View Article

Abstract

Fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) has become a revolutionary model in pharmaceutical chemistry, providing a logical and effective substitute for traditional high-throughput screening (HTS) methods. This detailed review explores the principles, methods, uses, and obstacles of FBDD in contemporary drug development. Using low-molecular-weight compounds (generally 150?300 Da following the "rule of three") as foundations, FBDD facilitates a methodical investigation of extensive chemical space, enhancing binding efficiency and shortening development periods. This review examines a range of screening technologies such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), X-ray crystallography, and thermal shift assays. We outline strategies for fragment optimization?such as growing, linking, and merging techniques?and emphasize successful clinical applications, featuring eight FDA-approved medications and more than 50 compounds currently in clinical trials. Recent developments in targeting protein-protein interactions (PPIs), allosteric modulation, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence and machine learning are analyzed. FBDD offers considerable potential for identifying new therapeutic compounds, especially for targets that were previously considered "undruggable," but it also faces challenges such as weak initial binding affinities, a need for precise detection techniques, and intricate optimization procedures. This review consolidates existing insights and future outlooks on FBDD, establishing it as an essential instrument in modern pharmaceutical chemistry and drug development.

Keywords

Fragment-based drug discovery, pharmaceutical chemistry, drug design, fragment screening, optimization strategies, biophysical methods, structure-activity relationship, lead discovery, protein-protein interactions

Introduction

The identification and creation of new therapeutic compounds constitute one of the major difficulties in pharmaceutical chemistry. Conventional methods for drug discovery, especially high-throughput screening (HTS), encompass evaluating extensive collections of drug-like compounds against target proteins. Though HTS has greatly aided in discovering new chemical entities, this traditional approach is becoming increasingly constrained by rising development expenses, prolonged periods, and the challenges in targeting structurally complex proteins. In the last twenty years, fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) has become a transformative approach in pharmaceutical chemistry, providing a complementary and frequently better option to conventional screening techniques. [1, 2] FBDD embodies a bottom-up strategy for drug development that starts with small, low-molecular-weight entities known as "fragments." In contrast to traditional HTS that usually examines extensive libraries of drug-like substances with molecular weights over 400 Da, FBDD employs molecular fragments that typically fall between 150 and 300 Da, following the "rule of three" guidelines. This essential difference in strategy offers multiple strategic benefits: fragments show enhanced binding efficiency (ligand efficiency), necessitate fewer compounds for screening because of improved exploration of chemical space, and allow for the discovery of novel pharmacophores that traditional HTS might miss. The theoretical basis of FBDD is founded on the idea that small molecular fragments, despite having weak individual binding affinities with protein targets, can effectively act as initial points for methodical development into strong lead compounds via rational medicinal chemistry. Starting with fragments that engage particular binding sites on target proteins allows medicinal chemists to steer further optimization by utilizing comprehensive structural data acquired from diverse biophysical techniques, which ensures that the transition from fragment to lead compound is intentional and systematic instead of accidental. The influence of FBDD on pharmaceutical chemistry and the development of clinical drugs has been significant and increasing. As of now, eight drugs identified through FBDD have gained FDA approval, and over 50 compounds derived from FBDD have moved into clinical development spanning various therapeutic fields such as oncology, infectious diseases, and neurology. Prominent instances comprise vemurafenib (BRAF blocker for melanoma), venetoclax (BCL-2 blocker for blood cancers), pexidartinib (CSF-1R blocker), erdafitinib (pan-FGFR blocker), and asciminib (ABL allosteric blocker for chronic myeloid leukemia). This review offers an in-depth analysis of fragment-based drug discovery, covering its historical evolution, theoretical foundations, screening and optimization techniques, applications in difficult target categories, and the incorporation of new computational and AI-driven methods.

