View Article

  • Thermostability of Vaccines in the Indian Context: A Review of Progress and Perspectives

  • S.N.D College of Pharmacy, Babhulgaon, Yeola

Abstract

Vaccine stability plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of immunization programs and is instrumental in preventing millions of deaths annually. To maintain the potency of vaccines, cold chain systems have been established for their proper storage and transportation, as exposure to unsuitable temperatures can significantly reduce vaccine efficacy. Aluminium-based compounds are commonly employed to enhance the thermal stability of vaccines. The formulation process is a vital phase in the development pipeline of new vaccines, encompassing approval, testing, and production. Despite advancements in stabilizing techniques, liquid formulations remain the preferred choice due to their simplicity in administration, packaging, and large-scale manufacturing. Nonetheless, several alternative strategies have been explored to improve thermostability. This review highlights various methods used to convert thermolabile vaccines into thermostable forms and discusses formulation strategies, including the incorporation of heat shock proteins such as mHSP70 and mHSP65, which play a role in enhancing both innate and adaptive immune responses.

Keywords

Cold chain, calcium phosphate, thermostable vaccine, vaccine formulation design

Introduction

Vaccination saves millions of lives each year, and the effectiveness of immunization programs relies heavily on the stability of vaccines. Since most vaccines are sensitive to temperature variations, it is essential to maintain a cold chain and store them consistently between 2°C and 8°C throughout the entire process—from manufacturing to administration—to preserve their potency [1]. Thermal sensitivity is a major factor                influencing both the potency and overall quality of vaccines. To ensure their stability, cold chain systems have been implemented. However, even within these systems, vaccines remain vulnerable to temperature excursions, which can compromise their effectiveness. Several factors contribute to failures in maintaining cold chain integrity, including fuel shortages, malfunctioning or outdated refrigeration units, and inadequate adherence to proper cold chain protocols—all of which can lead to temperature fluctuations [2].The thermal sensitivity impact on the distribution of vaccine worldwide and concern to the philanthropic organizations, government Institutions, health authorities and vaccine industry attempting to enhance the distribution of vaccines [3]. Aluminium-based adjuvants have traditionally been used to enhance vaccine thermostability; however, growing concerns regarding their potential neurotoxic effects and possible links to autoimmune disorders have led to the exploration of alternative strategies. To ensure the stability and safety of vaccines, the World Health Organization (WHO) has established specific guidelines for their evaluation [4]. These guidelines offer a structured framework for determining appropriate storage conditions and shelf life, and they help identify various factors that can influence vaccine stability [5]. Various methods are available for estimating the shelf life of vaccines, many of which are outlined by the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines [6]. Shelf-life estimation is commonly performed using statistical models, including both linear and non-linear regression analyses, often supported by pourability tests. To enhance the accuracy and robustness of the ICH procedures, additional approaches such as quantile regression, consideration of batch effects, and mixed model tolerance interval methods have been suggested [ 7,8]. n the past, lyophilization has been used to produce dry powder formulations of live attenuated vaccines, significantly improving their stability by reducing moisture content to typically below 3% [ 9]. Despite the use of drying techniques, many vaccines still depend on cold chain storage. Subunit vaccines containing aluminium salt adjuvants are particularly challenging to lyophilize, as the process can compromise immunogenicity and alter particle size. To overcome these limitations, alternative drying methods such as vacuum-foam drying, spray-freeze drying, supercritical fluid drying, and spray drying have recently been explored to enhance both the thermostability and flexibility of vaccine formulations [10–12]. The formulation of vaccines plays a pivotal role in the overall development process, including approval, testing, and large-scale production. It involves transforming the vaccine antigen into a medicinal product suitable for administration. The formulation process encompasses several key stages—from the initial identification of immunogenic components to the creation of a stable, effective vaccine. This includes developing stability-indicating assays (such as potency testing), characterizing the chemical and physical properties of antigens, optimizing the route of administration and choice of adjuvants, and designing formulations that improve the vaccine’s stability, immune response, and shelf life. A primary objective in vaccine formulation is to enhance immunogenicity using adjuvants, which not only amplify the immune response but also guide it effectively toward both humoral and cellular immunity.

1.Types of thermostability of vaccines

Understanding how stable a vaccine is, particularly how quickly its potency decreases at a specific temperature, is important for determining its proper storage conditions. [13]. Among the vaccines commonly administered in the UIP, adsorbed diphtheria and tetanus toxoids exhibit the highest stability, while OPV is highly heat-sensitive. Once reconstituted, vials without preservatives (such as most live virus vaccines) should be discarded within one hour, whereas those containing preservatives may be used for up to three hours or until the end of the aimmunization session [14].

A] Diphtheria and tetanus toxoids

Adsorbed diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, whether in monovalent form or as part of combination vaccines, are among the most stable vaccines in common use. They can tolerate elevated temperatures for extended storage periods; however, freezing can alter both their appearance and potency. Freezing of adsorbed vaccines such as DPT, DT, TT, and HB is strictly contraindicated, as it can lead to reduced immune response or increased local reactions. This effect is not due to the toxoids themselves, but to the aluminium-based adjuvant, which undergoes structural changes upon freezing. The freezing point of adsorbed DTP vaccines lies between –5°C and –10°C, and the time required to freeze depends on the vial’s dose volume and ambient temperature—typically about 110 to 130 minutes at –10°C. Once frozen, aluminium oxide loses its colloidal form and breaks into crystalline particles, which can cause aseptic abscesses at the injection site and render the vaccine ineffective. Thawed frozen vaccines often display granular or flaky particles, and when shaken, these settle within 30 minutes, leaving a sediment beneath a clear liquid column. This sedimentation pattern, known as the “shake test,” confirms prior freezing. Studies have shown that potency loss is minimal when the vaccine is stored for up to 1.5 years at 18°C, for 6–12 months at 24°C, and for 2–6 months at 37°C, as outlined in Table I.[15,16,17,18].

B] Pertussis Vaccine

The thermostability of this vaccine is presented in Table I. Freezing affect. the same way as DPT. Although no specific data exist for the acellular pertussis vaccine, its stability is expected to be comparable to other protein-based vaccines—showing relatively good heat stability, low tolerance to freezing, and a shelf life of about 2–3 years when stored at 2°C to 8°C. [19].

Vaccine

Type

Usual Storage Temp.

Thermostability (Retention at Elevated Temp.)

