View Article

Abstract

Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD) has become an indispensable component of the current pharmaceutical research and has changed the established paradigms of drug discovery. This extensive overview of the research analyses the basic concepts, protocols, and uses of CADD in an in-silico viewpoint. We highlight the key computational techniques, including molecular docking, pharmacophore modelling, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis, molecular dynamics simulation, and part-based drug designs, including the structural-based drug design (SBDD) and ligand-based drug design (LBDD) approaches. The integration of computational chemistry, structural biology, and bioinformatics has enabled reasonable design of therapeutic agents, including improved efficacy, selectivity, and reduction of toxicity. Some of the theoretical foundations of CADD methodologies, their practical uses in the fields of hit identification, lead optimization, and ADMET prediction, and case studies representing successful translation of computational predictions to clinical candidates are discussed. There are severe issues such as limitations on accuracy, computational cost, protein flexibility and validation concerns, that are tackled. The prospects that involve the implementation of artificial intelligence, quantum mechanical models, and cloud computing are examined. CADD remains a developing technology that is playing a vital role as a bridge between the computational sciences and the experimental pharmaceutical research to fast-track drug discovery and minimize expenses and the need of animal testing.

Keywords

Computer-Aided Drug Design, Molecular Docking, QSAR, Pharmacophore Modelling, Structure-Based Drug Design, Virtual Screening, In Silico Methods

Introduction

1.1 The Evolution of Drug Discovery

The discovery of traditional medicine was largely dependent on sudden observation, natural product screening, and rugged trial-and-error methods. Detection of therapeutic agents through systematic random screening of chemical libraries, although sometimes successful, proved unskilled, expensive, and timely. The average cost for bringing a new drug to market approval from the initial discovery exceeds 2.6 billion USD over 12-15 years; success rates remain unexpectedly low—about 90% of drug candidates entering clinical trials fail to achieve regulatory approval.  The molecular revolution of biology, with the exponential growth of computational energy, has fundamentally transformed pharmaceutical research. Explanation of disease processes at molecular and genetic levels, determining the three-dimensional structure of biological macromolecules through X-ray crystallography, and the development of sophisticated computational algorithms enabled reasonable, knowledge-based methods in the design of medicine. Computer-aided drug design represents this paradigm shift, using computational methods to guide and accelerate the discovery and optimization of therapeutic agents [1].

1.2 Principles of Computer-Aided Drug Design

CADD includes computational techniques that facilitate drug discovery by molecular interaction prediction, binding affinity estimation, pharmacological property evaluations, and prioritizing compounds for experimental validity. The underlying basic fundamental of CADD is that drugs interact with specific biological goals and apply therapeutic effects—usually proteins such as enzymes, receptors, ion channels, or nucleic acid. The three-dimensional structure of targets and molecular determinants of ligand-target interactions enable rational design of molecules with the desired binding properties.

The CADD method is usually classified into two complementary methods:

Structure-based drug design (SBDD): This method uses three-dimensional structural information of biological targets, which are obtained through experimental methods or computational modelling. SBDD techniques predict how small molecules are bound to target active sites, enabling rational changes to increase affinity and specificity. The main SBDD method includes molecular docking, de novo design, and structure-based virtual screening [2].

Ligand-based drug design (LBDD): When target structural information is unavailable or limited, LBDD uses knowledge of the molecules known to interact with the target. By analysing structural features, physical and chemical properties, and activity profiles of known ligands, LBDD methods detect patterns related to biological activities and use these patterns to design or identify new active compounds. The original LBDD method includes pharmacophore modelling, QSAR analysis, and similar searches [3].  Integration of SBDD and LBDD methods, complementarily combined with computational techniques, produces a wide workflow capable of dealing with various challenges across the pipeline.

