View Article

Abstract

Pharmacovigilance (PV), or drug safety, is the science and activities related to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and other drug-related problems. It plays an essential role in protecting patient safety, improving public health, and ensuring the safe and effective use of medicines. PV involves systematic reporting, evaluation, and monitoring of ADRs through national and international programs such as the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI). Hospital pharmacists significantly contribute to pharmacovigilance by identifying, documenting, and reporting ADRs, providing patient counseling, and ensuring rational drug use. Despite its importance, challenges such as underreporting, lack of awareness, and limited resources remain. Strengthening training, using digital tools, increasing patient involvement, and promoting global collaboration are key to improving pharmacovigilance systems in the future.

Keywords

Pharmacovigilance (pv), Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs), Drug Safety, Hospital Pharmacist, PvPI, ADR Reporting, Patient Safety, VigiBase, Risk Benefit Assessment, Drug Regulation

Introduction

Pharmacovigilance, often known as Drug Safety, can be abbreviated as PV or PhV.  The term “pharmacovigilance” comes from the Greek word “pharmakon” meaning “drug” and the Latin word “vigilare,” which means “to keep watch.” [1]. PV is a significant and necessary component of clinical research [2].  The research and practices around the identification, evaluation, comprehension, and avoidance of side effects or other drug-related issues are known as pharmacovigilance.  “The science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or any other possible drug-related problem, particularly long term and short-term adverse effects of medicines,” states the World Health Organization.  [3]. Pharmacovigilance plays a crucial role in drug regulation, public health programs, and clinical practice. It promotes safe and appropriate drug use by detecting previously unknown adverse drug reactions (ADRs), identifying risk factors for ADR development, and estimating quantitative benefits/risks to improve prescribing.  [4]. Pharmacovigilance focuses on adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which are undesirable and unanticipated reactions to drugs used for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, or alteration of physiological functions. [5]. Pharmacovigilance refers to the science and activities involved in detecting, assessing, understanding, and preventing adverse effects or any other drug-related issues [6]. With the increasing use of medicines in various health conditions, ensuring patient safety has become more critical than ever [7]. Pharmacovigilance plays a vital role in identifying previously unknown adverse drug reactions (ADRs), reducing harm to patients, and improving the overall healthcare system [8].  ADR is described as "an appreciably harmful or unpleasant reaction, resulting from an intervention related to the use of a medicinal product, which warrants prevention or regimen, or withdrawal of the product, and which predicts hazard from future administration” [9].

OBJECTIVES OF PHARMACOVIGILANCE   

  • Improve patient care and safety when using medications. [10]
  • Enhance public health and safety of medications. [11]
  • Identify and communicate drug-related issues effectively. [12]
  • Assessing the benefits and risks of medicines, while supporting safe and effective use. [13]
  • Promote education, clinical training, and effective communication about pharmacovigilance among healthcare workers and the public. [14]
  • To enhance patient safety by minimizing risks associated with drug use [15].  
  • To detect and assess ADRs and take necessary actions [16].  
  • To improve public health by monitoring drug efficacy and safety [17].  
  • To educate healthcare professionals and patients on drugrelated risks [18]. 

Types of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)   

Type A (Augmented): Dose-related and predictable.  

Type B (Bizarre): Not dose-related and unpredictable.  

Type C (Chronic): Occurs during long-term treatment.  

Type D (Delayed): Appears after prolonged use or exposure.  

Type E (End of use): Occurs after stopping the drug.  

Type F (Failure): Lack of therapeutic effect [19], [20].

Table: - 1

Type of reaction

Description

A: Dose related

Exaggerated expected effects from medicines at usual doses

e.g.) bleeding with warfarin, bradycardia with beta-blockers

B: Idiosyncratic

Unrelated to pharmacological properties

e.g.) Steven’s Johnsons syndrome with allopurinol

C: Dose & time related

Related to cumulative drug use over time

e.g.) adrenal insufficiency with corticosteroids

D: Delayed

Apparent only use of medicines after time

e.g.) skin cancers with topical tacrolimus

E: Withdrawal

Associated with withdrawal or medication cessation

e.g.) rebound tachycardia with stopping beta-blockers

F: Failure of therapy

Associated with unexpected failure of therapy, possibly due to drug interaction

e.g.) St. John’s Wort reducing efficacy of combined oral contraceptives

G: Genetic

Associated with irreversible genetic damage

e.g.) phocomelia after thalidomide

H: Hypersensitivity

Associated with an immune-mediated response to medicines in a sensitized patient

e.g.) amoxicillin and interstitial nephritis (immune complex)

ADR Reporting Process: 

