View Article

  • Organic Home Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review Of Sustainable Practices, Benefits, Challenges, And Future Directions

    1. Pathgene Health Care Pvt.Ltd.1-212, Tiruchanoor Rd, Srinivasapuram, Padmavati Nagar, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh 517503. India
    2. Toxgene AR Biolabs Pvt.Ltd.Plot no 31,32,41&42, APIIC Industrian Park, Chandragiri, Tirupati,, Andhra Pradesh 517102. India

Abstract

Organic home agriculture has emerged as a practical and sustainable approach to household food production, particularly in response to increasing concerns regarding food safety, environmental degradation, and dependence on chemically intensive farming systems. The practice involves cultivating crops within domestic spaces using organic inputs and ecological management techniques while avoiding synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. This review synthesizes existing scientific literature on organic home agriculture, focusing on its conceptual framework, commonly adopted organic practices, nutritional and environmental benefits, socio-economic relevance, and associated challenges. Recent technological and methodological advancements that enhance productivity in limited spaces are also discussed. The review highlights that organic home agriculture contributes positively to household nutrition, ecological sustainability, and self-reliance, while acknowledging constraints such as pest control, space limitations, and knowledge gaps. The current review focus on an organic home agriculture represents a viable strategy for promoting sustainable food systems at the household level.

Keywords

Home agriculture; home gardening; organic farming practices; sustainable food systems; food security.

Introduction

Modern agricultural intensification has significantly increased food production; however, it has also resulted in serious environmental and health-related concerns. The extensive use of synthetic fertilizers and chemical pesticides has been linked to soil degradation, water contamination, biodiversity loss, and the presence of chemical residues in food products (gomiero et al., 2011). These issues have led to growing interest in alternative farming approaches that prioritize ecological balance and human health Organic agriculture is one such approach, emphasizing natural nutrient cycling, biological pest management, and soil health preservation. When applied at the household level, organic agriculture takes the form of organic home agriculture, where crops are cultivated within home gardens, terraces, balconies, or small backyard spaces using organic principles. This practice has gained popularity due to rising consumer awareness of food quality, increased urbanization, and the need for household-level food security, organic agriculture is widely recognized as an environmentally sound approach that relies on natural nutrient cycling, biological pest regulation, and soil health management. When these principles are applied at the household level, they form the basis of organic home agriculture. This practice involves cultivating vegetables, fruits, herbs, and other useful plants within home premises using organic inputs and eco-friendly techniques. The increasing adoption of organic home agriculture is closely linked to rising consumer awareness, urban food insecurity, and the desire for chemical-free food (Ponisio LC et al., (2015). Although numerous studies have examined organic farming and home gardening independently, a consolidated review focusing specifically on organic home agriculture remains limited. Therefore, this review aims to critically evaluate existing literature on organic home agriculture, emphasizing, culvation practices, benefits, recent innovations and future research needs.in countries such as india, organic home agriculture holds particular significance due to limited land availability, rising food prices, and widespread apprehension regarding food adulteration. Small-scale household cultivation offers a practical means of producing fresh vegetables and medicinal plants while reducing dependence on external food supply chains. During recent global disruptions in food distribution systems, including the covid-19 pandemic, household food production systems demonstrated resilience and adaptability, reinforcing the value of decentralized agriculture.Organic home agriculture adopts methods such as composting, crop rotation, biological pest management, and organic nutrient recycling, which collectively support sustainable plant growth while minimizing environmental harm.The intensive use of chemical-based inputs in conventional agriculture has been associated with soil degradation, loss of biodiversity, pesticide residues in food, and adverse health effects. In contrast, organic home agriculture emphasizes natural nutrient cycling, composting, biological pest control, and soil health restoration. These practices not only enhance crop quality but also contribute to reduced environmental footprints by minimizing chemical runoff and greenhouse gas emissions. At the household level, organic cultivation promotes self-reliance, food security, and access to fresh, nutrient-dense produce. Therefore, a comprehensive review synthesizing available evidence on organic home agriculture is essential. Such an analysis can provide insights into cultivation practices, benefits, constraints, and emerging innovations, while identifying knowledge gaps that require further investigation. This review aims to consolidate current scientific understanding and highlight the role of organic home agriculture within sustainable and resilient food systems.

  1. Types of organic farming:

Organic farming can be categorized into different types based on the nature of inputs used and the degree of reliance on external resources. One major type is pure organic farming, which strictly avoids all synthetic chemical inputs such as artificial fertilizers, pesticides, and growth regulators. In this approach, soil fertility and crop health are maintained exclusively through natural and biological means, including compost, farmyard manure, green manure, bio‑fertilizers, and botanical pest repellents. This system emphasizes the enhancement of soil organic matter, promotion of beneficial microbial activity, and conservation of ecological integrity without nutrient or pest control from synthetic sources. Another form is integrated organic farming, which combines various biological and ecological components within the farm ecosystem. In an integrated system, nutrient and pest management are achieved through a combination of crop diversification, intercropping, crop rotation, biological control methods, and recycling of on‑farm resources such as crop residues and livestock manure. Integrated systems often link crops, livestock, and composting to form a self‑sustaining nutrient cycle, reducing dependency on external inputs and enhancing overall farm resilience. For small‑scale and home‑based organic agriculture, both pure and integrated organic methods provide sustainable strategies for maintaining soil health, increasing biodiversity, and producing nutritious food while minimizing environmental impact. These classifications demonstrate how different organic systems use biological processes and resource recycling to support sustainable agriculture (Muller, A (2021), Seufert, V., & Ramankutty, N. (2020), Duru, M., 2021).

    1. Pure organic farming: It is a system in which crop production depends entirely on natural and certified organic inputs with out the use of synthetic fertilizers, chemical pesticides, herbicides, or genitically modified organisms. The central principle of pure organic farming is to maintain soil biological activity and ecological balance through natural nutrient cycling. This system prioritizes environmental safety, biodiversity conservations and the production of residue-free food. However, yields may initially decline during the transition from conventional to organic systems, and management requires careful planning to maintain soil nutrient balance (Tuck SL et al., (2014).
    2. Integrated organic farming: It is a diversified and holistic approach in which crop production is combined with Livestock, composting unit, agroforestry, and multiple croping systems to create a self-sustaining farm ecosystem. The emphasis in integrated organic farming ison internal resource recycling and minimizing dependence on purchased inputs. Practices such as crop rotation, inter cropping, mixed farming and biological pest management enhance ecological stability and reduce pest and disease pressure. Integration of livestock improves nutrient availability through manure recycling while diversified enterprises provide economic stability and risk reduction Integrated systems are often considered more suitable for small-scale and home agriculture because they enhance nutrient self-reliance, reduce production costs, and improve farm resilience to climatic variability. By linking different farm enterprises, this model supports sustainable intencification while maintaining ecological integrity (Reganald & Wachter, 2016).

Geographical comparison of organic home agriculture practices:

Region

Common crops grown

Predominant organic practices

Key motivations

Major constraints

Asia (India, Southeast asia)

Vegetables, Herbs, Medicinal plants

Composting, vermicomposting, biofertilizers, neem-based pest control

Household food security, traditional knowledge, low-cost farming

Limited urban space, seasonal pest pressure

Africa

Leafy vegetables, Legumes, Root crops

Organic manure use, mixed cropping, crop rotation

Nutritional improvement, livelihood support

Water scarcity, limited technical access

Europe

Vegetables, berries, herbs

Composting, organic mulching, integrated pest management

Environmental sustainability, food quality

High labor input, regulatory complexity

North america

Vegetables, fruits, salad crops

Raised beds, compost, organic soil amendments

Health awareness, lifestyle choice

Cost of organic inputs, climate variability

Latin america

Vegetables, fruits, native crops

Agroecological practices, composting, intercropping

Biodiversity conservation, subsistence farming

Limited extension services

Urban regions worldwide

Leafy greens, microgreens, herbs

Container gardening, vertical farming, organic potting media

Space-efficient food production, fresh produce

Space limitation, water management

 

Table 1: Regional comparsion of organic home agriculture practices (Altieri, M. A, & Nicholls (2017).

Fig. 2  Conceptual framework of organic home agriculture illustrating the flow from household resources and organic inputs to sustainable food production and household outcomes.