Notes

BCG (Bacillus Calmette–Guérin)

Live attenuated

2–8°C

Sensitive; potency drops quickly above 8°C

Requires strict cold chain

Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR)

Live attenuated

2–8°C

Highly sensitive; loses potency rapidly above 8°C

Very fragile to heat

Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV)

Live attenuated

2–8°C

Highly heat sensitive

Limited thermostability

Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis (DTP)

Inactivated toxoid + subunit

2–8°C

Moderate thermostability; better with CaP adjuvant

CaP adjuvant improves stability

Hepatitis B vaccine

Recombinant protein

2–8°C

Moderate thermostability; some formulations stable at 25°C for weeks

Can be improved with adjuvants like CaP or alum

Influenza vaccine

Inactivated virus

2–8°C

Moderate; loses potency over time at higher temps

Some thermostable formulations developed

Human Papillomavirus (HPV)

Virus-like particles (VLPs)

2–8°C

Moderate thermostability; some VLP formulations retain potency at 25°C

Lyophilized forms improve stability

Tetanus toxoid

Inactivated toxoid

2–8°C

Good thermostability, especially with CaP adjuvant

Common thermostable vaccine candidate

Rabies vaccine

Inactivated virus

2–8°C

Moderate thermostability; improved with new formulations

Often requires cold chain

Typhoid Vi polysaccharide

Polysaccharide

2–8°C

Moderate stability; some heat-tolerant versions available

 

World Health Organization (WHO): Vaccine Storage and Handling Guidelines, various vaccine position papers (2015–2018).

C] Hepatitis B Vaccine

The hepatitis B vaccine is formulated as a liquid suspension containing purified hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) adsorbed onto aluminium salts. When stored between 2°C and 8°C, it maintains stability for many years, with an average shelf life of around four years, although no absolute maximum has been established. Research indicates that heating the vaccine to various temperatures for different durations does not significantly affect its safety or effectiveness. In one investigation, products from three manufacturers retained stability for at least one year at ambient temperatures of 20°C to 26°C. Additionally, one brand remained stable and effective even after being exposed to 45°C for one week or 37°C for one month. [20]. It is thus in the upper range of heat stability, together with tetanus and diphtheria toxoids. Although HB vaccine is extremely heat stable, there are not yet enough data to recommend using it entirely outside the cold chain. There is however scope for developing a management instruction that would allow removal of the vaccine from the cold chain in emergencies or in outreach activities of short duration. This vaccine is not to be frozen as with other adsorbed vaccines. The freezing point for HB vaccine is about –0.5ºC.

D] Measles Vaccine

In recent years, notable advancements have been achieved in enhancing the heat stability of the measles vaccine, largely due to established WHO guidelines and the incorporation of effective stabilizing agents. [21]. The WHO criteria specify that: (i) a freeze-dried measles vaccine must contain a minimum of 1,000 live virus particles per dose after being incubated at 37°C for seven days, and (ii) any reduction in viral titer during this process should not exceed 1 log??. Freeze-dried measles vaccine in its lyophilized form is highly stable and can withstand freezing and refreezing without damage. However, once reconstituted, its potency declines rapidly at higher temperatures. As shown in Table I, the reconstituted vaccine remains effective for about 24 hours when stored at 4°C and for approximately 16–24 hours at 26°C. [22]. Due to the risk of contamination, the reconstituted vaccine should be used within six hours, or for a single immunization session, regardless of the storage temperature. During this time, it must be kept away from high temperatures and protected from light.

E] BCG Vaccine

BCG was the first vaccine to have a WHO-defined heat stability requirement. However, standardizing its stability profile is challenging due to variations in strains and manufacturing processes. Each vaccine lot should undergo accelerated degradation testing. Research indicates that prolonged storage at higher temperatures can decrease post-vaccination allergic reactions and reduce the size of lesions at the injection site. Most freeze-dried BCG vaccines remain stable when stored between 0°C and 8°C. [23]. The stability of BCG vaccine depends on factors such as the lyophilization process, the type of stabilizer used, and the quality of ampoule sealing. Vaccines sealed under vacuum demonstrate greater stability compared to those sealed with nitrogen or argon. [24]. BCG vaccines sealed under vacuum maintain higher stability than those sealed with nitrogen or argon. Additionally, products stored in rubber-stoppered vials tend to be less stable than those preserved in ampoules. [25]. BCG vaccine should be packaged in amber-coloured glass ampoules to shield it from exposure to ultraviolet and fluorescent light. [26].

F] Oral Polio Virus Vaccine (OPV)

Although OPV is among the least stable vaccines, its durability has been enhanced in recent years through the addition of stabilizers such as magnesium chloride. An Indian study reported that the half-life of various OPV formulations was approximately 4.3 days at 22°C and 1.7 days at 36°C.[27]. OPV from most manufacturers can remain stable for up to two years when stored at –20°C, for more than six months at 2°C to 8°C, and for over 48 hours at 37°C. Vials in current use may be kept at 2°C to 8°C in the central section of a refrigerator. The freezing point ranges from –6.6°C to –8.1°C, and at freezer temperatures around –5°C, OPV may not fully solidify. Studies have shown that repeated thawing and refreezing—up to 180 cycles within the –25°C to 2.5°C range—does not reduce the vaccine’s titer.[28].It should be noted that in the study, the temperature did not exceed 2.1°C. In real-world settings, interruptions in the cold chain can expose vaccines to much higher temperatures. Therefore, these findings apply only when thawed vaccine remains within the temperature range of a properly functioning refrigerator. In practice, repeated thawing of OPV should be avoided. According to WHO guidelines, OPV should not be stored at 0°C to 8°C in health centres for longer than one month, and transport at these temperatures should not exceed one week. [29]. The introduction of Vaccine Vial Monitors (VVMs) has simplified the process of assessing vaccine stability. The heat stability of OPV is influenced by several factors, including the virus type, the stabilizer used, the pH of the suspension, the seal integrity of the vial, and the volume of air space above the vaccine.

G] Mumps and Rubella Vaccine

The heat stability of the mumps vaccine is comparable to that of measles. In Indian MMR formulations, the mumps component remains stable at 37°C for up to 21 days. Freeze-dried monovalent rubella vaccines and the rubella component in combination vaccines exhibit a low rate of degradation, with rubella being more stable than the other components in the combined formulation.

H] Hepatitis A Vaccine

This is an inactivated vaccine formulated with aluminium as an adjuvant. Studies have shown no reduction in immunogenicity when stored at 37°C for up to three weeks. [30].

I] Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) Vaccine

The lyophilized PRP-T Hib vaccine remains stable for up to 36 months when stored at refrigerator temperatures and for at least 24 months at 25°C. Once reconstituted, it should be used within six hours. The liquid form of Hib vaccine maintains stability for 24 months under refrigerated conditions.

J] Typhoid Vaccine

The Vi polysaccharide vaccine is exceptionally stable and can remain effective without a cold chain, even in tropical climates, which is a key advantage. Its immunogenicity is preserved for up to six months at 37°C and for three years at 22°C. Nonetheless, refrigeration is recommended to reduce the risk of degradation. [31]. The live oral typhoid vaccine Ty21a should be stored at 2°C to 8°C. In testing, three vaccine lots retained their potency after being kept at 37°C for 12 hours. Further evaluation showed that storage for seven days at 20°C to 25°C still met potency standards. [32].

