Abstract
Ultraviolet radiation is a major environmental factor responsible for acute and chronic skin damage, including erythema, photoaging, immunosuppression, and carcinogenesis. Continuous exposure to UVA and UVB radiation induces oxidative stress through reactive oxygen species generation, leading to cellular and molecular alterations in skin tissues. Conventional synthetic sunscreens, though effective, have raised concerns regarding skin irritation, hormonal disruption, and environmental toxicity, particularly their impact on marine ecosystems. These limitations have driven increasing interest toward herbal sunscreen formulations that utilize plant derived bioactive compounds with inherent photoprotective and antioxidant properties.Herbal sunscreen lotions are formulated using phytoconstituents such as flavonoids, polyphenols, carotenoids, and tannins, which possess the ability to absorb ultraviolet radiation and neutralize free radicals. The formulation process involves careful selection of excipients, optimization of emulsification techniques, and stability considerations to ensure product efficacy and safety. Evaluation parameters include physical, chemical, microbiological, and biological assessments, along with in vitro and in vivo determination of Sun Protection Factor. Regulatory frameworks governing herbal sunscreens vary across regions, with classification as cosmetic or drug products depending on their claims and composition. Authorities such as CDSCO, US FDA, and EMA impose guidelines for safety, efficacy, labeling, and quality control. Despite challenges such as variability in herbal extracts and lower SPF values, advancements in nanotechnology and delivery systems offer promising solutions. Herbal sunscreens represent a sustainable and biocompatible alternative with significant future potential in dermatological and cosmetic applications.
Keywords
Herbal sunscreen, phytoconstituents, sun protection factor, ultraviolet radiation, natural cosmetics, topical formulation, regulatory guidelines
Introduction
Solar radiation reaching the earth’s surface consists primarily of ultraviolet A radiation with wavelengths ranging from 320 to 400 nm and ultraviolet B radiation ranging from 290 to 320 nm, while ultraviolet C radiation between 100 and 290 nm is largely absorbed by the atmospheric ozone layer and does not significantly reach the skin surface (1). Among these, ultraviolet A penetrates deeply into the dermis and is primarily responsible for photoaging and oxidative damage, whereas ultraviolet B mainly affects the epidermis and induces erythema, sunburn, and direct DNA damage leading to mutagenesis and carcinogenesis (2). Prolonged exposure to ultraviolet radiation results in cumulative skin damage characterized by collagen degradation, elastin fiber disruption, pigmentation disorders, and increased risk of non-melanoma and melanoma skin cancers (3). The underlying mechanism of ultraviolet induced skin damage involves the generation of reactive oxygen species, which initiate lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and nucleic acid damage. These processes activate signaling pathways such as nuclear factor kappa B and activator protein one, leading to inflammation, immunosuppression, and premature aging of the skin (4). Therefore, photoprotection has become an essential component of dermatological care and cosmetic science. Synthetic sunscreen agents, including organic ultraviolet filters such as oxybenzone and avobenzone and inorganic filters like titanium dioxide and zinc oxide, have been widely used due to their high sun protection factor and broad-spectrum coverage. However, concerns have been raised regarding their potential adverse effects, including skin irritation, allergic reactions, endocrine disruption, and environmental hazards such as coral reef bleaching (5). These limitations have prompted the exploration of safer and eco-friendly alternatives. Herbal sunscreens, formulated using plant derived bioactive compounds, have gained considerable attention due to their natural origin, biocompatibility, and multifunctional properties. Phytoconstituents such as flavonoids, polyphenols, tannins, and carotenoids exhibit significant ultraviolet absorption and antioxidant activity, thereby providing effective photoprotection while minimizing adverse effects (6). Additionally, many herbal ingredients possess anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and skin nourishing properties, enhancing their suitability for topical applications. The formulation of herbal sunscreen lotions requires a systematic approach involving the selection of appropriate plant extracts, optimization of excipients, and evaluation of physicochemical and biological parameters to ensure stability, efficacy, and safety. Despite promising advantages, challenges such as variability in plant sources, standardization of active constituents, and comparatively lower sun protection factor values must be addressed through advanced formulation strategies and scientific validation (7). The present review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of herbal sunscreen lotions, focusing on their formulation approaches, evaluation techniques, and regulatory status. It also highlights the scientific basis of photoprotection offered by herbal agents and discusses recent advancements and future perspectives in the development of safe and effective natural sunscreen products.