2. Concept of organic home agriculture: Organic home agriculture is grounded in the fundamental principles of organic farming, including soil health maintenance, biodiversity conservation, and ecological sustainability. It involves the cultivation of vegetables, fruits, herbs, and medicinal plants using organic inputs derived from natural and household sources, such as composted kitchen waste and plant residues (Orsini et al., 2013). Unlike commercial organic farming, organic home agriculture operates on a small scale and prioritizes self-consumption rather than market production. The integration of waste recycling, minimal resource use, and crop diversity makes this system particularly suitable for urban and Organic Home Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Sustainable Practices, Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions households. By promoting closed nutrient cycles and reducing reliance on external inputs, organic home agriculture supports sustainable living practices. Organic home agriculture represents a transformative approach to food production that harmonizes household cultivation with the principles of ecological sustainability and human health. Rather than relying on synthetic fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides, this system embraces natural inputs and biological processes to nurture plant growth. At its heart, organic home agriculture reflects a deep respect for natural cycles, understanding that soil fertility, plant resilience, and ecosystem balance are interconnected (Reganold & Wachter, 2016). In practice, this means building healthy soil through composting kitchen waste and garden residues, using green manures and cover crops to protect and enrich soil structure, and employing crop rotation to manage pests and preserve nutrients These practices collectively increase soil organic matter, enhance water retention, and support beneficial soil organisms such as earthworms and mycorrhizal fungi — factors that are essential for sustained productivity in an era of intensifying environmental challenges, organic home agriculture addresses several pressing issues simultaneously. Modern industrial agriculture has contributed to soil degradation, water contamination, and reduced biodiversity through its dependence on synthetic agrochemicals (Smith & Goodwin, 2019). By contrast, organic methods minimize chemical inputs, protect pollinators, and reduce ecological footprints. When home gardeners adopt organic practices, they transform their own living spaces into microhabitats for biodiversity, attracting beneficial insects, birds, and microorganisms that contribute to more resilient local ecosystems. This ecological orientation not only benefits the home garden but also contributes to broader environmental stewardship at the community level. one of the most important advantages of organic home agriculture is its potential to produce nutrient‑rich and safe food for family consumption. Studies have indicated that organically grown fruits and vegetables often have higher levels of certain vitamins, antioxidants, and micronutrients compared with conventionally grown produce (Hughes et al., 2011). While research continues to define the full nutritional differences, many gardeners report improvements in flavor and quality when they harvest food grown without synthetic chemicals. For families concerned about chemical residues and long‑term health impacts, organic home agriculture offers a pathway to greater food safety and peace of mind. Beyond nutritional benefits, organic home agriculture plays a constructive role in strengthening food security and self‑reliance. In many regions, access to fresh, affordable produce is limited by economic or logistical barriers. By cultivating their own food, households reduce dependence on external markets, buffer themselves against food price fluctuations, and ensure a consistent supply of fresh produce throughout growing seasons (Jones & Burgess, 2018). This is especially valuable in urban and peri‑urban areas where food deserts — places with limited access to healthy food — are prevalent. Even small spaces such as balconies, rooftops, and patios can be converted into productive organic gardens, enabling families to supplement their diets with fresh vegetables and herbs Organic home agriculture also encourages waste reduction and circular resource use. Instead of disposing of organic waste, gardeners can transform kitchen scraps and yard trimmings into compost — a rich source of nutrients that enhances soil fertility. This cycle of reuse reduces pressure on landfill systems and provides an economical alternative to purchased soil amendments. Water conservation practices such as mulching and rainwater harvesting are commonly integrated into organic home systems, further reducing resource waste and supporting garden resilience during dry periods. These resource‑efficient strategies mirror global efforts to transition toward sustainable consumption and production patterns on a social level, organic home agriculture fosters community engagement and knowledge exchange. Many organic gardeners participate in seed swaps, local gardening clubs, and online communities where they share experiences, techniques, and harvests. This collective learning strengthens social bonds while preserving traditional agricultural knowledge. In addition, children raised in households that practice organic gardening often develop early awareness of ecological processes, seasonal rhythms, and healthy eating habits — contributing to lifelong environmental literacy Despite its many benefits, organic home agriculture. Successful organic cultivation requires more time, planning, and manual effort compared to conventional gardening. Pest management often relies on preventative measures and natural controls, which may initially seem less predictable than chemical interventions. Additionally, achieving consistent high yields in small spaces requires careful selection of crop varieties and optimization of planting schedules (Smith & Goodwin, 2019). However, these challenges also present opportunities for creativity; many gardeners experiment with companion planting, vertical gardening, and integrated pest management to maximize productivity without compromising organic principles in summary, organic home agriculture is more than a gardening technique — it is a holistic approach to living that values health, environment, and community. By prioritizing natural soil building, chemical‑free cultivation, and efficient resource use, organic home agriculture contributes to sustainable food systems at the household and community levels. Its relevance continues to grow as global populations seek locally grown, nutritious food and as environmental awareness expands. For individuals and families, adopting organic home practices can lead to improved food quality, environmental benefit, and a deeper connection to the rhythms of the natural world.

3. Sustainable practices in organic home agriculture:

Organic nutrient management is central to the sustainability and productivity of home agriculture systems. Unlike conventional farming, which often relies heavily on synthetic fertilizers, organic home agriculture emphasizes ecological processes, biological nutrient cycling, and recycling of locally available resources. Among the key components of organic practices in household cultivation are organic manures and composting, vermicomposting, and biofertilizers. These approaches not only enhance soil fertility but also contribute to environmental sustainability, waste recycling, and long-term soil health.

3.1 organic manures and composting:

Organic manures and compost form the foundation of nutrient management in organic home agriculture. Composting household biodegradable waste converts organic material into nutrient-rich soil amendments that enhance soil fertility and structure. Studies have shown that compost application improves soil organic carbon content, microbial activity, and nutrient availability, resulting in improved crop growth (bernal et al., 2017). Organic manures constitute decomposed plant and animal materials applied to soil to improve its physical, chemical, and biological properties. Common sources include farmyard manure, green manure, leaf compost, crop residues, and kitchen waste. Organic manures supply essential macro- and micronutrients while simultaneously increasing soil organic matter content. Soil organic matter plays a crucial role in improving soil structure, enhancing aggregation, increasing cation exchange capacity, and promoting water retention (lal et al., 2015). Composting is a controlled aerobic process through which microorganisms decompose biodegradable. The composting process typically involves three phases: the mesophilic phase (moderate temperature decomposition), the thermophilic phase (high temperature microbial activity that destroys pathogens and weed seeds), and the maturation phase (stabilization and humification) (Bernal et al., 2009). Proper composting requires adequate aeration, moisture (50–60%), balanced carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (approximately 25–30:1), and periodic turning to ensure uniform decomposition the application of compost in home gardens improves nutrient availability through gradual mineralization, thereby reducing nutrient leaching losses. Compost enhances soil microbial biomass, which plays a vital role in nutrient cycling and suppression of soil-borne pathogens (Zeng G, et al., 2010). In addition, compost incorporation improves soil porosity in clay soils and increases moisture retention in sandy soils, making it particularly beneficial in small-scale home cultivation where irrigation resources may be limited. from an environmental perspective, composting reduces household organic waste accumulation and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions associated with landfill disposal. It contributes to carbon sequestration by increasing soil organic carbon content. Therefore, composting in home agriculture integrates waste management with sustainable nutrient recycling, forming a closed-loop system within household food production.

3.2 Vermicomposting:

Vermicomposting utilizes earthworms to decompose organic waste into vermicompost, which is rich in essential nutrients and beneficial microorganisms. Vermicompost has been reported to enhance plant growth, improve soil aeration, and increase resistance to certain plant diseases (arancon et al., 2015). Due to its efficiency and low space requirement, vermicomposting is particularly suitable for household-level organic agriculture. Vermicomposting is a bio-oxidative process that involves the joint action of earthworms and microorganisms in converting organic waste into stabilized organic manure known as vermicompost. Epigeic earthworm species such as Eisenia fetida and Eudrilus eugeniae are commonly used due to their high reproductive rate and feeding efficiency. During vermicomposting, earthworms fragment organic matter, increasing its surface area for microbial colonization. The material undergoes biochemical transformation in the earthworm gut, resulting in castings that are enriched with plant-available nutrients, enzymes, beneficial microbes, and growth-promoting substances (Atiyeh et al., 2000). Vermicompost typically contains higher levels of available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium compared to conventional compost (Arancon et al., 2004) In home agriculture, vermicomposting offers significant advantages. The process is relatively rapid, often producing mature compost within 45–60 days under optimal conditions. It requires limited space and can be performed in containers, bins, or small pits, making it suitable for urban and peri-urban households. Vermicompost improves soil aeration, enhances microbial diversity, and stimulates plant growth through natural phytohormones and humic substances Studies have demonstrated that vermicompost application improves seed germination, root development, and crop yield in vegetables and ornamental plants (Arancon et al., 2004). Additionally, vermicomposting reduces environmental pollution by converting kitchen waste into valuable fertilizer. Thus, vermicomposting represents an efficient and eco-friendly technology for nutrient recycling in home-based agricultural systems.

