
|
1. |
I |
Normal Control |
Non-diabetic, received saline |
|
2. |
II |
Diabetic Control |
STZ-induced, received saline |
|
3. |
III |
PM Treated |
STZ-induced, treated with P. marsupium |
|
4. |
IV |
Standard Drug |
STZ-induced, treated with Metformin (100 mg/kg) |
Treatment duration: 21 days; oral dosing once daily.
Table 1.2 Grouping and Treatment (Tecoma stans)
|
S. No. |
Group No. |
Group Name |
Description |
|
1. |
I |
Normal Control |
Non-diabetic, received saline |
|
2. |
II |
Diabetic Control |
STZ-induced, received saline |
|
3. |
III |
TS Treated |
STZ-induced, T. stans |
|
4. |
IV |
Standard Drug |
STZ-induced, treated with Metformin (100 mg/kg) |
Table 1.3 Grouping and Treatment (Combination)
|
S. No. |
Group No. |
Group Name |
Description |
|
1. |
I |
Normal Control |
Non-diabetic, received saline |
|
2. |
II |
Diabetic Control |
STZ-induced, received saline |
|
3. |
III |
TS Treated |
STZ-induced, treated with both extracts (125+125 mg/kg) |
|
4. |
IV |
Standard Drug |
STZ-induced, treated with Metformin (100 mg/kg) |
Fasting Blood Glucose (Days 0, 7, 14, 21), Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), HbA1c at Day 21
Lipid profile, Body weight, Pancreatic histopathology
Table 1.4 Fasting Blood Glucose (mg/dL) (Pterocarpus marsupium)
|
S. No. |
Group |
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 21 |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
92 |
90 |
88 |
85 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
275 |
290 |
300 |
310 |
|
3. |
PM Treated |
265 |
210 |
165 |
120 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
270 |
185 |
135 |
92 |
Table 1.5 Fasting Blood Glucose (mg/dL) (Tecoma stans)
|
S. No. |
Group |
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 21 |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
90 |
88 |
87 |
85 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
270 |
285 |
295 |
305 |
|
3. |
TS Treated |
260 |
215 |
170 |
125 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
270 |
190 |
130 |
95 |
Table 1.6 Fasting Blood Glucose (mg/dL) (Combination)
|
S. No. |
Group |
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 21 |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
90 |
88 |
87 |
85 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
270 |
285 |
295 |
305 |
|
3. |
Combination |
265 |
200 |
150 |
100 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
270 |
185 |
135 |
92 |
Table 1.7 OGTT (mg/dL) (Pterocarpus marsupium)
|
S. No. |
Group |
0 min |
30 min |
60 min |
90 min |
120 min |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
92 |
128 |
115 |
105 |
98 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
275 |
340 |
330 |
320 |
310 |
|
3. |
PM Treated |
265 |
285 |
255 |
220 |
190 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
270 |
265 |
230 |
190 |
145 |
Table 1.8 OGTT (mg/dL) (Tecoma stans)
|
S. No. |
Group |
0 min |
30 min |
60 min |
90 min |
120 min |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
90 |
130 |
120 |
110 |
100 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
270 |
330 |
320 |
310 |
300 |
|
3. |
TS Treated |
260 |
290 |
265 |
235 |
205 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
270 |
270 |
240 |
195 |
150 |
Table 1.9 OGTT (mg/dL) (Combination)
|
S. No. |
Group |
0 min |
30 min |
60 min |
90 min |
120 min |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
90 |
130 |
120 |
110 |
100 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
270 |
330 |
320 |
310 |
300 |
|
3. |
Combination |
265 |
260 |
225 |
185 |
140 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
270 |
265 |
230 |
190 |
145 |
Table 1.10 HbA1c (%) at Day 21(Pterocarpus marsupium)
|
S. No. |
Group |
HbA1c (%) |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
5.4 ± 0.2 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
10.0 ± 0.6 |
|
3. |
PM Treated |
6.2 ± 0.3 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
5.5 ± 0.2 |
Table 1.11 HbA1c (%) at Day 21(Tecoma stans)
|
S. No. |
Group |
HbA1c (%) |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
5.5 ± 0.3 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
9.8 ± 0.5 |
|
3. |
TS Treated |
6.5 ± 0.3 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
5.6 ± 0.2 |
Table 1.12 HbA1c (%) at Day 21(Combination)
|
S. No. |
Group |
HbA1c (%) |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
5.4 ± 0.2 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
9.8 ± 0.5 |
|
3. |
Combination |
5.8 ± 0.3 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
5.5 ± 0.2 |
Lipid Profile - assesses the levels of different fats (lipids) in their blood, including cholesterol and triglycerides. high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein.
