View Article

  • Preparation and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) Cement for Dental Application

  • Delight College of Pharmacy, Bhima Koregaon, Pune Maharashtra: -411039

Abstract

Zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) cement is widely used in dentistry due to its excellent sealing ability, biocompatibility, sedative action on the pulp, and antimicrobial properties. However, its clinical use is often restricted because of weak mechanical strength and high solubility, limiting its application mainly as a temporary restorative material. The present research focuses on the preparation and characterization of ZOE dental cement aimed at improving its performance for potential extended clinical applications. In this study, ZOE cement was formulated by reacting zinc oxide powder with eugenol under controlled laboratory conditions. The physicochemical and mechanical properties of the prepared cement were evaluated using standard testing protocols, including setting time, compressive strength, surface microhardness, and solubility analysis. Characterization techniques such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) were employed to analyze the structural composition and morphology of the cement matrix. The results demonstrated that optimized ZOE formulations exhibited improved mechanical behavior and reduced solubility while maintaining desirable biological properties. This study suggests that modification of ZOE composition can significantly enhance its functional properties, making it a promising material for broader dental applications. Further research is recommended to examine long-term clinical performance and biocompatibility enhancements.

Keywords

Zinc Oxide–Eugenol (ZOE) cement, Dental restorative material, Temporary restorative filling , Luting cement ,Eugenol ,Zinc oxide ,Acid–base reaction ,Zinc eugenolate matrix ,Mechanical properties ,Compressive strength ,Surface microhardness ,Setting time ,Solubility, Biocompatibility ,Antimicrobial activity ,Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) ,Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) ,Microstructural characterization ,Modified ZOE formulation ,Glass fiber reinforcement ,Dental cavity filling ,Matrix–filler interaction ,Temporary cementation , Pulpo-protective effect ,Sedative effect

Introduction

Zinc oxide (ZnO) powder is a key ingredient in numerous dental formulations and is commonly blended with various liquid components to create cements such as zinc oxide eugenol, zinc polycarboxylate, and zinc phosphate. This tooth-colored inorganic metal oxide exhibits valuable characteristics including excellent biocompatibility, antimicrobial action, and strong durability. Zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) is an oil-based dental cement widely used for several clinical purposes, including temporary restorations, luting, pulp protection, endodontic sealing, cavity lining, and as a base material. Its popularity is attributed to its soothing effect on the pulp, antimicrobial activity, and effective marginal sealing]. However, some negative responses have been reported when ZOE is placed directly on exposed pulp, as eugenol may lead to persistent inflammatory reactions. In contrast, eugenol is found to be non-damaging when applied to pulp tissue that has been previously fixed with agents like form cresol. Zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) cement is generally composed of approximately 80–90% zinc oxide powder, which reacts with eugenol or a eugenol-based resin to form the remaining portion. ZOE is an acid–base reaction cement created when eugenol chemically interacts with zinc oxide, producing zinc eugenolate, a chelate compound that forms the cement matrix. A small amount of moisture is necessary for this reaction to proceed. The structural characteristics of ZnO particles have a major effect on the mechanical behavior and final properties of the cement. Compared with many other dental cements, ZOE is more biocompatible with oral tissues, contributing to its excellent sealing ability. It demonstrates antiseptic, bacteriostatic, antibacterial, sedative, and analgesic effects, largely due to the release of eugenol from the material. However, their relatively low mechanical strength restricts ZOE cements mainly to temporary restorative functions. To enhance their durability and reduce solubility, various additives can be incorporated into the formulation. Improvements in dental materials have been significantly achieved through the incorporation of inorganic fillers. Adding fibres enhances the physical, mechanical, thermal, and wear properties of resin matrices, and these enhancements are greatly influenced by silane surface treatment. Coupling agents improve the adhesion between filler particles and the organic matrix, enabling composite materials to perform much better than simple polymer matrices. Various matrix-filler combinations have resulted in modern, improved formulations. Evaluating mechanical properties—such as modulus, flexural strength, and compressive strength—is essential in dental material development. Different additives, including zirconia, tricalcium phosphate, titanium oxide, aluminum oxide, and hydroxyapatite, can significantly improve mechanical performance when dispersed fibers or particles are bonded to the matrix using a coupling agent. Glass fibers, which are fine strands made primarily from silica, are available in several types such as A-, C-, D-, AR-, S-, and E-glass, each with distinct characteristics and applications but composed of an amorphous 3-D silica-oxygen network. They are widely used in fields like dentistry and engineering, particularly in prosthodontic, restorative, and endodontic materials. E-glass fibers, the most commonly used type in dentistry, are favored due to their water resistance, electrical insulation, cost-effectiveness, favorable aesthetics, biocompatibility, insolubility, and high mechanical strength, including flexural strength, compressive strength, and fracture toughness. When added to dental materials, E-glass fibers act as load-bearing reinforcements and help protect the material from environmental degradation. This study aims to evaluate ZOE cement modified with 10 wt.% silane-treated E-glass fiber fillers, comparing its compressive strength, surface microhardness, and solubility with unmodified ZOE. The null hypothesis states that incorporating 10 wt.% silane-treated E glass fibers will have no significant effect on these properties compared with the control ZOE