3.3 biofertilizers:

Biofertilizers consist of living microorganisms that promote plant growth by enhancing nutrient availability. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms, and mycorrhizal fungi are commonly used in organic home agriculture. These bio-inputs improve nutrient uptake efficiency and support long-term soil fertility without causing environmental harm (vessey, 2003) Crop rotation and mixed cropping are essential practices that enhance soil fertility and reduce pest incidence. The cultivation of diverse crops within limited home spaces improves nutrient cycling and biodiversity. The inclusion of leguminous crops contributes to biological nitrogen fixation, improving overall system productivity. Biofertilizers are preparations containing living microorganisms that enhance nutrient availability to plants through natural biological processes. Unlike organic manures that directly supply nutrients, biofertilizers facilitate nutrient transformation and mobilization in the soil ecosystem. They include nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, potassium-mobilizing bacteria, and mycorrhizal fungi (Vessey, 2003) Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms such as Rhizobium, Azotobacter, and Azospirillum convert atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, making it accessible to plants. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria release organic acids that convert insoluble phosphates into soluble forms, thereby improving phosphorus uptake. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi form symbiotic associations with plant roots and enhance nutrient and water absorption by extending the effective root surface area. The use of biofertilizers in home agriculture reduces dependence on synthetic fertilizers and promotes ecological balance. These microbial inoculants improve soil biological activity, increase nutrient use efficiency, and enhance plant tolerance to environmental stress. Biofertilizers are typically applied through seed treatment, soil application, or root dipping before transplanting Integration of biofertilizers with compost and vermicompost creates a synergistic effect. Organic matter provides a favorable environment for microbial colonization, while biofertilizers accelerate nutrient cycling processes. This integrated approach supports sustainable productivity and maintains soil health in small-scale cultivation systems. (Bhattacharyya, 2012).

BENEFITS OF ORGANIC FARMING:

Organic home agriculture offers multiple advantages that span nutritional, environmental, economic, and social dimensions. One of the most immediate benefits is the production of chemical-free, nutritious food. By avoiding synthetic pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, households can access fresh fruits, vegetables, and herbs with minimal chemical residues, contributing to improved health and food safety (Hughes et al., 2011). Organic home gardening also supports environmental sustainability by promoting practices such as composting, mulching, crop rotation, and natural pest control. These methods enhance soil fertility, maintain biodiversity, conserve water, and reduce pollution, thereby creating a positive impact on the local ecosystem from an economic perspective, organic home agriculture strengthens household self-reliance and reduces dependency on external markets. Families growing their own food can save money on groceries and buffer themselves against fluctuating food prices (Jones & Burgess, 2018). Surplus produce can sometimes be sold locally, creating additional income opportunities. Socially, organic home gardening encourages community engagement and knowledge exchange, as gardeners share seeds, tools, and cultivation techniques. This promotes collaborative learning, preserves traditional agricultural knowledge, and fosters social cohesion (Smith & Goodwin, 2019) Additionally, engaging in organic home agriculture has educational and therapeutic benefits. Household members, especially children, gain practical experience in sustainable food production, ecological principles, and seasonal cycles. The physical activity and interaction with nature associated with gardening also improve mental well-being, reduce stress, and provide a sense of accomplishment. Collectively, these benefits make organic home agriculture a holistic approach that integrates health, environment, economy, and social development, while also encouraging sustainable living practices at the household level. (Ohly H, & Gentry S., 2016).

RECENT ADVANCES AND INNOVATIONS:

Innovations such as vertical gardening, container gardening, and terrace farming have expanded the potential of organic home agriculture in space-limited environments. Efficient irrigation systems, including drip irrigation and rainwater harvesting, improve water use efficiency. The integration of digital tools for plant monitoring and organic input management has further enhanced household-level productivity Organic home agriculture — the practice of growing food using natural methods at small or household scales — is rapidly evolving. Innovations now combine traditional ecological wisdom with cutting-edge science and technology to help people grow nutritious food sustainably in backyards, balconies, terraces, and community spaces. Recent advances in organic home agriculture reflect a blending of traditional ecological practices with cutting-edge scientific and technological innovations aimed at improving productivity, sustainability, and resilience without reliance on synthetic agrochemicals. A growing body of research shows that precision tools and digital advisory systems — including remote sensing, AI-based decision support, and real-time soil monitoring — are being adapted to small-scale and home gardening environments to optimize irrigation, nutrient management, and pest control, thus narrowing the historical yield gap between organic and conventional systems (Specht K (2014), Campisano A (2017). Soil health innovations have emerged as a cornerstone of recent scholarship, with tailored biofertilizers, biostimulants, and cover crops demonstrated to enhance organic matter content, nutrient cycling, and microbial diversity — all central for long-term fertility and carbon sequestration in domestic soil ecosystems (Liakos KG, 2018). This work aligns with broader literature documenting the role of composting, green manures, vermicomposting, and mycorrhizal inoculations in improving soil structure and yield stability, especially under diverse climatic conditions  Parallel innovation in biological pest management, such as biopesticides and microbial treatments, has effectively reduced dependency on chemical pesticides while maintaining or enhancing crop protection and quality — an important trend noted in agricultural biotechnology reviews. Furthermore, the role of knowledge networks, advisory frameworks, and policy support has been highlighted as a critical enabler for adoption, particularly in resource-limited settings where education and extension services help integrate modern practices with local ecological knowledge (Glare T, 2012). Collectively, these innovations are transforming organic home agriculture into a data-informed, ecologically resilient system capable of producing nutritious food with enhanced environmental benefits, aligning with sustainable development goals and emerging consumer expectations for traceable, chemical-free produce.Recent advances demonstrate that organic home agriculture is progressively integrating digital innovation, biological inputs, and community-based systems to enhance sustainability and productivity. Contemporary growers increasingly employ Internet of Things (IoT) sensors and real-time environmental monitoring to optimize irrigation and nutrient management, thereby reducing resource wastage and minimizing plant stress (Padhiary et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence–assisted diagnostics and mobile-based applications further support early detection of pests, diseases, and nutrient deficiencies, enabling timely, non-chemical interventions. Precision-oriented practices, including smart irrigation systems and small-scale mapping technologies, allow household gardens to apply scientific management approaches traditionally limited to commercial agriculture. Simultaneously, the growing adoption of biofertilizers, microbial inoculants, pheromone traps, and beneficial insects reflect a shift toward ecologically balanced pest and soil management strategies. Urbanization has also stimulated the expansion of rooftop gardening, vertical cultivation systems, and organically managed hydroponic or aquaponic units, facilitating food production in space-constrained environments. In addition to technological innovations, community-supported agriculture networks, seed-sharing initiatives, and public training programs are strengthening knowledge exchange. Climate-smart approaches such as composting, mulching, cover cropping, and the selection of locally adapted or drought-tolerant varieties further enhance the adaptive capacity of home gardens under changing environmental conditions. Emerging concepts such as small-scale traceability systems and blockchain-enabled verification suggest future opportunities for building consumer trust and supporting micro-supply chains for surplus household produce. Collectively, these developments indicate that organic home agriculture is evolving into a technology-enabled, climate-resilient, and community-driven model of sustainable food production (Chiaraluce, G., Bentivoglio D. & Finco, A (2024).

Advantages and Disadvantages of Organic Farming:

Organic farming offers a sustainable alternative to conventional agriculture by emphasizing ecological balance, natural inputs, and biodiversity (Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2021). While it provides significant environmental, health, and socio-economic benefits, it also comes with challenges related to productivity, labor, and market accessibility. The table below summarizes the main advantages and disadvantages of organic farming (Crowder, D. W., & Reganold, J. P. (2020).

Advantages

Disadvantages

Reduces chemical pollution, protecting soil, water, and ecosystems.

Generally produces lower crop yields compared to conventional methods.

Enhances soil fertility and structure naturally through composting and crop rotation.

Requires more labor for tasks like weeding and manual pest control.

Provides food free from synthetic pesticide and chemical residues.

Managing pests and diseases is more challenging without chemical pesticides.

Helps mitigate climate change through carbon sequestration and reduced chemical use.

Land conversion to organic farming requires a long transition period to meet certification.

Offers better economic opportunities for small-scale and family farmers due to premium prices.