K] Varicella Vaccine

This vaccine is highly light-sensitive and can be easily inactivated, so it must be protected from direct light both before and after reconstitution. It maintains better stability at –1°C, remains stable for up to two years when stored between 2°C and 8°C, and should be used within 30 minutes after reconstitution. [33,34].

L] Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine (IPV)

Heat stability varies among inactivated poliovirus types, with type 1 being the most sensitive. When thiomersal is used as a preservative, overall stability declines. For type 1, the D-antigen content falls sharply after 20 days at 24°C and becomes undetectable after 20 days at 32°C. In contrast, types 2 and 3 show greater resilience. Trivalent IPV can remain stable for 1 to 4 years when stored at 2°C to 4°C. [35].

MATERIAL AND METHODS

1.Calcium Phosphate as an Adjuvant in Vaccine Thermostability

C] Thermostability Enhancement

Calcium phosphate as an adjuvant enhances both the physical and chemical stability of vaccines at higher temperatures more effectively than conventional aluminum-based adjuvants like alum. It safeguards the antigen by binding it to its surface, which helps preserve the vaccine’s effectiveness even under heat exposure. Studies have demonstrated that vaccines formulated with calcium phosphate maintain their immune-stimulating properties when stored at temperatures exceeding the typical cold chain range of 2-8°C, making them especially suitable for use in tropical regions such as India.

D]  Biocompatibility and Safety

Calcium phosphate is both biocompatible and biodegradable, with a non-toxic nature. Compared to alum, it tends to produce fewer local reactions and side effects, which enhances the overall acceptance of vaccines formulated with it.

E] Immune Response Enhancement

It functions as a reservoir that gradually releases the antigen over time. This controlled release helps in generating robust humoral and cellular immune responses. Additionally, it activates both Th1 and Th2 pathways, which are essential for sustained and effective immunity.

F] Applications in Thermostable Vaccines

Calcium phosphate has been successfully utilized in vaccines containing diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and other protein subunit antigens. It shows great potential for vaccines requiring storage beyond stringent cold chain requirements. Studies from vaccine producers in India emphasize CaP as a favored adjuvant for thermostable vaccine formulations because of its affordability and enhanced stability.

G] Manufacturing and cost barriers

Developing vaccines that can tolerate higher temperatures often involves specialized stabilization approaches, including freeze-drying (lyophilization), spray-drying, or embedding the antigen in sugar-based protective matrices. While effective, these methods add layers of technical complexity and raise production expenses. For large-scale public immunization programs in India, such cost increases can be prohibitive. Consequently, manufacturers frequently opt for conventional formulations designed for cold-chain storage, as these allow high-volume production at a lower unit cost. [42].

H] Regulatory and programmatic constraints

Even when a thermostable formulation is developed, extensive stability testing and regulatory approval are required before it can be deployed. India’s vaccine procurement and distribution systems are designed around an existing cold-chain infrastructure, making the integration of new thermostable products slower unless supported by national policy and funding. [43].

I] Environmental logistic challenges in India

 Many regions in India experience extended periods of extreme heat, with temperatures often surpassing 40 °C. In rural and hard-to-reach locations, inconsistent electricity supply further limits reliable refrigeration. These conditions heighten the chances of vaccines being exposed to damaging heat during transportation or field immunization activities. While heat-stable formulations would help mitigate these risks, limited commercial incentives and insufficient focused research mean that most vaccines still rely on conventional cold-chain storage. [44].

Plotkin, S. A., Orenstein, W. A., Offit, P. A., & Edwards, K. M. (Eds.). Plotkin’s Vaccines (8th ed.). Elsevier. [45].

A] Choice of platform & antigen engineering

When feasible, vaccines should be developed using antigen platforms that naturally exhibit higher thermal stability. Examples include recombinant subunit proteins modified for heat tolerance, stabilized virus-like particles, or inactivated antigens combined with suitable stabilizers. Adjusting the genetic sequence or structural framework to eliminate unstable regions can significantly enhance the antigen’s resistance to elevated temperatures. [52].

B] Excipients and stabilizers (sugars, polyols, amino acids, antioxidants)

Incorporating stabilizing excipients like trehalose, sucrose, mannitol, specific amino acids (such as glycine or histidine), and antioxidants can help safeguard proteins and viral particles against heat-related damage, including unfolding, aggregation, and chemical breakdown. These compounds work by forming protective glass-like matrices or by preferentially hydrating the proteins, thereby reducing the rate of degradation. [53].

D] Adjuvant selection and formulation compatibility

Choose or modify adjuvants that can maintain their potency and structural integrity under elevated temperatures or in dried formulations. Since traditional options like alum are proneto freezing damage and particle aggregation, thermostable vaccines often require alternative adjuvants or strategies that preserve the adjuvant–antigen bond during storage and transport in warmer conditions. [55].

METHODS

a. Instruments

(a) Walk in cold rooms (WIC): -

Situated at regional hubs, these rooms can store vaccines for up to three months and typically serve four to five districts.

(b) Deep freezers and domestic/ice lined refrigerators (ILR) (300 L):

Installed in all districts and WIC locations, these units store vaccines for extended periods at temperatures below –20°C and are also used to prepare ice packs. OPV and measles vaccines can be stored in deep freezers. Temperature is checked twice daily—using an alcohol thermometer for deep freezers and a dial thermometer for ILRs.

(c) Small deep freezers and ILRs (140 L) are provided to PHCs and clinics.

Provided to primary health centres (PHCs) and clinics for local vaccine storage.

(d) Cold boxes or isothermal boxes are well insulated, solid and hermetically (air tight) sealed boxes.

These insulated, airtight containers are distributed to peripheral centers for transporting large quantities of vaccines, keeping them cold for several days. They are also useful during power outages. Cold packs are placed between the vaccine cartons and the box walls, with paper or polythene sheets in between to prevent direct contact and freezing.

e) Vaccine carrier or ice boxes are used to carry small quantity of vaccines for distribution or to carry the vac(cines to the outreach place of immunization session.  

Designed for small quantities of vaccines, these are used for distribution or transport to outreach immunization sessions, with cold packs placed around the vaccines inside.

(f) Day carriers

Small, lunchbox-sized containers that carry even smaller amounts of vaccines for short periods, typically a few hours, using two fully frozen ice packs.

(g) Ice packs

should be made of plain water. Should be filled with plain water up to the marked level—salt should not be added. Dry ice (solid carbon dioxide) may be used as an alternative coolant.

