View Article

Abstract

The existing work reviews the latest advancements and applications of 3D printing in the pharmaceutical sphere, which have altered drug development technology towards personalized and controlled release profiles for dosing forms and effective demand production [1]. The current technology has the capability of evolving from a date of inception in 1996 to systems dependent on sheet lamination, liquid, powder, and extrusion. FDA approval opened the door to marketing mass production of drugs using 3D printing [2]. It paved the way for initiating 3D-printed medicine. There is also a lot of use for those interested in veterinary medicine, while providing unique dosage forms for animals with special dosage needs [3]. In recent years, patient-centric pharmaceutical design would make today-the use of 3D printing for producing personalized dosage forms likely, where drugs could be encouraged to improve adherence towards treatment [4]. The inclusion of Formulation by Design (3FD) also harmonizes tablets formulations on regulated release rates and kinetics [5]. All the benefits notwithstanding, it is impeded by material limitations, printer technology limitations, and regulatory issues, but the biggest is in terms of broader implementation [6]. However, even though it poses such challenges, this technology could still potentially change medicine, from personalized drugs to tissue engineering and surgical simulation. As 3D printing technology advances, they are yet to be redefined for future scope and possibilities in drug delivery, personalized medicine, and treatment of the patient [7].

Keywords

3D printing, pharmaceutical manufacturing, personalized medicine, drug-release profiles, Formulation by Design, veterinary medicine, patient adherence, drug design challenges

Introduction

3D printing in pharmaceuticals has been under vigorous research and developments ever since the beginning, with the first researches traced back to 1996 (Wu et al., 1996). But then, times have changed-a lot of things have changed very recently with the advent of commercial-scale capabilities [8]. Most of these earlier studies have focused on exploring different aspects of 3D printing technology suitable for pharmaceutical applications. Spritam®, the very first representative product to have been FDA commercialized and manufactured in a scale significant, evidences the potential of 3D printing technologies appear to be instrumental in allowing the manufacturing of drugs in large scales [9]. Generally, all 3D printing methods for developing pharmaceutical dosage forms can be classified into four major categories: extrusion-based, powder-based, liquid-based, and sheet lamination-based [10].

3DP, or three-dimensional printing, is the technology whereby different geometric shapes are created into 3D issues layer by layer. Major advantages of 3DP technologies over conventional processes are the making of complex and sophisticated solid dosage forms, efficient on-demand manufacture, and the ability to actually personalize pharmaceuticals with individually adjusted doses [11]. Currently, there is a high degree of interest in 3DP application in pharmaceuticals for innovative design of drug delivery systems and drug manufacturing [12]. Yet, the full deployment of 3DP technology in pharmaceuticals may be impeded by some technological advancements and legal problems, though it is clear that it reflects several possible medical and commercial benefits [13].

3D printing in pharmaceutical product design

The medicines meant for the animals are needed for the maintenance and restoration of health in mammals [14]. This medicine is obtained by making dosage forms available in various strengths as would be needed for administration as veterinary medicine: that these differences are among the particular-most pharmacokinetic variations that affect the composition and operation of veterinary dosage forms [15]. Generally, a dosage regimen is adjusted according to animal weight; thus, it is A drug often shows up in different strengths [16]. An important example of this is fluralaner, clindamycin hydrochloride, and mavacoxib [17]. But it is also an everyday practice where veterinarians and pet owners extract the whole tablets and divide it into 2 or 4 parts according to the need of their pets [18]. Like humans, animals have their own preference in the way they take medications. Therefore, considering animal preference is an important aspect in veterinary drug design [19]. For other species, take for example; horses are very fond of fruits (like apple) while dogs love eating animal proteins (like chicken, pig, and beef). To make it fit to the taste of dogs, Simparica Trio contains hydrolyzed vegetable protein, sweeteners, gelatin, and pork liver powder. Generally, nowadays most frequent doses given to animals are orally and parenterally given formulations. Advancement in pharmaceutical production has led to the manufacturing of many palatable oral dosage forms. Chewable tablets are still widely used in veterinary for pet applications, particularly cats and dogs. As a matter of fact, chewable tablets are the most commonly utilized pharmaceutical dosage form in veterinary care -more than in human medicine [20]. This puts into perspective the situation as regards chewable formulations for animal purposes in the market [21]. In fact, compared to human formulations more chewable veterinary formulations are marketed. Probably because the animal does this without luring anything into its mouth [22].