Reference
- Diffey BL. Solar ultraviolet radiation effects on biological systems. Phys Med Biol. 1991;36(3):299 328.
- Matsumura Y, Ananthaswamy HN. Toxic effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;195(3):298 308.
- Narayanan DL, Saladi RN, Fox JL. Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer. Int J Dermatol. 2010;49(9):978 986.
- Rittié L, Fisher GJ. UV light induced signal cascades and skin aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2002;1(4):705 720.
- Schneider SL, Lim HW. Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(1):266 271.
- Nichols JA, Katiyar SK. Skin photoprotection by natural polyphenols. Curr Drug Targets. 2010;11(12):1450 1462.
- Draelos ZD. Botanical antioxidants in skin care. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6(4):245 252.
- Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen JM. The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol. 2008;17(12):1063 1072.
- Fisher GJ, Kang S, Varani J, Bata Csorgo Z, Wan Y, Datta S, et al. Mechanisms of photoaging and chronological skin aging. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(11):1462 1470.
- Brash DE. UV induced DNA damage and skin cancer. Photochem Photobiol. 2015;91(1):15 26.
- Pinnell SR. Cutaneous photodamage, oxidative stress, and topical antioxidant protection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(1):1 19.
- Quan T, Qin Z, Xia W, Shao Y, Voorhees JJ, Fisher GJ. Matrix degrading metalloproteinases in photoaging. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2009;14(1):20 24.
- Ullrich SE. Mechanisms underlying UV induced immune suppression. Mutat Res. 2005;571(1 2):185 205.
- Saewan N, Jimtaisong A. Natural products as photoprotection. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015;14(1):47 63.
- Mukherjee PK, Maity N, Nema NK, Sarkar BK. Bioactive compounds from natural resources against skin aging. Phytomedicine. 2011;19(1):64 73.
- Surjushe A, Vasani R, Saple DG. Aloe vera: a short review. Indian J Dermatol. 2008;53(4):163 166.
- Priyadarsini KI. The chemistry of curcumin. Molecules. 2014;19(12):20091 20112.
- Katiyar SK. Green tea prevents ultraviolet induced immunosuppression. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(8):989 994.
- Subapriya R, Nagini S. Medicinal properties of neem leaves. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents. 2005;5(2):149 156.
- Goyal A, Sharma V, Upadhyay N, Gill S, Sihag M. Flax and carrot seed oil properties. J Food Sci Technol. 2014;51(9):1633 1640.
- Misra BB, Dey S. Biological activities of sandalwood oil. Nat Prod Commun. 2013;8(9):1407 1410.
- Nichols JA, Katiyar SK. Skin photoprotection by natural polyphenols. Curr Drug Targets. 2010;11(12):1450 1462.
- Scalbert A, Johnson IT, Saltmarsh M. Polyphenols: antioxidants and beyond. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(1):215S 217S.
- Stahl W, Sies H. Carotenoids and photoprotection. Mol Aspects Med. 2003;24(6):345 351.
- Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI. Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology. 3rd ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2009.
- Benson HAE, Watkinson AC. Topical and Transdermal Drug Delivery. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell; 2012.
- Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 6th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2009.
- Barry BW. Dermatological Formulations. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1983.
- Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1986.
- Aulton ME, Taylor K. Aulton's Pharmaceutics. 4th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2013.
- Sinko PJ. Martin’s Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011.
- Florence AT, Attwood D. Physicochemical Principles of Pharmacy. 5th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2011.
- Shah VP, Elkins J, Williams RL. Evaluation of topical formulations. Pharm Res. 1999;16(4):530 540.
- Tadros T. Rheology of Dispersions. Weinheim: Wiley VCH; 2010.
- Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010.
- ICH. Stability testing of new drug substances and products Q1A R2. Geneva: ICH; 2003.
- Mansur JS, Breder MN, Mansur MC, Azulay RD. Determination of SPF by spectrophotometry. An Bras Dermatol. 1986; 61:121 124.
