View Article

  • A Clinical Study of Go-Ghrita Nasya In Management of Ardhavabhedaka W.S.R to Migraine

  • 1,2PG Scholar, Department of Kayachikitsa,Ashwini Ayurvedic Medical College and P.G.Centre Davanagere, Karnataka, India.
    3Professor and Guide Department of Kayachikitsa,Ashwini Ayurvedic Medical College And P.G.Centre Davanagere,Karnataka ,India.
    4 Principal and HOD Department of Kayachikitsa,Ashwini Ayurvedic Medical College And P.G.Centre Davanagere,Karnataka ,India

Abstract

Ardhavabhedaka, commonly referred to as migraine in modern medicine, is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent headaches, often accompanied by nausea, vomiting, and sensory sensitivity. Ayurveda, with its holistic approach, provides various therapeutic modalities to manage this condition. One such intervention is Goghrita Nasya, which involves the administration of ghee (clarified butter) infused with medicinal herbs through the nasal passages. This case study explores the effectiveness of Goghrita Nasya in the management of Ardhavabhedaka.

Keywords

Ardhavabhedaka, Nasya, Migraine, Goghrita Nasya

Introduction

Migraine is primarily a headache disorder derived from a Greek word meaning "half-head." The pain typically begins early in the morning on one side of the head and can occur as frequently as several times a week or as infrequently as once every few years. The intensity of the pain ranges from fairly mild to almost unbearable1. The clinical presentation of migraine varies from patient to patient and over time. Migraine is the 3rd most prevalent and 7th leading cause of disability worldwide2. It is more common in women than in men (2:1 to 3:1), and a family history is present in more than 60% of cases3. Although there is no direct reference to migraine in Ayurvedic texts, its symptoms fall under Shirahshoola, a Nanatmaja Vyadhi of Vata dosha4. The disease Ardhavabhedaka, described under Shiroroga and caused by vitiated Vata dosha, presents symptoms like half-head pain with intermittent episodes similar to those of migraine5. Acharya Sushrut mentions 11 types of Shiroroga, one of which is Ardhavabhedaka. In Ardhavabhedaka, pain is felt in the nape of the neck, eyebrows, temporal region, ears, eyes, and half of the frontal region6, resembling paroxysmal unilateral headache associated with vertigo and pain of varying intensity, very similar to migraine.  Migraine affects the head region, known as Urdhvajatrugata sthana. The nostrils are considered the doorway to the brain, as expressed in the phrase "Nasa hi shiraso dwaram." The nasal route of administration is, therefore, the most effective route for treating Urdhvajatrugat vikara7. For this reason, the effect of go ghrita nasya on migraine has been selected for a review study which has been told in Baishaja rathnavali shiroroga chikitsa prakarna adhyaya 65th chapter.

OBJECTIVES

1.To review the literature of Ardhavabhedaka and Migraine

2. To observe the efficacy of Go-ghritanasya in the management of Ardhavabhedaka

Source of data

Clinical data

Subjects of either sex attending the OPD and IPD of Ashwini Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital, Davanagere were selected for the study. Also subjects are selected from medical camps conducted under the college.Patients were selectd consisting of 40 subjects using simple randomization. Complete details of the clinical trail and rights of the participants were explained and informed consent was obtained from each participant or guardians of them from the Institutional Ethical Committee clearance has been obtained for the study.

METHOD OF PREPARATION

Cow’s milk is collected from healthy cow, is boiled. This is to ensure that the milk is free from bacteria and is safe for consumption. Once the milk has cooled down, the cream part is separated and collected. The fermentation to the milk cream is done just day before. Then churned to extract butter using a wooden churner. And then butter is heated in a pan over medium flame. The butter has to boil till the water content evaporates and there is a visible layer of solid at the bottom of pan. This ghee is filtered and stored in a dry, air tight container.

Inclusion Criteria

? Patients of either sex with age group between 18 to      50 years.