Fig.1. Target product profile of medicinal products intended to be used by dermatological patient

Patient Centric Pharmaceutical Drug Product Design:

The Impact on Adherence to Medication.

The Impact of Focused on patients Pharmaceutical Drug Product Design on Medication Persistence The core principle of PCDPD is to include patients' needs and preferences into the design of a medicinal product [23]. Only 45 studies examining patients' preferences for medications were found in a recent literature review. Only 35 of them focused into dosage form design, and 11 of them only evaluated oral dosage forms [24]. surprisingly, almost no study has examined at patients' preferences for the size, shape, and colour of solid dosage forms, which are frequently used for The foundation of PCDPD is to incorporate patients' requirements and preferences into the design of a medication [25]. Only 45 studies examining patients' preferences for medicinal mixtures were found in a recent review of the literature. Only 35 of them focused into dosage form design, and 11 of these only examined oral dosage forms. remarkably, not much research have looked at patients' preferences for the size, shape, and color of solid dosage forms, which are frequently utilized to treat non-communicable illnesses [26]. The pharmaceutical business is capable of developing and manufacturing a wide range of dosage forms as well as to traditional solid dosage forms like tablets [27]. Certain pharmaceutical goods become more popular as better NCD remedies when a PCDP design is used. The pharmaceutical sector is capable of producing a wide range of dosage forms as well as to traditional solid dosage forms such tablets. In the context of a PCDP-based product design, some dis-opy of drug products seem to emerge more favourably than others for promoting adherence, and these will be addressed in greater detail with more focus on their impact on adherence to medication.

Faster formulation development by formulation design.

The selection of excipients and the design of the tablet are complex and should be made with a proper understanding of the formulation. The excipients must exhibit performance characteristics expected, such as stability with the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), ease of tableting, and the required disintegration rate [28]. The tablet structure may influence delivery of the desired pharmacokinetic profile. This phenomenon occurs in conventional as well as 3D printed tablets. Thus, in light of these factors, the newly devised 3D Printing Formulation by Design (3DFbD) came into being [29]. The best formulation among others can thus be achieved by considering tablet structure information in conjunction with the physicochemical and biopharma-ceutical characteristics of the API and excipients [30]. The formulation would thus be controlled based on physicochemical data that would decrease the uncertainty in the traditional formulation approaches. 3D printings work such that they can produce structures controlling the rate, duration, and mode of release. Therefore, the traditional empirical method gives way to a rational design based on the Formulation-by-Design process. This decides the necessary release mode, the start, and the rate of release through physiological parameters like GI transit time and site of absorption to assure knowledge of the amount of drug delivered at different times during absorption. The tablet design is to be selected from a comprehensive list of previously known tablet designs that provide the desired mode, rate, and time of onset of release [31]. In such a "stackable approach", tablet components are added toward tablet formation, just like Legos stack to create a structure. This allows for rather easy construction of tablet structures yielding complex release profiles. after the formation of the tablet structure, excipients with the necessary physicochemical properties to enable formulation and performance upon construction compatibility with API form pharmacological excipients and Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) substances. Once the structures and excipients have been determined, the computer codes will be drawn upon to print prototypes for rapid performance assessment both in vivo and in vitro. The designs can be modified within hours instead of days or weeks as required, owing to the dSemonstrated application in the in vitro release profile and the specific in vivo PKs using the 3DFbD® and 3D printing. Zheng et al. showed this potential realization of the target value in the in vitro release profile and PK results in vivo through application of 3DFbD and 3D printing to the molecule. Its overall tendency is oriented more favorably towards 3D printing technologies, as the release profile can be altered in a much accurate and precise way [32].