The pharmacovigilance process involves: 

Adverse event reporting is the most prevalent activity related with pharmacovigilance (PV), and it consumes a large amount of resources for drug regulatory bodies (or equivalent government organizations) and drug safety departments in pharmaceutical corporations. [21]. Identifying suspected ADRs by healthcare professionals or patients [22]. Recording the details using ADR reporting forms [23]. Sending the report to regional or national pharmacovigilance centers [24].    Analyzing data and implementing regulatory actions [25].  Adverse event (AE) reporting entails receiving, triaging, data entering, assessing, distributing, reporting (if applicable), and archiving AE data and documentation. [26].AE reporting also gives data to these firms and drug regulatory bodies, which are critical in determining the riskbenefit profile of a medicine. [27].

Fig: 1

? The following are several facets of AE reporting:

  • Individual Case Safety Report

One of the core concepts of adverse event reporting is determining what constitutes a single case safety report.  During the triage phase of a prospective adverse event report, it is critical to determine whether the “four elements” of a valid individual case safety report exist: (1) an identifiable patient, (2) an identifiable reporter, (3) a suspect drug, and (4) an adverse event. [28]. 

  • Activities involved in pharmacovigilance:

Case-control study (retrospective study) 2- Prospective research (a cohort study). 3. Population statistics. and (4) Intensive event report. 5- The spontaneous report in the case represents the population of the single case report. [29].

  • Coding of adverse events:

Adverse event coding is the process of coding "verbatim" information from an AE reporter using standardized vocabulary from a medical coding dictionary, such as MedDRA (the most often used medical coding dictionary). The goal of medical coding is to translate adverse event data into terminology that is easy to identify and evaluate. [30].

  • Seriousness determination:

Although it may seem apparent, pharmacovigilance has a set of criteria for distinguishing between a significant adverse event and a non-serious one. An unfavorable incident is considered serious if it fits one or more of the following conditions: The following criteria are considered serious: death or life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly (birth defect), or "medically significant" (i.e., not meeting the preceding criteria but requiring treatment to prevent one of the preceding criteria). [31].

  • Expedited reporting:

This refers to individual case safety reports involving a serious and unlisted occurrence (one not stated in the drug's labeling) that is thought to be related to the drug's use (US FDA). (Spontaneous reports are often assumed to have positive causation, whereas clinical trial cases are typically evaluated for causality by the clinical trial investigator and/or license holder.) In most countries, the deadline for reporting accelerated instances is 7/15 calendar days after a drug firm receives notification (referred to as "Day 0") of the case.

  • Clinical trial reporting:

Safety information from clinical trials, also known as AE (adverse event) or SAE (serious adverse event) reporting, is used to establish a drug's safety profile in humans and is a key component that drug regulatory authorities consider when deciding whether to grant or deny market authorization (market approval) for a drug. AE reporting occurs when study patients (subjects, participants) encounter any "untoward" occurrence while clinical trials are being conducted. Non-serious adverse events are often recorded separately, at a lower level than pharmacovigilance.

  • Spontaneous reporting:

Spontaneous reports are so named because they occur during the physician's usual diagnostic evaluation of a patient, when the clinician concludes that the drug may be involved in the event's etiology. The spontaneous reporting system (SRS) relies on watchful physicians and other healthcare professionals to not only detect but also report adverse medication reactions. It is a key source of regulatory measures, such as removing a medicine from the market or changing the label due to safety concerns. [32].

  • Aggregate reporting:

Aggregate reporting, also known as periodic reporting, is an important component of medication safety evaluation.  Aggregate reporting is the collection of safety data for a drug over a lengthy period of time (months or years), as opposed to single-case reporting, which only includes individual AE reports.  The advantage of aggregate reporting is that it provides a more complete picture of a drug’s safety profile.  The Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) and the Development Safety Update Report (DSUR) are the two most important aggregate reports globally.  This is a document that is sent to drug regulatory bodies in Europe, the United States, and Japan (ICH nations), as well as other countries worldwide.

