View Article

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is a disorder associated with high level of glucose in blood which requires prolonged therapy. Metformin hydrochloride and repaglinide are used widely to manage Type II diabetes mellitus. In this study, the objective is to formulate and assess polymeric transdermal patches for sustained delivery of drugs. Method: Solvent casting method was employed in formulating transdermal patches. Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose, Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone, and Ethyl Cellulose was used as film-forming polymers, while PEG-400 was used as a plasticizer. Six formulations (PF1–PF6) were developed and tested for various parameters. Result: FTIR analysis shows compatibility of drug and excipients. PF6 was chosen as optimised formulation showing the best overall performance with excellent flexibility, smooth appearance, thickness of 0.28 mm, Tensile strength of 0.66 kg/mm2, Percentage elongation 29.6 %, folding endurance of 236, drug content uniformity of 98.3 % and sustained drug release with 98.6% drug release over 12hr. The correlation between the Korsmeyer-Peppas kinetic equation and the experimental results of drug release kinetic data indicated that release process was diffusion-controlled and depended on the polymeric matrix. Discussion: Stability studies conducted under accelerated storage conditions suggest stability with no significant changes. Conclusion: Finding shows that polymeric transdermal patch system was successfully prepared and provided sustained drug release and shows potential of alternative to conventional therapy of diabetes mellitus.

Keywords

Diabetes Mellitus, Transdermal Patch, Metformin Hydrochloride, Repaglinide, Sustained Drug Release, Controlled Drug Delivery.

Introduction

× Popup Image

Diabetes mellitus is a disorder associated with increased level of glucose in blood as a result of issues with insulin production, utilization, or both. [1,2] This is the most prevalent endocrine disorders in the world and causes various serious issues related to heart, kidney, and nerve. [3] Glycaemic control requires lifelong treatment using medications, but traditional oral anti-diabetic drugs have various drawbacks like frequent dosage, gastrointestinal problems, poor absorption, fluctuating drug plasma levels, and low compliance. [4-6]

Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) is being used lot as a mode of administration of systemic drugs. [7,8] When drugs are administered transdermally, they will be absorbed through skin into blood in a regulated and controlled way hence prolongation of therapeutic effect. [9,10] There are various benefits that transdermal delivery systems have over the traditional routes. [11,12] Bypassing first pass effect, low irritation of the gastrointestinal tract, improved bioavailability, sustained drug release, less frequent doses, improved compliance of patients, and maintenance of relatively steady plasma levels are some benefits of TDDS. [13-15]

Metformin HCL belongs to the biguanides class of anti-diabetic agents which inhibit glucose production in liver and improve insulin action in the periphery. [16,17] Repaglinide is a drug belonging to the meglitinides group; it functions as an insulin secretagogue. [18,19] The combination therapy involving metformin and repaglinide is often used due to synergistic action of these drugs. [20,21] On the other hand, taking these medications orally results in various gastrointestinal side effects, poor absorption, first pass effect, and repeated doses of the drugs. [22-24]

Transdermal delivery of metformin hydrochloride and repaglinide needs to be considered due to the necessity of achieving sustained and uniform drug concentration in plasma. [25,26] There might be some advantages in using TDDS as a way to achieve better results through controlled drug release, maintenance of constant glucose level in blood stream, reduction of side effects, and improvement in patient compliance. [27-30] In view of the foregoing, aim of this research was to develop and assess transdermal patches consisting of metformin hydrochloride and repaglinide.

2. MATERIAL AND METHOD

2.1. Materials

Metformin Hydrochloride and Repaglinide were acquired from Tokyo Chemical Industry (India) Pvt. Ltd., Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose, Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone, Ethyl Cellulose, Polyethylene Glycol-400 and Propylene Glycol were acquired from CDH New Delhi, India. Methanol and Chloroform were purchased from Rankem, India.

2.2. Drug–Excipient Compatibility Study

For compatibility study of excipients with drug FTIR spectrometry analysis was applied to examine samples of pure medications and drug-polymer mixture in the wavenumber range of 4000-400 cm⁻¹. [31,32] The presence or absence of the specific peaks in the resulting spectrum was determined. [33]

2.3. Formulation Development

Solvent casting method was employed for preparation of transdermal patch loaded with Metformin Hydrochloride and Repaglinide. [34,35] Silicon molds of appropriate size were taken for casting purpose. [36] HPMC and PVP or Ethyl cellulose were taken in required quantity and solubilised in solvent containing of Methanol and chloroform (1:1). [37,38] Stirring was continued until a homogenous polymeric solution was obtained. [39] The drugs were dissolved in same solvent system and mixed to polymeric solution. [40]

Polyethylene Glycol-400 and Propylene Glycol are then added that are use ad plasticizer and permeation enhancer respectively. [41,42] The solution was subjected to vacuum to get bubble free casting solution. [43] The solution obtained after preparation was placed in a cleaned levelled glass petri dish which had been previously greased with glycerine. [44,45] Slow evaporation of the solvent took place at ambient temperature for 12 hr to give an invariable and flexible layer. [46,47] After drying was completed, patches were carefully retrieved from molds, and packed. [48]

Ingredients

PF1

PF2

PF3

PF4

PF5

PF6

Metformin Hydrochloride (mg)

500

500

500

500

500

500

Repaglinide (mg)

10

10

10

10

10

10

HPMC (mg)

300

250

200

300

250

200

PVP (mg)

200

250

300

-

-

-

Ethyl Cellulose (mg)

-

-

-

200

250

300

PEG-400 (ml)

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Propylene Glycol (ml)

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Methanol : Chloroform (1:1) (ml)

10

10

10

10

10

10

Table 1: Formulation Table

2.4. Evaluation of Transdermal patch

In order to assess the quality, stability, homogeneity, and release characteristics of transdermal patches prepared from metformin hydrochloride and repaglinide, certain physico-chemical, mechanical and pharmaceutical parameters were analysed. [49,50] In order to ensure the production of effective transdermal delivery systems, certain tests were carried out using standard procedures. [51,52]]

2.4.1. Physical Appearance

Visually, appearance of prepared patches was studied. The general quality and elegance of the preparation were assessed by studying the appearance of the patches under normal light conditions. [53,54]

2.4.2. Thickness

The patches obtained in each formula were measured for their thickness using the digital screw gauge at three different points. For ensuring consistency of film thickness, the mean and standard deviation of thickness was computer. [55,56]

2.4.3. Folding Endurance

For assessing physical strength of transdermal patches one patch was constantly folded in same area until it broke. Number of folds before breaking of patch is folding endurance. [57,58]

2.4.4. Drug Content Uniformity

Homogenous mixing of Repaglinide and Metformin Hydrochloride into the transdermal patches was analysed through drug content determination. [59] In drug content determination, a certain patch of known area was placed into a solvent to dissolve the drug until complete dissolution occurs by constant swirling. Drug content was determined using UV- Spectroscopy. [60]

2.4.5. Moisture Content

For determining moisture content, weight of individual patches taken and kept in desiccator which contain fused calcium chloride for an entire day and then reweighed. [61,62]

