View Article

  • Studies on Charcoal Rot of Infected by Macrophomina Phaseolina from Various Regions in Madhya Pradesh

  • Bio-Design Innovation Centre, R. D. University, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh, 482001 

Abstract

Macrophomina phaseolina, a soil-borne necrotrophic fungus, poses a significant threat to soybean (Glycine max L.) production across diverse agro-climatic regions. This pathogen is known for its extensive host range-infecting over 500 plant species-making crop rotation strategies less effective and disease management more complex. In soybean agro ecosystems, M. phaseolina is a major cause of charcoal rot, particularly under drought and high-temperature conditions, which are increasingly prevalent due to climate change. This study focuses on the isolation and identification of Macrophomina phaseolina from infected soybean plants. Infected plant samples were collected from various soybean fields and subjected to surface sterilization using 1% sodium hypochlorite. The samples were then placed on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium supplemented with antibiotics to prevent bacterial contamination. After incubation at 25 ± 1°C for 2-3 days, characteristic mycelial growth and sclerotia formation were observed. The fungal isolates were further purified and identified based on morphological characteristics and pathogenicity tests. Morphological examination revealed the diversity of pathogens infecting soybean, highlighting variations in structure and appearance among different pathogen types. Morphological studies contribute to understanding the interactions between pathogens and their host plants. Certain morphological traits may correlate with pathogenicity virulence and host specificity.

Keywords

Macrophomina phaseolina; Charcoal rot; Fungal Sources; Potential Application

Introduction

Since there are various biotic and abiotic factor that is responsible for causing deficiency and diseases. It leads to the reduction of yield and health decreases in gross global productivity. Fungal pathogens like Macrophomina phaseolina is soil, seed and stubble borne pathogenic fungus (Khan, 2007). Now a day it has emerged as severely damaging fungus to the agricultural world. It belongs to the family Botryosphaericeae known as anamorphic fungus in the ascomycete group (Creus et al., 2006). Its sustainability in broad tropical to subtropical regions from and to semi-arid climates favors the inhabitation of fungus in various agro-climatic conditions including Asiatic nations (Diourte et al., 1995; Wrather et al., 2001). In India there are 15 meso agro climatic and 73 subzone. The evidences explain it sustains in soil in latent-state. Initiation of the microorganism as fungal pathogen accelerates in when plant is in optimal stress condition, Macrophomina phaseolina produces asexual structures have microsclerotia and pycnidia, which can be detected in soil and host tissue utilizing various techniques and assays (Babu et al., 2011), Microsclerotia can survive in soil for 2-15 yrs. or in root debris for longer periods (Baird et al., 2003; Sarr et al., 2014). Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) is one of the most economically and nutritionally significant leguminous oilseed crops cultivated worldwide. Believed to have originated in China, it was considered one of the five sacred grains vital to the foundation of early Chinese civilization (Hymowitz, 1970). In India, soybean gained substantial commercial importance over the past six decades, especially in central and western regions. Soybean seeds are rich in macronutrients, containing approximately 40% high-quality protein and 20% edible oil (Talukdar et al., 2009). In addition to these, soybean is a dense source of essential amino acids, minerals like calcium and phosphorus, and fat-soluble vitamins including A, B-complex, C, and D. The crop also contains antioxidants and nutraceutical compounds-particularly is flavones-that have been shown to reduce blood cholesterol levels, enhance immune function, and lower the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hormone-related cancers (Sharma et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2014; Liu, 2010). These qualities have established soybean as a vital component of functional foods and health-promoting diets globally.

Life Cycle of Macrophomina phaseolina

Macrophomina phaseolina is a fungal pathogen that causes charcoal rot disease in various plants, including soybeans, maize, sunflowers, and other economically important crops. Understanding its life cycle is crucial for devising effective management strategies (Agarwal et al., 2013; Islam et al., 2018).

  1. Survival as Sclerotia: The primary survival and overwintering structure of Macrophomina phaseolina is sclerotia. These are compact masses of fungal mycelium and are capable of surviving adverse conditions in the soil for extended periods (Kaur et al., 2012).
  2. Germination: Under the favorable conditions like adequate moisture and temperature, sclerotia germinate, forming mycelium.
  3. Infection: The fungus can infect host plants directly through roots or lower stems. Infection is facilitated by fungal penetration of plant tissues.
  4. Colonization and Spread: Macrophomina phaseolina colonizes the vascular tissues of the host plant, causing the characteristic symptoms of charcoal rot disease, including wilting, stem necrosis, and vascular discoloration.
  5. Production of Sclerotia: As the disease progresses, the fungus produces new sclerotia within the infected plant tissues.
  6. Release of Sclerotia: When infected plant tissues senesce and decompose, sclerotia are released into the soil.
  7. Repeat Cycle: The released sclerotia serve as a source of primary inoculum for subsequent infection cycles, completing the life cycle.

The fungal isolates were further purified and identified based on morphological characteristics and pathogenicity tests. Morphological examination revealed the diversity of pathogens infecting soybean, highlighting variations in structure and appearance among different pathogen types. Morphological studies contribute to understanding the interactions between pathogens and their host plants. Certain morphological traits may correlate with pathogenicity virulence and host specificity.        