OBJECTIVES: -

Zinc oxide–eugenol (ZOE) combinations have been utilized in dentistry for many years, initially introduced as dental cements and later adapted for use as impression materials. These materials share similar fundamental physical characteristics. Early research on ZOE mixtures primarily focused on optimizing their composition and investigating their setting behavior. Several researchers—including Wallace and Hansen, Molnar and Skinner, Harvey and Petch, and Paffenbarger and Caul—evaluated suitable formulations for these mixtures. Additionally, many authors explored the influence of different additives on ZOE systems to shorten setting time or enhance specific physical properties of the cement. The mechanism behind the setting reaction of zinc oxide–eugenol materials has been explained by Copeland and colleagues, as well as by Smith. More recent research on the physical properties of ZOE cements includes work by Norman and collaborators, Swartz and co-authors, and Oldham, Swartz, and Phillips, with the last two studies examining commercially available ZOE products. Investigations into the properties of ZOE impression pastes have been presented by Skinner, Cooper, and Ziehm, Asgarzadeh and Peyton, Vieira, Clark and Phillips, and Myers and Peyton. Zinc oxide–eugenol (ZOE) cements have traditionally been used primarily as temporary restorative materials during dental treatment and before placement of a permanent restoration. More recently, they have also been applied for the temporary cementation of fixed bridges and other prosthetic restorations. This temporary phase provides a useful period for evaluating the response of the teeth and surrounding tissues. Due to their soothing, non-irritating (anodyne) properties, ZOE cements are particularly advantageous compared to more irritating cements such as zinc phosphate, especially when extensive tooth preparation has exposed large areas of dentin. In cases where fixed prostheses are placed after periodontal therapy, it is often beneficial to extend the temporary cementation period for several months, or even up to a year. During this phase, the prosthesis may be periodically removed for evaluation, adjustments, and assessment of tissue health before being replaced and temporarily cemented again. Through this approach, the need for permanent cementation can be effectively delayed until optimal conditions are achieved. There are various commercially available forms of zinc oxide–eugenol (ZOE) cements, and they differ in the way they are packaged, mixed, and handled during clinical application. Their physical characteristics also vary, including differences in setting time, working consistency, and the mechanical strength of the hardened cement.

Dental Application: -

When zinc oxide is mixed with eugenol along with different additives, it forms a putty-like cohesive mass known as ZOE cement, which has proven to be highly useful in many areas of dentistry. This material shows greater biocompatibility with oral hard and soft tissues compared to most dental materials, helps in pain relief, and ensures a proper marginal seal in prepared tooth cavities. Therefore, ZOE cements are commonly used as temporary restorative fillings, soothing base materials, and as luting agents for crowns and bridges. They are also applied as periodontal and surgical dressings, used as root canal sealers in endodontics, and, when modified with additives, serve as impression pastes. However, the major drawbacks of ZOE cement include:

(1) its low mechanical strength, which may not withstand occlusal forces

(2) poor resistance to abrasion; and

(3) tendency to break down in the oral environment, thereby limiting the durability of temporary restorations.