Availability of organic inputs like fertilizers, seeds, and biocontrol agents can be limited.

Note: Information summarized from Varma et al. (2024).

FUTURE DIRECTIONS:

Organic home agriculture is rapidly evolving beyond a lifestyle choice into a critical component of sustainable food systems. As global urban populations increase and climate risks intensify, the integration of innovative technologies, ecological design principles, and community dynamics promises to transform how households produce and consume food. Future research should focus on bridging traditional organic practices with cutting‑edge tools, designing systems tailored for limited spaces, and expanding the measurable benefits of home cultivation across nutritional, environmental, and socio‑economic dimensions. one significant avenue for future research lies in the development and adaptation of smart technologies for small‑scale environments. Precision agriculture tools — such as real‑time soil nutrient sensors, micro‑climate monitors, and automated irrigation systems — have traditionally been applied in commercial agriculture (Zhang et al., 2019). Future work should customize these tools for home gardeners, making them affordable, intuitive, and scalable. Deploying Internet of Things (IoT) devices and mobile platforms can help non‑expert users diagnose nutrient deficiencies, schedule irrigation, and predict pest outbreaks, ultimately improving yields while conserving water and inputs (Jones & Clark, 2021). Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms into home gardening apps could further support decision‑making by offering personalized recommendations based on plant species, local climate, and historical growth patterns (Singh et al. 2022). This convergence of digital technology and organic practice represents a transformative frontier that can democratize agricultural knowledge and empower households to cultivate complex crops with minimal waste in addition to technological innovations, space‑efficient cultivation systems will be crucial as more people live in apartments and densely populated urban areas. Traditional garden beds are often impractical in these contexts. Future implementations of vertical farming, modular hydroponics, and aeroponic units specifically designed for domestic settings could significantly increase productivity per square meter (Kumar et al., 2020). These systems should emphasize organic inputs — such as organic nutrient solutions and biological pest controls — ensuring they are aligned with organic certification standards even when operated indoors. Research should investigate how these systems interact with urban microclimates, energy consumption, and user preferences, as well as how to optimize plant varieties adapted to vertical and controlled environments (Lee et al., 2023). Hybrid approaches that combine soil‑based methods with soilless systems may also provide resilience against nutrient imbalances and pest pressures common in closed environment. Organic gardeners rely heavily on compost and natural amendments, but there is growing interest in biofertilizers, mycorrhizal inoculants, and microbial consortia that improve nutrient cycling and disease resistance (Martinez & Gupta, 2018). Future studies should explore how these biological products perform in small‑scale settings, where volume, application frequency, and environmental variability differ from field trials. Additionally, expanding research into natural pest control strategies — including companion planting, pheromone traps, and beneficial insect habitats — can reduce the reliance on even approved organic pesticides, further aligning home gardens with regenerative ecological principles (Harper & Singh 2021). Investigations into the genomics of beneficial microbes and their symbiotic relationships with plants can unlock new potential for enhancing resilience in home systems beyond the biological and technological facets, future research must emphasize education, accessibility, and socio‑cultural integration. The success of organic home agriculture depends not only on tools but also on the knowledge and motivation of growers. Interactive learning platforms, virtual reality (VR) based training modules, and community workshops can disseminate best practices on crop rotation, seasonal planning, pest identification, and soil management (Oliveira & Thomson, 2020). Engaging educational efforts targeted at youth, seniors, and underserved communities may reduce barriers to entry, ensuring that the benefits of home agriculture are equitable and widespread (Nguyen & Patel, 2024). Simultaneously, partnerships with local governments and NGOs to offer incentives — such as subsidized compost bins, rainwater collection systems, and rooftop garden permits — can catalyze adoption in urban neighborhoods with limited green space the linkage between organic home agriculture and household nutrition also warrants expanded research. Cultivating food at home can improve access to fresh vegetables and herbs, which are often lacking in urban diets (Smith et al., 2022). Longitudinal studies exploring how home gardening impacts dietary diversity, micronutrient intake, and overall health outcomes can provide robust evidence for policy support. Further, integrating home farm outputs into local food networks — such as farm‑to‑table cooperatives or seed swap communities — can strengthen food sovereignty and local biodiversity (Ramirez & Lee, 2023). The role of community compost hubs and shared tool libraries could be evaluated as mechanisms for fostering collective stewardship of resources and enhancing social cohesion Finally, the future of organic home agriculture should integrate climate adaptation and resilience frameworks. With intensifying weather extremes, home gardeners will benefit from research on crop varieties tolerant to drought, heat, and pest pressures exacerbated by climate change. Trials examining microclimate modification techniques — such as shade structures, water‑retaining mulches, and biochar amendments — can identify practical strategies that minimize risk and enhance productivity. Additionally, coupling organic home agriculture with renewable energy solutions — such as solar‑powered lighting for indoor systems or rainwater harvesting — can further reduce environmental footprints and contribute to decentralized, resilient living environments in conclusion, the future of organic home agriculture lies at the intersection of innovation, ecology, and social engagement. By tailoring advanced technologies for home use, expanding biological input research, enhancing educational outreach, and investigating health and community impacts, researchers and practitioners can elevate home gardening from a hobby to a vital component of sustainable living. This integrated approach will not only increase food self‑reliance but also strengthen environmental stewardship and foster holistic human well‑being. (Huq F. F., & Deacon, L. (2025).

DISCUSSION:

The growing interest in organic home agriculture reflects broader global concerns regarding food safety, environmental sustainability, and household resilience within modern food systems. This review highlights that organic home agriculture is not merely a scaled-down version of organic farming but represents a distinct, household-centered production system characterized by closed nutrient cycles, diversified cropping, and minimal external inputs. The synthesis of available literature suggests that when organic principles are adapted to domestic settings, they can deliver meaningful nutritional, environmental, and socio-economic benefits (francis et al. 2003). One of the most significant findings across studies is the role of organic inputs, particularly compost and vermicompost, in improving soil quality and sustaining crop productivity over time. Unlike conventional home gardening practices that often depend on readily soluble chemical fertilizers, organic systems rely on gradual nutrient release and enhanced microbial activity. Although this approach may not always result in rapid short-term yield increases, it contributes to long-term soil fertility and crop resilience. This distinction is particularly relevant for home agriculture, where soil health directly influences repeated cultivation cycles in limited spaces. (mader et al. (2002); diacono & montemurro (2010); kumar & sharma (2017).Pest and disease management remains a critical point of divergence between organic and conventional home gardening systems. Conventional approaches prioritize immediate pest suppression through chemical pesticides, whereas organic home agriculture emphasizes preventive and ecological strategies such as crop diversity, botanical extracts, and biological control. While these organic methods may require greater labor input and monitoring, they reduce the risk of pesticide residues and promote beneficial organisms. The literature indicates that integrated organic pest management can be effective at the household level, although its success is highly dependent on user knowledge and consistency of application. (philpott & bichier, 2017). From a nutritional and health perspective, organic home agriculture offers clear advantages. The consumption of freshly harvested produce minimizes post-harvest nutrient losses and reduces exposure to synthetic agrochemicals. While some comparative studies report modest differences in nutrient composition between organic and conventionally grown crops, the cumulative benefits of freshness, dietary diversity, and chemical-free cultivation are particularly relevant in home-based systems. These factors collectively enhance household food quality rather than focusing solely on yield metrics. (brown & jameton (2000) Despite its advantages, the effectiveness of organic home agriculture is constrained by several limitations. Space availability, especially in urban environments, restricts crop selection and total production capacity. In addition, variability in organic input quality and limited access to technical guidance can lead to inconsistent outcomes. These constraints highlight the need for context-specific recommendations rather than generalized organic farming guidelines. Importantly, existing research remains fragmented, with limited long-term and quantitative evaluations of household-level organic systems. (zezza & tasciotti (2010) The discussion also underscores several research gaps that warrant attention. There is a lack of standardized frameworks for assessing productivity, soil health, and nutritional outcomes in organic home agriculture. Comparative long-term studies examining organic and conventional home gardening under similar environmental conditions are scarce. Furthermore, limited research has explored the integration of emerging technologies, such as digital monitoring tools and climate-resilient crop varieties, within organic home agriculture systems overall, the reviewed evidence suggests that organic home agriculture has substantial potential as a complementary strategy for sustainable food production, particularly in urban and peri-urban settings. Its success, however, depends on adequate knowledge dissemination, locally adapted practices, and supportive policy initiatives. Addressing current limitations through targeted research and extension efforts will be essential for maximizing the long-term benefits of organic home agriculture.This review distinguishes itself by presenting organic home agriculture not merely as a household gardening practice, but as an integrated, decentralized micro-model of sustainable food systems that simultaneously links ecological nutrient cycling, waste recycling, soil carbon enhancement, biodiversity conservation, digital innovation, climate resilience, and household nutritional security within a unified analytical framework. By synthesizing geographical comparisons, emerging technological interventions, biological input strategies, and socio-economic dimensions alongside traditional organic principles, this work moves beyond descriptive discussions and offers a systems-oriented perspective that positions organic home agriculture as a scalable and research-relevant pathway toward resilient and sustainable food production at the household level. (Tilman et al., 2011).