Reference

  1. Serrano DR, Kara A, Yuste I, Luciano FC, Ongoren B, Anaya BJ, Molina G, Diez L, Ramirez BI, Ramirez IO, Sánchez-Guirales SA. 3D printing technologies in personalized medicine, nanomedicines, and biopharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 17;15(2):313.
  2. Katakam P, Kumar R, Ranjan N, Babbar A, editors. Handbook of 3D Printing in Pharmaceutics: Innovations and Applications. CRC Press; 2024 Dec 10.
  3. Serrano DR, Kara A, Yuste I, Luciano FC, Ongoren B, Anaya BJ, Molina G, Diez L, Ramirez BI, Ramirez IO, Sánchez-Guirales SA. 3D printing technologies in personalized medicine, nanomedicines, and biopharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 17;15(2):313.
  4. Page S, Da Costa SB, Stillhart C, Timpe C, Wagner L. The Design of Patient-centric Dosage Forms for Older Adults. InPharmaceutical Formulations for Older Patients 2023 Nov 11 (pp. 63-95). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  5. Mazarura KR. Design and evaluation of a non-opioid tripartite release tablet for chronic inflammatory pain.
  6. Tofail SA, Koumoulos EP, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S, O’Donoghue L, Charitidis C. Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Materials today. 2018 Jan 1;21(1):22-37.
  7. Lam EHY, Yu F, Zhu S, Wang Z. 3D Bioprinting for Next-Generation Personalized Medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 28;24(7):6357. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076357. PMID: 37047328; PMCID: PMC10094501.
  8. Wang S, Chen X, Han X, Hong X, Li X, Zhang H, Li M, Wang Z, Zheng A. A Review of 3D Printing Technology in Pharmaceutics: Technology and Applications, Now and Future. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 26;15(2):416. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020416. PMID: 36839738; PMCID: PMC9962448.
  9. Peng H, Han B, Tong T, Jin X, Peng Y, Guo M, Li B, Ding J, Kong Q, Wang Q. 3D printing processes in precise drug delivery for personalized medicine. Biofabrication. 2024 Apr 17;16(3):10.1088/1758-5090/ad3a14. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad3a14. PMID: 38569493; PMCID: PMC11164598.
  10. Tonk M, Gupta V, Dhwaj A, Sachdeva M. Current developments and advancements of 3-dimensional printing in personalized medication and drug screening. Drug Metabolism and Personalized Therapy. 2025 Jan 16;39(4):167-82.
  11. Parhi R, Jena GK. An updated review on application of 3D printing in fabricating pharmaceutical dosage forms. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 2022 Oct 1:1-35.
  12. Gao G, Ahn M, Cho WW, Kim BS, Cho DW. 3D printing of pharmaceutical application: drug screening and drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Aug 31;13(9):1373.
  13. Ballardini RM, Mimler M, Minssen T, Salmi M. 3D printing, intellectual property rights and medical emergencies: in search of new flexibilities. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2022 Sep;53(8):1149-73.
  14. Ponnampalam EN, Kiani A, Santhiravel S, Holman BW, Lauridsen C, Dunshea FR. The importance of dietary antioxidants on oxidative stress, meat and milk production, and their preservative aspects in farm animals: Antioxidant action, animal health, and product quality—Invited review. Animals. 2022 Nov 24;12(23):3279.
  15. Rodríguez-Pombo L, Awad A, Basit AW, Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Goyanes A. Innovations in Chewable Formulations: The Novelty and Applications of 3D Printing in Drug Product Design. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Aug 18;14(8):1732. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081732. PMID: 36015355; PMCID: PMC9412656.
  16. De Santis F, Boari A, Dondi F, Crisi PE. Drug-dosing adjustment in dogs and cats with chronic kidney disease. Animals. 2022 Jan 21;12(3):262.
  17. Budde JA, McCluskey DM. Plumb's veterinary drug handbook. John Wiley & Sons; 2023 May 31.
  18. Anderson M. Bill's Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics for Veterinary Technicians-E-Book: Bill's Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics for Veterinary Technicians-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2023 Apr 11.
  19. Primeau CA, McWhirter JE, Carson C, McEwen SA, Parmley EJ. Exploring medical and veterinary student perceptions and communication preferences related to antimicrobial resistance in Ontario, Canada using qualitative methods. BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):483.
  20. Wei YP, Yao LY, Wu YY, Liu X, Peng LH, Tian YL, Ding JH, Li KH, He QG. Critical review of synthesis, toxicology and detection of acyclovir. Molecules. 2021 Oct 29;26(21):6566.
  21. Dzanis DA, Marzo I. Pet Food and Supplement Regulations: Practical Implications. Applied Veterinary Clinical Nutrition. 2023 Aug 23:72-97.
  22. Forsythe LR, Gochenauer AE. Drug Compounding for Veterinary Professionals. John Wiley & Sons; 2023 Jun 13.
  23. Stegemann S, Sheehan L, Rossi A, Barrett A, Paudel A, Crean A, Ruiz F, Bresciani M, Liu F, Shariff Z, Shine M. Rational and practical considerations to guide a target product profile for patient-centric drug product development with measurable patient outcomes–A proposed roadmap. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2022 Aug 1; 177:81-8.