(h) Distribution of vaccines

Only limited quantities are sent to peripheral areas to minimize cold chain failures caused by power cuts or handling errors. Vacuum flasks should never be used for transporting vaccines to outreach sites.

• Refrigerator

A domestic refrigerator can be used to store vaccines for short durations. The main compartment generally maintains temperatures between 4°C and 10°C, while the freezer section typically ranges from 0°C to –4°C. To ensure reliable performance, certain operational guidelines should be followed [.36,37,38,39]. Position the refrigerator away from direct sunlight and keep at least 10 cm clearance from the wall to allow proper ventilation. Store cold packs in the freezer section so they can be used during power outages or placed in iceboxes when needed. Fill the shelves with plastic bottles of water (not for drinking) to help stabilize internal temperatures in case of electricity failure. Check and record the refrigerator’s temperature twice daily, and note the duration of any power cut. During outages, transfer vaccines into insulated containers to maintain their potency. When ice buildup in the freezer reaches 5 mm or more, defrost the unit, ensuring vaccines are kept in insulated boxes during the process. The refrigerator should be dedicated solely to vaccine storage, with no food, beverages, or other medicines kept inside. To preserve the internal temperature, open the door only when necessary. Vaccines should not be stored in the door compartments or baffle tray, as these areas may contain water that could freeze. Avoid placing vaccines in direct contact with ice, and ensure there is space between packages to allow proper air circulation. Maintain only the required monthly stock to reduce wastage, and prevent diluents from freezing, as frozen vials may crack or burst.

B. Procedures

In countries such as India, where ambient temperatures can be high, maintaining vaccine stability is crucial for successful immunization. Yet, the majority of vaccines used in the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) are sensitive to temperature fluctuations and must be stored within a tightly controlled range of 2–8 °C.

D] Adjuvant selection and formulation compatibility

Choose or modify adjuvants that can maintain their potency and structural integrity under elevated temperatures or in dried formulations. Since traditional options like alum are prone to freezing damage and particle aggregation, thermostable vaccines often require alternative adjuvants or strategies that preserve the adjuvant–antigen bond during storage and transport in warmer conditions. [55].

A] Antigen sensitivity to heat:

Vaccines administered in India often contain protein-based antigens, inactivated microorganisms, or live attenuated viruses. These components rely on delicate three-dimensional structures to trigger an immune response. Exposure to temperatures exceeding 8 °C can disrupt these structures, reducing the vaccine’s effectiveness. Live preparations, such as the oral polio vaccine (OPV), are particularly vulnerable to heat and can lose potency quickly in warm, tropical environments. [40].

B] Formulation and adjuvant limitations

A significant number of vaccines include aluminium-based adjuvants, such as alum, which can be damaged by both excessive heat and freezing. Achieving stability for these formulations in high-temperature settings while preserving their ability to stimulate immunity is a complex task. Moreover, some preservatives and buffering agents deteriorate when exposed to elevated temperatures, further contributing to the degradation of the antigen. [41].

A] Strengthen the cold chain infrastructure

Utilize WHO-approved cold chain devices such as ice-lined refrigerators, deep freezers, insulated cold boxes, and vaccine carriers capable of keeping temperatures between 2 °C and 8 °C for prolonged durations. In areas without reliable electricity, deploy solar-powered refrigeration units to ensure constant cooling. Upgrade older storage units with modern models that offer improved insulation and built-in systems for continuous temperature tracking. [46].

B] Improve Transport Practices

Prepare ice packs by conditioning them so they remain cool without freezing, which helps protect vaccines that are sensitive to very low temperatures. Use well-tested, insulated transport containers packed with the right number of ice packs to preserve safe storage conditions during field vaccination activities. For large-scale distribution between storage facilities, employ vehicles equipped with active refrigeration systems to keep vaccines within the recommended temperature range. [47].

D] Implement Controlled Temperature Chain (CTC) Where Possible

For vaccines with verified stability at moderately elevated temperatures—such as some meningitis formulations—apply WHO Controlled Temperature Chain (CTC) protocols, which permit storage at up to 40 °C a limited number of before days use.This approach can ease the reliance on constant refrigeration during outreach activities while preserving the vaccine’s effectiveness.[49].

E] Training and Supervision

Provide health workers with training on proper ice-pack preparation, correct vaccine packing methods, and how to identify changes in vaccine vial monitors (VVMs). Organize regular refresher. trainings and on-site supervisory visits to reinforce best practices and provide ongoing guidance. [50].

F] Research & Adoption of Thermostable Formulations

Promote research and development efforts aimed at creating thermostable vaccine formulations, including techniques such as freeze-drying, spray-drying, and stabilization in sugar-glass matrices. Collaborate with vaccine producers to develop formulations specifically adapted to withstand India’s hot and humid climate conditions. [51].

F] Container–closure systems and primary packaging

Select primary and secondary packaging that offers strong protection against moisture and oxygen, while withstanding physical stresses such as thermal fluctuations and vibration during distribution. Factors such as glass composition, stopper materials, and the inclusion of desiccants or oxygen absorbers can significantly impact product stability. Packaging in small, unit-dose formats can also help reduce wastage during outreach programs. [57].

G] Stability testing, CTC validation, and regulatory pathway

Conduct both accelerated and real-time stability studies in line with WHO and ICH recommendations to confirm that vaccines maintain potency at the intended elevated temperatures. Where suitable, collect evidence to support Controlled Temperature Chain (CTC) use. Regulatory submissions should present well-justified specifications, validated analytical methods, and field challenge data to enable labeling that permits short-term storage at higher temperatures. [58].

9.Storage and [packaging of vaccines according to India.

1]  Storage Practices

A] Long-term storage: Maintain vaccines at 2–8 °C inside an Ice-Lined Refrigerator (ILR) or Walk-In Cooler (WIC) until they are scheduled for controlled temperature chain (CTC) deployment.

B] Short-term CTC storage: Hold the vaccine within the manufacturer-approved temperature and duration limits—for many products this means up to 40 °C for a few days, but always follow the specific product guidelines.

C] Freeze protection: Prevent exposure to sub-zero temperatures, as many thermostable vaccines remain sensitive to freezing damage.

D] VVM check: Inspect the Vaccine Vial Monitor before administration to confirm the vaccine’s heat exposure has not exceeded safe limits. [46,49].

Packaging Guidelines

2] Primary Packaging (manufacturer level): Vaccines should be stored in their original cartons to prevent light exposure and minimize the risk of physical damage. Packaging and labelling must remain intact to enable accurate identification, batch number verification, and expiry date tracking. [60].

3] Secondary Packaging (transport):

A] Cold chain transport: For vaccines requiring refrigeration, use WHO-prequalified cold boxes or carriers with properly conditioned ice packs to maintain the recommended 2–8 °C range.