% Moisture Content = Initial Weight - Final Weight Final Weight

  × 100

2.4.6. Moisture Uptake

For this studies formulation weight was precisely recorded and kept in desiccator enclosing KCl solution. Patches were removed and weighed again after specified time intervals. [63,64]

% Moisture Uptake = Initial Weight - Final Weight Initil Weight

  × 100

2.4.7. Tensile Strength

It is performed in order to determine physical strength of formulated system. Tensile strength equipment had two clamps that fixed the transdermal patch. Then, the patch was gradually strained until it got ruptured. [65,66]

2.4.8. Percentage Elongation

Percentage elongation study was performed to evaluate elasticity and flexibility of the transdermal patches. [67,68]

% Elongation = increase in LengthOriginal Length

  × 100

2.4.9. ln-vitro Drug Release Study

To check release behaviour of Repaglinide and Metformin Hydrochloride from the patches, Franz diffusion cell system was used. [69,70] Patch was put on a dialysis membrane that was fixed between the Franz diffusion cells. The pH 7.4 PO3- buffer was maintained at a suitable temperature and constantly stirred. Sample was taken at different time and restored with fresh buffer solution. Spectrophotometric analysis was done to determine drug content in samples. [71,72]

2.4.10. Drug release kinetics

Release kinetic study of Metformin Hydrochloride and Repaglinide in the developed transdermal patches were investigated by putting data of in-vitro drug release studies in several kinetic models. [73,74]

2.4.11. Stability Studies

For evaluating the impact of storage environment on quality and performance of prepared transdermal patch, stability testing was done. [75] During study, the optimized patch was properly packed and stored under controlled temperature and humidity. Patch properties were periodically evaluated. [76]

  1. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
    1. Compatibility Study

FTIR analysis was employed to study compatibility in drugs and excipients in terms of possible drug-polymers interaction. The FTIR spectrum for pure metformin hydrochloride and repaglinide exhibited unique peaks and mixture spectra of drug and polymers retain all those peaks without any shifts or loss of peaks.

(A)

(B)

(C)

Fig 1: FTIR Spectra of (A) Metformin (B) Repaglinide (C) Drug and Polymer Mixture

3.2. Folding Endurance

Folding endurance of all patches were observed adequate, which shows flexibility. The folding endurance increases with increase in concentration of ethyl cellulose or PVP and found in range of 80 to 96 while PF6 shows highest value of 96. (Table 2) 

    1. Tensile Strength

Tensile strength of patches was found between 0.32 kg/cm2 and 0.61 kg/cm2 with PF6 with highest tensile strength of 0.61 kg/mm2. All formulations exabits good tensile strength. (Table 2)

    1. Percentage Elongation

% Elongation of the patches was found to be in between 21.4 % and 29.6%. The standard deviation value shows that method of formulation development is reproducible which give uniform result. (Table 2)

3.5. Thickness

Thickness of patches were between 0.24 and 0.31 mm. All patches show uniform thickness with little standard deviation of 0.02. (Table 2)

Formulation

Folding Endurance

Tensile Strength (kg/mm²)

Percentage Elongation (%)

Thickness (mm)

PF1

80 ± 0.5

0.32 ± 0.010

21.4 ± 0.004

0.47 ± 0.02

PF2

86 ± 0.5

0.37 ± 0.005

23.9 ± 0.003

0.51 ± 0.01

PF3

92 ± 1.0

0.48 ± 0.006

26.1 ± 0.004

0.51 ± 0.01

PF4

84 ± 0.6

0.38 ± 0.010

27.2 ± 0.002

0.48 ± 0.01

PF5

88 ± 1.0

0.51 ± 0.010

27.8 ± 0.005

0.49 ± 0.02

PF6

96 ± 1.0

0.61 ± 0.005

29.6 ± 0.006

0.47 ± 0.01

Table 2: Evaluation of Transdermal Patch

    1. Moisture Content and Moisture Uptake

Moisture contents of patches were found in the range 1.23 to 2.11 %. Moisture uptake by patches was in the range 4.1 to 6.7 %. With increase in concentration of HPMC moisture contents and moisture uptake percentage increases while it observed low with high concentration of PVP or ethyl cellulose. Low value of moisture uptake is good for stability of formulation. (Table 3)

    1. Drug Content Studies

From this study it is found that all formulation shows satisfactory drug content which range between 92.4-98.3 % with PF6 showing highest percentage of drug content. (Table 3).

Formulation

Moisture Content (%)

Moisture Uptake (%)

Drug Content (%)

PF1

2.11 ± 0.15

6.7 ± 0.20

92.17 ± 0.05

PF2

1.91 ± 0.12

5.9 ± 0.17

94.16 ± 0.04

PF3

1.60 ± 0.10

5.3 ± 0.10

96.57 ± 0.01

PF4

1.77 ± 0.06

5.1 ± 0.15

98.58 ± 0.04

PF5

1.57 ± 0.13

4.7 ± 0.06

96.81 ± 0.02

PF6

1.23 ± 0.15

4.1 ± 0.20

    1. ± 0.03

Table 3: Evaluation of Transdermal Patches

    1. ln-vitro Drug Release Study

The results of drug release study are given in table 4 and shown in figure 4, 5 and 6. Formulation PF4 shows highest percentage drug release 98.6 % over 12 hr time period. The percentage drug release of formulation PF1, PF2, PF3, PF4, PF5 and PF6 was 89.5%, 90.6 %, 93.8%, 98.6%, 86.2% and 84.3% respectively. The drug release from patch was in order as PF6 > PF5 > PF4 > PF3 > PF2 > PF1.

Time (hr)

% Drug reIease

PF1

PF2

PF3

PF4

PF5

PF6

1

15.2

16.8

17.4

12.2

13.4

14.1

2

25.8

27.5

27.6

21.6

22.7

24.3

4

40.8

43.1

44.2

35.9

37.6

39.4

6

54.1

56.2

55.4

48.5

50.3

52.8

8

66.4

67.8

67.6

60.8

62.7

65.2

10

78.1

79.2

79.4

72.6

74.8

77.4

12

89.5

90.6

93.8

84.3

86.2

98.6

Table 4: ln-vitro Drug ReIease of Transdermal Patches

Fig 2: % Drug Release of PF1 and PF2

Fig 3: % Drug Release of PF1 and PF2

Fig 4: % Drug Release of PF1 and PF2

3.2.12. Drug Release Kinetics

Kinetic Model

Linear Equation

R² Value

Zero Order

y = 7.2576x + 8.5316

0.9939

First Order

y = -0.1274x + 2.2556

0.7138

Higuchi Model

y = 32.389x – 22.392

0.9730

Hixson–Crowell Model

y = -0.2542x + 4.9041

0.8608

Korsmeyer–Peppas Model

y = 0.7332x + 1.1550

0.9967

Table 5: Drug Release Kinetics Data

In-vitro drug release data of PF6 was analysed in various models. Among these kinetic models, Korsmeyer-Peppas model has highest value of R² i.e. 0.9967, (Table 5) then follow the Zero-order (R² = 0.9939) and Higuchi (R² = 0.9730) models. Hixson-Crowell and First-order models had relatively low R² (R² = 0.8610; R² = 0.7138). Thus, drug release of prepared transdermal patch is mainly governed by Korsmeyer-Peppas kinetic model.