- Sayre RM, Agin PP, LeVee GJ, Marlowe E. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo SPF testing. Photochem Photobiol. 1979;29(3):559 566.
- Draize JH. Dermal toxicity methods. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1944; 82:377 390.
- COLIPA. Guidelines for SPF testing. Brussels: European Cosmetic Association; 2011.
- United States Pharmacopeia. Microbial limits tests. USP 41 NF 36. Rockville: USP; 2018.
- Denyer SP, Hodges NA, Gorman SP. Hugo and Russell’s Pharmaceutical Microbiology. 8th ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2011.
- Dureja H, Kaushik D, Gupta M, Kumar V, Lather V. Cosmeceuticals: an emerging concept. Indian J Pharmacol. 2005;37(3):155 159.
- Schlumpf M, Cotton B, Conscience M, Haller V, Steinmann B, Lichtensteiger W. Endocrine activity of UV filters. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(3):239 244.
- Danovaro R, Bongiorni L, Corinaldesi C, Giovannelli D, Damiani E, Astolfi P, et al. Sunscreens cause coral bleaching. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;55(2):222 227.
- Korać RR, Khambholja KM. Potential of herbs in skin protection. Pharmacogn Rev. 2011;5(10):164 173.
- Heinrich M, Barnes J, Gibbons S, Williamson EM. Fundamentals of Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2012.
- Pandey A, Tripathi S. Stability of herbal formulations. J Chem Pharm Res. 2014;6(2):640 645.
- Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101 112.
- Saija A, Tomaino A, Trombetta D, Giacchi M, De Pasquale A, Bonina F. In vitro SPF evaluation of natural products. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2000;22(3):197 203.
- US FDA. Sunscreen drug products for over the counter human use. Federal Register. 2011;76(117):35620 35665.
- European Commission. Cosmetic products regulation EC No 1223 2009. Off J Eur Union. 2009.
- CDSCO. Guidelines for cosmetic products. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2020.
- EMA. Guidelines on quality of herbal medicinal products. London: European Medicines Agency; 2017.
- Diffey BL. Sunscreens and labeling requirements. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144(3):449 450.
- Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Bossi R. Contents of fragrance allergens in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45(4):221 225.
- WHO. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
- EMEA. Guideline on specifications for herbal substances. London: European Medicines Agency; 2008.
- Souto EB, Müller RH. Cosmetic features and applications of lipid nanoparticles. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2008;30(3):157 165.
- Kidd PM. Bioavailability and activity of phytosomes. Altern Med Rev. 2009;14(3):226 246.
- Bonina F, Lanza M, Montenegro L, Puglisi C, Tomaino A, Trombetta D, et al. Flavonoids as potential sunscreen agents. Int J Pharm. 1996;145(1 2):87 94.
- Gupta VK, Fatima A, Faridi U, Negi AS, Shanker K, Kumar JK, et al. Antimicrobial potential of herbal extracts. Pharm Biol. 2008;46(6):421 428.
- Dhiman S, Kumar V, Sharma S. Herbal cosmetics: regulatory and safety aspects. Res J Top Cosmet Sci. 2012;3(2):75 82.
- Shah KA, Patel MB, Patel RJ, Parmar PK. Mangifera indica leaves as sunscreen agent. Pharmacogn Rev. 2010;4(8):42 46.
- Joshi LS, Pawar HA. Herbal cosmetics and green chemistry. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2015;37(1):1 7.
Mrunali Patil
Corresponding author
Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India
Krunal Sabale
Co-author
Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India
Sahil Prajapati
Co-author
Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India
Prathamesh Salunkhe
Co-author
Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India
Shital Jadhav
Co-author
Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India
Dr. Bhagyesh U Janugade
Co-author
Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India
Bhagyesh Janugade
Co-author
Krishna Foundation Jaywant Institute of Pharmacy Wathar Maharashtra, India
Mrunali Patil*, Krunal Sabale, Sahil Prajapati, Prathamesh Salunkhe, Shital Jadhav, Bhagyesh Janugade, A Comprehensive Review on Herbal Sunscreen Lotions: Formulation Approaches, Evaluation Methods, and Regulatory Status, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (4), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19393816