CONCLUSION

Organic home agriculture represents a sustainable and practical approach to household food production, integrating ecological principles with small-scale cultivation. By emphasizing composting, vermicomposting, biofertilizers, crop rotation, and biological pest management, it strengthens soil fertility, enhances microbial activity. These practices not only improve environmental quality but also encourage responsible resource use through waste recycling and closed nutrient cycles. The review indicates that organic home agriculture contributes significantly to household nutrition, food safety, and dietary diversity by providing access to fresh, chemical-free produce. It also promotes economic savings, self-reliance, and community engagement while supporting biodiversity conservation and reduced environmental footprint. Despite constraints such as limited space, labor intensity, pest control challenges, and variability in technical knowledge, these limitations can be addressed through proper training, locally adapted practices, and the integration of innovative technologies suited to small-scale farms. Overall, organic home agriculture offers a resilient, environmentally responsible, and socially beneficial strategy that can play an important role in strengthening sustainable food systems at the household level.

REFERENCES

  1. Gomiero, t., pimentel, d., paoletti, m. G. Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 2011; 30(1–2), 95–124.
  2. Ponisio LC, M’Gonigle LK, Mace KC, Palomino J, de Valpine P, Kremen C. Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(24):7611-6.
  3. Muller, A., Schader, C., Scialabba, N. E. H., Brüggemann, J., Isensee, A., Erb, K. H., et al., Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nature Communications, 2021; 12, 1–11.
  4.  Seufert, V., & Ramankutty, N. (2020). Many shades of gray—The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture. Science Advances, 6(45), eaba5123.
  5. Duru, M., Therond, O., & Fares, M. (2021). Designing agroecological transitions in food systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41, 1–15.
  6. Tuck SL, Winqvist C, Mota F, Ahnström J, Turnbull LA, Bengtsson J. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: A meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol. 2014;51(3):746–755.
  7. Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016). Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nature Plants, 2, 15221.
  8. Altieri, M. A., & Nicholls, C. I. (2017). The adaptation and mitigation potential of traditional agriculture in a changing climate. Climatic Change, 140(1), 33–45.
  9. Orsini F, Kahane R, Nono-Womdim R, Gianquinto G. Urban agriculture in the developing world: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2013;33:695–720.
  10. Smith, L., & Goodwin, A. (2019). Home gardens: sustainability and resilience in community food systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 147–155.
  11. Hughes, D., et al. Organic gardening and sustainable urban agriculture. Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 2011;5(2), 25–36.
  12. Jones, P., & Burgess, D. (2018). Urban food security & home agriculture. Sustainable Cities Review, 12, 45–60.
  13. Smith, L., Goodwin, A. Home gardens: sustainability and resilience in community food systems. Environmental Science & Policy. 2019;101, 147–155.
  14. Bernal, m. P., alburquerque, j. A., & moral, r. Composting of organic wastes. Bioresource technology. 2017; 99, 7783–7793.
  15. Lal R. Soil organic matter and its role in soil health and crop productivity. J Soil Water Conserv. 2015;70(2): A11–A14.
  16. Zeng G, Yu M, Chen Y, Huang D, Zhang J, Huang H, et al. Effects of inoculation with Phanerochaete chrysosporium during composting of agricultural waste on nutrient transformation and pathogen removal. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(1):111–117.
  17. Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., & Bierman, P. (2015). Influences of vermicomposts on plant growth and pest incidence. Pedobiologia, 58(2–3), 79–87.
  18. Atiyeh, R. M., Subler, S., Edwards, C. A., Bachman, G., Metzger, J. D., & Shuster, W. (2000). Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia, 44(5), 579–590.
  19. Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., Atiyeh, R., & Metzger, J. D. (2004). Effects of vermicomposts produced from food waste on the growth and yields of greenhouse peppers. Bioresource Technology, 93(2), 139–144.
  20. Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., Atiyeh, R., & Metzger, J. D. (2004). Effects of vermicomposts produced from food waste on the growth and yields of greenhouse peppers. Bioresource Technology, 93(2), 139–144.
  21. Vessey, J. K. (2003). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255(2), 571–586.
  22. Vessey, J. K. (2003). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255(2), 571–586.
  23. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28:1327–1350.
  24. Hughes, R., Brown, L., & Smith, J. (2011). Organic food consumption and health implications: A review. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24(6), 567–580.
  25. Jones, M., & Burgess, P. J. (2018). Economic viability of small-scale organic food production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 33(4), 315–326.
  26. Smith, L., & Goodwin, D. (2019). Community gardening and social sustainability: A review. Local Environment, 24(3), 230–245
  27. Ohly H, Gentry S, Wigglesworth R, Bethel A, Lovell R, Garside R. A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:286.
  28. Specht K, Siebert R, Hartmann I, Freisinger UB, Sawicka M, Werner A, et al. Urban agriculture of the future: An overview of sustainability aspects of vertical farming. Sustainability. 2014;6(11):7654–7675.
  29.  Campisano A, Butler D, Ward S, Burns MJ, Friedler E, DeBusk K, et al. Urban rainwater harvesting systems: Research, implementation and future perspectives. Water Res. 2017;115:195–209.
  30. Liakos KG, Busato P, Moshou D, Pearson S, Bochtis D. Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors. 2018;18(8):2674.
  31.  Glare T, Caradus J, Gelernter W, Jackson T, Keyhani N, Köhl J, et al. Have biopesticides come of age Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(5):250–258.
  32. Padhiary et al. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Farm Management: Integrating Smart Systems for Optimal Agricultural Practices. International Journal of Smart Agriculture, 3(1), 1-11.
  33. Chiaraluce, G., Bentivoglio, D., & Finco, A. (2024). Exploring the role of blockchain technology in modern high-value food supply chains: Global trends and future directions. Agricultural and Food Economics, 12, Article 6.
  34. Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2021). Organic agriculture in the 21st century. Nature Sustainability, 4(7), 546–556.
  35. Crowder, D. W., & Reganold, J. P. (2020). Financial and environmental benefits of organic farming. Nature Plants, 6, 107–115.
  36. Varma, N., Wadatkar, H., Salve, R., & Varun Kumar, T. (2024). Advancing sustainable agriculture: A comprehensive review of organic farming practices and environmental impact. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 46(7), 695–703.
  37. Zhang, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, D. (2019). Precision tools for eco friendly agriculture. Journal of Precision Agriculture, 17(2), 88–109.
  38. Jones, P. & Clark, E. (2021). Smart technologies for urban gardening. Urban Agriculture Review, 9(1), 78–94.
  39. Singh, A., Zhao, Y., & Li, P. (2022). AI in small scale agriculture: potentials and challenges. Agricultural Informatics, 14(2), 66–83.
  40. Kumar, V., Patel, S., & Lee, J. (2020). Vertical farming applications in limited spaces. Agriculture Advances, 12(4), 123–136.
  41. Lee, J. et al. (2023). Optimizing indoor hydroponic systems for home use. Journal of Controlled Environment Agriculture, 18(3), 209–220.
  42. Martinez, A. & Gupta, N. (2018). Biofertilizers and soil microbiology. Soil Biology International, 5(3), 201–217.
  43. Harper, D. & Singh, R. (2021). Natural pest control strategies for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Organic Systems, 16(2), 45–59.
  44. Oliveira, M. & Thomson, H. (2020). Educational platforms for sustainable gardening. Global Agriculture Education, 7(2), 157–178.
  45. Nguyen, L. & Patel, R. (2024). Accessibility in home agricultural education. Community Agriculture Journal, 11(1), 90–112.
  46. Smith, L., Brown, K., & Islam, M. (2022). Diet diversity outcomes of home gardening. Nutrition & Health Perspectives, 15(3), 141–159.