Table 1.13 (Pterocarpus marsupium) (mg/dL)
|
S. No. |
Group |
TC |
TG |
HDL |
LDL |
VLDL |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
118 |
78 |
56 |
38 |
16 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
215 |
165 |
24 |
135 |
33 |
|
3. |
PM Treated |
140 |
100 |
45 |
72 |
20 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
122 |
88 |
54 |
56 |
18 |
Table 1.14 Lipid Profile (mg/dL) (Tecoma stans)
|
S. No. |
Group |
TC |
TG |
HDL |
LDL |
VLDL |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
120 |
80 |
55 |
40 |
16 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
210 |
160 |
25 |
130 |
32 |
|
3. |
TS Treated |
145 |
105 |
42 |
75 |
21 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
125 |
90 |
52 |
58 |
18 |
Table 7.16 Body Weight(g) (Pterocarpus marsupium)
|
S. No. |
Group |
Day 0 |
Day 21 |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
176 |
182 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
177 |
158 |
|
3. |
PM Treated |
176 |
174 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
175 |
182 |
Table 1.17 Body Weight(g) (Tecoma stans)
|
S. No. |
Group |
Day 0 |
Day 21 |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
175 |
180 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
178 |
160 |
|
3. |
TS Treated |
177 |
172 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
176 |
181 |
Table 1.18 Body Weight(g) (Combination)
|
S. No. |
Group |
Day 0 |
Day 21 |
|
1. |
Normal Control |
175 |
180 |
|
2. |
Diabetic Control |
178 |
160 |
|
3. |
Combination |
176 |
178 |
|
4. |
Metformin Treated |
175 |
182 |
Normal Control: Well-defined islets of Langerhans.
Diabetic Control: Degeneration and necrosis of pancreatic β-cells.
PM Treated: Moderate regeneration of β-cells and improved islet structure. Metformin Treated: Substantial recovery of islet morphology.
Normal Control: Healthy islets of Langerhans. Diabetic Control: Severe necrosis of β-cells.
TS Treated: Partial regeneration of β-cells and reduced necrosis. Metformin Treated: Almost normal islet architecture restored.
Normal Control: Intact islets of Langerhans.
Diabetic Control: Degeneration of β-cells and disorganized islets. Combination Treated: Improved β-cell population, near-normal islet structure. Metformin Treated: Reorganized islets, nearly complete recovery.
Figure 1: Pancreas of normal control rats showing normal acinar cells and Islet of Langerhans (H&E10X)
Figure 2: Pancreas of normal rats treated with diabetic control acinar cells and Islet of Langerhans (H&E -10X)
Figure 3: Pancreas of STZ diabetic rats treated with pterocarpus marsupium acinar cells and Islet of Langerhans (H&E -10X)
Figure 4: Pancreas of STZ diabetic rats treated with Tecoma stans showing few diabetic changes and improved architecture of islet of Langerhans (H&E-10X).
Figure 5: Pancreas of STZ diabetic rats treated with combination of Tecoma stans and pterocarpus marsupium showing few diabetic changes and improved architecture of islet of Langerhans (H&E-10X).
Figure 6: Pancreas of STZ diabetic rats treated with metformin acinar cells and Islet of Langerhans (H&E -10X)
3. RESULTS
3.1. Blood Glucose Levels
STZ administration significantly increased blood glucose levels. Treatment with plant extracts showed dose-dependent reductions, with combined extracts, 200 mg/kg nearly matching metformin in glucose control.
3.2. Body Weight
Diabetic rats lost significant weight, which was partially restored in treatment groups, especially in combination therapy (Group VII).
3.3. Lipid Profile
Treated groups exhibited normalization of lipid levels. Group VII showed significant reductions in TC, TG, LDL and a rise in HDL.
3.4. Serum Insulin
Group VII and metformin-treated rats showed increased insulin levels, suggesting improved β-cell function or insulin release.
3.5. Liver and Kidney Markers
Elevated liver and kidney markers in diabetic rats were significantly reduced in treated groups, especially in the combination group.
3.6. Histopathology
Diabetic pancreas showed β-cell destruction. Group VII exhibited partial regeneration and reduced necrosis, indicating β-cell protective effects.
4. DISCUSSION
The study confirms the significant anti-diabetic activity of both Pterocarpus marsupium and Tecoma stans in STZ-induced diabetic rats. The observed reduction in blood glucose, normalization of lipid profile, and improved pancreatic histology support their therapeutic potential. The combination therapy produced a synergistic effect, likely due to complementary phytoconstituents enhancing β-cell function, insulin secretion, and peripheral glucose uptake. These findings are consistent with previous reports on P. marsupium’s β-cell regeneration properties and T. stans’ hypoglycemic activity. The observed hepatoprotective and renoprotective actions also highlight their safety and broader metabolic benefits.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates that Pterocarpus marsupium and Tecoma stans possess significant anti-diabetic activity in STZ-induced diabetic rats. Their combination therapy exhibits enhanced efficacy, suggesting a potential synergistic effect. These plant extracts can be considered as promising candidates for the development of novel, safe, and cost-effective anti-diabetic therapies. Further clinical validation and mechanistic studies are warranted.
REFERENCE
Verma Sanjivani*, Dr. Bais Nidhi, Dr. Jain K. Sachin, Dr. Vengurlekar Sudha, Evaluation of Combination Study of Pterocarpus Marsupium and Tecoma Stans for Antidiabetic Action, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (7), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15806208
10.5281/zenodo.15806208