View Article

  • Factors Motivating Behavioural Intention Towards Digital Banking Among Women in Rural Kerala: Evidence from A Structural Equation Modelling Framework

  • 1Research Scholar, Al-Ameen College, Edathala (Affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India), Aluva, Ernakulam District, Kerala. India
    2Research Guide & Associate Professor, Al-Ameen College, Edathala (Affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India), Aluva, Ernakulam District, Kerala. India
     

Abstract

The financial landscape of our country has undergone drastic changes due to the rise in internet connectivity and smartphone users. This study’s major objective is to figure out the key factors affecting rural Keralan women’s intention to use digital financial services. A theoretical model utilizing the ‘Extended Technology Acceptance Model’ (ETAM) was developed to explore the association between all aspects promoting the adoption of digital banking. In this study, we investigated ‘Perceived ease of Use’ (PEOU), Perceived Usefulness’(PU), ‘Trust and Security’ (TS), ‘Convenience and Accessibility’ (CA), and ‘Financial Self-Efficacy’ (FSE) from the point of view of the digital economy. Purposive sampling was used to collect data from 240 respondents using a structured questionnaire. The dataset was critically examined using ‘Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling’ (PLS-SEM) by using Smart PLS Software. The findings indicate that intention to use digital financial services was strongly influenced by FSE. Also, behavioural intention is influenced by PEOU, PU, CA, and TS. The study’s outcomes underline the significance of designing more user-friendly features in the online banking systems. This study is helpful to the banking industry in developing a service model to increase the utilisation of digital banking among clients. Additionally, this study offers financial institutions, businesses, regulatory authorities, and consumers valuable information for promoting Kerala’s digital banking system.

Keywords

Digital Banking, TAM, Financial self-efficacy, convenience and accessibility, Trust and security, Behavioural Intention

Introduction

Digital banking, also known as online banking or internet banking process of managing bank accounts and performing money transactions.  Through these platforms, Clients have simple access to traditional banking services such as fund transfers, account management, fund deposits, debt management, investment activities, and other related services. These rapid technological advancements encourage the use of technology to boost productivity and business competitiveness, and the creation of a variety of new tools and applications to meet customer needs (Mehdiabadi et al.,2020). So all banking institutions are forced to develop innovative utility services called digital banking (Nguyen, 2020). Digital banking is a banking method brought about by the quick development of mobile technology and the growing number of smartphone users (Suhaimi & Hassan, 2018). According to the RBI Payment Systems Report, 2025, India’s financial payment mechanism has shown a drastic growth in recent years, with internet-based payments accounting for 99.8% of all payment transactions in the first 6 months of 2025. 56.8 % of people in Kerala perform online banking transactions using a computer or mobile device. According to “The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation’s Comprehensive Modular Survey – Telecom, 2025”, 30.0 percent of rural Indian women can perform online banking transactions. Compared to 17.1% in the previous year, this is a notable growth. In Kerala, 49.2% rural women in the 15 years and above age category can successfully perform digital financial transactions effectively www.esankhyiki.mospi.gov.in.  In this view, the present study concentrates on identifying the main factors that motivate rural women towards digital banking.  Identifying the motivating factors is helpful to authorities, policymakers, and financial services providers, who can promote financial inclusion in our country through new technology initiatives. This study enhances digital banking platforms and provides advice on how to successfully promote new digital systems to potential clients by determining the elements that promote and prevent the use of digital banking.  Additionally, this study significantly contributes to women's empowerment, which is essential to our nation’s equitable and sustainable economic development. The study focuses on the following research questions:

RQ1: Is PEOU a motivating factor to use digital banking for their financial transactions?

RQ2: Does the intention to utilise digital banking depend on PU?

RQ3: Does TS motivate consumers’ willingness to access online banking facilities?

RQ4: Does the consumer’s intention to use digital banking services change due to the effect of CA?

RQ5: Does FSE shape consumers' decisions to utilise digital banking services?

The following way this research study is organised. The research article is introduced in Part A, where the literature review and hypothesis development are presented. Part C includes the study's methodology, and Part D contains the Data Analysis and outcomes of the study. The conclusion and recommendations are presented in Part E.

B. Literature Review, Theoretical Background, and Hypothesis Formulation

Several studies have been conducted globally to identify the critical elements that contribute to the broad adoption of digital banking. Research in the advanced nations has been concentrated on the variables that motivate individuals to use internet-based banking channels (Ananda et al., 2020; Fonchamnyo, 2012; Muñoz-Leiva et al., 2017; Vuković, 2025). Based on the “Theory of Reasoned Action” (TRA), Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980, TAM (Davis, 1989) is believed to be the most often used model among information systems researchers. An ETAM was utilized in most of the research to pinpoint the major variables impacting the adoption of various kinds of digital banking applications. Here, we studied the rural women's acceptance of digital banking using ETAM. In addition to the traditional TAM categories of PEOU and PU, the model incorporates TS, FSE, and CA as external variables impacting behavioural intention.

  1. Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU)

 PEOU was suggested by Davis (1989) as "the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would be free of effort”. Potential consumers' views about difficulties of learning and utilizing technologically based apps are collected by PEOU (Gounaris & Koritos, 2008). It refers to the way people understand and utilize electronic banking, or how much they thought it would be effortless (Davis et al., 1989). Banks can better connect with their customers by making their products easy to use (Jeong & Yoon, 2013). According to previous studies, results have a strong influence on usage intention (Davis, 1989; Ali et al., 2021; Gounaris & Koritos, 2008; Utomo et al., 2025. In the light of the aforementioned findings we propose the following hypothesis.