  47. Ramirez, F. & Lee, S. (2023). Community food networks and biodiversity. Journal of Urban Food Systems, 4(1), 33–49.
  48. Huq, F. F., & Deacon, L. (2025). A systematic review of community gardens and their role in urban food security and resilience. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 696.
  49. Francis, c., lieblein, g., gliessman, s., breland, t. A., creamer, n., harwood, r., … Poincelot, r. (2003). Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of sustainable agriculture, 22(3), 99–118.
  50. Mader, p., fliessbach, a., dubois, d., gunst, l., fried, p., & niggli, u. (2002). Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science, 296(5573), 1694–1697.
  51. Diacono, m., & montemurro, f. (2010). Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. Agronomy for sustainable development, 30(2), 401–422.
  52. Kumar, s., & sharma, s. (2017). Vermicomposting for sustainable organic agriculture. International journal of recycling of organic waste in agriculture, 6(3), 199–206.
  53. Philpott, s. M., & bichier, p. (2017). Local and landscape drivers of arthropod abundance and diversity in urban gardens. Environmental entomology, 46(1), 201–212.
  54. Brown, k. H., & jameton, a. L. (2000). Public health implications of urban agriculture. Journal of public health policy, 21(1), 20–39.
  55. Zezza, a., & tasciotti, l. (2010). Urban agriculture, poverty, and food security. Food policy, 35(4), 265–273.
  56. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(50):20260–20264..
  57. Pimentel, d., et al. (2005). Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. Bioscience, 55(1), 10–15.
  58. Soga, m., gaston, k. J., & yamaura, y. (2017). Gardening is beneficial for health. Preventive medicine reports, 5, 92–99.
  59. Worthington, v. (2001). Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits and vegetables. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine, 7(2), 161–173.
  60. Wolfert, s., ge, l., verdouw, c., & bogaardt, m. J. (2017) big data in smart farming – a review. agricultural systems, 153, 69–80.
  61. Liakos, k. G., busato, p., moshou, d., pearson, s., & bochtis, d. (2018) machine learning in agriculture: A review sensnors 18(8), 2674.
  62. Backer, r., rokem, j. S., ilangumaran, g., et al. (2018) plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context and future prospects frontiers in plant science, 9, 1473.
  63. Benke, k., & tomkins, b. (2017) future food-production systems: Vertical farming and controlled environments sustainability science, 12, 1–13.
  64. Lal, r. (2020). regenerative agriculture for food and climate journal of soil and water conservation, 75(5), 123a–124a.
  65. Klerkx, l., jakku, e., & labarthe, p. (2019). Njas – wageningen journal of life sciences, 90–91, 100315.
  66. Bhardwaj, d., ansari, m. W., sahoo, r. K., & tuteja, n. (2014). Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture. Microbial cell factories, 13, 66.
  67. Galhena, d. H., freed, r., & maredia, k. M. (2013). Home gardens: A promising approach to enhance household food security. Agriculture & food security, 2(8).
  68. Kortright, r., & wakefield, s. (2011). Edible backyards: A qualitative study of household food growing. Health & place, 17, 39–45.
  69. Taylor, j. R., & lovell, s. T. (2014). Urban home food gardens. Renewable agriculture and food systems, 29(4), 348–361.
  70. Lazcano, c., & domínguez, j. (2011). The use of vermicompost. Waste management & research, 29, 952–967.
  71. Malusá, e., & vassilev, n. (2014). A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilizers. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 98, 6599–6607.
  72. Isman, m. B. (2006). Botanical insecticides. Annual review of entomology, 51, 45–66.
  73. Koul, o. (2008). Phytochemicals and insect control. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 27, 1–24.
  74. Pretty, j., & bharucha, z. P. (2015). Integrated pest management. Agricultural systems, 136, 157–166.
  75. Tilman, d., et al. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and biodiversity. Nature, 418, 671–677.
  76. Wezel, a., et al. (2014). Agroecological principles. Agronomy for sustainable development, 34, 1–20.
  77. Barański, m., et al. (2014). Higher antioxidant levels in organic crops. British journal of nutrition, 112, 794–811.
  78. Brandt, k., et al. (2011). Agroecosystem management and food quality. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 91, 12–19.
  79. Dangour, a. D., et al. (2009). Nutritional quality of organic foods. American journal of clinical nutrition, 90, 680–685.
  80. Rembiałkowska, e. (2007). Quality of organic food. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 87, 2757–2762.
  81. Orsini, f., et al. (2013). Urban agriculture in europe. Agronomy for sustainable development, 33, 695–720.
  82. Specht, k., et al. (2014). Urban agriculture sustainability. Landscape and urban planning, 125, 1–10.
  83. Benis, k., & ferrão, p. (2017). Vertical farming. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 203–218.
  84. Eigenbrod, c., & gruda, n. (2015). Urban vegetable production. Horticulturae, 1, 43–60.
  85. Rockström, j., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries. Nature, 461, 472–475.
  86. Rose, d. C., & chilvers, j. (2018). Precision agriculture. Science, 362, 1060–1061.
  87. Kamilaris, a., et al. (2019). Ai in agriculture. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 162, 751–768.
  88. Patrício, d. I., & rieder, r. (2018). Computer vision in agriculture. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 156, 69–80.
  89. Alaimo, k., et al. (2008). Community gardening and health. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 40, 94–101.
  90. Ghosh, s., et al. (2019). Organic farming in india. Indian journal of agricultural sciences, 89, 192–202.
  91. Ramesh, p., et al. (2005). Organic farming. Current science, 88, 561–568.
  92. Yadav, a. K., et al. (2013). Organic inputs in indian agriculture. Journal of cleaner production, 47, 228–234.
  93. Clapp, j. (2017). Food security and food systems. Global environmental change, 43, 1–11.
  94. Fraser, e. D. G., et al. (2016). Food systems resilience. Global food security, 8, 17–23.
  95. Tendall, d. M., et al. (2015). Food system resilience. Global food security, 5, 18–23.
  96. Ericksen, p. J. (2008). Food system vulnerability. Global environmental change, 18, 234–245.
  97. Kirchmann, h., et al. (2008). Organic waste management. Agronomy for sustainable development, 28, 1–14.
  98. Velenturf, a. P. M., et al. (2019). Circular economy. Resources, conservation and recycling, 141, 1–9.
  99. Geissdoerfer, m., et al. (2017). Circular economy. Journal of cleaner production, 143, 757–768.
  100. Nicholls, c. I., et al. (2016). Ecological pest management. Agronomy for sustainable development, 36, 1–16.
  101. Tittonell, p. (2014). Ecological intensification. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 8, 53–61.
  102. Vanlauwe, b., et al. (2014). Integrated soil fertility management. Field crops research, 158, 11–20.
  103. Pretty, j., et al. (2010). Sustainable intensification. International journal of agricultural sustainability, 8, 5–24.
  104. Kremen, c., & miles, a. (2012). Ecosystem services. Ecology and society, 17, 40.Rosegrant, m. W., et al. (2014). Climate change and food. Food policy, 45, 56–67.
  105. Sanyé-mengual, e., et al. (2015). Environmental assessment of urban agriculture. Journal of cleaner production, 90, 20–30.
  106. Gruda, n. (2019). Increasing sustainability in horticulture. Horticulturae, 5, 23.
  107. Benis, k., et al. (2018). Resource efficiency in vertical farms. Journal of industrial ecology, 22, 1–12.
  108. Kneafsey, m., et al. (2013). Short food supply chains. Journal of rural studies, 28, 1–12.
  109. Marsden, t. (2013). Sustainable place-based food systems. Sociologia ruralis, 53, 1–19.
  110. Goodman, d., et al. (2012). Alternative food networks. Journal of rural studies, 28, 1–10.
  111. Hinrichs, c. (2003). Embeddedness in local food systems. Journal of rural studies, 19, 33–45.
  112. Feenstra, g. (2002). Local food systems. Renewable agriculture and food systems, 17, 28–36.
  113. Brown, k. H., & jameton, a. L. (2000). Public health implications. Public health reports, 115, 20–29.
  114. Draper, c., & freedman, d. (2010). Community gardens. Journal of community practice, 18, 458–492.
  115. Wakefield, s., et al. (2007). Growing urban health. Health promotion international, 22, 92–101.
  116. Morgan, k., & sonnino, r. (2010). Urban food governance. International planning studies, 15, 1–17.