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present investigation was conducted on studies on charcoal rot of Soybean caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid and its Management included survey for charcoal rot, isolation, purification, pathogenicity, morphological variability and physiological studies, pathogen. The laboratory experiments were conducted in Department of Biological Sciences, Rani Durgavati University, Jabalpur (M.P.) and pot experiment was undertaken in green house.

Survey and Collection of Infected Soybean Crops from different regions in Madhya Pradesh

Study Area

Survey was undertaken in the major field soybean crops region of Madhya-Pradesh during 2016-17 and 2017-18 based on the information provided by the extension workers and reports of Indian Council Agriculture Research (ICAR, M.P.) and Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya (JNKVV, Jabalpur M.P.). This included important soybean cultivation areas covering 12 districts (viz, Jabalpur, Jabalpur sites, Jabalpur Khamariya, Ganjbasoda, Narshingpur, Narshingpur agriculture, Sagar, Gadarwara, Indore, Garhakota, Rewa and Tikamgarh region of Madhya-Pradesh, India as shown in Figure 1

Figure 1: Location of Study Sites (www.Mapsofindia.com).

Collection of Infected Soybean Crops

The present study carried out a comprehensive field survey to identify plants exhibiting characteristic symptoms of infection, such as wilting, stem discoloration, and necrosis. All the selected plants were representing a range of disease severity from different locations within the field. To capture variation in symptoms and pathogen distribution a detailed study was conducted. Disinfested tools were used such as pruning shears or scissors to minimize cross-contamination between plants (Bockus & Harvey, 2010). Sterilized tools were used between sampling locations or plants by dipping them in a disinfectant solution (e.g., 70% ethanol) to prevent spread of pathogens. In this point of view collecting symptomatic plant parts (stems, roots, leaves) that show clear signs of infection. All the samples included both diseased and apparently healthy plants for comparison and to assess pathogen distribution within the field. Sufficient samples were collected to ensure statistical reliability and representativeness (Frederiksen & Odvody, 1990). During the study period, samples were collected from a minimum of 10 to 20 plants per sampling site or field, depending on the size of the area and the uniformity of disease distribution. The plant samples were in clean, labeled bags or containers to prevent physical damage during transport. Keep samples cool and avoid extended exposure to sunlight or heat, especially during transit to the laboratory. Once the samples were reach the laboratory, process them promptly to prevent deterioration or loss of diagnostic value. Depending on the purpose (e.g., pathogen isolation and DNA extraction) were store samples appropriately (refrigeration, freezing or drying) until further analysis (Islam et al., 2017).

Isolation of pathogen and observation of their morphological characters

The pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina was isolated from infected plant tissues exhibiting characteristic symptoms such as charcoal rot, stem discoloration, and wilting. Infected root or stem segments were surface-sterilized using 1% sodium hypochlorite for 2 minutes, rinsed thrice with sterile distilled water, and then placed on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium under aseptic conditions. The inoculated plates were incubated at 28?±?2?°C for 5-7 days. Fungal growth was initially observed as fluffy white mycelium that gradually turned grey to black. The morphological identification was based on macroscopic and microscopic characters. Colonies of M. phaseolina appeared dark grey to black with abundant microsclerotia. Under the microscope, microsclerotia were spherical to oblong, dark brown to black, measuring 80-120?µm in diameter. Mycelium was septate, hyaline in the early stages, and turned pigmented with age. The identification was confirmed by comparing morphological traits with standard descriptions (Dhingra and Sinclair, 1978; Babu et al., 2011). Pure cultures were sub-cultured and stored for further pathogenicity and molecular characterization.

Slide Culture Technique

The slide culture technique is an essential method used in mycology to observe and document the microscopic morphological characteristics of fungal structures such as hyphae, conidia, and microsclerotia in their natural, undisturbed arrangement. This technique is especially valuable for delicate fungi like Macrophomina phaseolina, where microscopic features are critical for identification according (Dhingra et al., 2022).

Optimization of Various Conditions from Fungal isolates

The fungus is known for its wide host range and adaptability across diverse agro-climatic zones of Madhya Pradesh. The present study evaluates the influence of temperature, pH, and radial growth patterns of M. phaseolina isolates under controlled laboratory conditions. 

Effect of Temperature

It is well established phenomenon that the temperature significantly affects the biochemical activity of pathogens. 20 ml of PDA was poured in each of sterilized petri plates. Each petri plate was inoculated aseptically by placing a 5 mm disc in the center from actively growing 7 days old culture on PDA in petri dishes. The inoculated petri dishes were incubated at 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35±1°C temperature for 96 hrs according to Srinivas et al., (2017).   

Effects of pH

The study was conducted to determine the impact of various pH levels on the growth of the fungus by measuring the effect of different hydrogen ion concentrations in the medium. The initial pH of the basal medium before autoclaving was adjusted 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 and 8.5 with a maintained by using 0.1N NaOH or 0.1N HCl. After autoclaving the pH was again tested. The inoculated petri plates were incubated at 30±1°C for 96 hrs and observed the radial growth (mm) was recorded (c).  