Composition: -

Since basic mixtures of zinc oxide and eugenol tend to set very slowly, most commercial formulations include additional components. Table 1 provides the composition of commonly used ZOE cements, while Table 2 shows a typical formula for a root canal sealer. The handling properties and mechanical strength of ZOE cements are improved by adding materials such as rosin or hydrogenated rosin. Many salts can speed up the setting process; however, zinc salts—especially zinc acetate—are particularly effective accelerators. Substances like water, alcohol, and glacial acetic acid can also increase the reaction rate. It is believed that water or hydrated salts interact with zinc oxide through the following reactions:

ZnO + H?O → Zn (OH)?

Zn (OH)? + 2 C??H??O? (eugenol) → Zn(C??H??O?) ? + 2H?O

Therefore, only a small amount of water is needed to initiate the reaction because the water released during eugenolate formation continues to react with more zinc oxide.

Components

Description

Example

Zinc Oxide (ZnO)

Main powder components react with eugenol to form zinc eugenolate cement

 

Eugenol

Liquid Component provide sedative effect and form chelate compound with ZnO

 

Rosin/Hydrogenated rosin

(Optional)

Improve Strength and Handling characteristics and enhanced mixing

Gum rosin, Hydrogenated

Rosin

Accelerator’s (salt)

(Optional)

Increased setting reaction speed and reduce setting time.

Zinc acetate, Zinc Chloride

Other Accelerator’s

(Optional)

Assist in increasing reaction rate and initiate reaction with ZnO

Water, Alcohol, Glacial acetic acid

Hydrated Salt /water

React with zinc oxide to form Zn (OH)?, which then reacts with eugenol

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS: -

1.Zinc Oxide (ZnO)

Zinc oxide (ZnO) powder is a fine, white, and odorless inorganic substance that serves as the main base material in the preparation of zinc oxide eugenol dental cement. It is typically supplied in high-purity pharmaceutical or analytical grades to ensure safety and compatibility for dental use. The powder is composed of uniformly sized particles with controlled fineness, which assists in achieving proper mixing and desirable cement consistency. When combined with eugenol, ZnO undergoes an acid–base reaction to form a solid zinc eugenolate matrix that provides effective sealing properties and adequate mechanical strength. Modifying agents such as zinc acetate or magnesium oxide may be added to adjust setting time, working characteristics, and overall performance. To maintain stability and prevent moisture uptake, the powder is stored in tightly sealed containers.

2. Eugenol

Eugenol (4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol) is an aromatic, naturally derived compound obtained mainly from clove oil. It is a pale yellow, oily liquid with a characteristic spicy fragrance and exhibits analgesic, sedative, and antiseptic effects. In dental practice, eugenol functions as the liquid component in zinc oxide–eugenol (ZOE) cement. Upon mixing with zinc oxide powder, it reacts through a chelation process to form zinc eugenolate, which delivers a soothing and protective action to the dental pulp. Owing to its good biocompatibility and pain-relieving properties, ZOE-based cements are widely applied as temporary fillings, cavity liners, periodontal dressings, and root canal sealing materials. Its capacity to reduce discomfort and inflammation makes it an essential agent in various dental treatments.

2.1 Syzygium aromaticum Linn Is a tropical evergreen tree of the family Myrtaceae and it has small, reddish-brown flower buds. This is commonly called Laung in Hindi lavang in marathi.

Table 1 – Taxonomic Classification of Syzygium Arimaticum

Taxonomic Rank

Classification

Kingdom

plantae

Family

Myrtaceae

Subfamily/Subclass

Myrtoideae

Genus

Syzygium

Species

Syzygium Aromaticum

Common Name

Clove

In India Syzygium aromaticum is known by a variety of colloquial names Sanskrit: Lavanga, Devakusuma, Hindi: Laung, Lavang, Tamil: Kirambu, Telugu: Lavangam, Lavangalu, Kannada: Lavanga, Gujarati: Lavang, Malayalam: Grambu, Lavangam, Bengali: Labango, Marathi: Lavang, Punjabi: Laung. (The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2025)

Botanical Description of Syzygium Arimaticum

The clove is a reddish-brown, aromatic dried flower bud harvested from the evergreen tree Syzygium aromaticum. Each bud consists of a long calyx that terminates in a ball-like unopened corolla. The buds are typically 1.5–2 cm in length and have a hard, woody texture with a strong, pungent aroma. The clove tree can grow up to 10–12 meters tall and begins flowering in 5 to 7 years, with optimal yield occurring after 15–20 years. Flower buds are harvested when they turn from green to bright crimson, just before blooming, and are then sun-dried for preservation (Sharma A, Verma RK, Iqbal M, 2023).  

