View Article

  • Carbon Storage and Sequestration Potential of Sacred Groves in Pakur District, Jharkhand

  • 1Divisional Forest Officer, Pakur Forest Division, Jharkhand, India.
    2Functional Area Expert, Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Kanke Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
    3Wildlife Expert, Pakur Forest Division, Jharkhand, India
     

Abstract

This study evaluates the carbon storage and sequestration potential of sacred groves (Jaher Thaans) in Pakur District, Jharkhand, India, with an emphasis on their role as localized carbon sinks in tropical dry deciduous forests. A total of 46 sacred groves across six forest blocks were sampled using standardized quadrat and subplot methods for tree, litter, and soil pools. Aboveground and belowground biomass was estimated using Allometric equations, while soil organic carbon (SOC) and annual litterfall were measured through core sampling and oven-drying, respectively. The total biomass accumulated was 7,845.08 tonnes, and the aggregate carbon stock was found to be 17,625 t/ha, primarily contributed by aboveground biomass (79%) and belowground biomass (18.8%), with smaller but ecologically significant shares from SOC (1.8%) and leaf litter (0.4%). Calculated total CO? sequestration across all groves was 31,080.04 t/ha. A one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences (p < 0.01) among the four carbon pools?Above-Ground Biomass (AGB), Below-Ground Biomass (BGB), Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), and Leaf Litter Carbon (LLC) indicating that each pool contributes uniquely to total CO? sequestration. The high F-value confirmed that the observed variation stems from inherent ecological and structural differences rather than random variation. Post-hoc Tukey?s test showed that AGB and BGB differed significantly from SOC and LLC, emphasizing the dominance of biomass-based pools in overall carbon storage. Pearson?s correlation analysis demonstrated a strong positive relationship between AGB and BGB (r = 0.96), a moderate correlation between AGB and SOC (r = 0.52), and a weak correlation between AGB and LLC (r = 0.32). A moderate positive correlation between SOC and LLC (r = 0.46) further indicated the role of litter decomposition in enhancing soil carbon. These findings highlight the structural interdependence among carbon pools and underscore the pivotal role of vegetation biomass in carbon sequestration within sacred groves of the Pakur Forest Division.

Keywords

Sacred groves, Carbon sequestration, Biomass estimation, Soil organic carbon, Pakur, Jharkhand

Introduction

Sacred groves are fragmented forest remnants preserved over generations by local communities based on ancient practices that have important implications for biodiversity and carbon offsets (Bafakeeh et al., 2012; Singh et al., 2022). They play a vital role in conserving delicate ecosystems and serve as significant carbon sinks (Sahu et al., 2015). These groves are crucial sanctuaries for many rare and endemic species, helping protect forest biodiversity (Kulkarni et al., 2015). The locals uphold these sacred areas and have a deep respect for the flora, fostering both the preservation of species and ecological stability. Additionally, aboveground and belowground trees, as well as soil organic carbon in sacred groves, bolster soil structure, reduce erosion, improve water retention, and enhance agricultural productivity (Bhattacharya and Nandi, 2019). The present study evaluates the carbon stock and sequestration potential of some sacred groves in Pakur District of Jharkhand to understand their contribution to climate change mitigation. Sacred groves are sacred community-conserved areas that conserve biodiversity and deliver several ecosystem services including carbon pool. However, carbon pool and its disaggregated components in sacred groves of Jharkhand, particularly in Pakur district, is under-researched. Thus, the present study was conducted in Pakur district to estimate the total carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential in selected sacred groves of Pakur district, Jharkhand, India. For this, allometric equations were employed to estimate biomass in trees, shrubs, and herbs of above gradient, below gradient, litter, and soil organic carbon to evaluate total, aboveground, and belowground carbon pool of sacred groves (Joshi & Garkoti, 2024).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Study Area

The study sites are located in Pakur District of Jharkhand, India which lies between 24?38’ N to 24?50’ N latitudes and 87?50’ E to 88?5’ E longitudes. Pakur district is one of the twenty-four districts of Jharkhand state, India, and Pakur is the administrative headquarters of this district. Pakur sub-division of Sahibganj district was carved out on 28 January 1994 to constitute Pakur District. Pakur district lies in the north-eastern portion of Santhal Pargana in Jharkhand covering an area of 686.21 km2. Pakur is predominantly a hilly area with certain pockets of plain land. Topographically it is divided into three parts i.e. the hilly area, the rolling area and alluvial area. The hilly area includes the whole of Damini-i-koh from northern corner of Pakur district up to the south-west bordering the Birbhum district of West Bengal. A narrow continuous strip of alluvial soil which lies between the Ganga feeder canal and the loop line of Eastern Railway is very fertile. The rest of the part covers the Rolling areas, which is less conducive for agriculture (Sharma, 2016). Average altitude of the district is about 300 meters above MSL. There are three main rivers in this district namely, Bansloi, Torai & Brahmini. Rivers Bansloi & Torai flow in the middle while Brahmini flows in the Southern portion of the district. The district is characterized by three distinct seasons – summer, rainy and winter. The summers are extremely hot and lasts from March to May with maximum temperature rising up to 42 to 46 °C in some places. The winters are cold and last from November to February with minimum temperature going around 3 °C. The average annual rainfall is about of 1200 mm to 1400 mm. According to the classification of forest types of India, the forests of Pakur district fall into Northern Dry Peninsular Sal Forest–5B/C-1 type, Northern Tropical Dry Mixed Deciduous Forest– 5B/C-2 type and Tropical Dry Deciduous Scrub Forest–5B/DS-1 type (Champion and Seth1968). The forest is mainly dominated by Shorea robusta trees and their associates namely- Terminalia chebula, Buchanania lanzan, Semicarpus anacardium, etc. along with occasional bamboo brakes. These forests of entire Santhal Parganas (which now include the districts of Pakur, Godda, Sahibganj, Dumka and Jamtara) were rich in wildlife at the turn of the 20th century, within the next few decades’ large mammalian fauna was wiped off due to rampant hunting and habitat loss. Birdlife is rich in these forests. (https://pakur.nic.in).