Test the Efficacy of Fungicides against Macrophomina phaseolina in-vitro condition 

Various fungicides as listed below at different concentrations were evaluated for their effectiveness against pathogen by poisoned food technique as suggested by Nene and Thapliyal (1993). The fungicidal agents such as Azoxystrobin 23%, Carbendazim 50% and Propiconazole 25% were observed in this work. Stock solutions of each fungicide were prepared and aseptically incorporated into the sterilized PDA to achieve final concentrations of 25 ppm, 50 ppm and 100 ppm. The fungicide-amended media were then dispensed uniformly into sterile 90 mm Petri dishes within a laminar airflow cabinet to maintain aseptic conditions.  All plates were incubated in an incubator set at 28 ± 1°C for a duration of 7 days. Plates were positioned in an inverted manner to prevent condensation related contamination and growth interference.

Percent reduction (%) = (Dc-Tc) × 100

                                             Dc

Where:

Dc = Average diameter of the fungal growth in control.

Dt = Average diameter of the fungal growth treatment.

Table 1. Treatments detail to test the efficacy of fungicides against M. phaseolina in-vitro condition.

S. No.

Ingredients

Concentrations (ppm)

1

Azoxystrobin 23%

25

50

100

2

Carbendazim 50%

 

25

50

100

3

Propiconazole 25%

25

50

100

RESULT AND DISCUSSION  

In the present study investigations were undertaken to considering the economic significance of soybean charcoal rot disease, determine status, role of factors in disease development and management through integrating approaches. The results so obtained were presented here with.  

Survey and Collection of Infected Soybean host by the pathogens

A survey was conducted in soybean growing various districts of Madhya Pradesh during Kharif season 2016-17 and 2017-18 revealed that the charcoal rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid from agriculture fields. The soybean showing typical symptoms of charcoal rot at flowering and pod formation stage were collected from some districts of Madhya Pradesh state during second week of September to first week of October. All samples were brought in the laboratory condition and symptoms were recorded in detail Table 2. The roots of affected plant showing the symptoms of charcoal rot were cut and isolation were made for the presence or absence of the causal agent. Similarly, Cui et al., 2021 M. phaseolina isolates from soybean plants exhibiting symptoms of charcoal rot disease from different regions. Conventional identification methods, such as morphological and cultural characteristics, were employed to tentatively identify the isolates as M. phaseolina (Cui et al., 2021). Further confirmation was done through molecular techniques, including DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis (Cui et al., 2021).

Table 2. Survey, Collection, and Meteorological Evaluation of Soybean Fields Affected by Charcoal Rot in Madhya Pradesh (2017-2018).

S. No.

Districts

Location

Isolates codes

1.

Jabalpur

Adhartal

I1

2.

Ganjbasoda

K.V.K Farmer field

I2

3.

Narsingpur

K.V. K

I3

4.

Sagar

K.V.K Farmer field

I4

5.

Narsingpur agriculture

Farmer field

I5

6.

Jabalpur sites

Farmer field

I6

7.

Gadarwara

Farmer field

I7

8.

Jabalpur Khamariya

Khamariya, Krishi Nagar Farm

I8

9.

Indore

K.V.K.

I9

10.

Garhakota

Farmer field

I10

11.

Rewa

K.V. K

I11

12

Tikamgarh

K.V. K

I12

The observed data from Table 3 and Figure 2 indicates that the mean disease incidence of soybean root rot across surveyed districts of Madhya Pradesh was 10.31% over the two seasons (Kharif 2016-17 and 2017-18). The disease incidence varied significantly between districts, highlighting geographic differences in disease pressure, which could be attributed to environmental factors, varietal susceptibility, and agronomic practices. The maximum mean disease incidence was recorded in Ganjbasoda (14.87%), followed by Gadarwara (14.55%) and Sagar (11.87%), all of which reported values above the district-level average of Narshingpur (10.88%).  In contrast, districts such as Indore (10.67%), Jabalpur (9.88%), Tikamgarh (9.72%), and Rewa (7.62%) reported disease incidences below the district mean. Jabalpur district appeared multiple times, with three observations showing slightly varying disease levels: 9.16%, 9.82%, and 9.88%. The lowest disease incidence was observed in Narshingpur II (7.18%), followed closely by Garhakota (7.57%) and Rewa (7.62%). These trends indicate that Ganjbasoda and Gadarwara are critical areas for root rot management interventions. The variations may be due to differences in microclimate, cropping systems, or pathogen load. This trend is consistent with previous research by Gupta et al. (1983), who documented root rot incidence in Northern Madhya Pradesh ranging from 3.58% to 20.63%, which is comparable to the present findings. 

Table 3. The disease incidence (%) of soybean in various districts of Madhya Pradesh.

S. No.

Districts

Disease incidence (%) *

Kharif 2016-17

Kharif 2017-18

Mean

1.

Jabalpur

8.00

10.33

9.16

2.

Ganjbasoda

9.50

10.57

14.87

3.

Narsingpur

10.56

11.21

10.88

4.

Sagar

10.39

13.35

11.87

5.

Narsingpur II

6.26

8.10

7.18

6.

Jabalpur

9.31

10.33

9.82

7.

Gadarwara

14.11

15.00

14.55

8.

Jabalpur

9.22

10.55

9.88

9.

Indore

10.35

11.00

10.67

10.

Garhakota

7.15

8.00

7.57

11.

Rewa

7.00

8.24

7.62

12.