The great correspondence to the Zero order model proves that the developed system was able to provide a practically constant rate of drug release during the period of observation, which is the desired property for sustained transdermal drug delivery systems. Moreover, the perfect correlation to the Higuchi model shows that diffusion is major factors regulating process of drug release from the patch. The low R² value for First order model shows that release is not concentration-dependent.

3.2.13. Stability Studies

Accelerated stability study was performed on PF6. (table 6) Physical attributes of patch and in-vitro release pattern were checked over three months of storage. Results from stability analysis indicated that in the course of storage, physical properties and the release pattern of formulation show no significant change.

Parameter

Initial

1 Month

2 Months

3 Months

Folding Endurance

236

235

233

232

Tensile Strength (kg/mm²)

0.66

0.66

0.66

0.65

Percentage Elongation (%)

29.6

29.6

29.1

28.8

Percentage Drug Release (12h)

98.6

98.5

98.1

97.9

Table 6: Stability Study of Optimized Formulation (F4)

CONCLUSION

Aim of this study was formulation and evaluation of polymeric transdermal patches for sustained release of Metformin Hydrochloride and Repaglinide. Solvent casting method was employed for development of patches. FTIR shows compatibility between drug and excipient. The result shows prepared transdermal patches have acceptable physicochemical properties and in-vitro release studies showed sustained release behaviour of drug. Drug release from patch increases with increase in conc of polymer PVP and ethyl cellulose. This shows that the optimum concentration of polymer HPMC and Ethyle Cellulose or PVP is required for desired drug release. PF6 was chosen as optimized formulation because of its superior mechanical properties, drug content and maximum cumulative drug release of 98.6%. Finding shows that polymeric transdermal patch system was successfully prepared and provided sustained drug release and shows potential of alternative to conventional therapy of diabetes mellitus.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Sr. No.

Abbreviation

Full Form

1

TDDS

Transdermal Drug Delivery System

2

HPMC

Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose

3

PVP

Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone

4

PEG

Polyethylene Glycol

5

FTIR

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

6

UV

Ultraviolet

7

PF

Patch Formulation

8

HCl

Hydrochloride

9

RPM

Revolutions Per Minute

10

°C

Degree Celsius

11

hr

Hour

12

mg

Milligram

13

ml

Millilitre

14

mm

Millimetre

15

kg/mm²

Kilogram per Square Millimetre

16

SD

Standard Deviation

17

POâ‚„ Buffer

Phosphate Buffer

18

Regression Coefficient

19

EC

Ethyl Cellulose

20

API

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient

21

QbD

Quality by Design

22

DLS

Dynamic Light Scattering

23

DM

Diabetes Mellitus

24

CDR

Cumulative Drug Release

25

FLT

Folding Endurance Test

26

TFT

Total Folding Time

27

USP

United States Pharmacopeia

LIST OF TABLE

Sr. No.

Table No.

Title

1

Table 1

Formulation Composition of Metformin Hydrochloride and Repaglinide Transdermal Patches (PF1–PF6)

2

Table 2

Evaluation of Transdermal Patches: Folding Endurance, Tensile Strength, Percentage Elongation and Thickness

3

Table 3

Evaluation of Transdermal Patches: Moisture Content, Moisture Uptake and Drug Content

4

Table 4

In-vitro Drug Release Profile of Transdermal Patches (PF1–PF6)

5

Table 5

Drug Release Kinetic Model Analysis of Optimized Formulation

6

Table 6

Stability Study of Optimized Formulation (PF4)

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure No.

Title

Figure 1 (A)

FTIR Spectrum of Metformin Hydrochloride

Figure 1 (B)

FTIR Spectrum of Repaglinide

Figure 1 (C)

FTIR Spectrum of Drug–Polymer Mixture

Figure 4

Comparative In-vitro Drug Release Profile of PF1 and PF2

Figure 5

Comparative In-vitro Drug Release Profile of PF3 and PF4

Figure 6

Comparative In-vitro Drug Release Profile of PF5 and PF6

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript. The authors confirm that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to J. S. Singh Institute of Pharmacy, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh, for providing the necessary academic support, infrastructure, and resources to carry out this work.

We also extend our heartfelt thanks to all faculty members and colleagues for their valuable guidance, encouragement, and constructive suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript.

The authors acknowledge the use of institutional facilities and library resources that greatly contributed to the successful completion of this review work.

No specific financial support was received for this study unless otherwise stated.