Chemical Constituents

Major Bioactive Components:

Eugenol (70–85%) – The primary component responsible for its medicinal and aromatic properties, Eugenyl acetate, Beta-caryophyllene, Tannins, Flavonoids, Terpenoids, and Gallic acid.

Nutritional Composition (per 100g of dried buds):

Carbohydrates: 30 g, Dietary Fiber: 34 g, Protein: 6 g, Fat: 20 g (mostly essential oils), Calcium: 632 mg, Iron: 11.83 mg, Magnesium: 259 megavitamin C: 0.2 mg (USDA Database; Ayurvedic sources)

Pharmacological and Therapeutic Activities

Clove and its main component eugenol exhibit a wide range of biological activities: Analgesic – Local anaesthetic effect useful in dental applications.

Antimicrobial – Effective against bacteria, fungi, and some viruses.

Antioxidant – Protects against oxidative damage.

Anti-inflammatory – Inhibits pro-inflammatory mediators.

Antiseptic – Promotes wound healing and prevents infection.

Anticancer – Shown to induce apoptosis in certain cancer cells (in vitro).

3.Rosin/Hydrogenated rosin

In ZOE cement, rosin acts as a reinforcing and plasticizing agent that increases strength, reduces brittleness, and improves film-forming ability. It also enhances adhesion to dentin and decreases solubility, thereby contributing to longer-lasting temporary restorations. The addition of rosin improves the overall working and setting characteristics of the cement, making it more suitable for clinical dental applications such as temporary restorations, cavity liners, and root canal sealing procedures.

Procedure

  1. Preparation of Mixing Area

A clean and dry glass slab was arranged on the working surface, and all instruments were properly sterilized prior to the procedure.

  1. Weighing of Zinc Oxide Powder

The required quantity of zinc oxide powder was accurately weighed using an analytical balance and positioned on the center of the glass slab.

  1. Measurement of Eugenol Liquid

Eugenol was measured using a calibrated dropper or weighing technique according to the predetermined powder-to-liquid ratio (1:1 w/w) suitable for dental cavity filling consistency.

  1. Mixing Operation

Eugenol was slowly incorporated into the zinc oxide powder, and the components were blended with a stainless-steel spatula in a figure-eight motion for approximately 30–45 seconds until a homogeneous, putty-like mass was produced.

  1. Assessment of Working Characteristics

The working time was recorded from the start of mixing until the material could no longer be effectively manipulated.

  1. Insertion into Cavity

The freshly prepared ZOE cement paste was immediately transferred into the prepared tooth cavity using a cement carrier and gently condensed with a dental condenser to remove trapped air and ensure proper wall adaptation. A matrix strip was utilized when required for Class II restorations.

  1. Setting Process

The cement was allowed to harden in situ under simulated oral conditions at 37 ± 1 °C. The initial set occurred within approximately 4–7 minutes, while complete setting required around 10–15 minutes depending on the mixing ratio and technique.

  1. Final Shaping and Finishing

After complete setting, excess material was removed with a carving instrument, and the restoration surface was polished to obtain a smooth finish.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

  1. Physical Properties

The formulated Zinc Oxide–Eugenol cement displayed a uniform, smooth, and putty-like consistency that is appropriate for temporary restorative dental procedures. The measured setting time varied between 6–12 minutes, influenced by differences in powder–liquid ratios and mixing technique. The working time was found to be approximately 3–5 minutes, ensuring sufficient manipulation and placement within the cavity.

Parameter

Observation

Required Standard

Working Time

3–5 minutes

Minimum 2 minutes

Initial Setting Time

6–8 minutes

4–10 minutes

Final Setting Time

10–15 minutes

10–20 minutes

Consistency

Smooth, non-granular

Smooth

Discussion

These findings confirm that the prepared cement demonstrates clinically acceptable handling characteristics. An increase in powder proportion resulted in faster setting, attributed to improved acid–base reaction between ZnO powder and eugenol liquid. The setting profile closely corresponds to commercially utilized ZOE cements commonly employed as temporary restorations and cavity bases.