Tikamgarh

9.23

10.21

9.72

Mean of various districts

9.25

10.57

10.31

Figure 2: Diseases Incidence of Soyabean in different regions of Madhya Pradesh.

Isolation of Pathogen and Observation the Morphological Characters

Isolation of pathogen morphological variability of M. phaseolina isolates 

The pathogen was successfully isolated from infected soybean samples using selective PDA media or appropriate isolation techniques based on the suspected type of pathogen (M. phaseolina). The pure cultures of the isolated pathogen were obtained through single-colony isolation methods. Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid was isolated from the samples collected in surveyed chickpea growing blocks of Indore district of Madhya Pradesh were studied for their discernible characters such as the Colour of colony, colony diameter, Colour and shape of sclerotia, length and width of sclerotia and on the basis of above characters, 12 isolates were designated as (I1, I2, I3……to I12) localities cultural type. The isolated pathogen was cultured on specific growth media under controlled laboratory conditions (temperature, humidity and light or dark condition). Growth characteristics such as colony morphology (size, shape, color, texture) and growth rate with the different incubation time were observed and documented. Variations in cultural and morphological characteristics were recorded in all the isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina was result obtained as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. A depicted Image of Isolation and Identification of Macrophomina phaseolina.

Mycelia Development

During in this study, the results revealed that variation of morphological culture in mycelia growth of the Macrophomina phaseolina were isolated as given in Table 3 and Figure 2. The colony colour is greyish white in I1, I4 and I5, grey with black margin in I2, greyish white with grey margin in I3, grey I6 and greyish black colour in I7. Hyphal morphology (e.g., septate, aseptate). The spore morphology (shape, size, color, presence of spore-bearing structures like conidia or sporangia).

Table 4: The Incubation Periods of soybean in various districts of Madhya Pradesh.

S. No.

Places

Incubation Periods (mm)

Colony Character

48°C

72°C

120°C

1

Jabalpur

42.2

74.2

78.2

Black color and fluppy growth in middle ring

2

Ganjbasoda

34.6

74.8

78.2

Grey Colour slightly fluppy

3

Narsingpur

37

72.4

79.4

Greyish black and dense growth

4

Sagar

31

72.4

79.6

Greyish black slightly fluppy

5

Narsingpur II

33.6

59.6

79

Dark black slightly fluppy

6

Jabalpur

38.8

65.6

76.8

Dark grey and fluppy growth

7

Gadarwara

31.8

62.4

79.2

Whitish grey and feathery

8

Jabalpur

34.2

58.4

84.4

Black color and feathery

9

Indore

23.2

67

78.2

Black and feathery growth

10

Garhakota

36.6

63.4

78.8

Black feathery

11

Rewa

31.2

71.4

84.6

Whitish grey and feathery

12

Tikamgarh

28.2

69.8

83

Grey floppy

Figure 4: To study mean radial growth (mm) among the all isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina at 25 °C for different incubation periods.

The colony diameter and growth of different isolates of M. phaseolina were recorded at 48 hrs after incubation up to 120 hrs. Maximum radial growth were observed in isolates I1, I4, I7 (79 mm) were completed their radial growth within 120 hrs of inoculation. Isolates I7, I8, I11 recorded 79.2 mm, 84.4 mm, and 84.6 mm after 120 hrs of inoculation. Minimum radial growth was observed in isolates I6. Growth even after 48, 72 and 120 hrs of inoculation period. Similarly, Waseer et al., (1990) reported that M. phaseolina from soybean grew best on potato dextrose agar or potato dextrose broth at 35°C. However, least growth occurred on either media at 20°C or 40°C. Suriachandraselvan and Seetharaman (2003) evaluated 5 culture media (potato dextrose agar, oat meal agar, Richard’s agar, Czapek’s dox agar and peptone sucrose agar) and they observed that potato dextrose agar was found best culture medium for mycelial growth and sclerotial formation of M. phaseolina. Sharma et al., (2004) reported potato dextrose agar medium as the best for mycelial growth and sclerotial formation of Rhizoctonia bataticola. Salunkhe et al., (2009) evaluated six media for growth of Rhizoctonia bataticola and stated that potato dextrose agar medium was the most suitable medium for growth and sclerotial formation of R. bataticola. Hooda and Grover (1982) studied the isolates of R. batalicola obtained from different plant species and plant parts of the same host which differed in their morphological and cultural characteristics. Gupta and Kolte (1982) also observed variation in growth characters, size and production of sclerotia, pycnidia and pycnidiospores in M. phaseolina.

Sclerotial growth

Table 5: Variation in abundance, growth, colour, shape and size of sclerotia of M. phaseolina isolates.

Isolates

Abundance

Colour

Shape

Length of sclerotia (μm) *

Width of sclerotia (μm) *

Size of sclerotia (μm) *

I1

++

Black

Ovoid

94.0

84.0

89.0

I2

+++

Brown

Round

84.6

74.6

79.6

I3

+++

Black

Round

84.6

74.6

79.6

I4

++++

Black

Ovoid

84.6

74.6

79.6

I5

++

Brown

Irregular

112.8

103.8

108.3

I6

+++

Black

Round

84.6

78.6

81.6

I7

++

Black

Ovoid

112.8

103.4

108.1

I8

++

Black

Round

103.4

94.0

98.7

I9

+

Black

Irregular

122.2

108.2

115.2

I10

++

Brown

Round

84.6

75.2

79.9

I11

++++

Black

Ovoid

84.6

74.6

79.6

I12

+

Black

Irregular

141.0

131.6

136.3

Figure 5: Variation in abundance, colour, shape and size of sclerotia of M. phaseolina isolates.