Reference

  1. Niazi SK, Mariam Z. Computer-aided drug design and drug discovery: a prospective analysis. Pharmaceuticals. 2023 Dec 22;17(1):22.
  2. Rakshit G, Murtuja S, Kumar BK, Murugesan S, Jayaprakash V. Structure-based drug design (SBDD). In Computer aided drug design (CADD): from ligand-based methods to structure-based approaches 2022 Jan 1 (pp. 181-229). Elsevier.
  3. Yadav V, Tonk RK. Ligand-based drug design (LBDD). In Computer aided drug design (CADD): from ligand-based methods to structure-based approaches 2022 Jan 1 (pp. 57-99). Elsevier.
  4. Arthur D, Dogara GB, Babafem AA, Akan JC. Computational Modeling of Chemical Inhibitors Targeting the HIV-1 Main Protease: A Review. Medicinal and Medical Chemistry. 2024 Aug 1;1(2):71-83.
  5. Dias R, de Azevedo J, Walter F. Molecular docking algorithms. Current drug targets. 2008 Dec 1;9(12):1040-7.
  6. Pagadala NS, Syed K, Tuszynski J. Software for molecular docking: a review. Biophysical reviews. 2017 Apr;9(2):91-102.
  7. Liu J, Wang R. Classification of current scoring functions. Journal of chemical information and modeling. 2015 Mar 23;55(3):475-82.
  8. Sahu MK, Nayak AK, Hailemeskel B, Eyupoglu OE. Exploring recent updates on molecular docking: Types, method, application, limitation & future prospects. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences. 2024;13(2-2024):24-40.
  9. Pirhadi S, Shiri F, Ghasemi JB. Methods and applications of structure-based pharmacophores in drug discovery. Current topics in medicinal chemistry. 2013 May 1;13(9):1036-47.
  10. Pal S, Kumar V, Kundu B, Bhattacharya D, Preethy N, Reddy MP, Talukdar A. Ligand-based pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening and molecular docking studies for discovery of potential topoisomerase I inhibitors. Computational and structural biotechnology journal. 2019 Jan 1; 17:291-310.
  11. Tyagi R, Singh A, Chaudhary KK, Yadav MK. Pharmacophore modeling and its applications. In Bioinformatics 2022 Jan 1 (pp. 269-289). Academic Press.
  12. Muhammed MT, Ak?-yalc?n E. Pharmacophore modeling in drug discovery: methodology and current status. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry. 2021 Aug 8;8(3):749-62.
  13. Mouchlis VD, Afantitis A, Serra A, Fratello M, Papadiamantis AG, Aidinis V, Lynch I, Greco D, Melagraki G. Advances in de novo drug design: from conventional to machine learning methods. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021 Feb 7;22(4):1676.
  14. Durrant JD, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery. BMC biology. 2011 Oct 28;9(1):71.
  15. Dudek AZ, Arodz T, Gálvez J. Computational methods in developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR): a review. Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening. 2006 Mar 1;9(3):213-28.
  16. Tropsha A, Golbraikh A. Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening. Current pharmaceutical design. 2007 Dec 1;13(34):3494-504.
  17. Sippl W. 3D-QSAR–applications, recent advances, and limitations. Recent advances in QSAR studies: Methods and applications. 2009 Oct 30:103-25.
  18. Muegge I, Mukherjee P. An overview of molecular fingerprint similarity search in virtual screening. Expert opinion on drug discovery. 2016 Feb 1;11(2):137-48.
  19. Guan L, Yang H, Cai Y, Sun L, Di P, Li W, Liu G, Tang Y. ADMET-score–a comprehensive scoring function for evaluation of chemical drug-likeness. Medchemcomm. 2019;10(1):148-57.
  20. Nascimento IJ, de Aquino TM, da Silva-Júnior EF. The new era of drug discovery: The power of computer-aided drug design (CADD). Letters in Drug Design & Discovery. 2022 Nov 1;19(11):951-5.
  21. Wang T, Wu MB, Chen ZJ, Chen H, Lin JP, Yang LR. Fragment-based drug discovery and molecular docking in drug design. Current pharmaceutical biotechnology. 2015 Jan 1;16(1):11-25.
  22. Verma S, Pathak RK. Discovery and optimization of lead molecules in drug designing. In Bioinformatics 2022 Jan 1 (pp. 253-267). Academic Press.
  23. Dal Col V. In silico prediction of drug resistance: from cancer targeted therapy to cancer targeted prevention (Doctoral dissertation, Università degli studi di Trieste).
  24. Cohen NC. Structure-Based Drug Design and the Discovery of Aliskiren (Tekturna®): Perseverance and Creativity to Overcome a R&D Pipeline Challenge. Chemical biology & drug design. 2007 Dec 1;70(6).
  25. Talele TT, Khedkar SA, Rigby AC. Successful applications of computer aided drug discovery: moving drugs from concept to the clinic. Current topics in medicinal chemistry. 2010 Jan 1;10(1):127-41.
  26. Kaushik N, Kumar S. Accomplishment of Toxicity Prediction by CADD Tools. InApplications of Computational Tools in Drug Design and Development 2025 May 21 (pp. 555-601). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  27. Siddiqui B, Yadav CS, Akil M, Faiyyaz M, Khan AR, Ahmad N, Hassan F, Azad MI, Owais M, Nasibullah M, Azad I. Artificial intelligence in computer-aided drug design (cadd) tools for the finding of potent biologically active small molecules: Traditional to modern approach. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening. 2025 Jan 15.
  28. Niazi SK. Quantum mechanics in drug discovery: a comprehensive review of methods, applications, and future directions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025 Jun 30;26(13):6325.
  29. Ol?aç A, Türe A, Ol?aç S, Möller S. Cloud-based high throughput virtual screening in novel drug discovery. InHigh-Performance Modelling and Simulation for Big Data Applications: Selected Results of the COST Action IC1406 cHiPSet 2019 Mar 26 (pp. 250-278). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Photo
Deep Jyoti Shah
Corresponding author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Mahesh Kumar Yadav
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Astha Topno
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Shivam Kashyap
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Jiten Goray
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Ajay Kumar
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Amisha Kumari
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Ayush Kumar Verma
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Gangadhar Singh
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Karan Kumar
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Manshi Kumari
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Priti Payal Jha
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Rakhi Kumari
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Sakshee Goswami
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Sudarshan Rawani
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Suraj Kumar
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Anjali Prasad
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Ashish Ranjan Yaduvendu
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Dhananjay sahu
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Amit Kumar Prajapati
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Photo
Biplop Debnath
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand-835219, India