  • Other reporting methods:

In several countries, physicians are required by law to report spontaneously. Most nations require manufacturers to report any reports received from healthcare practitioners to the national authority via their Qualified Person for Pharmacovigilance (QPPV). Others have extensive, specialized programmes that focus on new pharmaceuticals, problematic drugs, doctor prescription patterns, or pharmacists' reporting. [33]

Role of Hospital Pharmacist: 

Pharmacists are ideally situated to play a key

Role in the identification and reporting of Suspected drug-related adverse effects due to Our accessibility and knowledge of drug therapy.  As stated, the reporting of suspected Adverse drug reactions does not mandate That a direct cause-and-effect relationship be Established. All that is required is to document the reaction itself and the circumstances Around how it occurred (relevant history, Investigations, concurrent medications, etc.). In 2012, pharmacists submitted only 10% of Health Canada adverse drug reaction reports, which is Unacceptably low. As a profession, we need to Accept responsibility to ensure this activity is Performed systematically and consistently for All suspected adverse drug reactions. [34], [35], [36]. A hospital pharmacist provides expert advise to patients and collaborates with medical and nursing staff to provide optimal treatment. Hospital pharmacists play an essential role in ensuring patient safety [37]. Monitoring drug therapy and identifying potential ADRs [38]. Educating patients about safe drug use [39]. Reporting ADRs to appropriate      pharmacovigilance bodies [40]. Collaborating with doctors and nurses in clinical settings [41].   Hospital pharmacists can suggest whether tablet, injections, Ointment or inhaler may be the best form of medication and Frequently liaise with medical staff concerning their patients. [42].

Hospital pharmacists can provide information on potential adverse effects and ensure drugs are compatible with existing medications. [43]. A hospital pharmacist plays a vital role in ensuring the safe, effective, and rational use of medicines within healthcare settings. They are responsible for dispensing medications, providing information about drug interactions and side effects, and ensuring that prescribed drugs are appropriate for each patient’s clinical condition. Hospital pharmacists work closely with doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals to optimize patient care by offering expert advice on the selection, dosage, and administration of medicines. They also monitor therapeutic outcomes, participate in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting, and contribute to patient education regarding correct medicine use. Additionally, hospital pharmacists are involved in procurement, quality assurance, and inventory control to ensure the availability of essential and cost-effective medicines in hospitals. [44], [45], [46], [47].

Patient Admission

????

Review of Prescriptions

????

Check for Drug Interactions,

Allergies, and Dosage Errors

????

Dispensing of Medicines

????

Provide Drug Information and

Counseling to Patients

????

Monitor Therapeutic Response and

Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

????

Collaborate with Doctors and

Nursing Staff on Wards

????

Ensure Rational Use of Medicines and

Maintain Medicine Inventory

????

Documentation & Reporting

(e.g., ADR, Medication Errors)

Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI):  

The PvPI was initiated by CDSCO and is coordinated by the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC) [48]. It aims to collect, analyze, and monitor ADR data from across the country and issue safety alerts. PvPI has Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Centres (AMCs) in hospitals that report data to IPC [49].

Digital Tools in Pharmacovigilance   

??PvPI App: Mobile application for quick ADR reporting [50].  

??VigiBase: WHO global database of ADRs [51].  

??AI tools: Used for detecting safety signals and analyzing trends [52].  

??Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Integrated for real-time monitoring [53].  

Challenges in Pharmacovigilance   

Underreporting of ADRs by healthcare professionals. Legal concerns and time constraints [54]. Limited access to reporting tools, especially in rural areas. Lack of awareness and training [55].  

Solutions and Future Scope   

Conduct training sessions and awareness campaigns [56].  

Encourage patient participation in ADR reporting [57].  

Use AI and digital platforms for better data handling [58].  

Strengthen national policies and international collaboration [59].                                          

REFERENCE

  1. Soni R, Kesari B. A Review on Pharmacovigilance. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res.; c2014 May-Jun;26(2):237-241.
  2. WHO. Pharmacovigilance: Ensuring the Safe Use of Medicines.Geneva: WHO; 2004.
  3. Health Organization. The Importance of pharmacovigilance – safety Monitoring of medicinal products. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002.
  4. Campbell JE, Gossell-Williams M, Lee MG. A Review Of Pharmacovigilance. West Indian Med J. 2014;63(7):771.
  5. Shuka SS, Gidwani Bina, Pandey R, Rao SP, Singh V and Vyas Amber, “Importance of Pharmacovigilance in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry”, Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Science, 2, 2012, 04-08.
  6. WHO. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance (2002).
  7. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000; 356:1255–1259.
  8. PvPI, CDSCO. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India.
  9. Edwards, I.R. and Aronson, J.K., 2000. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, Diagnosis, and management. The Lancet, 356(9237), pp.1255-1259.
  10. 10.World Health Organization. (2002). The importance of pharmacovigilance: Safety monitoring of medicinal products. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9532191 
  11. European Medicines Agency. (2023). Pharmacovigilance overview. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatoryoverview/pharmacovigilance-overview
  12. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Education & Research. (2011). Pharmacovigilance: Needs and objectives. Retrieved from https://japer.in/storage/models/article/wkBGGOw52pgChzf4nV P3j5U2BLIr4XbpPc6Iu2W6KGCWVRAjxYtO9ghn9tOR/pharmaco vigilance-needs-and-objectives.pdf
  13. MedWin Publishers. (2022). Advancing pharmacovigilance: Safeguarding drug safety and enhancing public health. Retrieved from https://medwinpublishers.com/APCT/advancingpharmacovigilance-safeguarding-drug-safety-and-enhancingpublic-health.pdf
  14. World Health Organization. (2023). Pharmacovigilance. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/teams/regulationprequalification/regulation-and-safety/pharmacovigilance
  15. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. (2025). Transformative education: Enhancing pharmacovigilance knowledge and ADR reporting confidence among healthcare Professionals. Retrieved from