REFERENCES

  1. Hussain M, Hafeez A, Kushwaha SP. Nanoformulation mediated transdermal delivery of anti-diabetic drugs: an updated review. Intelligent Pharmacy. 2023 Dec 1;1(4):192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipha.2023.08.009
  2. Ahad A, Al-Saleh AA, Akhtar N, Al-Mohizea AM, Al-Jenoobi FI. Transdermal delivery of antidiabetic drugs: formulation and delivery strategies. Drug Discovery Today. 2015 Oct 1;20(10):1217-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.06.002
  3. Adepu S, Ramakrishna S. Controlled drug delivery systems: current status and future directions. Molecules. 2021 Sep 29;26(19):5905. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195905
  4. Migdadi EM, Courtenay AJ, Tekko IA, McCrudden MT, Kearney MC, McAlister E, McCarthy HO, Donnelly RF. Hydrogel-forming microneedles enhance transdermal delivery of metformin hydrochloride. Journal of controlled release. 2018 Sep 10;285:142-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.07.009
  5. El-Ridy MS, Yehia SA, Elsayed I, Younis MM, Abdel-Rahman RF, El-Gamil MA. Metformin hydrochloride and wound healing: from nanoformulation to pharmacological evaluation. Journal of liposome research. 2019 Oct 2;29(4):343-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982104.2018.1556291
  6. KHAN S, JAN SU, GUL R, QADIR MA, SHAH KU. Formulation and evaluation of metformin hcl release from topical preparation using two different types of membrane. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research. 2020 Jul 15:97-101. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2020v12i4.39091
  7. Kulkarni P, Ahmed KA, Shirsand SB, Raikar PK, Hiraskar A. Transdermal patches: design, evaluation, and potential applications in modern therapeutics. Biomedical Materials & Devices. 2026 Jun;4(2):1609-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-025-00359-5
  8. Patel RP, Patel G, Baria A. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of aceclofenac. International Journal of Drug Delivery. 2009 Jul 5;1(1):41-51. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/651909
  9. Arora P, Mukherjee B. Design, development, physicochemical, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of transdermal patches containing diclofenac diethylammonium salt. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2002 Sep 1;91(9):2076-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.10200
  10. Kanikkannan N, Andega S, Burton S, Babu RJ, Singh M. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of transdermal patches of melatonin. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 2004 Jan 1;30(2):205-12. https://doi.org/10.1081/DDC-120028716
  11. Aggarwal G, Dhawan S, Hari Kumar SL. Formulation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of transdermal patches containing risperidone. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 2013 Jan 1;39(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2012.657643
  12. Gupta R, Mukherjee B. Development and in vitro evaluation of diltiazem hydrochloride transdermal patches based on povidone–ethylcellulose matrices. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 2003 Jan 1;29(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1081/DDC-120016678
  13. Shehata TM, Mohafez O, Hanieh HN. Pharmaceutical formulation and biochemical evaluation of atorvastatin transdermal patches. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2018 Jan 1;52:54-61. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.52.1.6
  14. Hai NT, Kim J, Park ES, Chi SC. Formulation and biopharmaceutical evaluation of transdermal patch containing benztropine. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2008 Jun 5;357(1-2):55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.01.024
  15. Bácskay I, Hosszú Z, Budai I, Ujhelyi Z, Fehér P, Kósa D, Haimhoffer Á, PetÅ‘ Á. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches containing BGP-15. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Dec 27;16(1):36.  https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16010036
  16. Sobhani H, Karimi M, Alibolandi M, Rahbardar MG, Kamali H, Hosseinzadeh H. Preparation and characterization of metformin-loaded transdermal formulations based on liquid crystalline lipid particles in diabetic-induced rats. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2025 Mar 1;105:106634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2025.106634
  17. Kumar A, Maurya P, Narayan KP. Fabrication of Polymeric Matrix Type Transdermal Patch Containing Glimepiride for Therapeutic Management of Type-2 Diabetes. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education & Research. 2025 Jul 1;59(3). https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.20250924
  18. Prajapati ST, Patel CG, Patel CN. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of repaglinide. International Scholarly research notices. 2011;2011(1):651909. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/651909
  19. Panda S, Das S. Formulation and evaluation of inclusion complexed repaglinide with β-cyclodextrin transdermal patches. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022(I):12812-24. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.8590
  20. Bhairam M, Prasad J, Verma K, Jain P, Gidwani B. Formulation of transdermal patch of Losartan Potassium & Glipizide for the treatment of hypertension & diabetes. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023 Jan 1;83:59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.147
  21. Kaushik U, Joshi SC. Formulation and evaluation of Momordica charantia fruit extract based transdermal drug delivery against diabetes. Biomedical and Therapeutics Letters. 2024 May 16;11(1):905-. https://doi.org/10.62110/sciencein.btl.2024.v11.905
  22. Shivhare S, Jain AP, Jain T, Vishwakarma R, Vishwakarma P, Prajapati S, Jain A. Formulation, Development and Characterization of Transdermal Patches of Glipizide. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharma Research. 2022 Sep 15;8(3):1-7. https://doi.org/10.22270/ijmspr.v8i3.47
  23. Kaur H, Rathore S, Kaur S, Singh MP, Srivastava V, Anand A. Formulation Development, Characterization, And Optimization Of Teneligliptin-Embedded Transdermal Patches For The Management Of Diabetes Mellitus. Vascular and Endovascular Review. 2025 Dec 15;8(20s):10-8. https://verjournal.com/index.php/ver/article/view/1475
  24. Das PS, Saha PU. Design and characterisation of transdermal patches of Phenformin hydrochloride. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2017 Nov 14;9(6):90-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2017v9i6.23437
  25. Chauhan SB, Naved TA, Parvez NA. Formulation and development of transdermal drug delivery system of ethinylestradiol and testosterone: in vitro evaluation. Int J App Pharm. 2019 Jan 1;11(1):55-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2019v11i1.28564
  26. Latha AM, Ravikiran TN, Kumar JS. Formulation, Optimization and Evaluation of Glibenclamide Transdermal Patches by using chitosan Polymer. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019;9(1):1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2231-5713.2019.00001.1
  27. Cherukuri S, Batchu UR, Mandava K, Cherukuri V, Ganapuram KR. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery of topiramate. International journal of pharmaceutical investigation. 2017 Jan;7(1):10. https://doi.org/10.4103/jphi.JPHI_35_16
  28. Shivalingam MR, Balasubramanian AR, Ramalingam KO. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of pantoprazole sodium. Int J App Pharm. 2021 Sep 7;13(5):287-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2021v13i5.42175
  29. Jacob L, Manju Salim S, Saju J. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of selegiline. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022 Apr;12(2):96-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.52711/2231-5713.2022.00016
  30. R. Madan J, S. Argade N, Dua K. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of donepezil. Recent patents on drug delivery & formulation. 2015 Apr 1;9(1):95-103. https://doi.org/10.2174/1872211308666141028213615
  31. Thakur N, Goswami M, Deka Dey A, Kaur B, Sharma C, Kumar A. Fabrication and Synthesis of Thiococlchicoside Loaded Matrix Type Transdermal Patch. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. 2024 Apr 1;12(2):143-54. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211738511666230606120828
  32. Maskare RG, Mishra MU, Bansod HD, Sahoo II, Chure IM, Thule SG, Agrawal HR. Formulation and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Herbal Patches. Research Journal of Topical and Cosmetic Sciences. 2024 Jul 1;15(2):91-7. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5844.2024.00016
  33. Shirisha S, Sahoo SK, Veena T, Rao YM. Design and Evaluation of Different Transdermal Therapeutic Systems of Promethazine Hydrochloride. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education & Research. 2024 Jan 2;58. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.58.1s.13
  34. Tadhi N, Chopra H, Sharma GK. Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal patch of Methimazole. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021 Sep 1;14(9):4667-72. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360x.2021.00811
  35. Rajasekhar B, Reddy BH, Farheen GA, Anjinappa J, Krishna KR, Srilatha P, Farida S. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of carbamazepine. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;22(2):1601-1. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.2.1549
  36. Gajbhiye K, Hakam N, Rathod G, Tawar M. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of benidipine hydrochloride. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021 Jul;11(3):207-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.52711/2231-5713.2021.00034
  37. Soral M, Nanjappa SH, Alayadan P. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of rabeprazole sodium. Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021 Jul 1;10(2):240-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_126_20
  38. Akhlaq M, Arshad MS, Mudassir AM, Hussain A, Kucuk I, Haj-Ahmad R, Rasekh M, Ahmad Z. Formulation and evaluation of anti-rheumatic dexibuprofen transdermal patches: a quality-by-design approach. Journal of drug targeting. 2016 Aug 8;24(7):603-12. https://doi.org/10.3109/1061186X.2015.1116538
  39. Mahajan NM, Zode GH, Mahapatra DK, Thakre S, Dumore N, Gangane PS. Formulation development and evaluation of transdermal patch of piroxicam for treating dysmenorrhoea. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2018 Nov 30;8(11):035-41. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2018.81105