The colony diameter and growth of different isolates of M. phaseolina were recorded at 48 hrs after incubation up to 120 hrs. Maximum radial growth were observed in isolates I1, I4, I7 (79 mm) were completed their radial growth within 120 hrs of inoculation. Isolates I7, I8, I11 recorded 79.2 mm, 84.4 mm, and 84.6 mm after 120 hrs of inoculation. Minimum radial growth was observed in isolates I6. Growth even after 48, 72 and 120 hrs of inoculation period. 

Effect of various temperature on growth of Macrophomina phaseolina

Temperature plays an important role in infection and disease development. Effect of different temperature viz., 10°C, 15°C, 20°C, 25°C, 30°C and 35°C on radial growth of M. phaseolina were studied in in-vitro condition and observation have been presented in Table 4 and illustrated in Figure 3. The maximum radial growth of the pathogen was recorded at 30°C (76.00 mm) which was significantly superior followed by 25°C (76.04 mm), 35°C (74.52 mm), 20°C (65.27 mm), 15°C (37.25 mm). Lowest radial growth was obtained at 10°C (25.45 mm) 120 hrs of incubation period. The maximum mycelial growth was observed at 35ºC followed by 30 and 25ºC in all the isolates. The optimum temperature for dry root rot severity rating was at 35°C (8.5) followed by 30°C (7.9) followed by 25°C (7.0).  Moreover, Parmar et al., (2018) tested different temperatures for M. phaseolina growth and found that temperature range of 25 to 35°C found optimum for growth and sclerotial formation. Whereas 30°C (79.44 mm) was ideal for growth of fungus. Sanjay et al., (2020a) reported that 30°C temperature was optimum for growth of Macrophomina phaseolina which was reduced growth significantly at below 25°C and above 35°C.   

Table 6: Effect of various temperatures on growth of Macrophomina phaseolina.

Temperature

Radial growth (mm)*

After 72 HAI

After 120 HAI

10 oC

15.45

25.45

15 oC

25.27

37.25

20 oC

45.25

65.27

25 oC

59.75

72.45

30 oC

65.35

76.04

35 oC

62.23

74.52

Figure 6: Effect of various temperatures on growth of Macrophomina phaseolina.

CONCLUSIONS  

The pathogen was isolated from infected soybean samples using appropriate techniques such as culturing on selective media or employing isolation methods specific to the suspected type of pathogen (fungal). Pure cultures of the isolated pathogen were obtained through the growth and propagation of the pathogen on suitable media under controlled laboratory conditions. Growth characteristics of the pathogen, including colony morphology (size, shape, color) and growth rate, were observed and recorded. The morphological features of the isolated pathogen were examined using microscopy techniques (slide culture method). Understanding pathogen morphology guides the development of targeted control measures tailored to specific pathogens. In conclusion, isolating and studying the morphological characteristics of pathogens infecting soybean is essential for effective disease management in agriculture. The insights gained from these studies play a pivotal role in developing sustainable and resilient crop production systems by targeting specific pathogens and mitigating disease risks. Further advancements in morphological characterization, coupled with interdisciplinary research, will continue to drive innovations in plant pathology and crop protection. Important morphological characteristics such as spore morphology, hyphal structure (for fungi species) were identified and analyzed. The morphological characteristics observed allowed for preliminary identification of the pathogen at the genus or species level. Specific features such as spore shape, arrangement, and coloration provided clues for taxonomic classification. Morphological examination revealed the diversity of pathogens infecting soybean, highlighting variations in structure and appearance among different pathogen types.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author is grateful to Vice Chancellor, Rani Durgavati University Jabalpur. Director, Bio-design Innovations Centre, Rani Durgavati University Jabalpur, Further to thank Head, Department of Biological Science Rani Durgavati University, Jabalpur, India (M.P.). I would like to thankful Ministry Human Resource Development, New-Delhi, for permitting me to completed this research work.  

Conflicts of Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest incorporated in this work.