B] CTC transport: For vaccines approved for Controlled Temperature Chain (CTC) use, employ validated insulated carriers designed to maintain the allowed ambient conditions and protect from direct sunlight.

C] Marking for CTC Use

Clearly record the date and time when the vaccine is placed under Controlled Temperature Chain (CTC) conditions on the vial or its outer packaging. If recommended for that product, affix a peak temperature indicator to monitor any exposure beyond the approved temperature limit.

D] Handling During Outreach

Only take vaccines out of cold storage immediately before the immunization session. Store them in a shaded area, avoiding exposure to direct heat or sunlight.

•                               The Vaccine Vial Monitor (VVM) shows the discard colour stage.

•               The allowed time limit for Controlled Temperature Chain (CTC) use has been exceeded.

•      The peak temperature indicator signals that the maximum temperature threshold has been surpassed.

E] Documentation & Monitoring

Keep detailed temperature records for both cold chain and Controlled Temperature Chain (CTC) storage. Document the start and end times of CTC use in session logs. Supervisors should regularly verify the condition of Vaccine Vial Monitors (VVMs), inspect the packaging for any damage, and ensure adherence to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Mohawk) guidelines on CTC procedures. [48,49].

C. Techniques

C] Drying & solid-state approaches (lyophilization, spray-drying, sugar-glass)

Techniques such as lyophilization (freeze-drying), spray-drying, or creating sugar-glass matrices transform vaccines into a solid form, making them significantly more resistant to heat-related deterioration. While highly effective in prolonging stability at higher temperatures, these approaches demand carefully optimized processing conditions and reliable methods for reconstitution before use. [54].

E] Innovative delivery formats (microneedle patches, dry-powder inhalation, films)

Solid-state vaccine delivery platforms—such as dissolvable microneedle patches, inhalable dry powders, or thin-film dosage forms—eliminate many of the limitations associated with liquid formulations requiring a cold chain. These formats can be engineered for stability at room temperature, reducing reliance on refrigeration and streamlining both last-mile transport and administration. [56].

H] India-specific considerations (short)

Prioritize formulation development for vaccines most affected by last-mile wastage in outreach programs. Emphasize affordable stabilizers, cost-effective drying techniques, and packaging or delivery systems compatible with Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) operations. Scaling up thermostable vaccines in India can be supported through public–private collaborations and procurement strategies such as advance purchase commitments or preferential listing. [59].

C] Continuous Temperature Monitoring

Install digital data loggers equipped with alert systems to immediately detect and signal any deviations from required temperature range. Apply vaccine vial monitors—heat-sensitive labels that gradually change color when a vial has been exposed temperature over time. Implement automated notification tools that promptly inform supervisors when temperature breaches occur, enabling rapid corrective action.[48].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Calcium Phosphate used as adjuvant for thermostability

Parameter

Details / Results

Adjuvant type

Inorganic salt (naturally occurring in bone and teeth)

Mechanism of action

Acts as an antigen depot, slow release; enhances antigen uptake by APCs (antigen-presenting cells)

Thermostability contribution

Protects antigens from heat-induced denaturation, improving stability outside strict cold chain

Immune response

Strong humoral and cellular immunity; induces Th1 and Th2 responses

Comparison with Alum

Less local irritation and toxicity; higher biocompatibility; comparable adjuvanticity

Biodegradability

Biocompatible and fully resorbable (natural component of the body)

Safety profile

Low risk of granuloma or tissue accumulation compared to aluminum salts

Applications in vaccines

Diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, hepatitis B, recombinant protein vaccines

Advantages in LMICs

Cost-effective, supports thermostable vaccine formulations, suitable for low-resource settings

Limitations

Limited widespread regulatory approval compared to alum; more human trial data needed

Distributing vaccines without relying on a cold chain could greatly streamline the delivery process and facilitate integration with existing drug supply systems in developing nations. The sugar-glass drying method enables the production of vaccines that can be stored and transported at typical tropical room temperatures. [35-]. Trehalose, a disaccharide with strong long-term stabilizing properties, is utilized in vaccine manufacturing for drying and preservation. Measles vaccine dried with trehalose remains stable for up to two months at room temperature, while DTaP maintains stability for 12 weeks even at 60ºC. Attempts to dry OPV with this method, however, have been unsuccessful. Despite promising results, factors such as high regulatory costs and uncertain market demand have so far prevented the licensing of sugar-dried vaccines. Future multivalent vaccines developed with this stabilization approach could be approved for storage at temperate or tropical room temperatures. If all vaccines were stabilized in this way, refrigeration and related maintenance would no longer be necessary, potentially saving around $200 million globally each year. Calcium phosphate (CaP) has gained attention as a potential alternative to aluminum-based adjuvants for thermostable vaccine formulations. Its biocompatibility and natural presence in the human body make it a safer choice, minimizing the risks of tissue irritation, granuloma formation, and long-term accumulation. Unlike aluminum salts, which may sometimes cause local adverse reactions, CaP is biodegradable and resorbable, thereby improving its safety profile. From an immunological perspective, CaP supports both humoral and cellular immune responses, inducing a balanced Th1/Th2 response. This property is especially important for modern vaccines that rely on recombinant proteins, subunits, or peptide-based formulations, which often require stronger immunostimulation to achieve long-lasting protection