? Either sex

? Both fresh and chronic case will be selected

? Symptoms include bheda, toda, akasmattosa, prakashaasahishnuta, pakshat, dashahat

Exclusion Criteria

? Other types of shirashoola such as anantavata, suryavartha, pittajashirashoola, kaphajashirashoola, dustapratishaya, peenasa will be excluded.

? Referred pain in one half of the head due to disorders of eye, ear, nose, throat, teeth etc., will be excluded. • Patients with complicated migraine, status migrainosus, ophthalmic migraine, hemiplegic migraine, retinal migraine, basilar artery migraine etc., will be excluded

? Patient is suffering from DM,HTN,CA,Tb any other general debilitating health condition, needing surgical intervention and other systemic illness are excluded

?                                       Anaemic / iron deficiency anemia patient is excluded.

Clinical method of Administration

• The subjects were instilled medicine through nasal route for 7 days once in every month for 3 consecutive months.

•                                      8 drops of Goghrita nasya in each nostril will be instilled

•                      (According to Ayurvedic Formulary of India 1 drop =0.05ml 16 drops=0.8ml)

 

Subjective Parameters;

Ardhaparshwashoola (half side of head)

• BhedatodavatShoola

• Prakashasahishnuta

• Akasmattosa, • Pakshat, Dashahat

Objective Parameters:

MIDAS 97 scoring will be done as follows.

1.Severity of Headache:

0 = No headache

1 = Mildheadache, patient is aware onlyif he or she pays attention on it.

2= Moderate headache, can ignore at times.

3= Severe headache,can’t ignore but he or she can do his or her usual activities

4=Excruciating headache, can do anything

2.Frequency of headache:Assessed in term of frequency in days

0 = Nil

1= >20 days

2= 15 days

3= 10 days

4= < 5 days

3.Duration of headache: assessed in terms of hours or day

0 = Nil

1= 1- 3 Hours / day

2= 3-6 hours / day

3=6-12 hours /day

4=More than 12 hours /day

4.Nausea:

0= Nil

1= occasionally

2= Moderate but does not disturb routine work

3= severe, disturbing routine work

4= Severe enough, small amount of fluid regurgitating from mouth

5.Vomiting

0=nil

1=feeling of giddiness

2=pt feels as if everyting is revolving

3=revolving signs + black outs

4=unconscious

6.Aura

0=Nill

1=Lasts for 5 minutes

2=Lasts for 15 minutes

3=Lasts for 30 minutes

4=Last for 60 minutes

RESULTS

  1. Ardhaparshwashoola

 

Ardhaparshwa Shoola

 

Score

Number of Patients

 

BT

AT

7th day

37th day

67th day

90th day

Intolerable pain

4

03

01

00

00

00

Disturb the normal work

3

16

12

02

02

00

Not disturb the normal work

2

11

12

13

06

03

Pain tolerable

1

10

12

15

18

11

No pain

0

0

03

10

14

26

  1. Bedatodavatshoola

 

Bedatodavatshoola

Score

Number of Patients

BT

AT

7th day

37th day

67th day

90thday

Intolerable pain

4

02

00

00

00

00

Disturb the normal work

3

13

05

00

00

00

Not disturb the normal work

2

12

13

05

01

00

Pain tolerable

1

11

15

15

14

09

No pain

0

02

07

20

25

31

  1. Prakashasahishnuta

 

Prakashasahishnuta

 

Score

Number of Patients

 

BT

AT

7th day

37th day

67thday

90th day

Intolerable pain

4

00

00

00

00

00

Disturb the normal work

3

04

02

00

00

00

Not disturb the normal work

2

12

04

01

00

00

Pain tolerable

1

16

12

10

07

06

No pain

0

08

22

29

33

34

  1. Severity

 

Severity

 

Score

Number of Patients

BT

AT

7th day

37th day

67thday

90th day

Excruciating headache

4

00

00

00

00

00

Severe headache

3

19

05

00

00

00

Moderate headache

2

16

16

08

06

00

Mild

1

04

14

23

22

16

No pain

0

01

05

09

12

24

  1. Frequency

 

Frequency

 