Reference

  1. Erlanson DA, McDowell RS, O'Brien T. Fragment-based drug discovery. J Med Chem. 2004;47(14):3463–3482.
  2. Hajduk PJ, Huth JR, Fesik SW. Druggability indices for protein targets derived from NMR-based screening data. J Med Chem. 2005;48(7):2518–2525.
  3. Congreve M, Murray CW, Carr RA. A 'Rule of Three' for fragment-based lead discovery? Drug Discov Today. 2003;8(19):876–877.
  4. Hopkins AL, Groom CR, Alex A. Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection. Drug Discov Today. 2004;9(10):430–431.
  5. Harner MJ, Frank AO, Fesik SW. Fragment-based drug discovery using NMR spectroscopy. J Biomol NMR. 2013;56(2):65–75.
  6. Lepre CA, Moore JM, Peng JW. Theory and applications of NMR-based screening in pharmaceutical research. Chem Rev. 1996;104(8):3641–3676.
  7. Navratilova I, Hopkins AL. Fragment screening by surface plasmon resonance. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2010;1(1):44–48.
  8. Patel D, Bauman JD, Arnold E, Olson AJ. Advantages of crystallographic fragment screening: functional and mechanistic insights from a powerful platform for efficient design of effective drugs. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2014;116(2–3):92–100.
  9. Shuker SB, Hajduk PJ, Meadows RP, Fesik SW. Discovering high-affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR. Science. 1996;274(5292):1531–1534.
  10. Hubbard RE, Murray JB. Recognising and exploiting protein flexibility in drug design. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(9):712–729.
  11. Jhoti H, Leung N, Wood A. Fragment libraries and screening methods. In: Drug Discovery Science. Wiley; 2003. p. 445–467.
  12. Rees DC, Congreve M, Murray CW, Carr R. Fragment-based lead discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(8):660–672.
  13. Erlanson DA, Fesik SW, Hubbard RE, Jahnke W, Jhoti H. Twenty years on: the impact of fragments on drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(9):605–619.
  14. Jhoti H, Williams G, Rees DC, Murray CW. The 'rule of three' for fragment-based drug discovery: where are we now? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(8):644–645.
  15. Keedy DA, Kenner LR, Warkentin M, Woldeyes RA, Hopkins JB, Thompson MC, et al. Crystal cryocooling distorts conformational heterogeneity in a rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor. eLife. 2018;7: e35333.
  16. Bollag G, Hirth P, Tsai J, Zhang J, Ibrahim PN, Cho H, et al. Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma. Nature. 2010;467(7315):596–599.
  17. Souers AJ, Leverson JD, Boghaert ER, Ackler SL, Catron ND, Chen J, et al. ABT-199, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets. Nat Med. 2013;19(2):202–208.
  18. Olivecrona M, Blaschke T, Engkvist O, Chen H. Molecular de-novo design through deep generative models for molecular optimization. J Cheminform. 2017;9(1):48.
  19. Zhavoronkov A, Ivanenkov YA, Aliper A, Veselov MS, Aladinskiy VA, Aladinskaya AV, et al. Deep learning enables rapid identification of potent DDR1 kinase inhibitors. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(9):1038–1040.
  20. Altae-Tran H, Ramsundar B, Pappu AS, Pande V. Low data drug discovery with one-shot learning. ACS Cent Sci. 2017;3(4):283–293.
  21. Schneider G, Fechner U. Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(8):649–663.
  22. Cernak T, Radchenko DS, Mnich MI, Kozlov AV, Hanson PR. Fragment-based drug discovery in the nucleoside and nucleotide space. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev. 2014;16(3):313–325.
  23. Leung SC, Bodkin M, Abagyan R, Perez-Pineiro R, Suen CS. Challenges in fragment-based drug discovery. Curr Top Med Chem. 2012;12(4):340–350.
  24. Kola I, Landis J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(8):711–715.
  25. Schoepfer J, Jahnke W, Berellini G, Buonamici S, Cotesta S, Cowan-Jacob SW, et al. Discovery of asciminib (ABL001), an allosteric inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase BCR-ABL1. J Med Chem. 2018;61(18):8120–8135.

Photo
Mohammad Javed
Corresponding author

School of Pharmacy, YBN University, Ranchi-Jharkhand

Photo
Sita Kumari
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Durga soren Univeristy, Deoghar-Jharkhand

Photo
Kundan Raj Jajware
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Durga soren Univeristy, Deoghar-Jharkhand

Photo
Somya Saurav
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Durga soren Univeristy, Deoghar-Jharkhand

Photo
Rajasmita Bhadra
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, RKDF University, Ranchi-Jharkhand

Mohammad Javed*, Sita Kumari, Kundan Raj Jajware, Somya Saurav, Rajasmita Bhadra, Fragment-Based Drug Discovery: Opportunities and Challenges in Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (3), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18898200

More related articles
Formulation and Evalution of Clindamycin Gel...
Deshmukh Ajinkya, Dr. Priti Shinde, ...
A Review on the Role of the Herbal Ingredients Use...
Harshal Pagar, Vaishali Pagar, Yash Tambe, Vaibhav Thakare, ...
A Study to Assess the Knowledge & Attitude Regardi...
Lakshmavva Gondi, Jayashree Itti, ...
Navigating the Path to Europe: How Social Media Shapes Irregular Migration Decis...
Rawezh Kamran Ahmad, Ismail Haji Zalmi, Neaz Naif Mustafa, Mohammed Satar Saeed, Hataw Hussein, ...
A Review on Vinca Alkaloids in Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Cultivation and Futur...
Priti Bhure, Rajashri Wagh, Trupti Bankar, Shital Karhale, Vikram Saruk, Manoj Garad, ...
Related Articles
Global Perspectives on Moyamoya Disease: Genetic Origins, Clinical Diversity and...
Arnab Roy, Deep Jyoti Shah, Abhinav Kumar, Abhijit Kumar, Shruti Kumari, Niraj Kumar, Abhinav Keshri...
The Effect of Size and Charge of Lipid Nanoparticles Prepared by Microfluidic Mi...
Sanchita Patil, Swaliha Mulla, Prajakta Mali, Sayali Shendage, Sakshi Kolekar, Deepak Kare, ...
Medicinal Plants in Alzheimer’s Disease Management...
Ashwini Pingle, Gayatri Gaikwad, Amol Darwade, Ganesh Darunte, Kunal Gaikwad, ...
Evaluation of Phytochemicals, Total Flavonoids Content and Antioxidant Activity ...
Jyoti Prajapati , Anusha Maitreya, Himanshu Pandya , Hitesh solanki , ...
Formulation and Evalution of Clindamycin Gel...
Deshmukh Ajinkya, Dr. Priti Shinde, ...
More related articles
Formulation and Evalution of Clindamycin Gel...
Deshmukh Ajinkya, Dr. Priti Shinde, ...
A Review on the Role of the Herbal Ingredients Used in Hair Oil...
Harshal Pagar, Vaishali Pagar, Yash Tambe, Vaibhav Thakare, ...