Reference

  1. Gomiero, t., pimentel, d., paoletti, m. G. Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 2011; 30(1–2), 95–124.
  2. Ponisio LC, M’Gonigle LK, Mace KC, Palomino J, de Valpine P, Kremen C. Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(24):7611-6.
  3. Muller, A., Schader, C., Scialabba, N. E. H., Brüggemann, J., Isensee, A., Erb, K. H., et al., Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nature Communications, 2021; 12, 1–11.
  4.  Seufert, V., & Ramankutty, N. (2020). Many shades of gray—The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture. Science Advances, 6(45), eaba5123.
  5. Duru, M., Therond, O., & Fares, M. (2021). Designing agroecological transitions in food systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41, 1–15.
  6. Tuck SL, Winqvist C, Mota F, Ahnström J, Turnbull LA, Bengtsson J. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: A meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol. 2014;51(3):746–755.
  7. Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016). Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nature Plants, 2, 15221.
  8. Altieri, M. A., & Nicholls, C. I. (2017). The adaptation and mitigation potential of traditional agriculture in a changing climate. Climatic Change, 140(1), 33–45.
  9. Orsini F, Kahane R, Nono-Womdim R, Gianquinto G. Urban agriculture in the developing world: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2013;33:695–720.
  10. Smith, L., & Goodwin, A. (2019). Home gardens: sustainability and resilience in community food systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 147–155.
  11. Hughes, D., et al. Organic gardening and sustainable urban agriculture. Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 2011;5(2), 25–36.
  12. Jones, P., & Burgess, D. (2018). Urban food security & home agriculture. Sustainable Cities Review, 12, 45–60.
  13. Smith, L., Goodwin, A. Home gardens: sustainability and resilience in community food systems. Environmental Science & Policy. 2019;101, 147–155.
  14. Bernal, m. P., alburquerque, j. A., & moral, r. Composting of organic wastes. Bioresource technology. 2017; 99, 7783–7793.
  15. Lal R. Soil organic matter and its role in soil health and crop productivity. J Soil Water Conserv. 2015;70(2): A11–A14.
  16. Zeng G, Yu M, Chen Y, Huang D, Zhang J, Huang H, et al. Effects of inoculation with Phanerochaete chrysosporium during composting of agricultural waste on nutrient transformation and pathogen removal. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(1):111–117.
  17. Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., & Bierman, P. (2015). Influences of vermicomposts on plant growth and pest incidence. Pedobiologia, 58(2–3), 79–87.
  18. Atiyeh, R. M., Subler, S., Edwards, C. A., Bachman, G., Metzger, J. D., & Shuster, W. (2000). Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia, 44(5), 579–590.
  19. Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., Atiyeh, R., & Metzger, J. D. (2004). Effects of vermicomposts produced from food waste on the growth and yields of greenhouse peppers. Bioresource Technology, 93(2), 139–144.
  20. Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., Atiyeh, R., & Metzger, J. D. (2004). Effects of vermicomposts produced from food waste on the growth and yields of greenhouse peppers. Bioresource Technology, 93(2), 139–144.
  21. Vessey, J. K. (2003). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255(2), 571–586.
  22. Vessey, J. K. (2003). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255(2), 571–586.
  23. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28:1327–1350.
  24. Hughes, R., Brown, L., & Smith, J. (2011). Organic food consumption and health implications: A review. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24(6), 567–580.
  25. Jones, M., & Burgess, P. J. (2018). Economic viability of small-scale organic food production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 33(4), 315–326.
  26. Smith, L., & Goodwin, D. (2019). Community gardening and social sustainability: A review. Local Environment, 24(3), 230–245
  27. Ohly H, Gentry S, Wigglesworth R, Bethel A, Lovell R, Garside R. A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:286.
  28. Specht K, Siebert R, Hartmann I, Freisinger UB, Sawicka M, Werner A, et al. Urban agriculture of the future: An overview of sustainability aspects of vertical farming. Sustainability. 2014;6(11):7654–7675.
  29.  Campisano A, Butler D, Ward S, Burns MJ, Friedler E, DeBusk K, et al. Urban rainwater harvesting systems: Research, implementation and future perspectives. Water Res. 2017;115:195–209.
  30. Liakos KG, Busato P, Moshou D, Pearson S, Bochtis D. Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors. 2018;18(8):2674.
  31.  Glare T, Caradus J, Gelernter W, Jackson T, Keyhani N, Köhl J, et al. Have biopesticides come of age Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(5):250–258.
  32. Padhiary et al. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Farm Management: Integrating Smart Systems for Optimal Agricultural Practices. International Journal of Smart Agriculture, 3(1), 1-11.
  33. Chiaraluce, G., Bentivoglio, D., & Finco, A. (2024). Exploring the role of blockchain technology in modern high-value food supply chains: Global trends and future directions. Agricultural and Food Economics, 12, Article 6.
  34. Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2021). Organic agriculture in the 21st century. Nature Sustainability, 4(7), 546–556.
  35. Crowder, D. W., & Reganold, J. P. (2020). Financial and environmental benefits of organic farming. Nature Plants, 6, 107–115.
  36. Varma, N., Wadatkar, H., Salve, R., & Varun Kumar, T. (2024). Advancing sustainable agriculture: A comprehensive review of organic farming practices and environmental impact. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 46(7), 695–703.
  37. Zhang, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, D. (2019). Precision tools for eco friendly agriculture. Journal of Precision Agriculture, 17(2), 88–109.
  38. Jones, P. & Clark, E. (2021). Smart technologies for urban gardening. Urban Agriculture Review, 9(1), 78–94.
  39. Singh, A., Zhao, Y., & Li, P. (2022). AI in small scale agriculture: potentials and challenges. Agricultural Informatics, 14(2), 66–83.
  40. Kumar, V., Patel, S., & Lee, J. (2020). Vertical farming applications in limited spaces. Agriculture Advances, 12(4), 123–136.
  41. Lee, J. et al. (2023). Optimizing indoor hydroponic systems for home use. Journal of Controlled Environment Agriculture, 18(3), 209–220.
  42. Martinez, A. & Gupta, N. (2018). Biofertilizers and soil microbiology. Soil Biology International, 5(3), 201–217.
  43. Harper, D. & Singh, R. (2021). Natural pest control strategies for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Organic Systems, 16(2), 45–59.
  44. Oliveira, M. & Thomson, H. (2020). Educational platforms for sustainable gardening. Global Agriculture Education, 7(2), 157–178.
  45. Nguyen, L. & Patel, R. (2024). Accessibility in home agricultural education. Community Agriculture Journal, 11(1), 90–112.
  46. Smith, L., Brown, K., & Islam, M. (2022). Diet diversity outcomes of home gardening. Nutrition & Health Perspectives, 15(3), 141–159.
  47. Ramirez, F. & Lee, S. (2023). Community food networks and biodiversity. Journal of Urban Food Systems, 4(1), 33–49.
  48. Huq, F. F., & Deacon, L. (2025). A systematic review of community gardens and their role in urban food security and resilience. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 696.
  49. Francis, c., lieblein, g., gliessman, s., breland, t. A., creamer, n., harwood, r., … Poincelot, r. (2003). Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of sustainable agriculture, 22(3), 99–118.
  50. Mader, p., fliessbach, a., dubois, d., gunst, l., fried, p., & niggli, u. (2002). Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science, 296(5573), 1694–1697.
  51. Diacono, m., & montemurro, f. (2010). Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. Agronomy for sustainable development, 30(2), 401–422.
  52. Kumar, s., & sharma, s. (2017). Vermicomposting for sustainable organic agriculture. International journal of recycling of organic waste in agriculture, 6(3), 199–206.
  53. Philpott, s. M., & bichier, p. (2017). Local and landscape drivers of arthropod abundance and diversity in urban gardens. Environmental entomology, 46(1), 201–212.
  54. Brown, k. H., & jameton, a. L. (2000). Public health implications of urban agriculture. Journal of public health policy, 21(1), 20–39.
  55. Zezza, a., & tasciotti, l. (2010). Urban agriculture, poverty, and food security. Food policy, 35(4), 265–273.
  56. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(50):20260–20264..
  57. Pimentel, d., et al. (2005). Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. Bioscience, 55(1), 10–15.
  58. Soga, m., gaston, k. J., & yamaura, y. (2017). Gardening is beneficial for health. Preventive medicine reports, 5, 92–99.
  59. Worthington, v. (2001). Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits and vegetables. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine, 7(2), 161–173.
  60. Wolfert, s., ge, l., verdouw, c., & bogaardt, m. J. (2017) big data in smart farming – a review. agricultural systems, 153, 69–80.
  61. Liakos, k. G., busato, p., moshou, d., pearson, s., & bochtis, d. (2018) machine learning in agriculture: A review sensnors 18(8), 2674.
  62. Backer, r., rokem, j. S., ilangumaran, g., et al. (2018) plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context and future prospects frontiers in plant science, 9, 1473.
  63. Benke, k., & tomkins, b. (2017) future food-production systems: Vertical farming and controlled environments sustainability science, 12, 1–13.
  64. Lal, r. (2020). regenerative agriculture for food and climate journal of soil and water conservation, 75(5), 123a–124a.
  65. Klerkx, l., jakku, e., & labarthe, p. (2019). Njas – wageningen journal of life sciences, 90–91, 100315.
  66. Bhardwaj, d., ansari, m. W., sahoo, r. K., & tuteja, n. (2014). Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture. Microbial cell factories, 13, 66.
  67. Galhena, d. H., freed, r., & maredia, k. M. (2013). Home gardens: A promising approach to enhance household food security. Agriculture & food security, 2(8).
  68. Kortright, r., & wakefield, s. (2011). Edible backyards: A qualitative study of household food growing. Health & place, 17, 39–45.
  69. Taylor, j. R., & lovell, s. T. (2014). Urban home food gardens. Renewable agriculture and food systems, 29(4), 348–361.
  70. Lazcano, c., & domínguez, j. (2011). The use of vermicompost. Waste management & research, 29, 952–967.
  71. Malusá, e., & vassilev, n. (2014). A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilizers. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 98, 6599–6607.
  72. Isman, m. B. (2006). Botanical insecticides. Annual review of entomology, 51, 45–66.
  73. Koul, o. (2008). Phytochemicals and insect control. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 27, 1–24.
  74. Pretty, j., & bharucha, z. P. (2015). Integrated pest management. Agricultural systems, 136, 157–166.
  75. Tilman, d., et al. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and biodiversity. Nature, 418, 671–677.
  76. Wezel, a., et al. (2014). Agroecological principles. Agronomy for sustainable development, 34, 1–20.
  77. Barański, m., et al. (2014). Higher antioxidant levels in organic crops. British journal of nutrition, 112, 794–811.
  78. Brandt, k., et al. (2011). Agroecosystem management and food quality. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 91, 12–19.
  79. Dangour, a. D., et al. (2009). Nutritional quality of organic foods. American journal of clinical nutrition, 90, 680–685.
  80. Rembiałkowska, e. (2007). Quality of organic food. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 87, 2757–2762.
  81. Orsini, f., et al. (2013). Urban agriculture in europe. Agronomy for sustainable development, 33, 695–720.
  82. Specht, k., et al. (2014). Urban agriculture sustainability. Landscape and urban planning, 125, 1–10.
  83. Benis, k., & ferrão, p. (2017). Vertical farming. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 203–218.
  84. Eigenbrod, c., & gruda, n. (2015). Urban vegetable production. Horticulturae, 1, 43–60.
  85. Rockström, j., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries. Nature, 461, 472–475.
  86. Rose, d. C., & chilvers, j. (2018). Precision agriculture. Science, 362, 1060–1061.
  87. Kamilaris, a., et al. (2019). Ai in agriculture. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 162, 751–768.
  88. Patrício, d. I., & rieder, r. (2018). Computer vision in agriculture. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 156, 69–80.
  89. Alaimo, k., et al. (2008). Community gardening and health. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 40, 94–101.
  90. Ghosh, s., et al. (2019). Organic farming in india. Indian journal of agricultural sciences, 89, 192–202.
  91. Ramesh, p., et al. (2005). Organic farming. Current science, 88, 561–568.
  92. Yadav, a. K., et al. (2013). Organic inputs in indian agriculture. Journal of cleaner production, 47, 228–234.
  93. Clapp, j. (2017). Food security and food systems. Global environmental change, 43, 1–11.
  94. Fraser, e. D. G., et al. (2016). Food systems resilience. Global food security, 8, 17–23.
  95. Tendall, d. M., et al. (2015). Food system resilience. Global food security, 5, 18–23.
  96. Ericksen, p. J. (2008). Food system vulnerability. Global environmental change, 18, 234–245.
  97. Kirchmann, h., et al. (2008). Organic waste management. Agronomy for sustainable development, 28, 1–14.
  98. Velenturf, a. P. M., et al. (2019). Circular economy. Resources, conservation and recycling, 141, 1–9.
  99. Geissdoerfer, m., et al. (2017). Circular economy. Journal of cleaner production, 143, 757–768.
  100. Nicholls, c. I., et al. (2016). Ecological pest management. Agronomy for sustainable development, 36, 1–16.
  101. Tittonell, p. (2014). Ecological intensification. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 8, 53–61.
  102. Vanlauwe, b., et al. (2014). Integrated soil fertility management. Field crops research, 158, 11–20.
  103. Pretty, j., et al. (2010). Sustainable intensification. International journal of agricultural sustainability, 8, 5–24.
  104. Kremen, c., & miles, a. (2012). Ecosystem services. Ecology and society, 17, 40.Rosegrant, m. W., et al. (2014). Climate change and food. Food policy, 45, 56–67.
  105. Sanyé-mengual, e., et al. (2015). Environmental assessment of urban agriculture. Journal of cleaner production, 90, 20–30.
  106. Gruda, n. (2019). Increasing sustainability in horticulture. Horticulturae, 5, 23.
  107. Benis, k., et al. (2018). Resource efficiency in vertical farms. Journal of industrial ecology, 22, 1–12.
  108. Kneafsey, m., et al. (2013). Short food supply chains. Journal of rural studies, 28, 1–12.
  109. Marsden, t. (2013). Sustainable place-based food systems. Sociologia ruralis, 53, 1–19.
  110. Goodman, d., et al. (2012). Alternative food networks. Journal of rural studies, 28, 1–10.
  111. Hinrichs, c. (2003). Embeddedness in local food systems. Journal of rural studies, 19, 33–45.
  112. Feenstra, g. (2002). Local food systems. Renewable agriculture and food systems, 17, 28–36.
  113. Brown, k. H., & jameton, a. L. (2000). Public health implications. Public health reports, 115, 20–29.
  114. Draper, c., & freedman, d. (2010). Community gardens. Journal of community practice, 18, 458–492.
  115. Wakefield, s., et al. (2007). Growing urban health. Health promotion international, 22, 92–101.
  116. Morgan, k., & sonnino, r. (2010). Urban food governance. International planning studies, 15, 1–17.