H1: “PEOU has a strong positive influence on Intention to use Digital Banking.”

  1. Perceived usefulness (PU)

According to Gounaris & Koritos,2008, PU captures responses from potential clients regarding the advantages of using a technology-based application. According to Davis et al. (1989), the most often used independent variable in earlier studies to measure the readiness of individuals to adopt digital banking is perceived utility. Customers are more likely to stay with digital payment methods if they find them effective, even though they had negative experiences (Ali et al., 2021; Linh & Huyen, 2025: Al-Fahim, 2012; Ryu, H.-S, 2018). Hence, we developed the hypothesis as follows.

H2: “PU has a great influence on Intention to use Digital Banking.” 

  1. Convenience and accessibility (CA)

Convenience is defined as “the time and effort saved in performing a task.” (Cheney, 2008).  An individual's capacity to access information and services on the internet is known as accessibility, and it depends on several factors, including hardware, software, infrastructure, and weather conditions, etc. (Hackett and Parmanto, 2009). E-banking allows users to access financial services 24/7. Digital banking allows clients to make online payments, transfer money between account holders, and monitor their bank account statements. Therefore, based on the above literature support, we developed a hypothesis as follows.

H3: “CA has a beneficial impact on Intention to use Digital Banking.” 

  1. Trust and security (TS)

According to Kolsaker and Payne (2002), security means opinion about the various safe payment options and the mechanisms for information storage and transmission systems. Casaló et al. (2007) state that customer trust and commitment in financial services organizations' online transactions are directly and significantly impacted by website security, privacy, and reputation. The behavioural intention to accept mobile applications will be positively impacted by the security of the system (Sharma et al. 2018; Hamlet and Strube 2000; Sathye 1999; Damghanian et al., 2016). As a result, the following hypothesis has been developed based on the research mentioned earlier:

H4 - TS has a significant influence on Digital Banking financial services.

  1. Financial self-efficacy (FSE)

The belief in one’s own skills, knowledge, and ability to perform a task is called self-efficacy. (Luarn & Lin, 2005). Furthermore, self-efficacy is the confidence that one can use a computer to obtain the information and knowledge one needs. According to Compeau and Higgins 1995, Self-efficacy is the belief in one's own abilities, which generally leads to the adoption of new technology. In this research, FSE refers to a person's level of confidence in her/his ability to make smart financial decisions (Netemeyer et al., 2017). The objective of our study is to determine whether respondents' opinions about their own knowledge, ability, and talent affect digital banking. Therefore, from the previous studies, we can conclude that one’s ability and confidence to utilise digital technologies influence online banking transactions Noor et al., 2020; Hedau, A., 2025; Aisjah, 2024). Thus, this study framed the following hypothesis:

H5: “FSE has a great impact on Intention to use Digital Banking.”

C. Research methodology

The influence of digital banking on rural women was investigated in this study using a descriptive research Methodology. Descriptive research can be useful for studies that investigate an event, situation, or population (Siedlecki, 2020). This study makes an effort to understand how digital banking platforms promote financial inclusion foe range of demographic groups by applying this methodology (Manlapaz & Quendangan, 2024). The primary data was collected from a sample size of 240 women respondents using a structured questionnaire. The data was collected between November 2025 and December 2026. The sample was chosen from the population via judgment sampling. It is a non-probability sampling technique, where samples are chosen based on certain attributes that help to achieve the study’s goals. Etikan, Musa, & Alkassim, 2016). The questionnaire was designed based on an exhaustive literature review to ensure that the questions are properly included according to the theme of the study. The demographic details of the respondents is included in the first part of the questionnaire. The second section of the survey instrument includes the indicators of each construct, as shown in Table 1. A 5-point Likert scale, with 1 denoting "strongly disagree" and 5 denoting "strongly agree," was used to measure each indicator in this study.

Table 1.  Measurement scales.

Construct

Items

Sources

PEOU

PEOU1: Digital banking Apps are easy to use

PEOU2: Money transactions using digital banking apps required little effort

PEOU3: Using digital banking services is clear and understandable.

Luarn & Lin, 2005)

 

PU

PU1 I am able to handle monetary transactions faster by using digital banking apps.

PU2: My overall banking experience is improved through digital banking

PU3: Using digital banking enhances my financial management.

Luarn & Lin, 2005)

 

CA

 

CA1: Digital banking allows me to access banking Services anytime.
CA2: Digital banking can be accessed easily from anywhere.
CA3: Digital banking reduced my visits to physical bank branches.

CA4: Digital banking has become an important part of my daily routine.

(Liao & Cheung, 2002)

TS

TS1: I believe digital banking transactions are safe and secure.
TS2: Personal information of a client is secured enough while using digital banking apps.

TS3: I believe that the digital banking apps can perform all financial transactions accurately.
TS4: I feel secure while using digital banking services.

(Musyaffi et al., 2023)

 

FSE
 

FSE1: I am confident in handling my money using digital banking.
FSE2: Using digital banking platforms, I can make sound financial decisions
FSE3: I am very confident in managing my financial issues related to digital banking
FSE4: I can complete digital banking transactions without assistance

Mindra & Moya, 2017; (Nurahmasari et al., 2023)

Behavioural Intention (BI)

BI1:  For my financial transactions, I'll continue using digital banking.