REFERENCE

  1. Babu BK, Mesapogu S, Sharma M, Upadhyay JP. Morphological and molecular characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Causing dry root rot of chickpea. Indian J Agric Sci. 2011; 81(12):1132–8.
  2. Baird RE, Watson CE, Scruggs M. Relative longevity of Macrophomina phaseolina and its damage to soybean under irrigation and non-irrigation. Plant Dis. 2003; 87(6):653–6.
  3. Barnett HL, Hunter BB. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi. 4th ed. APS Press; 1998.
  4. Bockus WW, Harvey TL. The plant health instructor: Chapter on Sorghum diseases. American Phyto pathological Society; 2010.
  5. Bressano M, Siri MI, Davyt D, Martínez V, Bettucci L. Pathogenic and molecular characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates from Uruguay. 
  6. Creus C, Sueldo R, Barassi C. Water relations and yield in Azospirillum-inoculated wheat exposed to drought in the field. Can J Bot. 2006; 84(1):114–21.
  7. Cui W, Zamorano A, Quiroga N, Bertaccini A, Fiore N. Ribosomal protein coding genes SSU12p and LSU36p as molecular markers for phytoplasma detection and differentiation. Phytopathologia Mediterranea. 2021; 60(2):281–92. doi:10.36253/phyto 11993
  8. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. Basic Plant Pathology Methods. 2nd ed. CRC Press; 1995.
  9. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. Biology and pathology of Macrophomina phaseolina. Imprensa Universitária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 1978.
  10. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. Biology and Pathology of Macrophomina phaseolina. Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 1978.
  11. Diourte M, Starr JL, Jeger MJ, Stack JP, Rosenow DT. Charcoal rot of sorghum: fungal distribution and disease response in West Africa. Plant Dis. 1995; 79(9):884–8.
  12. Francl LJ, Madden LV, Rowe RC. Spatial patterns of Verticillium wilt of potato. Phytopathology. 1988; 78(9):1067–1073.
  13. Frederiksen RA, Odvody GN. Compendium of Sorghum Diseases. 2nd ed. St. Paul (MN): APS Press; 1990.
  14. Gupta GK, Chauhan JS. Environmental and Experimental Biology. 2010; 8:1–9.
  15. Gupta?SC, Kolte?SJ. Cultural characteristics of leaf and root isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid from groundnut. Indian J Microbiol. 1982; 21(4):345–346.
  16. Gupta SK, Chauhan DV, Patel PN. Survey of root rot incidence in soybean fields of Northern Madhya Pradesh. Indian Phytopathol. 1983; 36(2):280–281. Hymowitz T. On the domestication of the soybean. Econ Bot. 1970; 24(4):408–21.
  17. Islam MS, Haque MS, Islam MM, Emdad EM, Halim A, Hossen QMM, Tools to kill: genome of one of the most destructive plant pathogenic fungi Macrophomina phaseolina. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13:493.
  18. Khan SN Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid.-an emerging and threatening pathogen of soybean. Journal of Oilseeds Research. 2005; 22(1):112–114.
  19. Khan SN. Macrophomina phaseolina as causal agent for charcoal rot of sunflower. Mycopathologia. 2007; 165(3):141–52. 
  20. Kumar V, Rani A, Dixit AK, Pratap D, Bhatnagar D. Health benefits of soy isoflavones and strategies for its delivery in foods. J Food Sci Technol. 2014; 51(12):
  21. Leslie JF, Summerell BA. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011; 81(12):1139–43. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Ames: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.
  22. Macrophomina phaseolina as causal agent for charcoal rot of maize. Mycopathologia. 2007; 5(1):1–6. Short GE, Wyllie TD, Bristow PR.
  23. Messina M. Insights gained from 20 years of soy research. J Nutr. 2010; 140(12 Suppl):2289S–2295S.
  24. Parmar H, Kapadiya HJ, Bhaliya CM, Patel RC. Effect of media and temperature on the growth and sclerotial formation of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid causing root rot of castor. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018; 7(2):671–675. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.083
  25. Pearson CA, Leslie JF, Schwenk FW. Host preference correlated with chlorate resistance in Macrophomina phaseolina. Plant Disease. 1984; 68(12):1173–1176.
  26. Salunkhe V, Deshpande GD. Diversity of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates causing root rot of safflower. Bioinfolet. 2014; 11:526–529.
  27. Sanjay, Prasad Acharya A, Ranasingh N, Pandit E, Nanda A, Biswamohan PM, et al. (Note: If “et al.” exceeds author listing norms, please insert full author list). Synergistic effect of abiotic environment on growth of Macrophomina phaseolina causing charcoal rot disease of sesame. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2024; 14(5):268–278. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i54187
  28. Sarr MP, Ndiaye M, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW, Mbaye N, Sy M. Macrophomina phaseolina associated with charcoal rot of cowpea in Senegal. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014; 8(13):1358–63.
  29. Sharma A, Meena R, Yadav V. Soybean: A golden bean of the 21st century. Asian Agri Hist. 2008; 12(3):171–85.
  30. Sharma YK, Gaur RB, Bisnoi HR. Cultural, morphological and physiological variability in Macrophomina phaseolina. J Mycol Plant Pathol. 2004; 34(2):532–534.
  31. Srinivas T, Shankar T. Studies on pathogenicity of Macrophomina phaseolina on sorghum cultivars. International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention. 2017; 6(12):5–8. doi:10.1629/Journal26883
  32. Survival of Macrophomina phaseolina in soil and in residue of soybean. Phytopathology. 1980; 70(1):13–17.
  33. Talukdar D, Mandal N, Bhattacharjee B, Roy A. Soybean: A valuable functional food. J Food Sci Technol. 2009; 46:225–33.
  34. Waseer NA. Studies on charcoal rot of soybean caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Pak J Phytopathol. 1990; 2:22.
  35. Wrather JA, Anderson TR, Arsyad DM, Gai J, Ploper LD, Porta-Puglia A, et al. Soybean disease loss estimates for the top 10 soybean-producing countries in 1998. Can J Plant Pathol. 2001; 23(2):115–21.
  36. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB, Tierney DF. Recent advances in the study of Macrophomina phaseolina and its management. J Agric Sci. 2022; 15(3):275–283. 
  37. Gupta SC, Kolte SJ, Sharma YK. Cultural variation in Macrophomina phaseolina isolates. Indian Phytopathol. 1983; 36(2):234–238.
  38. Frederiksen RA, Odvody GN. Management strategies for Macrophomina phaseolina in agricultural crops. Plant Dis. 1990; 74(2):115–120.