Score

Number of Patients

 

BT

AT

7th day

37th day

67thday

90th day

< 5 days

4

03

00

00

00

00

10 days

3

12

04

00

00

00

15 days

2

18

15

08

05

00

20 days

1

07

18

25

19

17

Nill

0

00

03

07

16

23

  1. Duration of Attack

 

Duration of Attack

 

Score

Number of Patients

 

BT

AT

7th day

37th day

67th day

90thday

More than 12 hrs/day

4

00

00

00

00

00

6-12 hrs/day

3

01

00

00

00

00

3-6 hrs/day

2

26

05

01

00

00

1-3hrs/day

1

12

28

30

19

13

Nill

0

01

07

09

21

27

  1. Nausea

 

Nausea

 

Score

Number of Patients

 

BT

AT

7th day

37thday

67thday

90th day

Severe, small amount of fluid regurgitating

4

00

00

00

00

00

Severe, disturb to routine work

3

04

00

00

00

00

Moderate, does not disturb to routine work

2

07

07

01

00

00

Occasionally

1

22

23

27

10

10

Nil

0

07

10

12

30

30

  1. Vomiting

 

Vomiting

 

Score

Number of Patients

BT

AT

7th day

37thday

67th day

90th day

Unconsiousness

4

00

00

00

00

00

Revolving signs +blackouts

3

02

00

00

00

00

Patient feels satisfy

2

09

05

00

00

00

Feeling giddiness

1

18

18

20

10

00

Nill

0

11

17

20

30

40

  1. Aura

 

Aura

 

Score

Number of Patients

BT

AT

7th day

37th day

67th day

90th day

Lasts for 60 min

4

00

00

00

00

00

Lasts for 30 min

3

00

00

00

00

00

Lasts for 15 min

2

03

01

00

00

00

Lasts for 5 min

1

13

12

07

04

00

Nil

0

24

27

33

36

40

Statistical Analysis of Effect of Therapy on Subjective Parameters by Paired “T” Test

        1. Ardhaparshwa Shoola

In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.3 before the treatment was reduced to 1.875 after the treatment with 81.52% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.001). 

Graph shows statistical analysis of Ardhaparshwa Shoola

  1. Bhedatodavat Shoola

In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.075before the treatment was reduced to 1.85 after the treatment with 89.15% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.001). 

Graph shows statistical analysis of Bhedatodavat Shoola

  1. Prakashsahishnuta

In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 1.3 before the treatment was reduced to 0.65 after the treatment with 50% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.01) and after follow up mean reduced to 1.15 with 88.46% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.001). 

Graph shows statistical analysis of Prakashsahishnuta

  1. Severity

In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.325 before the treatment was reduced to 0.55 after the treatment with 23.65% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.01) and after follow up mean reduced to 1.9 with 81.72% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.001). 

Graph shows statistical analysis of Severity

  1. Frequency

In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.275 before the treatment was reduced to 0.75 after the treatment with 32.96% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.01) and after follow up mean reduced to 1.85 with 81.31% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.001). 

Graph shows statistical analysis of Frequency

Overall Result of The Treatment on Ardhavabhedaka

Parameter

Mean

% impr.

SD

T-Value

P-Value

Remarks

Ardhaparshwa Shoola

BT

2.3

81.52

0.79

15

<0.001

HS

AF3

.425

Bhedatodavat Shoola

BT

2.075

89.15

0.83

14.03

<0.001

HS

AF3

0.225

Prakashsahishnuta

BT

1.3

88.46

0.83

8.72

<0.001

HS

AF3

0.15

Severity

BT

2.325

81.72

0.84

14.28

<0.001

HS

AF3

0.425

Frequency

BT

2.275

81.31

0.73

15.9

<0.001

HS

AF3

0.425

Duration

BT

1.725

81.15

0.49

17.84

<0.001

HS

AF3

0.325

Nausea

BT

1.2

79.16

0.71

8.41

<0.001

HS

AF3

0.25

Vomiting

BT

1.1

100

0.81

8.58

<0.001

HS

AF3

0

            Aura

BT

0.475

100

.64

4.69

<0.001

HS

AF3

0

From the above statistical analysis it is very clear that all the assessment parameters responded very well. The Go Ghrita Nasya is having highly significant effect on all the parameters of Ardhavabhedaka with p value <0.001. the average improvement was 86.94%.