BI2: I intend to use online banking services regularly
BI3: I would suggest digital banking to others.

Matlala, 2024;

Luarn & Lin, 2005

Figure1: Conceptual Framework of Digital Banking Adoption

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Descriptive findings

According to the researchers’ results, demographic characteristics play an important role in using digital financial services. Table 2 includes the demographic classification of rural women respondents under various categories such as age, marital status, education, occupation, and monthly income. This table demonstrates that out of 240 respondents, the largest number of digital financial service users, i.e., 48.8%, lies in the age group of 20-30 years, and the least number of users, i.e., 4.1%, lies in the age group of above 61 years. It indicates that rural women in the 20-30-year age group are more interested in using digital banking services effectively. About marital status most of the respondents are married (66.7 %), and 32.5% lies in the category of single. Most of the respondents (54.2%) are post-graduates, followed by undergraduates (25.8%). The maximum percent of respondents, i.e., 72.9%, were salaried women.  53% of rural women earn below 25000 rupees per month, and 31.3% get a monthly income between 25001 and 50000 rupees.

Table 2: Demographic data of Respondents.

Profile

Characteristics

No. of Respondents

Percentage

Cumulative frequency

Age Group

“20 - 30 years”

“31 - 40 years”

“41 - 50 years”

“51 - 60 years”

“Above 61 years.”

117

42

58

13

10

48.8%

17.5%

24.2%

5.4%

4.1%

48.8%

66.3%

90.5%

95.9%

100%

Marital Status

Married

Single

Widow

160

78

2

66.7%

32.5%

0.8%

99.7%

99.2%

100%

Educational Qualification

Post-Graduation

Graduation

Professional degree

School

130

62

46

2

54.2%

25.8%

19.2%

0.8%

54.2%

80%

99.2%

.100%

Occupation

Salaried

Retired/others

Professional practice

Business

175

30

23

12

72.9%

12.5%

9.6%

5%

72.9%

85.4%

95%

100%

Monthly Income

Below 25000

25001- 50000

50001-25000

Above 75001

127

75

23

15

53%

31.3%

9.6%

6.3%

53%

84.3%

93.9%

100%

Source: Author's calculation (2026)

Results of PLS-SEM analysis

This study employed SEM as the key analytical technique to assess the proposed research model. SEM is particularly beneficial in fields like marketing, the social sciences, and the adoption of digital technology, where research models incorporate mediating variables and latent constructs (Iacobucci, 2009). To perform the SEM analysis, Smart PLS 4.0 software was used.

Measurement model assessment

Table 3 shows the item reliability, which ranges from 0.710 to 0.931, which has an acceptable level of reliability. Following the item reliability assessment, our study used ‘Cronbach's alpha’, ‘Composite reliability’(CR), and ‘Average Variance extracted’ (AVE) to check the construct validity. According to Nunnally and Bernstein (1994), the range of the ‘Cronbach’s a lpha coefficients’ is 0.784 to 0.877, and all the measurements in this study are greater than 0.7.  Additionally, CR ratings from 0.876 to 0.916, which is above 0.7 and acceptable (Hair et al., 2009). Furthermore, the AVE coefficient, which ranges from 0.672 to 0.758, is likewise greater than 0.5 in terms of convergent validity. (Hair Jr et al., 2020). Consequently, these findings show strong overall reliability.

Table 3: Reliability Results

Construct

Items

Loading

Cronbach’s

Alpha (CA)

Rho A

CR

AVE

PEOU

 

PEOU1

0.861

0.784

0.817

0.876

0.704

PEOU2

0.931

PEOU3

0.710

PU

 

PU1

PU2

PU3

0,893

0.893

0.844

0.841

0.848

0.904

0.758

 

CA

CA1

CA2

CA3

0.860

0.881

0.825

0.818

0.820

0.891

0.732

TS

TS1

0.845

0.877

0.885

0.916

0.733

TS2

0.767

TS3

0.906

TS4

0.898

FSE
 

FSE1

0.835

0.836

0.847

0.891

0.672

FSE2

0.868

FSE3

0.844

FSE4

0.726

BI

BI1

0.794

0.858

0.865

0.904

0.703

BI2

0.827

BI3

0.823

Source: Author's calculation (2026)

Table:4 Fornell- Larcker Criterion (Discriminant Validity results)

Latent Constructs

BI

CA

FSE

PEOU

PU

TS

BI

0.839

 

 

 

 

 

CA

0.581

0.856

 

 

 

 

FSE

0.756

0.485

0.820

 

 

 

PEOU

0.346

0.307

0.272

0.839

 

 

PU

0.574

0.687

0.488

0.314

0.871

 

TS

0.655

0.475

0.683

0.201

0.377

0.856

Source: Author's calculation (2026)

Table 4 shows the Discriminant Validity Analysis using Fornell-Larcker (1981) criterion.  To have appropriate discriminant validity, the square root of AVE needs to be greater than all (Chin,1998).

Table 5: HTMT (Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratios)

 

BI

CA

FSE

PEOU

PU

TS

BI

 

 

 

 

 

 

CA

0.688

 

 

 

 

 

FSE

0.881

0.566

 

 

 

 

PEOU

0.421

0.373

0.330

 

 

 

PU

0.676

0.828

0.570

0.374

 

 

TS

0.750

0.552

0.791

0.234

0.433

 

Source: Author's calculation (2026)

According to the HTMT criterion, HTMT should not exceed the threshold of 0.90 for conceptually distinct indicators (Hair et al. 2019).  All HTMT ratios (Table 5) are less than the threshold.