REFERENCE

  1. Matthias, D. M., Robertson, J., Garrison, M. M., Newland, S., & Nelson, C.  (2007). Freezing temperatures in the vaccine cold chain:  a systematic literature review. Vaccine, 25(20), 3980-3986.
  2. Brandau, D. T., Jones, L. S., Wiethoff, C. M., Rexroad, J., & 
  3. Middaugh, C.  R.  (2003). Thermal stability of vaccines. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 92(2), 218-231.
  4. Clénet, D.  (2018).  Accurate prediction of vaccine stability under real storage conditions and during temperature excursions. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 125, 76-84.
  5. Organizaion, W.  H.  (2009).  Guidelines on stability evaluation of vaccines. Biologicals, 37(6), 424-434.
  6. Schofield, T.  L.  (2009).  Vaccine stability study design and analysis to support product licensure. Biologicals, 37(6), 387-396.
  7. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. (2009). International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System;availability. Notice. Federal register, 74(66), 15990.
  8. Stroup, W., & Quinlan, M. (2010). Alternative shelf life estimation methodologies. In JSM Proceedings 
  9. Quinlan, M., Stroup, W., Schwenke, J., & Christopher, D.  (2013).  Evaluating the performance of the ICH guidelines for shelf life estimation. Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 23(4), 881-896.
  10. Burke, C. J., Hsu, T. A., & Volkin, D. B. (1999). Formulation, stability, and delivery of live attenuated vaccines for human use. Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 16(1).
  11. Pisal, S., Wawde, G., Salvankar, S., Lade, S., & Kadam, S. (2006). Vacuum foam drying for preservation of LaSota virus:  effect of additives. Aaps Pharmscitech, 7(3), E30-E37. 
  12. Wong, Y. L., Sampson, S., Germishuizen, W. A., Goonesekera, S., Caponetti, G., Sadoff, J., ...  & Edwards, D.  (2007).  Drying a tuberculosis vaccine without freezing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(8), 2591-2595. 
  13. Maa, Y. F., Ameri, M., Shu, C., Payne, L. G., & Chen, D. (2004).  Influenza vaccine powder formulation development:  spray?freeze?drying and stability evaluation. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 93(7), 1912-1923.
  14. Galazka A, Milstien J, Zaffran M. Thermostability of vaccines. Geneva: WHO; 1998, WHO/GPV/98.07. p. 1-60.
  15. Bishai DM. Vaccine storage practices in pediatric offices. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 193-196.
  16. Nizar A. Vaccine Storage and the Cold Chain. In: Nizar A, editor. Vaccination, 3rd edition. New Delhi; Pasteur Merieux; 1988, p. 106-110.
  17. Expanded Programme on Immunisation. The effect of freezing on the appearance, potency and toxicity of adsorbed and unadsorbed DTP vaccine. Wkly Epidemio Rec 1980; 55: 385-389, 396-398.
  18. Stainer DW, Hart FE. The stability of bacterial vaccines at elevated temperatures. Dev Bio Stand 1978; 41: 249-253.
  19. Kindt H. Stability of DTP vaccine. J Bio Stand 1974: 2: 183-187.
  20. Kohl DT. Thermostability profile of pediatric vaccines used in the EPI frame, a paper presented at a meeting on vaccine thermostability at Kuala Lumpur, 1990.
  21. Van Damme P. Heat Stability of a recombinant DNA Hepatitis B Vaccine. Vaccine 1992; 10: 366-367
  22. WHO. Report of Expert Committee on Bio-logical Standardization, 32nd report, Require-ment for measles vaccine (live), Addendum, Geneva, WHO. TRS 1982; 673: Annex 6.
  23. EPI. Heat stability of Poliovirus and Measles Vaccines. Poland. Wkly Epidemio Rec 1988; 63: 349-352.
  24. Bhushan K. Freeze dried BCG vaccine sealed in presence of nitrogen. Indian J Med Res 1975; 63: 1335-1343.
  25. Lugosi L. Mutliple comparison of dried BCG vaccines. Vaccine 1984; 2: 149-156.
  26. Landi S. Effect of light on freeze dried BCG vaccines. J Bio Stand 1977; 5: 321-326.
  27. Sokhey J. Stability of poliovirus vaccine at different temperatures. Vaccine 1988; 6: 12-13.
  28. EPI. Stability of oral polio vaccine after repeated freezing and thawing. Geneva, WHO. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 1990; 65: 207-210.
  29. EPI. Manage the cold chain system. A training module for mid-level managers, Geneva, WHO, 1985
  30. Peetermans J. Production, quality control and characterization of an inactivated Hepatitis A vaccine. Vaccine 1992; 10 (suppl. 1): S99-S101.
  31. Maguin V. A new weapon against typhoid. In: One shot typhoid protection. Hong Kong: Scientific Communications International Ltd. 1994; p. 11.
  32. Cryz SJ. Post marketing experience with live oral Ty21a vaccine. Lancet 1993; 341: 49-50.
  33. 24.American Academy of Pediatrics. Varicella Vaccine Update, Policy statement. AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 136-141.
  34. 25. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Storage and handling of immunobiologics. In William LA, Larry P, Benjamin S, Bruce W, John Iskander, John Watson, General recommendations on Immunization. Editors. Atlanta: Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report 2002; 51(RR02): 15.
  35. 26. Moynihan M, Petersen I. The durability of inactivated poliovirus vaccine. J Bio Stand 1982; 10: 261-268.
  36. 27. WHO. Technologies for vaccine delivery in the 21st century. Ed. Lloyd J, Geneva, WHO 2000; WHO/V&B/00.35:18-23.
  37. Indian Academy of Pediatrics. The Cold Chain. In: Parthsarthy A, Dutta AK, Bhave S, editors. IAP Guidebook on Immunization. 2nd edition. Mumbai: Indian Academy of Pediatrics; 2001: p 53-55.
  38. Indian Academy of Pediatrics. Cold chain. In: Desai AB, Shah RC, Dutta A, Parthsarthy A, Mittal SK, Agarwal V, et al., editors. Immunization programme in India – Need for a change. Mumbai; Indian Academy of Pediatrics; 1990. p. 8-9, 48-50.
  39. Park K. Principles of Epidemiology and Epidemiologic Methods. In: Park K, editor. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 16th edition. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2000. p. 92.
  40. Nizar A. Vaccine Storage and the Cold Chain. In: Nizar A, editor. Vaccination, 3rd edition. New Delhi; Pasteur Merieux; 1988, p. 106-110.
  41. Plotkin, S. A., Orenstein, W. A., Offit, P. A., & Edwards, K. M. (2023). Plotkin’s Vaccines (8th ed., Chapter 4: Vaccine Stability and Storage Requirements). Elsevier.
  42. olhe, P., & Ohtake, S. (2021). Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development (Chapter 9: Vaccine Formulation and Stability). Academic Press
  43. Robinson, A., & Hudson, M. J. (2015). Vaccine Development and Manufacturing (Chapter 11: Stability Considerations). Wiley.
  44. Clemens, J., & Nair, H. (2019). Vaccine Design: Methods and Protocols (Chapter 2: Regulatory Requirements for Vaccine Stability). Springer.
  45. Nair, G., & Bhatia, R. (2018). Cold Chain Management for Vaccines in Tropical Countries (Chapter 5: Temperature Sensitivity and Vaccine Potency). CRC Press.
  46. Plotkin, S. A., Orenstein, W. A., Offit, P. A., & Edwards, K. M. (Eds.). Plotkin’s Vaccines (8th ed.). Elsevier.
  47. Nair, G., & Bhatia, R. (2018). Cold Chain Management for Vaccines in Tropical Countries. CRC Press.
  48. Plotkin, S. A., Orenstein, W. A., Offit, P. A., & Edwards, K. M. (2023). Plotkin’s Vaccines (8th ed., Cold Chain chapter). Elsevier.
  49. Kolhe, P., & Ohtake, S. (2021). Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development. Academic Press.
  50. World Health Organization. Guidelines on stability evaluation of vaccines. WHO Technical Report Series.
  51. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. Immunization Handbook for Medical Officers.
  52. Robinson, A., & Hudson, M. J. (2015). Vaccine Development and Manufacturing. Wiley.
  53. Plotkin, S. A., Orenstein, W. A., Offit, P. A., & Edwards, K. M. (Eds.). Plotkin’s Vaccines, 8th ed., Chapter on stability and vaccine platforms. Elsevier, 2023.
  54. Kolhe, P., & Ohtake, S. (Eds.). Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development. Academic Press, 2021 — Chapter: excipients and stabilization strategies.
  55. Lyophilized Biologics and Vaccines: Formulation and Process Development (Springer/CRC Press), Chapter on freeze-drying and spray-drying.
  56. Robinson, A., & Hudson, M. J. Vaccine Development and Manufacturing, Chapter 11: Stability and adjuvant considerations. Wiley, 2015.
  57. Plotkin, S. A., et al. Plotkin’s Vaccines, sections on novel delivery systems and implementation. Elsevier, 2023.
  58. Kolhe, P., & Ohtake, S. Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development, Chapter on container–closure and packaging
  59. World Health Organization. Guidelines on Stability Evaluation of Vaccines; see also Plotkin’s Vaccines and Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development (Kolhe & Ohtake) for relevant methods and examples.
  60. Nair, G., & Bhatia, R. Cold Chain Management for Vaccines in Tropical Countries. CRC Press, 2018.
  61. (Kumari, Vaccine Storage and Handling in Public Health Programs, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2021).