DISCUSSION ON RESULT

Effect on severity of Pain: In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.06 before the treatment was reduced to 1.5 after the treatment with 27.18% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.01) and after follow up mean reduced to 0.96 with 53.39% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test(p<0.001). It is clearly mentioned in ayurveda that without Vata there will not be pain.Goghrita by virtue of doshagnata effectively helps in mitiating the vitiated vata dosha.

Effect on Frequency of Pain: In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.06 before the treatment was reduced to 1.5 after the treatment with 27.18% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.01) and after follow up mean reduced to 0.96 with 53.39% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.001) As the vitiated doshas attains normalcy by administering nasya, the repeated occurrence of the disease gets subsided i.e., periodic attacks of the pain get subsided

Effect on Duration of Pain: In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.06 before the treatment was reduced to 1.5 after the treatment with 27.18% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.01). and after follow up mean reduced to 0.96 with 53.39% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test(p<0.001) As the vitiated doshas attains normalcy by administering nasya, the repeated occurrence of the disease gets subsided i.e., periodic attacks of the pain get subsided.

Effect on Nausea: In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.06 before the treatment was reduced to 1.5 after the treatment with 27.18% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test (p<0.01)and after follow up mean reduced to 0.96 with 53.39% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test(p<0.001) Pain signals are transmitted to the brain via the nerves,which can bring about several physiological responses,including Nausea, so as pain get subsided automatically nausea will reduce

Effect on Vomiting : In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.06 before the treatment was reduced to 1.5 after the treatment with 27.18% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test(p<0.01)and after follow up mean reduced to 0.96 with 53.39% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test(p<0.001) In response to pain,the brain triggerers serotonin release or the production of a stress hormone known as cortisol;both play role in regulating nausea and vomiting ,so as pain get subsided automatically vomiting will reduce

Effect on Aura : In this work of 40 patients studied in Ardhavabhedaka statistical analysis shows that the mean score which was 2.06 before the treatment was reduced to 1.5 after the treatment with 27.18% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test(p<0.01)and after follow up mean reduced to 0.96 with 53.39% improvement and it is statistically highly significant with T test(p<0.001) As this symptoms vitiated due to vata pitta dosha,Goghrita is having Tridoshahara properties,it might helps in removing avarana of vata by pitta thus subsides the symptoms

Discussion on Probable mode action

Ghrita is supreme in Jangama Sneha and is Balavardhaka, Ojovardhaka,Vayasthapana, Agni Deepana and Dhatuposhaka. By virtue of its Sanskaranuvartana property, it attains the properties of ingredients without losing its own. According to Acharya Charaka, Ghrita is effective in subsiding Pittaja and Vataja disorders; it improves Dhatus and is overall booster for improving Ojas Ghrita having Balya,Brimhana, Rasayana and Medhya effect which can be explained by two ways. Digestion, absorption and delivery to the target organ are made easy when any drug is processed with Ghrita due to its lipophilic action. Anti-oxidant effect of Go-Ghrita is due to its Vitamin A and Vitamin E content. According to Acharaya Sushruta in ardhavbhedak use Goghrita Nasaya8,and Acharya Dalhanacharya explain that GoGhrita Nasaya is effective in vataj Pittaj Avastha9

CONCLUSION

Goghrita Nasya therapy, when combined with dietary and lifestyle modifications, proved to be an effective treatment modality for managing Ardhavabhedaka (migraine). This case study highlights the potential of Ayurveda in offering a holistic and sustainable approach to migraine management, providing long-term relief without the side effects commonly associated with conventional medications. Further clinical studies are needed to validate these findings and explore the broader application of Goghrita Nasya in headache management