Structural Model Results

 The gathered data was analysed using “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling” (PLS-SEM) using Smart PLS 4 software.

Table 6: Direct effect Results

Hypothesis

Constructs

Beta

Standard deviation

T statistics

P values

H1

PEOU -> BI

0.093

0.041

2.293

0.022

H2

PU -> BI

0.162

0.054

2.995

0.003

H3

CA -> BI

0.123

0.056

2.217

0.027

H4

TS -> BI

0.211

0.068

3.092

0.002

H5

FSE  -> BI

0.447

0.069

6.516

0.000

Source: Author's calculation (2026)

Hypothesis test.

The path coefficients, S.D., T values, and P values were used to explain the structural model. The PEOU level of respondents has a positive and statistically significant effect on intention to use digital banking (β = 0.093, t = 2.293, p = 0.022). PU (β = 0.162, t = 2.995, p = 0.003) has a significant influence on digital banking. CA (β = 0.123, t = 2.217, p = 0.027) has a great influence on the use of digital banking facilities. TS (β = 0.211, t = 3.092, p = 0.002) emerges as the second most influential factor. FSE (β = 0.447, t = 6.516, p = 0.000) is the strongest predictor of behavioural intention toward digital banking, which indicates that rural women’s confidence in their ability to use digital financial services plays a decisive role in adoption. Table 6 shows the specific results of the five hypotheses.

Figure 2: Measurement Model of Digital Banking Adoption

Quality Analysis Model

Model performance can be measured using R-squared and adjusted R-squared. The regression model's quality of fit is frequently assessed using the R2 (Hair et al. 2019). R2, a measure of the variance explained in each internal construct in PLS-SEM studies, indicates the explanatory strength of the model.  Normally R-square value of 0.75 is considered to be good, 0.50 is considered to be acceptable, and 0.25 is considered to be weak (Hair et al. 2019). Table 7 shows the R-Square value of 0.673, which means that the independent variables, namely PEOU, PU, CA, TS, and FSE, collectively have 67.3% influence over behavioural intention on digital banking. The adjusted R-squared value of 0.666 means that after taking into consideration several predictors, 66.6% of the variance in the dependent variable remains explained. The model is well-specified and free of unnecessary variables, as evidenced by the modest difference between R2 and adjusted R2 (0.007).

Table 7. Results of Hypothesis Testing

 

R Square

R- squared Adjusted

Behavioural Intention to Digital Banking

0.673

0.666

Source: Author's calculation (2026)

Table 8 shows the status of a hypothesis tested in the study

Table 8: Hypothesis Assessment Summary

Sr. No

Hypothesis

Status

H1

“PEOU has a positive impact on Intention to use Digital Banking.”

Accepted

H2

“PU has a positive impact on Intention to use Digital Banking.”

Accepted

H3

“CA has a positive impact on Intention to use Digital Banking.”

Accepted

H4

“TS has a positive impact on Digital Banking financial services.”

Accepted

H5

“FSE has a great impact on Intention to use Digital Banking.”

Accepted

Source: Author's calculation (2026)

E Conclusion, Theoretical and Policy Implications

The Extended Technology Acceptance Model (ETAM) was used in this study to identify the important variables influencing digital financial services. FSE (β = 0.447) was found to be the best predictor, indicating that intention behaviour is significantly influenced by users' confidence in their abilities to use digital financial instruments. The findings support the results of  Hedau, 2025; Louis et al., 2023; Peral-Peral et al., 2020. To increase users' trust in utilizing digital banking, policymakers and financial institutions should give priority to community-based workshops, practical training, and digital financial literacy programs. Digital banking intention is influenced by PU (β = 0.162) and PEOU (β = 0.093), which supports the findings of Davis et al. 1989, and Gounaris & Koritos, 2008. The study supports the TAM in the area of digital banking. TS, an important motivating factor (β = 0.211), which reflects the security of financial transactions and personal data privacy, and has a positive influence on digital banking, supporting the result of Casaló et al. (2007). To build confidence among users, financial institutions and regulatory authorities should strengthen the cybersecurity measures and implement a good grievance settlement procedure for a speedy settlement process. CA (β = 0.123) contributes moderately towards users' intention, meaning easy access to digital platforms enhances the digital banking adoption and supports the findings of Wai‐Ching Poon 2007. Providing secure internet connections and user-friendly platforms in the regional language helps users to use these platforms more efficiently.  Overall, the study reveals that not only technological aspects of digital banking financial services influence the intention of users, but also the psychological factors, like financial self-efficacy, are important motivating factors towards digital banking adoption among the rural population. The study contributes to the repository of current knowledge by bringing TAM to a rural digital environment.  The UN SDGs, particularly Global SDG-4: ‘Quality Education’, SDG-5: ‘Gender Equality’, and SDG-10:’ Reduced Inequalities’, are in line with this study