  1. Mechanical Properties

Compressive strength testing was carried out after the cement was allowed to harden for 24 hours at 37 °C.

Sample

P/L Ratio

Compressive Strength (MPa)

A

1:1

6.5 ± 0.2

B

2:1

9.1 ± 0.4

C

3:1

10.5 ± 0.3

Effect of P/L Ratio

The compressive strength increased progressively with higher powder content due to improved structural density and greater formation of zinc–eugenolate chelate. The 3:1 ratio yielded the highest strength, making it suitable for temporary load-bearing restorations.

Interpretation

Although the compressive strength values are lower compared to permanent restorative materials such as glass ionomer cement (GIC) or composite resins, the obtained strength is considered adequate for temporary fillings, pulpal protection, and sedative dressings.

  1. Microstructural Analysis (SEM Evaluation)

Scanning Electron Microscopy revealed a compact matrix with evenly dispersed unreacted zinc oxide particles embedded within the hardened zinc-eugenolate phase.

Discussion

The SEM results substantiate efficient chelation and particle distribution, correlating well with enhanced mechanical behavior and reduced solubility. The minimal porosity contributes to better sealing of dentinal tubules, reducing postoperative sensitivity and improving clinical performance.

  1. pH Evaluation

The freshly prepared cement exhibited a slightly acidic pH of 5.5–6.0, which gradually increased to a nearly neutral pH (7.0–7.2) after 24 hours.

Significance

The shift toward neutral pH validates the material’s biocompatibility and analgesic effect on exposed pulp, making ZOE a suitable sedative dressing in restorative dentistry.

Overall Conclusion

The developed Zinc Oxide–Eugenol cement showed desirable clinical handling, acceptable setting characteristics, and adequate mechanical performance for temporary restoration and liner applications. Microstructural analysis confirmed dense structure formation and reduced porosity, supporting its sealing ability and biocompatibility. Thus, the prepared formulation fulfills clinical requirements and may be further enhanced using additives such as resin modifiers, accelerators, or rosin to improve strength and durability.

Limitations of Zinc Oxide–Eugenol Cement

  1. Low Mechanical Strength

Zinc Oxide–Eugenol cement possesses relatively poor compressive and tensile strength, which restricts its use in permanent restorative procedures, especially in high-stress posterior tooth regions.

  1. Inadequate Wear and Abrasion Resistance

The material is susceptible to wear and marginal breakdown under masticatory forces, limiting its durability and long-term clinical performance.

  1. Insufficient Bonding to Tooth Structure

ZOE does not chemically bond to enamel or dentin and depends mainly on mechanical retention, which can result in marginal gaps and microleakage.

  1. Solubility in Oral Environment

The cement demonstrates moderate solubility in saliva and acidic conditions of the oral cavity, potentially leading to surface erosion, dimensional changes, and eventual restoration failure.

  1. Adverse Interaction with Resin-Based Composites

The eugenol component inhibits polymerization reactions in resin materials, reducing the bond strength and hardness of composite restorations placed nearby.

  1. Thermal and Dimensional Instability

ZOE lacks strong thermal resilience and may undergo expansion or contraction in response to temperature variations in the mouth, affecting marginal integrity.

  1. Limited Antimicrobial Action

Although eugenol has some antibacterial properties, they are not sufficiently potent for severe or deep carious infections requiring stronger antimicrobial control.

  1. Potential for Pulpal Irritation

High concentrations of eugenol may cause irritation or cytotoxic effects, particularly in cases of direct pulp exposure or in sensitive individuals.

  1. Unsuitability for Long-Term Restorations

Due to its relatively weak mechanical properties and limited durability, ZOE is recommended only for temporary restorations, cavity bases, and liners.

  1. Aesthetic Limitations

The material is opaque and lacks natural tooth translucency, making it inappropriate for esthetic restorations, particularly in the anterior region.