Reference

  1. Babu BK, Mesapogu S, Sharma M, Upadhyay JP. Morphological and molecular characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Causing dry root rot of chickpea. Indian J Agric Sci. 2011; 81(12):1132–8.
  2. Baird RE, Watson CE, Scruggs M. Relative longevity of Macrophomina phaseolina and its damage to soybean under irrigation and non-irrigation. Plant Dis. 2003; 87(6):653–6.
  3. Barnett HL, Hunter BB. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi. 4th ed. APS Press; 1998.
  4. Bockus WW, Harvey TL. The plant health instructor: Chapter on Sorghum diseases. American Phyto pathological Society; 2010.
  5. Bressano M, Siri MI, Davyt D, Martínez V, Bettucci L. Pathogenic and molecular characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates from Uruguay. 
  6. Creus C, Sueldo R, Barassi C. Water relations and yield in Azospirillum-inoculated wheat exposed to drought in the field. Can J Bot. 2006; 84(1):114–21.
  7. Cui W, Zamorano A, Quiroga N, Bertaccini A, Fiore N. Ribosomal protein coding genes SSU12p and LSU36p as molecular markers for phytoplasma detection and differentiation. Phytopathologia Mediterranea. 2021; 60(2):281–92. doi:10.36253/phyto 11993
  8. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. Basic Plant Pathology Methods. 2nd ed. CRC Press; 1995.
  9. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. Biology and pathology of Macrophomina phaseolina. Imprensa Universitária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 1978.
  10. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. Biology and Pathology of Macrophomina phaseolina. Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 1978.
  11. Diourte M, Starr JL, Jeger MJ, Stack JP, Rosenow DT. Charcoal rot of sorghum: fungal distribution and disease response in West Africa. Plant Dis. 1995; 79(9):884–8.
  12. Francl LJ, Madden LV, Rowe RC. Spatial patterns of Verticillium wilt of potato. Phytopathology. 1988; 78(9):1067–1073.
  13. Frederiksen RA, Odvody GN. Compendium of Sorghum Diseases. 2nd ed. St. Paul (MN): APS Press; 1990.
  14. Gupta GK, Chauhan JS. Environmental and Experimental Biology. 2010; 8:1–9.
  15. Gupta?SC, Kolte?SJ. Cultural characteristics of leaf and root isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid from groundnut. Indian J Microbiol. 1982; 21(4):345–346.
  16. Gupta SK, Chauhan DV, Patel PN. Survey of root rot incidence in soybean fields of Northern Madhya Pradesh. Indian Phytopathol. 1983; 36(2):280–281. Hymowitz T. On the domestication of the soybean. Econ Bot. 1970; 24(4):408–21.
  17. Islam MS, Haque MS, Islam MM, Emdad EM, Halim A, Hossen QMM, Tools to kill: genome of one of the most destructive plant pathogenic fungi Macrophomina phaseolina. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13:493.
  18. Khan SN Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid.-an emerging and threatening pathogen of soybean. Journal of Oilseeds Research. 2005; 22(1):112–114.
  19. Khan SN. Macrophomina phaseolina as causal agent for charcoal rot of sunflower. Mycopathologia. 2007; 165(3):141–52. 
  20. Kumar V, Rani A, Dixit AK, Pratap D, Bhatnagar D. Health benefits of soy isoflavones and strategies for its delivery in foods. J Food Sci Technol. 2014; 51(12):
  21. Leslie JF, Summerell BA. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011; 81(12):1139–43. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Ames: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.
  22. Macrophomina phaseolina as causal agent for charcoal rot of maize. Mycopathologia. 2007; 5(1):1–6. Short GE, Wyllie TD, Bristow PR.
  23. Messina M. Insights gained from 20 years of soy research. J Nutr. 2010; 140(12 Suppl):2289S–2295S.
  24. Parmar H, Kapadiya HJ, Bhaliya CM, Patel RC. Effect of media and temperature on the growth and sclerotial formation of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid causing root rot of castor. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018; 7(2):671–675. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.083
  25. Pearson CA, Leslie JF, Schwenk FW. Host preference correlated with chlorate resistance in Macrophomina phaseolina. Plant Disease. 1984; 68(12):1173–1176.
  26. Salunkhe V, Deshpande GD. Diversity of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates causing root rot of safflower. Bioinfolet. 2014; 11:526–529.
  27. Sanjay, Prasad Acharya A, Ranasingh N, Pandit E, Nanda A, Biswamohan PM, et al. (Note: If “et al.” exceeds author listing norms, please insert full author list). Synergistic effect of abiotic environment on growth of Macrophomina phaseolina causing charcoal rot disease of sesame. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2024; 14(5):268–278. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i54187
  28. Sarr MP, Ndiaye M, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW, Mbaye N, Sy M. Macrophomina phaseolina associated with charcoal rot of cowpea in Senegal. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014; 8(13):1358–63.
  29. Sharma A, Meena R, Yadav V. Soybean: A golden bean of the 21st century. Asian Agri Hist. 2008; 12(3):171–85.
  30. Sharma YK, Gaur RB, Bisnoi HR. Cultural, morphological and physiological variability in Macrophomina phaseolina. J Mycol Plant Pathol. 2004; 34(2):532–534.
  31. Srinivas T, Shankar T. Studies on pathogenicity of Macrophomina phaseolina on sorghum cultivars. International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention. 2017; 6(12):5–8. doi:10.1629/Journal26883
  32. Survival of Macrophomina phaseolina in soil and in residue of soybean. Phytopathology. 1980; 70(1):13–17.
  33. Talukdar D, Mandal N, Bhattacharjee B, Roy A. Soybean: A valuable functional food. J Food Sci Technol. 2009; 46:225–33.
  34. Waseer NA. Studies on charcoal rot of soybean caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Pak J Phytopathol. 1990; 2:22.
  35. Wrather JA, Anderson TR, Arsyad DM, Gai J, Ploper LD, Porta-Puglia A, et al. Soybean disease loss estimates for the top 10 soybean-producing countries in 1998. Can J Plant Pathol. 2001; 23(2):115–21.
  36. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB, Tierney DF. Recent advances in the study of Macrophomina phaseolina and its management. J Agric Sci. 2022; 15(3):275–283. 
  37. Gupta SC, Kolte SJ, Sharma YK. Cultural variation in Macrophomina phaseolina isolates. Indian Phytopathol. 1983; 36(2):234–238.
  38. Frederiksen RA, Odvody GN. Management strategies for Macrophomina phaseolina in agricultural crops. Plant Dis. 1990; 74(2):115–120.