REFERENCE

  1. Abdullahi, M. S., Usman, B. M., Salisu, F. B., & Muhammad, Y. S. (2018). Investigating the Effect of Convenience, Accessibility and Reliability on Customer Satisfaction in the Nigeria Banking Industry. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2018.0603.0048
  2. Aisjah, S. (2024). Intention to use buy-now-pay-later payment system among university students: A combination of financial parenting, financial self-efficacy, and social media intensity. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2306705. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2306705
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Al-Fahim, N. H. (2012). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Internet Banking Amongst IIUM’ students: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach (SEM). Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 17(3).
  5. Ali, Q., Parveen, S., Yaacob, H., & Zaini, Z. (2021). Cardless Banking System in Malaysia: An Extended TAM. Risks, 9(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9020041
  6. Ananda, S., Devesh, S., & Al Lawati, A. M. (2020). What factors drive the adoption of digital banking? An empirical study from the perspective of Omani retail banking. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 25(1–2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-020-00072-y
  7. Ayatulloh Michael Musyaffi, Razana Juhaida Johari, & Bobur Sobirov. (2023). Examining Initial Trust in Adoption of Digital Banking Platform: A Personal Innovativeness and Security Perspective. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2024.0105
  8. Bhatt, A., & Bhatt, S. (2016). Factors Affecting Customer’s Adoption of Mobile Banking Services. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 21(1).
  9. Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2007). The role of security, privacy, usability and reputation in the development of online banking. Online Information Review, 31(5), 583–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520710832315
  10. Cheney, J. S. (2008). An Examination of Mobile Banking and Mobile Payments: Building Adoption as Experience Goods? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1266809
  11. Chin, W. W. 1998. Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS quarterly, vii-xvi.
  12. Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
  13. Damghanian, H., Zarei, A., & Siahsarani Kojuri, M. A. (2016). Impact of Perceived Security on Trust, Perceived Risk, and Acceptance of Online Banking in Iran. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(3), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2016.1191052
  14. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8): 903–1028.
  15. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
  16. Fonchamnyo, D. C. (2012). Customers’ Perception of E-banking Adoption in Cameroon: An Empirical Assessment of an Extended TAM. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(1), p166. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v5n1p166
  17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388.
  18. Gajendra Sharma. Subarna Shakya, Purushottam Kharel (2014), Technology Acceptance Perspectives on User Satisfaction and Trust of E- Government Adoption, Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(9). 860-872
  19. Gounaris, S., & Koritos, C. (2008). Investigating the drivers of internet banking adoption decision: A comparison of three alternative frameworks. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(5), 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320810894370
  20. Hackett, S., & Parmanto, B. (2009). Homepage not enough when evaluating web site accessibility. Internet Research, 19(1), 78-87.
  21. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31(1):2–24.
  22. Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.
  23. Hair, J. F., Bush, R. P. & Ortinau, D. J. (2009). Marketing research: Within a changing information environment. McGraw-Hill.
  24. Hakim Suhaimi, A. I., & Bin Abu Hassan, M. S. (2018). Determinants of Branchless Digital Banking Acceptance Among Generation Y in Malaysia. 2018 IEEE Conference on E-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2018.8632626
  25. Hamlet, C., and M. Strube. 2000. Community banks go online. ABA Banking Journal’s 2000 white paper/banking on the internet, 61–65.
  26. Hedau, A. (2025). Socio-Economic Challenges of Digital Banking Adoption: The Impact of Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Self-Efficacy. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.61093/sec.9(3).133-146.2025
  27. Iacobucci, D. (2009). Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equations modeling) but were afraid to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(4), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.002
  28. Jeong, B. K., & Yoon, T. E. (2013). An Empirical Investigation on Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Banking Services. Business and Management Research, 2(1), p31. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v2n1p31
  29. Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Khan, S. N., Khan, S. U., & Khan, M. T. (2022). Exploring the Effects of Culture on Acceptance of Online Banking: A Comparative Study of Pakistan and Turkey by Using the Extended UTAUT Model. Journal of Internet Commerce, 21(2), 183–216
  30. Kolsaker, A. and Payne, C. (2002), “Engendering trust in e-commerce: a study of gender-based concerns”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 206-14.
  31. Kumar S, Chawla S, Kumar P, Arora A (2025;), "An empirical investigation on mobile payments users’ experience: insights using PLS-SEM approach". The TQM Journal, 1-26
  32. Liao, Z., & Cheung, M. T. (2002). Internet-based e-banking and consumer attitudes: An empirical study. Information & Management, 39(4), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00097-0
  33. Linh, T. T., & Huyen, N. T. T. (2025). adoption of digital payment: An empirical study in Vietnam. F1000Research.