  40. Imtiaz MS, Shoaib MH, Yousuf RI, Ali FR, Saleem MT, Khan MZ, Sikandar M. Formulation development and evaluation of drug-in-adhesive-type transdermal patch of metoclopramide HCl. Polymer Bulletin. 2022 Feb;79(2):1187-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03559-3
  41. Jamaludin WB, Muthia R, Kartini K, Setiawan F, Juhrah S, Yulida N. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches from Eleutherine bulbosa Urb. bulb extract with plasticizer variations. International Journal Of Applied Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(1):94-7. https://journals.innovareacademics.in/index.php/ijap/article/view/46421/29406
  42. Suwandecha T, Changklang P. Formulation development and characterization of a transdermal patch containing Crinum asiaticum leaves extract. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2023 Dec 5;13(12):207-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2023.151643
  43. Soni R, Jain AK, Jain UK. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of antipsychotic drug to overcome nervous emotional disease. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development. 2025 Feb 15;13(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.22270/ajprd.v13i1.1497
  44. Lei Y, Yang G, Du F, Yi J, Quan L, Liu H, Zhou X, Gong W, Han J, Wang Y, Gao C. Formulation and evaluation of a drug-in-adhesive patch for transdermal delivery of colchicine. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Oct 21;14(10):2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102245
  45. Nandi S, Mondal S. Fabrication and evaluation of matrix type novel transdermal patch loaded with tramadol hydrochloride. Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2022 Oct 31;19(5):572. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjps.galenos.2021.43678
  46. Valeveti SK, Pashikanti SH. Design, development, and evaluation of transdermal patches containing memantine hydrochloride. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(5):181-97. https://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2023v15i5.48481
  47. Latif MS, Al-Harbi FF, Nawaz A, Rashid SA, Farid A, Mohaini MA, Alsalman AJ, Hawaj MA, Alhashem YN. Formulation and evaluation of hydrophilic polymer based methotrexate patches: in vitro and in vivo characterization. Polymers. 2022 Mar 24;14(7):1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071310
  48. Rai A, Sharma R, Dewangan HK. Formulation and evaluation of polymeric transdermal patch of Meloxicam. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022 Jan 1;68:803-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.156
  49. Mo L, Lu G, Ou X, Ouyang D. Formulation and development of novel control release transdermal patches of carvedilol to improve bioavailability for the treatment of heart failure. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2022 Jan 1;29(1):266-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.088
  50. Alissa I, Nair AB, Aldhubiab B, Shah H, Shah J, Mewada V, Almuqbil RM, Jacob S. Design, development, and evaluation of treprostinil embedded adhesive transdermal patch. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Apr 12;15(4):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041226
  51. Gadag S, Narayan R, Nayak Y, Garg S, Nayak UY. Design, development and evaluation of Resveratrol transdermal patches for breast cancer therapy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 5;632:122558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122558
  52. Patil AS, Birkodi S, Masareddy RS, Rajpurohit M. Fabrication, optimization, and evaluation of transdermal patch: as an alternative and effective transdermal delivery system for nebivolol HCl. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. 2024 Feb;12(1):79-89. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211738511666230601103658
  53. Sabareesh M, Rajangam J, Prakash Raj K, P. Yanadaiah J. Formulation and evaluation of novel vesicular nanoethosomal patches for transdermal delivery of zidovudine: In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo pharmacokinetic investigations. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology. 2026 Jun 7;47(7):1386-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2024.2444976
  54. Magfirah M, Utami IK. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of leaf ethanol extract Lantana Camara Linn with ethyl cellulose-poly vinyl pyrolidone polymer variations. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2022;15(3):284-9. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.15.3.0915
  55. Makanoneng DS, Suwitono MR, Sulastri T. Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Patch from Extract of Babadotan Leaves. Jurnal Biologi Tropis. 2025 May 2;25(2):1508-13. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbt.v25i2.8761
  56. Devhare LD, Hiradeve S, Uplanchiwar V, Thakare V, Mane NS, Suruse PB, Channe K. Development and In-Vitro Categorization of Cilnidipine-loaded Transdermal Patches: Design, Evaluation, and Performance Assessment. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2026 Aug;21(4):406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-026-10583-1
  57. Sk V, Pashikanti S. Design, Development, and Evaluation of Transdermal Patches Containing Donepezil Hydrochloride. Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 2023;13:576-83. https://doi.org/10.25258/ijddt.13.2.18
  58. Ghosh M, Banga AK. Formulation and evaluation of a transdermal drug-in-adhesive patch for lamotrigine delivery in potential epilepsy treatment. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2025 Aug 1;110:107067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107067
  59. Alhaushey L, Ahmad RD. Formulation and evaluation of celecoxib transdermal patches. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023 Apr 1;16(4):1574-80. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00257
  60. Parveen MD, Reddy YK. Formulation and evaluation of herbal transdermal patch of olea europaea to study anti-inflammatory activity. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2025;17(2):149-52. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5836.2025.00024
  61. Sharma P, Tailang M. Primaquine-loaded transdermal patch for treating malaria: design, development, and characterization. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2022 Oct 27;8(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-022-00433-5
  62. Chabru AS, Salve PS, Ghumare GD, Dhamak RS, Tiwari DR, Waghmare DS. Comparative pharmacokinetic studies of transferosomes loaded gel and pressure sensitive adhesive based patch formulation for transdermal delivery of benztropine mesylate. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2024 Feb 1;92:105287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.105287
  63. Dubal RB, Mulla JA, Kapse MV. Design, development and characterization of ketorolac tromethamine-loaded transdermal patches. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences. 2024;12(2):144-50. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jpbs.2024.021
  64. Sampaopan Y, Suksaeree J. Formulation development and pharmaceutical evaluation of Lysiphyllum strychnifolium topical patches for their anti-inflammatory potential. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2022 Apr 19;23(5):116. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-022-02269-x
  65. Hassam H, Shoaib MH, Yousuf RI, Ali FR, Siddiqui F, Irshad A. Formulation development and evaluation of nimesulide transdermal gel patch system. Polymer Bulletin. 2022 Jul;79(7):5121-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03764-0
  66. Manikpuriya S, Gandakhe I, Shinde N, Pawar S, Sanap D. Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Patch Containing Withania Coagulans. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development. 2024;12(3):66-74. https://doi.org/10.22270/ajprd.v11i3.1396
  67. Abdullah HM, Farooq M, Adnan S, Masood Z, Saeed MA, Aslam N, Ishaq W. Development and evaluation of reservoir transdermal polymeric patches for controlled delivery of diclofenac sodium. Polymer Bulletin. 2023 Jun;80(6):6793-818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-022-04390-0
  68. Shrestha N, Banga AK. Development and evaluation of transdermal delivery system of tranylcypromine for the treatment of depression. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 2023 Apr;13(4):1048-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-022-01269-5
  69. Santi TD, Siregar TN, Sutriana A, Andini R, Candra A. Phytochemical test and optimization of transdermal patches of Carica papaya extract: Formulation design of candidate drug for wound healing. Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity. 2022 Jun 1;23(6). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230617
  70. Jamshaid MA, Abbas M, Yousaf M, Younas M, Muzaffar H, Hussain T, Nawaz RA. Formulation and evaluation of sustained release domperidone hydrochloride transdermal patches to treat motion sickness. Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy. 2022 Dec 31;6(2):41-8. https://doi.org/10.56770/jcp2022621
  71. Qadir A, Jan SU, Shoaib MH, Sikandar M, Yousuf RI, Ali FR, Siddiqui F, Magsi AJ, Mustafa G, Saleem MT, Mohammad S. Formulation development and evaluation, in silico PBPK modeling and in vivo pharmacodynamic studies of clozapine matrix type transdermal patches. Scientific Reports. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81918-6
  72. Kumar M, Bose P, Singh AP, Singh AP. Formulation And Evaluation of Betulinic Acid Loaded Transdermal Patches. Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics. 2025 Jan 1;15(1). https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v15i1.6951
  73. Ghodke A, Taose S, Rathore P, Joshi N, Panwar AS. Formulation, Optimisation and Evaluation of Levodopa and Entacapone Loaded Transdermal Patches for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Drug Delivery. 2024;14(2):1044-50. https://doi.org/10.25258/ijddt.14.2.66
  74. Likhitha Ananthu & Anie Vijetha K. Formulation and Evaluation of Simvastatin Transdermal Drug Delivery System. Saudi J Med Pharm Sci. 2022;8(10):527-35. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjmps.2022.v08i10.006
  75. Nadendla R, PRIYANKA P. Optimizing transdermal patch formulation for enhanced delivery of rivaroxaban: a comprehensive design of experiments approach. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024 Dec 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2024v16i12.51075
  76. TS VB, Awdesh JV, Ansari MS. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of decongestant drug. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2022 Jul 16;14(3):195-8. https://doi.org/10.52711/0975-4377.2022.00031