REFERENCE

  1. B. Prameela, et.al; Migraine- A Malady: A Short Review;Sch. Acad. J. Pharm., 2014; 3(3): 285-289
  2. G Kulkarni, et.al; The prevalence and burden of migraine in India: results of a population-based study in Karnataka state; The Journal of Headache and Pain; 2014; 1515 (suppl 1): B1
  3. Shaha S., API Textbook of Medicine, Published by the association of Physicians of India, Mumbai; 8th edition, 2009; p-1103
  4. Agnivesh, Charak Samhita, Drudhabala, Shukla V, Tripathi R; Sutrasthana 20/11; Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan; Delhi; Vol 2; Reprint 2013; P-293
  5. Vagbhata, Ashtanghrudaya; Ganesh krushna Garde; uttarsthan 23/8. Chaukhamba Surabharati Prakashan; Varanasi; Reprint 2015; P- 423
  6. Sushruta, Sushruta Samhita, Revised by Sushrutavimarshini, Commentary by Acharya Priyavat Sharma, Edited by Anantaram Sharma, Uttartantra 25/3-4, Chaukhamba
  7. Surbharti Prakashana, Varanasi, 2004; p- 159 Agniveshavivechana, charaka samhita, edited by Bramhanand Tripathi, prabhakarajanardhandeshpande, 9thchpt, shloka no 76, chaukambikasurabatriprakashan,Varanasi. 2012 publication 1291pp
  8. Agneevesha, Charaka Samhita with Ayurveda Dipika Sanskrita Commentary by Chakrapani, Revised by Acharya Charaka & Dradhabala, Chaukhambha Publication, New Delhi, Re-print 2014, Chikitsa Sthana chap. 3 / 68 - 69, page – 404
  9.  Agneevesha, Charaka, Dradhabala, Charaka Samhita with Vidhyotini Hindi Commentary by Ksahinath Shastri and Gorakhnath, Chaukhambha Bharti Academy, Varanasi, Re-print 2009, Vimana Sthana chap. 2 / 7 -8, page – 328

Reference

  1. B. Prameela, et.al; Migraine- A Malady: A Short Review;Sch. Acad. J. Pharm., 2014; 3(3): 285-289
  2. G Kulkarni, et.al; The prevalence and burden of migraine in India: results of a population-based study in Karnataka state; The Journal of Headache and Pain; 2014; 1515 (suppl 1): B1
  3. Shaha S., API Textbook of Medicine, Published by the association of Physicians of India, Mumbai; 8th edition, 2009; p-1103
  4. Agnivesh, Charak Samhita, Drudhabala, Shukla V, Tripathi R; Sutrasthana 20/11; Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan; Delhi; Vol 2; Reprint 2013; P-293
  5. Vagbhata, Ashtanghrudaya; Ganesh krushna Garde; uttarsthan 23/8. Chaukhamba Surabharati Prakashan; Varanasi; Reprint 2015; P- 423
  6. Sushruta, Sushruta Samhita, Revised by Sushrutavimarshini, Commentary by Acharya Priyavat Sharma, Edited by Anantaram Sharma, Uttartantra 25/3-4, Chaukhamba
  7. Surbharti Prakashana, Varanasi, 2004; p- 159 Agniveshavivechana, charaka samhita, edited by Bramhanand Tripathi, prabhakarajanardhandeshpande, 9thchpt, shloka no 76, chaukambikasurabatriprakashan,Varanasi. 2012 publication 1291pp
  8. Agneevesha, Charaka Samhita with Ayurveda Dipika Sanskrita Commentary by Chakrapani, Revised by Acharya Charaka & Dradhabala, Chaukhambha Publication, New Delhi, Re-print 2014, Chikitsa Sthana chap. 3 / 68 - 69, page – 404
  9.  Agneevesha, Charaka, Dradhabala, Charaka Samhita with Vidhyotini Hindi Commentary by Ksahinath Shastri and Gorakhnath, Chaukhambha Bharti Academy, Varanasi, Re-print 2009, Vimana Sthana chap. 2 / 7 -8, page – 328

Photo
Dr. K. R. Neha
Corresponding author

PG Scholar, Department of Kayachikitsa,Ashwini Ayurvedic Medical College and P.G.Centre Davanagere, Karnataka, India.