  34. Liu, S., Gao, L., Latif, K., Dar, A. A., Zia-UR-Rehman, M., & Baig, S. A. (2021). The Behavioral Role of Digital Economy Adaptation in Sustainable Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 742118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742118
  35. Louis, E. N., Sartono, E. S., Patricia, E., Gui, A., Shaharudin, M. S., Pitchay, A. A., & Chanda, R. C. (2023). Factors Influencing Customers Intention to Use Digital Banking Services. 2023 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications (ISIEA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIEA58478.2023.10212252
  36. Luarn, P., & Lin, H.-H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003
  37. Manlapaz, M. A., & Quendangan, D. E. (2024). Impact of Digital Banking On Broadening Investment Access: Basis For Enhanced Financial Decision-Making Plan. Sibatik Journal, 3(9).
  38. Matlala, N. P. (2024). Consumer behaviour towards the adoption of digital banking channels. CBR - Consumer Behavior Review, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.51359/2526-7884.2024.260295
  39. Mehdiabadi, A., Tabatabeinasab, M., Spulbar, C., Karbassi Yazdi, A., & Birau, R. (2020). Are we ready for the challenge of Banks 4.0? Designing a roadmap for banking systems in Industry 4.0. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(2), 32.
  40. Mindra, R., & Moya, M. (2017). Financial self-efficacy: A mediator in advancing financial inclusion. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36(2), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-05-2016-0040
  41. Mothibi, N. H., & Malebana, M. J. (2025). Entrepreneurship Education, Role Models, and Risk-Taking Propensity as Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intention and Behaviour: Evidence from TVET and University Students in Gauteng, South Africa. Administrative Sciences, 15(10), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15100374
  42. Muñoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 21(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjme.2016.12.001
  43. Narteh, B., Mahmoud, M. A., & Amoh, S. (2017). Customer behavioural intentions towards mobile money services adoption in Ghana. The Service Industries Journal, 37(7–8), 426–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1331435
  44. Netemeyer, R., Warmath, D., Fernandes, D., & Lynch, J. (2017). How Am I Doing? Perceived Financial Well-Being, Its Potential Antecedents,and Its Relation to Overall Well-Being. Forthcoming in Journal of Consumer Research.
  45. Nguyen, O. T. (2020). Factors affecting the intention to use digital banking in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(3), 303-310.
  46. Noor, N., Batool, I., & Arshad, H. M. (2020). Financial literacy, financial self-efficacy and financial account ownership behavior in Pakistan. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1806479. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1806479
  47. Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory 3(1), 248-292.
  48. Nurahmasari, M., Silfiyah, S. N., & Pangaribuan, C. H. (2023). The Intention to Use Digital Banking Services among Gen Z in Indonesia Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). 5(1).
  49. Peral-Peral, B., Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F., & Arenas-Gaitán, J. (2020). Self-efficacy and anxiety as determinants of older adults’ use of Internet Banking Services. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(4), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00691-w
  50. RBI Payment Systems Report, 2025
  51. Ryu, H.-S. (2018). What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech? the moderating effect of user type. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 541-569.
  52. Sathye, M. 1999. Adoption of Internet banking by Australian consumers: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Bank Marketing 17(7): 324–334.
  53. Sharma, S.K., A. Al-Badi, P. Rana, P. Nripendra, and L. Al-Azizi. 2018. Mobile applications in government services (mG-App) from user’s perspectives: A predictive modelling approach. Government Information Quarterly
  54. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding Descriptive Research Designs and Methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 44–46.
  55. Thi Chinh, N., The Anh, K., Nguyen Duc, D., Phuong Kim Quoc, C., & Linh, L. D. (2024). Impact of self-efficacy and mediating factors on Fintech adoption in the VUCA era. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 11(4), 796–812. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v11i4.1740
  56. Utomo, F. S., Suryana, N., & Azmi, M. S. (2025). Factors Influencing User Adoption of Mobile Payment System: An Integrated Model of Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, Financial Literacy, and Trust. Journal of Digital Market and Digital Currency.
  57. Vuković, D. (2025). Understanding Consumer Behavior in Digital Banking: The DABU Model as an Extension of TAM and UTAUT. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(9), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18090507
  58. Wai‐Ching Poon,2007, Users' adoption of e‐banking services: the Malaysian perspective, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (2007) 23 (1): 59–69.
  59. Wei, N., Liang, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, M. (2025). Analysis of mobile fintech adoption based on perceived value and risk theory: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 973. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05142-x
  60. www.esankhyiki.mospi.gov.in
  61. Yohannes Kurniawan, Norizan Anwar, Sherlly Monica Dumais, & Sherlly Monica Dumais. (2023). An Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting the Usage of Digital Banking in Generation Z. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2023.0503
  62. Yohannes Kurniawan, Sherlly Monica Dumais, Norizan Anwar (2023), An Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting the Usage of Digital Banking in Generation Z, Journal of System and Management Sciences, Vol. 13 (2023) No. 5, pp.