Future Scope in (ZoE) Cement

The findings of the present research on the preparation and evaluation of Zinc Oxide–Eugenol (ZOE) cement demonstrate its usefulness as a temporary dental restorative material, yet there remains considerable scope for further innovation and development. Future investigations may emphasize improving mechanical durability, minimizing solubility in oral fluids, and enhancing biological compatibility to broaden its clinical utility.

  1. Advancement of Reinforced ZOE Compositions

Incorporating reinforcing agents such as resin-based polymers, glass fillers, nano-materials, or fibers can significantly enhance compressive strength, wear resistance, and service life, potentially enabling longer-term restorative usage.

  1. Application of Nanotechnology

Integrating nano-sized ZnO, hydroxyapatite, or bioactive glass nanoparticles could improve antibacterial activity, sealing capability, and internal structural stability.

  1. Modification of the Eugenol Component

Investigating substitute liquids like ortho-ethoxybenzoic acid (EBA) or non-eugenol polymeric systems may decrease cytotoxicity, enhance bonding characteristics, and prevent inhibition of resin polymerization.

  1. Improvement of Antimicrobial Properties

Additives such as chlorhexidine, silver nanoparticles, or plant-derived extracts may boost antimicrobial action, making the cement more effective for severely infected carious lesions.

  1. Enhancement in Aesthetic Quality

Future research could focus on incorporating tooth-colored fillers or pigments to improve esthetics, enabling use in anterior restorations where appearance is critical.

  1. Refinement of Handling Characteristics

The use of rheology modifiers and controlled-release additives may help fine-tune working and setting times to suit different clinical requirements.

  1. Extensive Clinical Validation

Long-term in vivo studies and clinical trials are required to verify biocompatibility, pulpal response, sealing performance, and overall success rate under real oral conditions.

  1. Adoption into Digital Dentistry and 3D Printing

Development of ZOE-compatible materials suitable for CAD/CAM fabrication or 3D printing of temporary restorations represents an emerging pathway.

  1. Eco-friendly and Biodegradable Variants

Exploring sustainable, environmentally friendly raw materials may contribute to greener dental biomaterial production.

  1. Development of Multi-functional ZOE Products

Designing versatile formulations capable of functioning simultaneously as a temporary restorative material, cavity base, and endodontic sealer may widen clinical applicability.

SUMMARY

Future advancements in ZOE cement aim to evolve it from a conventional temporary restorative agent to a high-performance, bioactive, and multifunctional biomaterial. Through formulation improvements and advanced characterization methods, enhanced mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and broader clinical usefulness can be achieved.                                          