Photo
Dr. Netravati S. Teggin
Co-author

PG Scholar, Department of Kayachikitsa,Ashwini Ayurvedic Medical College and P.G.Centre Davanagere, Karnataka, India.

Photo
Dr. Jayanthi C.
Co-author

Professor and Guide Department of Kayachikitsa,Ashwini Ayurvedic Medical College And P.G.Centre Davanagere,Karnataka ,India

Photo
Dr. Mukta M. H.
Co-author

Principal and HOD Department of Kayachikitsa,Ashwini Ayurvedic Medical College And P.G.Centre Davanagere,Karnataka ,India

Dr. K. R. Neha*, Dr. Netravati S. Teggin, Dr. Jayanthi C., Dr. Mukta M. H., A Clinical Study of Go-Ghrita Nasya In Management of Ardhavabhedaka W.S.R to Migraine, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (3), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14954511

More related articles
Harnessing AI And Machine Learning in Pharmaceutic...
Sadiya Inamdar , Harshada Gujar , Sachin Sapkal , Prasad Tanpure ...
Formulation and Evaluation of a Herbal Aloe Vera-B...
Amol Teke, Bhairavi Chavan, Machhandranath Mane , Kalyani Deshmuk...
From Pollution to Prediction: The Role of Air poll...
NVL Suvarchala Reddy, M. Ganga Raju, Nisha Shri C., N. Maheswari,...
The Medicinal Attributes of Delonix regia: An Exploratory Study of its Bioactive...
Arshin Solomon, Pragya Pandey , Faith Ruth Dixon, Meghna Singh, Aaron Dogba Yassah, Arnab Roy , ...
From Synapses to Stadiums: How Brain Physiology Informs Sports Training for Opti...
Arnab Roy, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Dr. K. Rajeswar Dutt, Ankita Singh, Chandan Pal, Ronit Tirkey, Rohit ...
Related Articles
Multiple Personality Disorder (Dissociative Identity Disorder)...
Sudarshan Kalagate , Madhura Jadhav , Jitesh Batra , ...
Phytochemical and Pharmacological Perspectives on Natural Edible Gums: A Review ...
Gupta Shalini , Trupesh Revad, Himanshu Pandya , Hitesh Solanki , ...
Harnessing AI And Machine Learning in Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance...
Sadiya Inamdar , Harshada Gujar , Sachin Sapkal , Prasad Tanpure , Prof. Tejashri kedar , ...
More related articles
Harnessing AI And Machine Learning in Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance...
Sadiya Inamdar , Harshada Gujar , Sachin Sapkal , Prasad Tanpure , Prof. Tejashri kedar , ...
Formulation and Evaluation of a Herbal Aloe Vera-Based Face Wash for Therapeutic...
Amol Teke, Bhairavi Chavan, Machhandranath Mane , Kalyani Deshmukh , Ravindra Jadhav , Dr. Rao Javva...
From Pollution to Prediction: The Role of Air pollution and Artificial intellige...
NVL Suvarchala Reddy, M. Ganga Raju, Nisha Shri C., N. Maheswari, D. Krishnaveni, P. Saritha, ...
Harnessing AI And Machine Learning in Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance...
Sadiya Inamdar , Harshada Gujar , Sachin Sapkal , Prasad Tanpure , Prof. Tejashri kedar , ...
Formulation and Evaluation of a Herbal Aloe Vera-Based Face Wash for Therapeutic...
Amol Teke, Bhairavi Chavan, Machhandranath Mane , Kalyani Deshmukh , Ravindra Jadhav , Dr. Rao Javva...
From Pollution to Prediction: The Role of Air pollution and Artificial intellige...
NVL Suvarchala Reddy, M. Ganga Raju, Nisha Shri C., N. Maheswari, D. Krishnaveni, P. Saritha, ...