Reference

  1. Abdullahi, M. S., Usman, B. M., Salisu, F. B., & Muhammad, Y. S. (2018). Investigating the Effect of Convenience, Accessibility and Reliability on Customer Satisfaction in the Nigeria Banking Industry. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2018.0603.0048
  2. Aisjah, S. (2024). Intention to use buy-now-pay-later payment system among university students: A combination of financial parenting, financial self-efficacy, and social media intensity. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2306705. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2306705
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Al-Fahim, N. H. (2012). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Internet Banking Amongst IIUM’ students: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach (SEM). Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 17(3).
  5. Ali, Q., Parveen, S., Yaacob, H., & Zaini, Z. (2021). Cardless Banking System in Malaysia: An Extended TAM. Risks, 9(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9020041
  6. Ananda, S., Devesh, S., & Al Lawati, A. M. (2020). What factors drive the adoption of digital banking? An empirical study from the perspective of Omani retail banking. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 25(1–2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-020-00072-y
  7. Ayatulloh Michael Musyaffi, Razana Juhaida Johari, & Bobur Sobirov. (2023). Examining Initial Trust in Adoption of Digital Banking Platform: A Personal Innovativeness and Security Perspective. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2024.0105
  8. Bhatt, A., & Bhatt, S. (2016). Factors Affecting Customer’s Adoption of Mobile Banking Services. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 21(1).
  9. Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2007). The role of security, privacy, usability and reputation in the development of online banking. Online Information Review, 31(5), 583–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520710832315
  10. Cheney, J. S. (2008). An Examination of Mobile Banking and Mobile Payments: Building Adoption as Experience Goods? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1266809
  11. Chin, W. W. 1998. Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS quarterly, vii-xvi.
  12. Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
  13. Damghanian, H., Zarei, A., & Siahsarani Kojuri, M. A. (2016). Impact of Perceived Security on Trust, Perceived Risk, and Acceptance of Online Banking in Iran. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(3), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2016.1191052
  14. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8): 903–1028.
  15. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
  16. Fonchamnyo, D. C. (2012). Customers’ Perception of E-banking Adoption in Cameroon: An Empirical Assessment of an Extended TAM. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(1), p166. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v5n1p166
  17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388.
  18. Gajendra Sharma. Subarna Shakya, Purushottam Kharel (2014), Technology Acceptance Perspectives on User Satisfaction and Trust of E- Government Adoption, Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(9). 860-872
  19. Gounaris, S., & Koritos, C. (2008). Investigating the drivers of internet banking adoption decision: A comparison of three alternative frameworks. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(5), 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320810894370
  20. Hackett, S., & Parmanto, B. (2009). Homepage not enough when evaluating web site accessibility. Internet Research, 19(1), 78-87.
  21. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31(1):2–24.
  22. Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.
  23. Hair, J. F., Bush, R. P. & Ortinau, D. J. (2009). Marketing research: Within a changing information environment. McGraw-Hill.
  24. Hakim Suhaimi, A. I., & Bin Abu Hassan, M. S. (2018). Determinants of Branchless Digital Banking Acceptance Among Generation Y in Malaysia. 2018 IEEE Conference on E-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2018.8632626
  25. Hamlet, C., and M. Strube. 2000. Community banks go online. ABA Banking Journal’s 2000 white paper/banking on the internet, 61–65.
  26. Hedau, A. (2025). Socio-Economic Challenges of Digital Banking Adoption: The Impact of Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Self-Efficacy. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.61093/sec.9(3).133-146.2025
  27. Iacobucci, D. (2009). Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equations modeling) but were afraid to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(4), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.002
  28. Jeong, B. K., & Yoon, T. E. (2013). An Empirical Investigation on Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Banking Services. Business and Management Research, 2(1), p31. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v2n1p31
  29. Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Khan, S. N., Khan, S. U., & Khan, M. T. (2022). Exploring the Effects of Culture on Acceptance of Online Banking: A Comparative Study of Pakistan and Turkey by Using the Extended UTAUT Model. Journal of Internet Commerce, 21(2), 183–216
  30. Kolsaker, A. and Payne, C. (2002), “Engendering trust in e-commerce: a study of gender-based concerns”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 206-14.
  31. Kumar S, Chawla S, Kumar P, Arora A (2025;), "An empirical investigation on mobile payments users’ experience: insights using PLS-SEM approach". The TQM Journal, 1-26
  32. Liao, Z., & Cheung, M. T. (2002). Internet-based e-banking and consumer attitudes: An empirical study. Information & Management, 39(4), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00097-0
  33. Linh, T. T., & Huyen, N. T. T. (2025). adoption of digital payment: An empirical study in Vietnam. F1000Research.
  34. Liu, S., Gao, L., Latif, K., Dar, A. A., Zia-UR-Rehman, M., & Baig, S. A. (2021). The Behavioral Role of Digital Economy Adaptation in Sustainable Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 742118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742118
  35. Louis, E. N., Sartono, E. S., Patricia, E., Gui, A., Shaharudin, M. S., Pitchay, A. A., & Chanda, R. C. (2023). Factors Influencing Customers Intention to Use Digital Banking Services. 2023 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications (ISIEA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIEA58478.2023.10212252
  36. Luarn, P., & Lin, H.-H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003
  37. Manlapaz, M. A., & Quendangan, D. E. (2024). Impact of Digital Banking On Broadening Investment Access: Basis For Enhanced Financial Decision-Making Plan. Sibatik Journal, 3(9).
  38. Matlala, N. P. (2024). Consumer behaviour towards the adoption of digital banking channels. CBR - Consumer Behavior Review, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.51359/2526-7884.2024.260295
  39. Mehdiabadi, A., Tabatabeinasab, M., Spulbar, C., Karbassi Yazdi, A., & Birau, R. (2020). Are we ready for the challenge of Banks 4.0? Designing a roadmap for banking systems in Industry 4.0. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(2), 32.
  40. Mindra, R., & Moya, M. (2017). Financial self-efficacy: A mediator in advancing financial inclusion. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36(2), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-05-2016-0040
  41. Mothibi, N. H., & Malebana, M. J. (2025). Entrepreneurship Education, Role Models, and Risk-Taking Propensity as Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intention and Behaviour: Evidence from TVET and University Students in Gauteng, South Africa. Administrative Sciences, 15(10), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15100374
  42. Muñoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 21(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjme.2016.12.001
  43. Narteh, B., Mahmoud, M. A., & Amoh, S. (2017). Customer behavioural intentions towards mobile money services adoption in Ghana. The Service Industries Journal, 37(7–8), 426–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1331435
  44. Netemeyer, R., Warmath, D., Fernandes, D., & Lynch, J. (2017). How Am I Doing? Perceived Financial Well-Being, Its Potential Antecedents,and Its Relation to Overall Well-Being. Forthcoming in Journal of Consumer Research.
  45. Nguyen, O. T. (2020). Factors affecting the intention to use digital banking in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(3), 303-310.
  46. Noor, N., Batool, I., & Arshad, H. M. (2020). Financial literacy, financial self-efficacy and financial account ownership behavior in Pakistan. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1806479. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1806479
  47. Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory 3(1), 248-292.
  48. Nurahmasari, M., Silfiyah, S. N., & Pangaribuan, C. H. (2023). The Intention to Use Digital Banking Services among Gen Z in Indonesia Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). 5(1).
  49. Peral-Peral, B., Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F., & Arenas-Gaitán, J. (2020). Self-efficacy and anxiety as determinants of older adults’ use of Internet Banking Services. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(4), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00691-w
  50. RBI Payment Systems Report, 2025
  51. Ryu, H.-S. (2018). What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech? the moderating effect of user type. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 541-569.
  52. Sathye, M. 1999. Adoption of Internet banking by Australian consumers: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Bank Marketing 17(7): 324–334.
  53. Sharma, S.K., A. Al-Badi, P. Rana, P. Nripendra, and L. Al-Azizi. 2018. Mobile applications in government services (mG-App) from user’s perspectives: A predictive modelling approach. Government Information Quarterly
  54. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding Descriptive Research Designs and Methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 44–46.
  55. Thi Chinh, N., The Anh, K., Nguyen Duc, D., Phuong Kim Quoc, C., & Linh, L. D. (2024). Impact of self-efficacy and mediating factors on Fintech adoption in the VUCA era. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 11(4), 796–812. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v11i4.1740
  56. Utomo, F. S., Suryana, N., & Azmi, M. S. (2025). Factors Influencing User Adoption of Mobile Payment System: An Integrated Model of Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, Financial Literacy, and Trust. Journal of Digital Market and Digital Currency.
  57. Vuković, D. (2025). Understanding Consumer Behavior in Digital Banking: The DABU Model as an Extension of TAM and UTAUT. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(9), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18090507
  58. Wai‐Ching Poon,2007, Users' adoption of e‐banking services: the Malaysian perspective, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (2007) 23 (1): 59–69.
  59. Wei, N., Liang, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, M. (2025). Analysis of mobile fintech adoption based on perceived value and risk theory: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 973. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05142-x
  60. www.esankhyiki.mospi.gov.in
  61. Yohannes Kurniawan, Norizan Anwar, Sherlly Monica Dumais, & Sherlly Monica Dumais. (2023). An Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting the Usage of Digital Banking in Generation Z. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2023.0503
  62. Yohannes Kurniawan, Sherlly Monica Dumais, Norizan Anwar (2023), An Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting the Usage of Digital Banking in Generation Z, Journal of System and Management Sciences, Vol. 13 (2023) No. 5, pp.