  24. Johannesson J, Hansson P, Bergström CA, Paulsson M. Manipulations and age-appropriateness of oral medications in pediatric oncology patients in Sweden: Need for personalized dosage forms. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Feb 1; 146:112576.
  25. Overgaard AB, Højsted J, Hansen R, Møller-Sonnergaard J, Christrup LL. Patients' evaluation of shape, size and colour of solid dosage forms. Pharm World Sci. 2001 Oct;23(5):185-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1012050931018. PMID: 11721676.
  26. Hauber B, Hand MV, Hancock BC, Zarrella J, Harding L, Ogden-Barker M, Antipas AS, Watt SJ. Patient Acceptability and Preferences for Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Product Attributes: A Scoping Review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jun 21; 18:1281-1297. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S443213. PMID: 38919378; PMCID: PMC11197953.
  27. De Villiers MM. Oral conventional solid dosage forms: powders and granules, tablets, lozenges, and capsules. InTheory and Practice of Contemporary Pharmaceutics 2021 Feb 25 (pp. 279-331). CRC press.
  28. 1.Makkad S, Sheikh M, Shende S, Jirvankar P. Pharmaceutical Excipients: Functions, Selection Criteria, and Emerging Trends. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation [Internet]. 2025 Feb 12;15(2):361–76. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20251676
  29. Peng H, Han B, Tong T, Jin X, Peng Y, Guo M, Li B, Ding J, Kong Q, Wang Q. 3D printing processes in precise drug delivery for personalized medicine. Biofabrication. 2024 Apr 17;16(3):10.1088/1758-5090/ad3a14. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad3a14. PMID: 38569493; PMCID: PMC11164598.
  30. Li Z, Luo X, Naeem A, Li Q, Zhang Y, Guan Y, Chen L, Zhu W, Jin Z, Feng Y, Ming L. Recent developments in the physical structure of solid formulations: a comprehensive review. Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024 Oct 1;33(10).
  31. Gueche YA, Sanchez-Ballester NM, Cailleaux S, Bataille B, Soulairol I. Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), a New Chapter in the Production of Solid Oral Forms (SOFs) by 3D Printing. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Aug 6;13(8):1212. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081212. PMID: 34452173; PMCID: PMC8399326.
  32. Do AV, Khorsand B, Geary SM, Salem AK. 3D Printing of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration Applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015 Aug 26;4(12):1742-62. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500168. Epub 2015 Jun 10. PMID: 26097108; PMCID: PMC4597933.
  33. Goh O, Goh WJ, Lim SH, Hoo GS, Liew R, Ng TM. Preferences of Healthcare Professionals on 3D-Printed Tablets: A Pilot Study. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 21;14(7):1521. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071521. PMID: 35890417; PMCID: PMC9319202.
  34. Peng H, Han B, Tong T, Jin X, Peng Y, Guo M, Li B, Ding J, Kong Q, Wang Q. 3D printing processes in precise drug delivery for personalized medicine. Biofabrication. 2024 Apr 17;16(3):10.1088/1758-5090/ad3a14. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad3a14. PMID: 38569493; PMCID: PMC11164598.
  35. Hughes RG, Blegen MA. Medication Administration Safety. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Apr. Chapter 37. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2656/
  36. Bose S, Ke D, Sahasrabudhe H, Bandyopadhyay A. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog Mater Sci. 2018 Apr; 93:45-111. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 26. PMID: 31406390; PMCID: PMC6690629.
  37. Nadagouda MN, Ginn M, Rastogi V. A review of 3D printing techniques for environmental applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2020; 28:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2020.08.002. PMID: 34327115; PMCID: PMC8318092.
  38. Sala D, Richert M. Perspectives of Additive Manufacturing in 5.0 Industry. Materials. 2025 Jan 17;18(2):429.
  39. Graça A, Bom S, Martins AM, Ribeiro HM, Marto J. Vat-based photopolymerization 3D printing: From materials to topical and transdermal applications. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2024 Aug;19(4):100940. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2024.100940. Epub 2024 Jul 3. PMID: 39253612; PMCID: PMC11381591.
  40. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M, Jachowicz R. 3D Printing in Pharmaceutical and Medical Applications - Recent Achievements and Challenges. Pharm Res. 2018 Jul 11;35(9):176. doi: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-x. PMID: 29998405; PMCID: PMC6061505.
  41. Baino F, Novajra G, Vitale-Brovarone C. Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Dec 17; 3:202. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00202. PMID: 26734605; PMCID: PMC4681769.
  42. Aimar A, Palermo A, Innocenti B. The Role of 3D Printing in Medical Applications: A State of the Art. J Healthc Eng. 2019 Mar 21; 2019:5340616. doi: 10.1155/2019/5340616. PMID: 31019667; PMCID: PMC6451800.
  43. National Research Council (US) Committee on Drug Use in Food Animals. The Use of Drugs in Food Animals: Benefits and Risks. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1999. 1, Drugs Used in Food Animals: Background and Perspectives. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232562/.