Reference

  1. Matthias, D. M., Robertson, J., Garrison, M. M., Newland, S., & Nelson, C.  (2007). Freezing temperatures in the vaccine cold chain:  a systematic literature review. Vaccine, 25(20), 3980-3986.
  2. Brandau, D. T., Jones, L. S., Wiethoff, C. M., Rexroad, J., & 
  3. Middaugh, C.  R.  (2003). Thermal stability of vaccines. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 92(2), 218-231.
  4. Clénet, D.  (2018).  Accurate prediction of vaccine stability under real storage conditions and during temperature excursions. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 125, 76-84.
  5. Organizaion, W.  H.  (2009).  Guidelines on stability evaluation of vaccines. Biologicals, 37(6), 424-434.
  6. Schofield, T.  L.  (2009).  Vaccine stability study design and analysis to support product licensure. Biologicals, 37(6), 387-396.
  7. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. (2009). International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System;availability. Notice. Federal register, 74(66), 15990.
  8. Stroup, W., & Quinlan, M. (2010). Alternative shelf life estimation methodologies. In JSM Proceedings 
  9. Quinlan, M., Stroup, W., Schwenke, J., & Christopher, D.  (2013).  Evaluating the performance of the ICH guidelines for shelf life estimation. Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 23(4), 881-896.
  10. Burke, C. J., Hsu, T. A., & Volkin, D. B. (1999). Formulation, stability, and delivery of live attenuated vaccines for human use. Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 16(1).
  11. Pisal, S., Wawde, G., Salvankar, S., Lade, S., & Kadam, S. (2006). Vacuum foam drying for preservation of LaSota virus:  effect of additives. Aaps Pharmscitech, 7(3), E30-E37. 
  12. Wong, Y. L., Sampson, S., Germishuizen, W. A., Goonesekera, S., Caponetti, G., Sadoff, J., ...  & Edwards, D.  (2007).  Drying a tuberculosis vaccine without freezing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(8), 2591-2595. 
  13. Maa, Y. F., Ameri, M., Shu, C., Payne, L. G., & Chen, D. (2004).  Influenza vaccine powder formulation development:  spray?freeze?drying and stability evaluation. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 93(7), 1912-1923.
  14. Galazka A, Milstien J, Zaffran M. Thermostability of vaccines. Geneva: WHO; 1998, WHO/GPV/98.07. p. 1-60.
  15. Bishai DM. Vaccine storage practices in pediatric offices. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 193-196.
  16. Nizar A. Vaccine Storage and the Cold Chain. In: Nizar A, editor. Vaccination, 3rd edition. New Delhi; Pasteur Merieux; 1988, p. 106-110.
  17. Expanded Programme on Immunisation. The effect of freezing on the appearance, potency and toxicity of adsorbed and unadsorbed DTP vaccine. Wkly Epidemio Rec 1980; 55: 385-389, 396-398.
  18. Stainer DW, Hart FE. The stability of bacterial vaccines at elevated temperatures. Dev Bio Stand 1978; 41: 249-253.
  19. Kindt H. Stability of DTP vaccine. J Bio Stand 1974: 2: 183-187.
  20. Kohl DT. Thermostability profile of pediatric vaccines used in the EPI frame, a paper presented at a meeting on vaccine thermostability at Kuala Lumpur, 1990.
  21. Van Damme P. Heat Stability of a recombinant DNA Hepatitis B Vaccine. Vaccine 1992; 10: 366-367
  22. WHO. Report of Expert Committee on Bio-logical Standardization, 32nd report, Require-ment for measles vaccine (live), Addendum, Geneva, WHO. TRS 1982; 673: Annex 6.
  23. EPI. Heat stability of Poliovirus and Measles Vaccines. Poland. Wkly Epidemio Rec 1988; 63: 349-352.
  24. Bhushan K. Freeze dried BCG vaccine sealed in presence of nitrogen. Indian J Med Res 1975; 63: 1335-1343.
  25. Lugosi L. Mutliple comparison of dried BCG vaccines. Vaccine 1984; 2: 149-156.
  26. Landi S. Effect of light on freeze dried BCG vaccines. J Bio Stand 1977; 5: 321-326.
  27. Sokhey J. Stability of poliovirus vaccine at different temperatures. Vaccine 1988; 6: 12-13.
  28. EPI. Stability of oral polio vaccine after repeated freezing and thawing. Geneva, WHO. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 1990; 65: 207-210.
  29. EPI. Manage the cold chain system. A training module for mid-level managers, Geneva, WHO, 1985
  30. Peetermans J. Production, quality control and characterization of an inactivated Hepatitis A vaccine. Vaccine 1992; 10 (suppl. 1): S99-S101.
  31. Maguin V. A new weapon against typhoid. In: One shot typhoid protection. Hong Kong: Scientific Communications International Ltd. 1994; p. 11.
  32. Cryz SJ. Post marketing experience with live oral Ty21a vaccine. Lancet 1993; 341: 49-50.
  33. 24.American Academy of Pediatrics. Varicella Vaccine Update, Policy statement. AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 136-141.
  34. 25. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Storage and handling of immunobiologics. In William LA, Larry P, Benjamin S, Bruce W, John Iskander, John Watson, General recommendations on Immunization. Editors. Atlanta: Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report 2002; 51(RR02): 15.
  35. 26. Moynihan M, Petersen I. The durability of inactivated poliovirus vaccine. J Bio Stand 1982; 10: 261-268.
  36. 27. WHO. Technologies for vaccine delivery in the 21st century. Ed. Lloyd J, Geneva, WHO 2000; WHO/V&B/00.35:18-23.
  37. Indian Academy of Pediatrics. The Cold Chain. In: Parthsarthy A, Dutta AK, Bhave S, editors. IAP Guidebook on Immunization. 2nd edition. Mumbai: Indian Academy of Pediatrics; 2001: p 53-55.
  38. Indian Academy of Pediatrics. Cold chain. In: Desai AB, Shah RC, Dutta A, Parthsarthy A, Mittal SK, Agarwal V, et al., editors. Immunization programme in India – Need for a change. Mumbai; Indian Academy of Pediatrics; 1990. p. 8-9, 48-50.
  39. Park K. Principles of Epidemiology and Epidemiologic Methods. In: Park K, editor. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 16th edition. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2000. p. 92.
  40. Nizar A. Vaccine Storage and the Cold Chain. In: Nizar A, editor. Vaccination, 3rd edition. New Delhi; Pasteur Merieux; 1988, p. 106-110.
  41. Plotkin, S. A., Orenstein, W. A., Offit, P. A., & Edwards, K. M. (2023). Plotkin’s Vaccines (8th ed., Chapter 4: Vaccine Stability and Storage Requirements). Elsevier.
  42. olhe, P., & Ohtake, S. (2021). Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development (Chapter 9: Vaccine Formulation and Stability). Academic Press
  43. Robinson, A., & Hudson, M. J. (2015). Vaccine Development and Manufacturing (Chapter 11: Stability Considerations). Wiley.
  44. Clemens, J., & Nair, H. (2019). Vaccine Design: Methods and Protocols (Chapter 2: Regulatory Requirements for Vaccine Stability). Springer.
  45. Nair, G., & Bhatia, R. (2018). Cold Chain Management for Vaccines in Tropical Countries (Chapter 5: Temperature Sensitivity and Vaccine Potency). CRC Press.
  46. Plotkin, S. A., Orenstein, W. A., Offit, P. A., & Edwards, K. M. (Eds.). Plotkin’s Vaccines (8th ed.). Elsevier.
  47. Nair, G., & Bhatia, R. (2018). Cold Chain Management for Vaccines in Tropical Countries. CRC Press.
  48. Plotkin, S. A., Orenstein, W. A., Offit, P. A., & Edwards, K. M. (2023). Plotkin’s Vaccines (8th ed., Cold Chain chapter). Elsevier.
  49. Kolhe, P., & Ohtake, S. (2021). Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development. Academic Press.
  50. World Health Organization. Guidelines on stability evaluation of vaccines. WHO Technical Report Series.
  51. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. Immunization Handbook for Medical Officers.
  52. Robinson, A., & Hudson, M. J. (2015). Vaccine Development and Manufacturing. Wiley.
  53. Plotkin, S. A., Orenstein, W. A., Offit, P. A., & Edwards, K. M. (Eds.). Plotkin’s Vaccines, 8th ed., Chapter on stability and vaccine platforms. Elsevier, 2023.
  54. Kolhe, P., & Ohtake, S. (Eds.). Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development. Academic Press, 2021 — Chapter: excipients and stabilization strategies.
  55. Lyophilized Biologics and Vaccines: Formulation and Process Development (Springer/CRC Press), Chapter on freeze-drying and spray-drying.
  56. Robinson, A., & Hudson, M. J. Vaccine Development and Manufacturing, Chapter 11: Stability and adjuvant considerations. Wiley, 2015.
  57. Plotkin, S. A., et al. Plotkin’s Vaccines, sections on novel delivery systems and implementation. Elsevier, 2023.
  58. Kolhe, P., & Ohtake, S. Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development, Chapter on container–closure and packaging
  59. World Health Organization. Guidelines on Stability Evaluation of Vaccines; see also Plotkin’s Vaccines and Practical Aspects of Vaccine Development (Kolhe & Ohtake) for relevant methods and examples.
  60. Nair, G., & Bhatia, R. Cold Chain Management for Vaccines in Tropical Countries. CRC Press, 2018.
  61. (Kumari, Vaccine Storage and Handling in Public Health Programs, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2021).