Deep Jyoti Shah*, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Astha Topno, Shivam Kashyap, Jiten Goray, Ajay Kumar, Amisha Kumari, Ayush Kumar Verma, Gangadhar Singh, Karan Kumar, Manshi Kumari, Priti Payal Jha, Rakhi Kumari, Sakshee Goswami, Sudarshan Rawani, Suraj Kumar, Anjali Prasad, Ashish Ranjan Yaduvendu, Dhananjay Sahu, Amit Kumar Prajapati, Biplop Debnath, Computer-Aided Drug Design in Modern Pharmaceutical Research: An In-Silico Perspective, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (10), 514-527. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17458222

More related articles
Onychomycosis: A Comprehensive Review of Current D...
Mahefuz Attar, Ravi Kurhade, Wasim Bagwan, Muskan Shaikh, ...
Caregiver-Led Dietary Interventions for Alzheimer'...
Arnab Roy, Susmita Gorai, Sayantani Samaddar, Krishnendu Roy, Mad...
Related Articles
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance: Emerging Trends & ...
Swati Gaykar, Ramdas Darade, Vikram Saruk, Manoj Garad, Anuja Ghaywat, Komal Gunjal, Bhure Priti, ...
Topical Application of Celecoxib Loaded Invasom Development, Characteristics and...
Pooja Rathore, Mukesh kumar, Mohini Ghodke, Mukesh kumar Jayaswal, Niraj Kushwaha, Neelesh Jhade, Ni...
Nutritional Profiling and Anti-Oxidant Activity of Teramnus Labialis (L.F) Spren...
Muskan Gandhi, Hitesh Kumarkhaniya, Bharat maitreya , ...
Onychomycosis: A Comprehensive Review of Current Diagnostics and Therapeutics...
Mahefuz Attar, Ravi Kurhade, Wasim Bagwan, Muskan Shaikh, ...
More related articles
Onychomycosis: A Comprehensive Review of Current Diagnostics and Therapeutics...
Mahefuz Attar, Ravi Kurhade, Wasim Bagwan, Muskan Shaikh, ...
Caregiver-Led Dietary Interventions for Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Nursing...
Arnab Roy, Susmita Gorai, Sayantani Samaddar, Krishnendu Roy, Madhu Vishwakarma, Priti Payal Jha, Na...
Onychomycosis: A Comprehensive Review of Current Diagnostics and Therapeutics...
Mahefuz Attar, Ravi Kurhade, Wasim Bagwan, Muskan Shaikh, ...
Caregiver-Led Dietary Interventions for Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Nursing...
Arnab Roy, Susmita Gorai, Sayantani Samaddar, Krishnendu Roy, Madhu Vishwakarma, Priti Payal Jha, Na...