Photo
S. S. Sandhu
Corresponding author

Bio-Design Innovation Centre, R. D. University, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh, 482001

Photo
Sujit Kumar
Co-author

Bio-Design Innovation Centre, R. D. University, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh, 482001

Sujit Kumar, S. S. Sandhu*, Literature Studies on Charcoal Rot of Infected by Macrophomina Phaseolina from Various Regions in Madhya Pradesh, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (7), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15835903

More related articles
A Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Rice...
Dr. Pranab Jyoti Barman, Abdul Masud, Anadi Krishna Saikia, Bhanu...
A Comprehensive Review on the Pharmacological Acti...
S. Swetha, M. Gopi, M. Gowri, V. Govarthini, K. Gowtham, ...
A Review on Laaksha Haridradi Dhupa...
Madhusudhana V., Chaitra H., Neethu M., Ananya Latha Bhat, ...
A Study on the Different Types of Biochar on the Geotechnical Behaviour of Local...
Dr. Pranab Jyoti Barman, Abhisek Gupta, Debasish Dutta, Deepjyoti Dutta, Jubli Jaman, Kangkana Gogoi...
Olaparib: A Magic Bullet in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer...
Bhagyashri Randhawan, Javane Nalini, Chaudhari Gauri, Damale Anjali, Munot Navinya, Mule Gayatri, Bh...
Related Articles
The Interplay Between Calcium Homeostasis and Cardiac Function in Congestive Hea...
Arnab Roy, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Naba Kishor Gorai , Rakhi Kumari , Megha Chattaraj , Tammana Parween,...
The Interplay Between Calcium Homeostasis and Cardiac Function in Congestive Hea...
Arnab Roy, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Naba Kishor Gorai , Rakhi Kumari , Megha Chattaraj , Tammana Parween,...
A Comprehensive Review on Chikungunya Virus Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinic...
Suraj Kedar, Prasad Harad, Bhavesh Mohape, Om Farde, Amin Shaikh, Manas Dandkar, Sarthak Bhusal, Nir...
The Effect of Size and Charge of Lipid Nanoparticles Prepared by Microfluidic Mi...
Sanchita Patil, Swaliha Mulla, Prajakta Mali, Sayali Shendage, Sakshi Kolekar, Deepak Kare, ...
A Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Rice Husk Ash and Bamboo Biochar i...
Dr. Pranab Jyoti Barman, Abdul Masud, Anadi Krishna Saikia, Bhanujita Kutum, Chiranjib Gogoi, Madhur...
More related articles
A Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Rice Husk Ash and Bamboo Biochar i...
Dr. Pranab Jyoti Barman, Abdul Masud, Anadi Krishna Saikia, Bhanujita Kutum, Chiranjib Gogoi, Madhur...
A Comprehensive Review on the Pharmacological Activities of Hylocereus Polyrhizu...
S. Swetha, M. Gopi, M. Gowri, V. Govarthini, K. Gowtham, ...
A Review on Laaksha Haridradi Dhupa...
Madhusudhana V., Chaitra H., Neethu M., Ananya Latha Bhat, ...
A Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Rice Husk Ash and Bamboo Biochar i...
Dr. Pranab Jyoti Barman, Abdul Masud, Anadi Krishna Saikia, Bhanujita Kutum, Chiranjib Gogoi, Madhur...
A Comprehensive Review on the Pharmacological Activities of Hylocereus Polyrhizu...
S. Swetha, M. Gopi, M. Gowri, V. Govarthini, K. Gowtham, ...
A Review on Laaksha Haridradi Dhupa...
Madhusudhana V., Chaitra H., Neethu M., Ananya Latha Bhat, ...