Reference

  1. Anderson, J. M., & Ingram, J. S. I. (1993). Tropical soil biology and fertility: A handbook of methods (2nd ed.). CAB International.
  2. Bafakeeh, O. T., Al-Qarawi, A. A., & Al-Otaibi, R. M. (2012). The role of sacred groves in biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Biology, 33(2), 301–308.
  3. Brown, S. (1997). Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests. FAO Forestry Paper No. 134. FAO, Rome.
  4. Bhattacharya, P., & Nandi, S. (2019). Sacred groves for soil and water conservation: Traditional ecological knowledge and sustainable ecosystem management in India. Journal of Environmental Management, 234, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.052
  5. Brown, S. (1997). Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: A primer. FAO Forestry Paper 134, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  6. Cairns, M. A., Brown, S., Helmer, E. H., & Baumgardner, G. A. (1997). Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia, 111, 1–11.
  7. Champion, H. G., & Seth, S. K. (1968). A revised survey of the forest types of India. Government of India Press, New Delhi.
  8. Chave, J., Réjou?Méchain, M., Búrquez, A., Chidumayo, E., Colgan, M. S., Delitti, W. B. C., ... & Vieilledent, G. (2014). Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global Change Biology, 20(10), 3177–3190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629
  9. Chhabra, A., Palria, S., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2002). Growing stock-based forest biomass estimate for India. Biomass and Bioenergy, 22(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00064-6
  10. Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K., & Paul, E. (2013). The Microbial Efficiency–Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework. Global Change Biology, 19, 988–995.
  11. Das, A., & Chaturvedi, R. K. (2015). Litter production and decomposition patterns in tropical dry deciduous forests of India. Ecological Processes, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-015-0041-5
  12. Deb, D., Malhotra, K. C., & Chatterjee, S. (2019). Sacred groves: Cultural and ecological significance in India. Environmental Development, 32, 100458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.100458
  13. Forest Survey of India (FSI). (2021). India State of Forest Report 2021. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), Government of India, Dehradun.
  14. Gadgil, M., & Vartak, V. D. (1976). The sacred groves of Western Ghats in India. Economic Botany, 30(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862961
  15. Giri, C., Kumar, A., & Rawat, G. S. (2019). Carbon sequestration potential and biodiversity value of dry tropical forests in Central India. Tropical Ecology, 60(2), 221–233.
  16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan.
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2019). 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC, Geneva.
  18. Joshi, P., & Garkoti, S. C. (2024). Biomass carbon estimation and ecosystem carbon dynamics in community-managed forests of Eastern Himalaya, India. Carbon Management, 15(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2023.2269438
  19. Kent, M., & Coker, P. (1992). Vegetation description and analysis: A practical approach. CRC Press.
  20. Kulkarni, A., Gaikwad, J., & Patil, S. (2015). Role of sacred groves in biodiversity conservation: A case study from Western Maharashtra, India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24(11), 2821–2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0978-9
  21. Kumar, A., Giri, C., & Rawat, G. S. (2020). Vegetation structure, biomass, and carbon stock assessment in tropical dry deciduous forests of India. Ecological Indicators, 118, 106750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106750
  22. Lal, R. (2005). Forest soils and carbon sequestration. Forest Ecology and Management, 220(1–3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.015
  23. MacDicken, K. G. (1997). A guide to monitoring carbon storage in forestry and agroforestry projects. Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, Arlington, USA.
  24. Malhotra, K. C., Gokhale, Y., Chatterjee, S., & Srivastava, S. (2007). Sacred groves in India: An overview. Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya (IGRMS), Bhopal.
  25. Mokany, K., Raison, R. J., & Prokushkin, A. S. (2006). Critical analysis of root:shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biology, 12, 84–96.
  26. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC). (2018). India’s Nationally Determined Contributions: Second Biennial Update Report to the UNFCCC. Government of India, New Delhi.
  27. Mokany, K., Raison, R. J., & Prokushkin, A. S. (2006). Critical analysis of root:shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biology, 12(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001043.x
  28. Nath, A. J., Lal, R., & Das, A. K. (2015). Managing woody bamboos for carbon farming and carbon trading. Global Ecology and Conservation, 3, 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.02.004
  29. Sahu, S. C., Dhal, N. K., & Mohanty, R. C. (2015). Tree species diversity, distribution and population structure in a tropical dry deciduous forest of Eastern Ghats, India. Tropical Ecology, 56(3), 283–296.
  30. Sahoo, U. K., Singh, S. L., Gogoi, A., Kenye, A., & Sahoo, S. S. (2020). Active role of community-managed forests in carbon sequestration. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 1–15.
  31. Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002). Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter. Plant and Soil, 241, 155–176.
  32. Sharma, S. (2016). District Census Handbook: Pakur, Jharkhand. Directorate of Census Operations, Government of India.
  33. Sileshi, G. W. (2014). A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures. Forest Ecology and Management, 329, 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.026
  34. Singh, P., Pandey, P., & Shukla, R. P. (2022). Sacred groves and their role in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in India. Environmental Conservation Journal, 23(1–2), 45–56.
  35. Tripathi, K. P., Chaudhary, L. B., & Tiwari, A. (2017). Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in tropical dry deciduous forests of India. Journal of Forestry Research, 28(4), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0321-0
  36. Upadhyay, T. P., Sankhayan, P. L., & Solberg, B. (2019). Carbon sequestration potential and cost-benefit analysis of community forests in Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 109, 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102001
  37. Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  38. Wildlife Institute of India (WII). (2020). Manual on carbon stock assessment and biodiversity monitoring in Indian forests. WII–MoEFCC, Government of India, Dehradun.
  39. Zanne, A. E., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Coomes, D. A., Ilic, J., Jansen, S., Lewis, S. L., & Chave, J. (2009). Global wood density database. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.234.