Photo
Syed Rahamthulla
Corresponding author

Pathgene Health Care Pvt.Ltd.1-212, Tiruchanoor Rd, Srinivasapuram, Padmavati Nagar, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh 517503. India

Photo
P. Shaik Shiya Farnaz
Co-author

Pathgene Health Care Pvt.Ltd.1-212, Tiruchanoor Rd, Srinivasapuram, Padmavati Nagar, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh 517503. India

Photo
Sufia Sultana
Co-author

Toxgene AR Biolabs Pvt.Ltd.Plot no 31,32,41&42, APIIC Industrian Park, Chandragiri, Tirupati,, Andhra Pradesh 517102. India

Syed Rahamthulla1*, P. Shaik Shiya Farnaz1, Sufia Sultana2, Organic Home Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review Of Sustainable Practices, Benefits, Challenges, And Future Directions, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (5), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19975211

More related articles
CAR-T Cells in Cancer Therapy: From Structural Blu...
Shruti Shinde , Vaibhavi Jadhav , Nilima Yadav, Sampada Waghmare,...
Economic Valuation and Willingness-to-Pay for Ecot...
Kolawole Farinloye, Samson Ojo, Ibukun Ayodele, Gbolagade Lameed,...
Linear Programming Applications in Supply Chain Optimization: A Comprehensive Re...
R. V. S. S. Nagabhushana Rao, K. Chandra Sekhar, P. Sreehari Reddy, ...
Applications Of Natural Zeolite Minerals In Cosmetics...
Yashodhan Patil, Praful Shinde, Karuna Ghodki, ...
More related articles
CAR-T Cells in Cancer Therapy: From Structural Blueprint to Clinical Barriers...
Shruti Shinde , Vaibhavi Jadhav , Nilima Yadav, Sampada Waghmare, ...
Economic Valuation and Willingness-to-Pay for Ecotourism Resources in Old-Oyo Na...
Kolawole Farinloye, Samson Ojo, Ibukun Ayodele, Gbolagade Lameed, Funmilayo Oni, ...
CAR-T Cells in Cancer Therapy: From Structural Blueprint to Clinical Barriers...
Shruti Shinde , Vaibhavi Jadhav , Nilima Yadav, Sampada Waghmare, ...
Economic Valuation and Willingness-to-Pay for Ecotourism Resources in Old-Oyo Na...
Kolawole Farinloye, Samson Ojo, Ibukun Ayodele, Gbolagade Lameed, Funmilayo Oni, ...