Photo
Naik Shruti
Corresponding author

S.N.D College of Pharmacy, Babhulgaon, Yeola

Naik Shruti*, Thermostability of Vaccines in the Indian Context: A Review of Progress and Perspectives, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (9), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17164089

More related articles
Molecular Mechanisms of SGLT2 Inhibitors Bridging ...
Rushikesh Bhosle, Darshil Ingale, Sachin Amrutkar, Swaraj Dhande,...
Floristic Diversity of Kansari Mavli Sacred Grove ...
Kainisha Gamit, Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya , Hitesh Solanki...
A Review on Sacred Groves of South Gujarat, India...
Kainisha Gamit, Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya , Hitesh Solanki...
Related Articles
Land Accumulation and Concentration for the Development of High-Tech Agriculture...
Nguyen Mau Dung, Nguyen Duc Minh Tu, Nguyen Phuong Phuong, ...
Modern Therapeutic Approach towards Schizophrenia: A Comprehensive Review of Con...
Deep Jyoti Shah, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Pintu Kumar, Love Mahato, Kush Mahato, Dulari Majhi, Aditya Raj...
Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems in Diabetes Management: A Review...
Amin Shaikh, Pratiksha Ravankole, Priyanka Konde, Fiza Mulani, ...
Molecular Mechanisms of SGLT2 Inhibitors Bridging Glucose Lowering and Cardiac P...
Rushikesh Bhosle, Darshil Ingale, Sachin Amrutkar, Swaraj Dhande, Shreyas Kurhe, ...
More related articles
Molecular Mechanisms of SGLT2 Inhibitors Bridging Glucose Lowering and Cardiac P...
Rushikesh Bhosle, Darshil Ingale, Sachin Amrutkar, Swaraj Dhande, Shreyas Kurhe, ...
Floristic Diversity of Kansari Mavli Sacred Grove in Songadh Forest Tapi Distric...
Kainisha Gamit, Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya , Hitesh Solanki , ...
A Review on Sacred Groves of South Gujarat, India...
Kainisha Gamit, Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya , Hitesh Solanki , ...
Molecular Mechanisms of SGLT2 Inhibitors Bridging Glucose Lowering and Cardiac P...
Rushikesh Bhosle, Darshil Ingale, Sachin Amrutkar, Swaraj Dhande, Shreyas Kurhe, ...
Floristic Diversity of Kansari Mavli Sacred Grove in Songadh Forest Tapi Distric...
Kainisha Gamit, Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya , Hitesh Solanki , ...
A Review on Sacred Groves of South Gujarat, India...
Kainisha Gamit, Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya , Hitesh Solanki , ...