Photo
Sourav Chandra
Corresponding author

Divisional Forest Officer, Pakur Forest Division, Jharkhand, India.

Photo
Sanjay Xaxa
Co-author

Functional Area Expert, Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Kanke Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

Photo
Ali Jabran
Co-author

Wildlife Expert, Pakur Forest Division, Jharkhand, India

Sourav Chandra*, Sanjay Xaxa, Ali Jabran, Carbon Storage and Sequestration Potential of Sacred Groves in Pakur District, Jharkhand, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (3), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18897902

More related articles
AI Forensic Handwritten Analysis System...
Sriram S., Rohith S., Sasi Balan, Kaviya P., Gokila P., ...
Performance Optimization of A Low-Speed Multi-Blad...
Lantolalaina RAKOTOMAVO, Andriamananarivo Ignace RAKOTOZANDRY, Jo...
Formulation and Development of Herbal Gel Utilizin...
SAIYED SELIM ALI, ABDUS SAMAD , HIMANGSHU SEKHAR MAJI, PINTU KUMA...
Advancements in Immunomodulatory Therapies for Autoimmune Disease...
Shrushti Shahane , Utkarsha Sawant, Pratiksha Ghodake , Swapnil Kale, Sneha Kanase, ...
Alzheimer Disease Detection and Classification Using NASSNet Mobile Network...
Aminu Abbas Gumel, Musbahu Yunusa Makama, Abdullahi Aminu Kazaure, ...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Patch...
Ashwini Karnakoti, Dr. Amol Borade, Prajwal Birajdar, Vishal Bodke, Mangesh Dagale, Ruchita Badekar,...
Formulation and Evaluation of Colon-Targeted Wheat Grass Tablets Using pH-Depend...
Neelima Devi, Kasala Sindhuja, Kavvampalli Shirisha, Kemidi Srikanth, Kokkonda Rajashekar Reddy, Kol...
AI Forensic Handwritten Analysis System...
Sriram S., Rohith S., Sasi Balan, Kaviya P., Gokila P., ...
More related articles
AI Forensic Handwritten Analysis System...
Sriram S., Rohith S., Sasi Balan, Kaviya P., Gokila P., ...
Performance Optimization of A Low-Speed Multi-Blade Wind Turbine For Pumping: An...
Lantolalaina RAKOTOMAVO, Andriamananarivo Ignace RAKOTOZANDRY, Josoa Albert Andriamorasata, ...
Formulation and Development of Herbal Gel Utilizing Natural Fruit Extracts....
SAIYED SELIM ALI, ABDUS SAMAD , HIMANGSHU SEKHAR MAJI, PINTU KUMAR DE, ...
AI Forensic Handwritten Analysis System...
Sriram S., Rohith S., Sasi Balan, Kaviya P., Gokila P., ...
Performance Optimization of A Low-Speed Multi-Blade Wind Turbine For Pumping: An...
Lantolalaina RAKOTOMAVO, Andriamananarivo Ignace RAKOTOZANDRY, Josoa Albert Andriamorasata, ...
Formulation and Development of Herbal Gel Utilizing Natural Fruit Extracts....
SAIYED SELIM ALI, ABDUS SAMAD , HIMANGSHU SEKHAR MAJI, PINTU KUMAR DE, ...