Reference

  1. Hussain M, Hafeez A, Kushwaha SP. Nanoformulation mediated transdermal delivery of anti-diabetic drugs: an updated review. Intelligent Pharmacy. 2023 Dec 1;1(4):192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipha.2023.08.009
  2. Ahad A, Al-Saleh AA, Akhtar N, Al-Mohizea AM, Al-Jenoobi FI. Transdermal delivery of antidiabetic drugs: formulation and delivery strategies. Drug Discovery Today. 2015 Oct 1;20(10):1217-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.06.002
  3. Adepu S, Ramakrishna S. Controlled drug delivery systems: current status and future directions. Molecules. 2021 Sep 29;26(19):5905. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195905
  4. Migdadi EM, Courtenay AJ, Tekko IA, McCrudden MT, Kearney MC, McAlister E, McCarthy HO, Donnelly RF. Hydrogel-forming microneedles enhance transdermal delivery of metformin hydrochloride. Journal of controlled release. 2018 Sep 10;285:142-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.07.009
  5. El-Ridy MS, Yehia SA, Elsayed I, Younis MM, Abdel-Rahman RF, El-Gamil MA. Metformin hydrochloride and wound healing: from nanoformulation to pharmacological evaluation. Journal of liposome research. 2019 Oct 2;29(4):343-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982104.2018.1556291
  6. KHAN S, JAN SU, GUL R, QADIR MA, SHAH KU. Formulation and evaluation of metformin hcl release from topical preparation using two different types of membrane. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research. 2020 Jul 15:97-101. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2020v12i4.39091
  7. Kulkarni P, Ahmed KA, Shirsand SB, Raikar PK, Hiraskar A. Transdermal patches: design, evaluation, and potential applications in modern therapeutics. Biomedical Materials & Devices. 2026 Jun;4(2):1609-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-025-00359-5
  8. Patel RP, Patel G, Baria A. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of aceclofenac. International Journal of Drug Delivery. 2009 Jul 5;1(1):41-51. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/651909
  9. Arora P, Mukherjee B. Design, development, physicochemical, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of transdermal patches containing diclofenac diethylammonium salt. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2002 Sep 1;91(9):2076-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.10200
  10. Kanikkannan N, Andega S, Burton S, Babu RJ, Singh M. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of transdermal patches of melatonin. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 2004 Jan 1;30(2):205-12. https://doi.org/10.1081/DDC-120028716
  11. Aggarwal G, Dhawan S, Hari Kumar SL. Formulation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of transdermal patches containing risperidone. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 2013 Jan 1;39(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2012.657643
  12. Gupta R, Mukherjee B. Development and in vitro evaluation of diltiazem hydrochloride transdermal patches based on povidone–ethylcellulose matrices. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 2003 Jan 1;29(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1081/DDC-120016678
  13. Shehata TM, Mohafez O, Hanieh HN. Pharmaceutical formulation and biochemical evaluation of atorvastatin transdermal patches. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2018 Jan 1;52:54-61. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.52.1.6
  14. Hai NT, Kim J, Park ES, Chi SC. Formulation and biopharmaceutical evaluation of transdermal patch containing benztropine. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2008 Jun 5;357(1-2):55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.01.024
  15. Bácskay I, Hosszú Z, Budai I, Ujhelyi Z, Fehér P, Kósa D, Haimhoffer Á, Pető Á. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches containing BGP-15. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Dec 27;16(1):36.  https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16010036
  16. Sobhani H, Karimi M, Alibolandi M, Rahbardar MG, Kamali H, Hosseinzadeh H. Preparation and characterization of metformin-loaded transdermal formulations based on liquid crystalline lipid particles in diabetic-induced rats. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2025 Mar 1;105:106634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2025.106634
  17. Kumar A, Maurya P, Narayan KP. Fabrication of Polymeric Matrix Type Transdermal Patch Containing Glimepiride for Therapeutic Management of Type-2 Diabetes. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education & Research. 2025 Jul 1;59(3). https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.20250924
  18. Prajapati ST, Patel CG, Patel CN. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of repaglinide. International Scholarly research notices. 2011;2011(1):651909. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/651909
  19. Panda S, Das S. Formulation and evaluation of inclusion complexed repaglinide with β-cyclodextrin transdermal patches. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022(I):12812-24. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.8590
  20. Bhairam M, Prasad J, Verma K, Jain P, Gidwani B. Formulation of transdermal patch of Losartan Potassium & Glipizide for the treatment of hypertension & diabetes. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023 Jan 1;83:59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.147
  21. Kaushik U, Joshi SC. Formulation and evaluation of Momordica charantia fruit extract based transdermal drug delivery against diabetes. Biomedical and Therapeutics Letters. 2024 May 16;11(1):905-. https://doi.org/10.62110/sciencein.btl.2024.v11.905
  22. Shivhare S, Jain AP, Jain T, Vishwakarma R, Vishwakarma P, Prajapati S, Jain A. Formulation, Development and Characterization of Transdermal Patches of Glipizide. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharma Research. 2022 Sep 15;8(3):1-7. https://doi.org/10.22270/ijmspr.v8i3.47
  23. Kaur H, Rathore S, Kaur S, Singh MP, Srivastava V, Anand A. Formulation Development, Characterization, And Optimization Of Teneligliptin-Embedded Transdermal Patches For The Management Of Diabetes Mellitus. Vascular and Endovascular Review. 2025 Dec 15;8(20s):10-8. https://verjournal.com/index.php/ver/article/view/1475
  24. Das PS, Saha PU. Design and characterisation of transdermal patches of Phenformin hydrochloride. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2017 Nov 14;9(6):90-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2017v9i6.23437
  25. Chauhan SB, Naved TA, Parvez NA. Formulation and development of transdermal drug delivery system of ethinylestradiol and testosterone: in vitro evaluation. Int J App Pharm. 2019 Jan 1;11(1):55-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2019v11i1.28564
  26. Latha AM, Ravikiran TN, Kumar JS. Formulation, Optimization and Evaluation of Glibenclamide Transdermal Patches by using chitosan Polymer. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019;9(1):1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2231-5713.2019.00001.1
  27. Cherukuri S, Batchu UR, Mandava K, Cherukuri V, Ganapuram KR. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery of topiramate. International journal of pharmaceutical investigation. 2017 Jan;7(1):10. https://doi.org/10.4103/jphi.JPHI_35_16
  28. Shivalingam MR, Balasubramanian AR, Ramalingam KO. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of pantoprazole sodium. Int J App Pharm. 2021 Sep 7;13(5):287-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2021v13i5.42175
  29. Jacob L, Manju Salim S, Saju J. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of selegiline. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022 Apr;12(2):96-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.52711/2231-5713.2022.00016
  30. R. Madan J, S. Argade N, Dua K. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of donepezil. Recent patents on drug delivery & formulation. 2015 Apr 1;9(1):95-103. https://doi.org/10.2174/1872211308666141028213615
  31. Thakur N, Goswami M, Deka Dey A, Kaur B, Sharma C, Kumar A. Fabrication and Synthesis of Thiococlchicoside Loaded Matrix Type Transdermal Patch. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. 2024 Apr 1;12(2):143-54. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211738511666230606120828
  32. Maskare RG, Mishra MU, Bansod HD, Sahoo II, Chure IM, Thule SG, Agrawal HR. Formulation and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Herbal Patches. Research Journal of Topical and Cosmetic Sciences. 2024 Jul 1;15(2):91-7. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5844.2024.00016
  33. Shirisha S, Sahoo SK, Veena T, Rao YM. Design and Evaluation of Different Transdermal Therapeutic Systems of Promethazine Hydrochloride. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education & Research. 2024 Jan 2;58. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.58.1s.13
  34. Tadhi N, Chopra H, Sharma GK. Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal patch of Methimazole. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021 Sep 1;14(9):4667-72. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360x.2021.00811
  35. Rajasekhar B, Reddy BH, Farheen GA, Anjinappa J, Krishna KR, Srilatha P, Farida S. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of carbamazepine. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;22(2):1601-1. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.2.1549
  36. Gajbhiye K, Hakam N, Rathod G, Tawar M. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of benidipine hydrochloride. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021 Jul;11(3):207-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.52711/2231-5713.2021.00034
  37. Soral M, Nanjappa SH, Alayadan P. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of rabeprazole sodium. Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021 Jul 1;10(2):240-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_126_20
  38. Akhlaq M, Arshad MS, Mudassir AM, Hussain A, Kucuk I, Haj-Ahmad R, Rasekh M, Ahmad Z. Formulation and evaluation of anti-rheumatic dexibuprofen transdermal patches: a quality-by-design approach. Journal of drug targeting. 2016 Aug 8;24(7):603-12. https://doi.org/10.3109/1061186X.2015.1116538
  39. Mahajan NM, Zode GH, Mahapatra DK, Thakre S, Dumore N, Gangane PS. Formulation development and evaluation of transdermal patch of piroxicam for treating dysmenorrhoea. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2018 Nov 30;8(11):035-41. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2018.81105