Photo
Ankita Dhere
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmacy / Ashokrao Mane college of pharmacy, Peth-Vadgaon / Shivaji University 416112, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Yogda Rawool
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy / Women's college of pharmacy, Peth-Vadgaon / DBATU Lonere, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Neha Chavan
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy / Ashokrao Mane college of pharmacy, Peth-Vadgaon / Shivaji University 416112, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Amruta Patil
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy / Ashokrao Mane college of pharmacy, Peth-Vadgaon / Shivaji University 416112, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Harshada Patil
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy / Ashokrao Mane college of pharmacy, Peth-Vadgaon / Shivaji University 416112, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Tejashree Khamkar
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy / Ashokrao Mane college of pharmacy, Peth-Vadgaon / Shivaji University 416112, Maharashtra, India

Ankita Dhere*, Yogda Rawool, Neha Chavan, Amruta Patil, Harshada Patil, Tejashree Khamkar, Revolution in The Making: A Survey of Emerging Applications and Technologies In 3D Printing, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (4), 378-389. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15237410

More related articles
The Impact of “Mother” Project on Maternal & C...
Sayandip Gangopadhyay, Sudipta Das, ...
Assessment of the Knowledge About Radiology Depart...
Aman Verma, Shubhanshi Rani, Jyoti Yadav, Sandhya Verma, Shivam K...
Fragment-Based Drug Discovery: Opportunities and C...
Mohammad Javed, Sita Kumari, Kundan Raj Jajware, Somya Saurav, Ra...
An Overview Of The Holistic Approach Of Ayurveda In Immuno – modulation Throug...
Dr. Dharti , Dr. Bhupendra kumar , Anita Sharma , Dr. Dinesh Kumar kumawat , ...
Branding A Legend, The Journey of Bajaj Chetak from Classic to Electric...
Aasifa Hussain, Sahayaraj Antony Michael, Dr. Sivasaktibalan D. P. , ...
Performance Optimization of A Low-Speed Multi-Blade Wind Turbine For Pumping: An...
Lantolalaina RAKOTOMAVO, Andriamananarivo Ignace RAKOTOZANDRY, Josoa Albert Andriamorasata, ...
Related Articles
Challenges And Opportunities In Termite Control: An Indian Perspectives...
Reshma Sinha, Radhika Sharma, Neha Rana, Asha Poonia, Ramneek Kaur, ...
Cheap Aerospace X-ray Film Visualizer Design for NDT Workshop...
Lijalem Gebrehiwet, Ephrem Damtew, Samuel Tilahun, ...
Review on Fluconazole: Properties and Analytical Methods for its Determination...
Dnyaneshwari Gaikwad, Amol Gayke, Amol Jadhav, Komal Kute, ...
More related articles
Assessment of the Knowledge About Radiology Department Among Paramedical Student...
Aman Verma, Shubhanshi Rani, Jyoti Yadav, Sandhya Verma, Shivam Kumar, ...
Fragment-Based Drug Discovery: Opportunities and Challenges in Pharmaceutical Ch...
Mohammad Javed, Sita Kumari, Kundan Raj Jajware, Somya Saurav, Rajasmita Bhadra, ...
Assessment of the Knowledge About Radiology Department Among Paramedical Student...
Aman Verma, Shubhanshi Rani, Jyoti Yadav, Sandhya Verma, Shivam Kumar, ...
Fragment-Based Drug Discovery: Opportunities and Challenges in Pharmaceutical Ch...
Mohammad Javed, Sita Kumari, Kundan Raj Jajware, Somya Saurav, Rajasmita Bhadra, ...