REFERENCE

  1. Brauer, G. M. (1976). A detailed evaluation of zinc oxide–eugenol when used as a dental restorative material. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z, 31, 824–834.
  2. Gilson, T. D., et al. (1968). Experimental analysis of five types of zinc oxide–eugenol cements with different compressive strengths. Journal of Dental Research, 47(5), 813–819.
  3. Pullishery, F., Alhejoury, H. A., Turkistani, M., & Souror, Y. R. (2021). Systematic review addressing the inhibitory effect of ZOE on resin-based restorations. Dentistry and Medical Research, 9, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.4103/dmr.dmr_14_21
  4. Stefanache, A., et al. (2023). A review discussing the characteristics, uses, and newest improvements in zinc-based dental cements. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 15(3), 356–365.
  5. National Bureau of Standards. (n.d.). Report on zinc oxide–eugenol type filling materials and their clinical relevance. NBS Report 8647.
  6. ScienceDirect Topics. (n.d.). Overview article on zinc oxide–eugenol cement, its uses and properties.
  7. Rhaiem, M., Elelmi, Y., Baaziz, A., Chatti, M., & Maatouk, F. (2023). A systematic review exploring alternatives to ZOE for root canal filling in primary teeth. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-023-00839-6
  8. Nicholson, J. W. & Wilson, A. D. (1993). Comprehensive discussion on acid-base dental cements including ZOE. In Acid-Base Cements. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  9. Markowitz, K., Moynihan, M., Liu, M., & Kim, S. (n.d.). Detailed study on biological effects of eugenol and ZOE systems. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology.
  10. Carvalho, C. N., de Oliveira Bauer, J. R., Loguercio, A. D., & Reis, A. (2007). Effects of ZOE temporary restorations on bonding performance of resin dentin adhesives. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 19, 144–152.
  11. Oldham, T., Swartz, M., & Phillips, R. W. (n.d.). Analysis of physical behaviour of commercially manufactured ZOE materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
  12. Skinner, A. R., Cooper, J., & Ziehm, H. (n.d.). Research on the functional characteristics of ZOE-based impression pastes. Dental Materials Journal.
  13. Asgarzadeh, M., & Peyton, F. (n.d.). Studies focused on modifying ZOE to improve working time and mechanical behavior. International Dental Journal.
  14. Vieira, G. L., Clark, T. H., & Phillips, R. W. (n.d.). Chemical and mechanical evaluation of ZOE cements. Journal of Dental Research – Special Issue.
  15. Myers, R. W., & Peyton, F. (n.d.). Influence of filler additives on the mechanical performance of zinc oxide–eugenol dental systems. Journal of Dental Materials.
  16. Wilson, A. D., & Nicholson, J. W. (n.d.). Study examining thermal expansion and setting shrinkage characteristics of ZOE cements. Dental Materials Research.
  17. Ferracane, J. L. (2001). Comprehensive textbook covering dental material science including ZOE reactions and strength properties. Dental Materials: Principles and Applications (2nd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  18. Lee, J.-H., Lee, H.-H., Kim, K.-S., Kim, K.-M., & Yu, J.-W. (2016). Investigation of cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory response of ZOE in oral keratinocyte cells. Dental Materials, 32(5), 656–665.
  19. Sulaiman, T. A., Abdulmajeed, A., Altitinchi, A., Ahmed, S. N., & Donovan, T. E. (2018). Mechanical behavior of different resin-based cement mixing systems, relevant to ZOE interaction. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 119(6), 6–14.
  20. Deshpande, A. N., Verma, S., & Macwan, C. (2014). Case report describing allergic reaction to eugenol-based cement in pediatric dentistry. Published via ResearchGate.

Reference

  1. Brauer, G. M. (1976). A detailed evaluation of zinc oxide–eugenol when used as a dental restorative material. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z, 31, 824–834.
  2. Gilson, T. D., et al. (1968). Experimental analysis of five types of zinc oxide–eugenol cements with different compressive strengths. Journal of Dental Research, 47(5), 813–819.
  3. Pullishery, F., Alhejoury, H. A., Turkistani, M., & Souror, Y. R. (2021). Systematic review addressing the inhibitory effect of ZOE on resin-based restorations. Dentistry and Medical Research, 9, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.4103/dmr.dmr_14_21
  4. Stefanache, A., et al. (2023). A review discussing the characteristics, uses, and newest improvements in zinc-based dental cements. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 15(3), 356–365.
  5. National Bureau of Standards. (n.d.). Report on zinc oxide–eugenol type filling materials and their clinical relevance. NBS Report 8647.
  6. ScienceDirect Topics. (n.d.). Overview article on zinc oxide–eugenol cement, its uses and properties.
  7. Rhaiem, M., Elelmi, Y., Baaziz, A., Chatti, M., & Maatouk, F. (2023). A systematic review exploring alternatives to ZOE for root canal filling in primary teeth. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-023-00839-6
  8. Nicholson, J. W. & Wilson, A. D. (1993). Comprehensive discussion on acid-base dental cements including ZOE. In Acid-Base Cements. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  9. Markowitz, K., Moynihan, M., Liu, M., & Kim, S. (n.d.). Detailed study on biological effects of eugenol and ZOE systems. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology.
  10. Carvalho, C. N., de Oliveira Bauer, J. R., Loguercio, A. D., & Reis, A. (2007). Effects of ZOE temporary restorations on bonding performance of resin dentin adhesives. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 19, 144–152.
  11. Oldham, T., Swartz, M., & Phillips, R. W. (n.d.). Analysis of physical behaviour of commercially manufactured ZOE materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
  12. Skinner, A. R., Cooper, J., & Ziehm, H. (n.d.). Research on the functional characteristics of ZOE-based impression pastes. Dental Materials Journal.
  13. Asgarzadeh, M., & Peyton, F. (n.d.). Studies focused on modifying ZOE to improve working time and mechanical behavior. International Dental Journal.
  14. Vieira, G. L., Clark, T. H., & Phillips, R. W. (n.d.). Chemical and mechanical evaluation of ZOE cements. Journal of Dental Research – Special Issue.
  15. Myers, R. W., & Peyton, F. (n.d.). Influence of filler additives on the mechanical performance of zinc oxide–eugenol dental systems. Journal of Dental Materials.
  16. Wilson, A. D., & Nicholson, J. W. (n.d.). Study examining thermal expansion and setting shrinkage characteristics of ZOE cements. Dental Materials Research.
  17. Ferracane, J. L. (2001). Comprehensive textbook covering dental material science including ZOE reactions and strength properties. Dental Materials: Principles and Applications (2nd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  18. Lee, J.-H., Lee, H.-H., Kim, K.-S., Kim, K.-M., & Yu, J.-W. (2016). Investigation of cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory response of ZOE in oral keratinocyte cells. Dental Materials, 32(5), 656–665.
  19. Sulaiman, T. A., Abdulmajeed, A., Altitinchi, A., Ahmed, S. N., & Donovan, T. E. (2018). Mechanical behavior of different resin-based cement mixing systems, relevant to ZOE interaction. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 119(6), 6–14.
  20. Deshpande, A. N., Verma, S., & Macwan, C. (2014). Case report describing allergic reaction to eugenol-based cement in pediatric dentistry. Published via ResearchGate.