  40. Imtiaz MS, Shoaib MH, Yousuf RI, Ali FR, Saleem MT, Khan MZ, Sikandar M. Formulation development and evaluation of drug-in-adhesive-type transdermal patch of metoclopramide HCl. Polymer Bulletin. 2022 Feb;79(2):1187-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03559-3
  41. Jamaludin WB, Muthia R, Kartini K, Setiawan F, Juhrah S, Yulida N. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches from Eleutherine bulbosa Urb. bulb extract with plasticizer variations. International Journal Of Applied Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(1):94-7. https://journals.innovareacademics.in/index.php/ijap/article/view/46421/29406
  42. Suwandecha T, Changklang P. Formulation development and characterization of a transdermal patch containing Crinum asiaticum leaves extract. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2023 Dec 5;13(12):207-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2023.151643
  43. Soni R, Jain AK, Jain UK. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of antipsychotic drug to overcome nervous emotional disease. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development. 2025 Feb 15;13(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.22270/ajprd.v13i1.1497
  44. Lei Y, Yang G, Du F, Yi J, Quan L, Liu H, Zhou X, Gong W, Han J, Wang Y, Gao C. Formulation and evaluation of a drug-in-adhesive patch for transdermal delivery of colchicine. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Oct 21;14(10):2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102245
  45. Nandi S, Mondal S. Fabrication and evaluation of matrix type novel transdermal patch loaded with tramadol hydrochloride. Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2022 Oct 31;19(5):572. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjps.galenos.2021.43678
  46. Valeveti SK, Pashikanti SH. Design, development, and evaluation of transdermal patches containing memantine hydrochloride. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(5):181-97. https://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2023v15i5.48481
  47. Latif MS, Al-Harbi FF, Nawaz A, Rashid SA, Farid A, Mohaini MA, Alsalman AJ, Hawaj MA, Alhashem YN. Formulation and evaluation of hydrophilic polymer based methotrexate patches: in vitro and in vivo characterization. Polymers. 2022 Mar 24;14(7):1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071310
  48. Rai A, Sharma R, Dewangan HK. Formulation and evaluation of polymeric transdermal patch of Meloxicam. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022 Jan 1;68:803-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.156
  49. Mo L, Lu G, Ou X, Ouyang D. Formulation and development of novel control release transdermal patches of carvedilol to improve bioavailability for the treatment of heart failure. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2022 Jan 1;29(1):266-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.088
  50. Alissa I, Nair AB, Aldhubiab B, Shah H, Shah J, Mewada V, Almuqbil RM, Jacob S. Design, development, and evaluation of treprostinil embedded adhesive transdermal patch. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Apr 12;15(4):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041226
  51. Gadag S, Narayan R, Nayak Y, Garg S, Nayak UY. Design, development and evaluation of Resveratrol transdermal patches for breast cancer therapy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 5;632:122558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122558
  52. Patil AS, Birkodi S, Masareddy RS, Rajpurohit M. Fabrication, optimization, and evaluation of transdermal patch: as an alternative and effective transdermal delivery system for nebivolol HCl. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. 2024 Feb;12(1):79-89. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211738511666230601103658
  53. Sabareesh M, Rajangam J, Prakash Raj K, P. Yanadaiah J. Formulation and evaluation of novel vesicular nanoethosomal patches for transdermal delivery of zidovudine: In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo pharmacokinetic investigations. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology. 2026 Jun 7;47(7):1386-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2024.2444976
  54. Magfirah M, Utami IK. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of leaf ethanol extract Lantana Camara Linn with ethyl cellulose-poly vinyl pyrolidone polymer variations. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2022;15(3):284-9. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.15.3.0915
  55. Makanoneng DS, Suwitono MR, Sulastri T. Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Patch from Extract of Babadotan Leaves. Jurnal Biologi Tropis. 2025 May 2;25(2):1508-13. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbt.v25i2.8761
  56. Devhare LD, Hiradeve S, Uplanchiwar V, Thakare V, Mane NS, Suruse PB, Channe K. Development and In-Vitro Categorization of Cilnidipine-loaded Transdermal Patches: Design, Evaluation, and Performance Assessment. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2026 Aug;21(4):406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-026-10583-1
  57. Sk V, Pashikanti S. Design, Development, and Evaluation of Transdermal Patches Containing Donepezil Hydrochloride. Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 2023;13:576-83. https://doi.org/10.25258/ijddt.13.2.18
  58. Ghosh M, Banga AK. Formulation and evaluation of a transdermal drug-in-adhesive patch for lamotrigine delivery in potential epilepsy treatment. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2025 Aug 1;110:107067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107067
  59. Alhaushey L, Ahmad RD. Formulation and evaluation of celecoxib transdermal patches. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023 Apr 1;16(4):1574-80. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00257
  60. Parveen MD, Reddy YK. Formulation and evaluation of herbal transdermal patch of olea europaea to study anti-inflammatory activity. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2025;17(2):149-52. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5836.2025.00024
  61. Sharma P, Tailang M. Primaquine-loaded transdermal patch for treating malaria: design, development, and characterization. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2022 Oct 27;8(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-022-00433-5
  62. Chabru AS, Salve PS, Ghumare GD, Dhamak RS, Tiwari DR, Waghmare DS. Comparative pharmacokinetic studies of transferosomes loaded gel and pressure sensitive adhesive based patch formulation for transdermal delivery of benztropine mesylate. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2024 Feb 1;92:105287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.105287
  63. Dubal RB, Mulla JA, Kapse MV. Design, development and characterization of ketorolac tromethamine-loaded transdermal patches. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences. 2024;12(2):144-50. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jpbs.2024.021
  64. Sampaopan Y, Suksaeree J. Formulation development and pharmaceutical evaluation of Lysiphyllum strychnifolium topical patches for their anti-inflammatory potential. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2022 Apr 19;23(5):116. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-022-02269-x
  65. Hassam H, Shoaib MH, Yousuf RI, Ali FR, Siddiqui F, Irshad A. Formulation development and evaluation of nimesulide transdermal gel patch system. Polymer Bulletin. 2022 Jul;79(7):5121-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03764-0
  66. Manikpuriya S, Gandakhe I, Shinde N, Pawar S, Sanap D. Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Patch Containing Withania Coagulans. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development. 2024;12(3):66-74. https://doi.org/10.22270/ajprd.v11i3.1396
  67. Abdullah HM, Farooq M, Adnan S, Masood Z, Saeed MA, Aslam N, Ishaq W. Development and evaluation of reservoir transdermal polymeric patches for controlled delivery of diclofenac sodium. Polymer Bulletin. 2023 Jun;80(6):6793-818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-022-04390-0
  68. Shrestha N, Banga AK. Development and evaluation of transdermal delivery system of tranylcypromine for the treatment of depression. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 2023 Apr;13(4):1048-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-022-01269-5
  69. Santi TD, Siregar TN, Sutriana A, Andini R, Candra A. Phytochemical test and optimization of transdermal patches of Carica papaya extract: Formulation design of candidate drug for wound healing. Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity. 2022 Jun 1;23(6). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230617
  70. Jamshaid MA, Abbas M, Yousaf M, Younas M, Muzaffar H, Hussain T, Nawaz RA. Formulation and evaluation of sustained release domperidone hydrochloride transdermal patches to treat motion sickness. Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy. 2022 Dec 31;6(2):41-8. https://doi.org/10.56770/jcp2022621
  71. Qadir A, Jan SU, Shoaib MH, Sikandar M, Yousuf RI, Ali FR, Siddiqui F, Magsi AJ, Mustafa G, Saleem MT, Mohammad S. Formulation development and evaluation, in silico PBPK modeling and in vivo pharmacodynamic studies of clozapine matrix type transdermal patches. Scientific Reports. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81918-6
  72. Kumar M, Bose P, Singh AP, Singh AP. Formulation And Evaluation of Betulinic Acid Loaded Transdermal Patches. Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics. 2025 Jan 1;15(1). https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v15i1.6951
  73. Ghodke A, Taose S, Rathore P, Joshi N, Panwar AS. Formulation, Optimisation and Evaluation of Levodopa and Entacapone Loaded Transdermal Patches for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Drug Delivery. 2024;14(2):1044-50. https://doi.org/10.25258/ijddt.14.2.66
  74. Likhitha Ananthu & Anie Vijetha K. Formulation and Evaluation of Simvastatin Transdermal Drug Delivery System. Saudi J Med Pharm Sci. 2022;8(10):527-35. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjmps.2022.v08i10.006
  75. Nadendla R, PRIYANKA P. Optimizing transdermal patch formulation for enhanced delivery of rivaroxaban: a comprehensive design of experiments approach. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024 Dec 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2024v16i12.51075
  76. TS VB, Awdesh JV, Ansari MS. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of decongestant drug. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2022 Jul 16;14(3):195-8. https://doi.org/10.52711/0975-4377.2022.00031