Photo
Nuthan K.
Corresponding author

Research Scholar, Al-Ameen College, Edathala (Affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India), Aluva, Ernakulam District, Kerala. India

Photo
Leena Varghese
Co-author

Research Guide & Associate Professor, Al-Ameen College, Edathala (Affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India), Aluva, Ernakulam District, Kerala. India

Nuthan K.*, Leena Varghese, Factors Motivating Behavioural Intention Towards Digital Banking Among Women in Rural Kerala: Evidence from A Structural Equation Modelling Framework, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (4), 364-374. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19543548

More related articles
Recurrent UTI in MEN: Risk Factor and Management: ...
HARI PRASAD SONWANI, GUMAN , SHWETA KUMARI SAW , JAYVANT SAHU , U...
A Review on Bioactive Compounds of Fabaceae Family...
Jyoti Prajapati , Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya, Hitesh Solank...
Spatial Analysis of Medicine Consumption and Disea...
Dania Ahmad, Dr. Pawan Kumar Singh, ...
Design and Analysis of Adders Using Pass Transistor Logic for Multipliers...
Chaitanya S., Abhishek B. S., Harshavardhan S., Karthik S., Manju T. M., ...
Preformulation Studies and Development of a Herbal Tooth Powder Using Coconut Sh...
Sandeep Ambore, Dr. Ajajy Kshirsagar, Pradnya Bhosle, ...
From Localization to Connectomics: A Contemporary View of Human Brain Structure ...
Arnab Roy, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Anchal Kumari , Karishma Kumari , Amit Kumar Prajapati , Vivek Prajap...
Related Articles
Advancements in Immunomodulatory Therapies for Autoimmune Disease...
Shrushti Shahane , Utkarsha Sawant, Pratiksha Ghodake , Swapnil Kale, Sneha Kanase, ...
Review on Ashwagandha...
Aashish Choudhary, Kavita Lovanshi, Rita Mourya, Shailesh Jain, ...
Recurrent UTI in MEN: Risk Factor and Management: a review...
HARI PRASAD SONWANI, GUMAN , SHWETA KUMARI SAW , JAYVANT SAHU , Upasana Sahu, Yunesh Kumar Mandavi, ...
More related articles
Recurrent UTI in MEN: Risk Factor and Management: a review...
HARI PRASAD SONWANI, GUMAN , SHWETA KUMARI SAW , JAYVANT SAHU , Upasana Sahu, Yunesh Kumar Mandavi, ...
A Review on Bioactive Compounds of Fabaceae Family...
Jyoti Prajapati , Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya, Hitesh Solanki , ...
Recurrent UTI in MEN: Risk Factor and Management: a review...
HARI PRASAD SONWANI, GUMAN , SHWETA KUMARI SAW , JAYVANT SAHU , Upasana Sahu, Yunesh Kumar Mandavi, ...
A Review on Bioactive Compounds of Fabaceae Family...
Jyoti Prajapati , Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya, Hitesh Solanki , ...