Photo
Afroj Ansar Pathan
Corresponding author

Delight College of Pharmacy, Bhima Koregaon, Pune Maharashtra: -411039

Photo
Vishakha Kasbe
Co-author

Delight College of Pharmacy, Bhima Koregaon, Pune Maharashtra: -411039

Afroj Ansar Pathan*, Vishakha Kasbe, Preparation and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) Cement for Dental Application, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (11), 738-746. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17740369

More related articles
Advancing the Radiopharmaceutical Revolution: Inno...
Alok Kumar, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Aryan Singh, Faizan...
Targeting and Reversing HIV Latency Using Novel 'B...
Arnab Roy, Sandeep Prasad Verma , Nikita Kumari , Bikash Vishwa...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Aloevera Lotion...
Tushar Wadekar , Dr. Jayashri Bairagi, Pandurang Pisal, Harshal Hire, Sahil Pawar, ...
Nodular Sclerosis Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in a Young Adult: A Comprehensive C...
Saira Susan Thomas, Pallippat Thumban Kheif Mamu, Manjima Sunil, ...
Valorization of Tender Coconut Waste into Sustainable Value-Added Products: Chal...
Selva Kumar C., Chinnarasu K., Kavi Nishanthini S., Kaviya Dharshini D., Kanimozhi B., ...
A Review on the Role of Transdermal Drug Delivery: Microneedles, Patches, and Na...
Yash Tambe, Vaishali Pagar, Harshal Pagar, Vaibhav Thakare, ...
Advancing the Radiopharmaceutical Revolution: Innovation, Challenges, and Expand...
Alok Kumar, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Aryan Singh, Faizan Raza, Md Raja Ansari, Md Affan, Ra...
More related articles
Advancing the Radiopharmaceutical Revolution: Innovation, Challenges, and Expand...
Alok Kumar, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Aryan Singh, Faizan Raza, Md Raja Ansari, Md Affan, Ra...
Targeting and Reversing HIV Latency Using Novel 'Block and Lock' Strategies: A C...
Arnab Roy, Sandeep Prasad Verma , Nikita Kumari , Bikash Vishwakarma, Kristy Kumari , Sajid Ansari...
Advancing the Radiopharmaceutical Revolution: Innovation, Challenges, and Expand...
Alok Kumar, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Aryan Singh, Faizan Raza, Md Raja Ansari, Md Affan, Ra...
Targeting and Reversing HIV Latency Using Novel 'Block and Lock' Strategies: A C...
Arnab Roy, Sandeep Prasad Verma , Nikita Kumari , Bikash Vishwakarma, Kristy Kumari , Sajid Ansari...