Photo
Yash Nigam
Corresponding author

J. S. Singh Institute of pharmacy, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh India-261207

Photo
Sujeet Kumar Gupta
Co-author

J. S. Singh Institute of pharmacy, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh India-2612077

Photo
Bhumika Yogi
Co-author

J. S. Singh Institute of pharmacy, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh India-261207

Photo
Nitin Mishra
Co-author

J. S. Singh Institute of pharmacy, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh India-261207

Photo
Aman Kumar Singh
Co-author

Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh Lucknow Campus, India-226028

Yash Nigam1, Sujeet Kumar Gupta1, Bhumika Yogi1, Nitin Mishra1, Aman Kumar Singh2, Formulation And Evaluation Of Polymeric Transdermal Patches For Sustained Release Of Metformin And Repaglinide, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (7), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21240083

More related articles
Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems for ...
Dr. Devinder Maheshwari, Ankit Kumar...
A Review On RP-HPLC Method Development And Validation For Simultaneous Estimatio...
Nikhil A. Bawane, Pratiksha D. Wagh, Mamata D. Wadkar, Jotshna R. Adhagale, Pallavi D. Borse, Vanita...
Validated Analytical Approaches for Sitagliptin Monohydrate and Metformin: A Cri...
Manda Sreekanth, Tadikonda Rama Rao, Nenavath Kanakaraju, Padugula Soumya, Konda Sri Vaishnavi...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Patch...
Ashwini Karnakoti, Ruchita Badekar, Mangesh Dagale, Vishal Bodke, Prajwal Birajdar, Dr. Amol Borade...
A Review on the Role of Transdermal Drug Delivery: Microneedles, Patches, and Na...
Yash Tambe, Vaibhav Thakare, Harshal Pagar, Vaishali Pagar...