https://journals.lww.com/jfmpc/fulltext/2025/05000/transform ative_education__enhancing.65.aspx

  1. WHO. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance (2002).
  2. Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC). Pharmacovigilance Toolkit. 2015.
  3. Gupta SK. Textbook of Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Research. Jaypee, 2011.  
  4. WHO. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance (2002).
  5. Rawlins MD, Thompson JW. Pathogenesis of adverse drug reactions. In: Davies DM, editor. Textbook of Adverse Drug Reactions. Oxford University Press, 1991.
  6. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM. Pharmacology. 7th ed. Churchill Livingstone, 2012.
  7. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: Definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255-9. Doi:10.1016/S01406736(00)02799-9
  8. WHO. Handbook: Monitoring the safety of medicinal products. Geneva: WHO, 2000.
  9. PvPI, IPC. Guidelines for ADR reporting. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, 2014.
  10. PvPI, CDSCO. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India.
  11. WHO. Handbook: Monitoring the safety of medicinal products. Geneva: WHO, 2000.
  12. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Post-Approval Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting (E2D). 2003. Available from: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E2D_Guideline.pdf
  13. European Medicines Agency. Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP) Module V: Risk management systems. 2017.Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/humanregulatory/post-authorisation/pharmacovigilance/goodpharmacovigilance-practices
  14. Current Challenges in Pharmacovigilance: Pragmatic Approaches (Report of CIOMS Working Group V), 2001 Geneva.
  15. Mackenzie SG, Lippman A (January 1989). “An investigation of report bias in a case-control study of pregnancy outcome”. American Journal of Epidemiology. 129 (1): 65–75.

Doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115125. PMID 2910073.

  1. MedDRA MSSO | MedDRA”. www.meddra.org. Retrieved March 16, 2020 
  2. Current Challenges in Pharmacovigilance: Pragmatic Approaches (Report of CIOMS Working Group V), 2001 Geneva.
  3. Lindquist M. Vigibase, the WHO Global ICSR Database System: Basic Facts. Drug Information Journal, 2008, 42:409419.
  4. Barry, A. R. (2014). Adverse drug reactions: The importance of maintaining pharmacovigilance. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67(5), 367-369.
  5. Shalansky, S. J., & Vu, T. T. (2018). Adverse drug reaction reporting: Opportunities to improve. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 71(5), 313-319.
  6. Khalid, J., et al. (2025). Hospital pharmacists’ perspectives on adverse drug reaction reporting. Pharmacy (MDPI), 13(4), 103.
  7. Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Hospital Pharmacists: Key Roles and Responsibilities. London: RPS, 2019.
  8. Abramson, Brian Dean (2025). “Ch. 12-Reporting Requirements”. Vaccine, Vaccination, and Immunization Law, Third Edition. Bloomberg Law. P. 13. ISBN 979-8-34170-407-7.
  9. NHS Health Careers. Pharmacist, Hospital Pharmacist Job Role and Responsibilities. National Health Service, UK, 2021.
  10. General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC). Standards for Pharmacy Professionals. London: GPhC, 2017.
  11. World Health Organization (WHO). The Role of the Pharmacist in the Health Care System: Preparing the Future Pharmacist. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
  12. Smith, J., & Brown, A. (2018). Hospital Pharmacy Practice: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 79(6), 320–325.
  13. Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Hospital Pharmacist – Roles and Responsibilities. London: RPS Publications; 2020.
  14. Anderson, R. (2019). Clinical Roles of Hospital Pharmacists in Optimizing Patient Safety. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 41(5), 1200–1207.
  15. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). Pharmacist’s role in ADR monitoring and reporting. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1995; 52:417– 419.  
  16. Patel TK, et al. Role of Pharmacist in Pharmacovigilance. J Young Pharm. 2010;2(3):302–306.  
  17. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). Pharmacist’s role in ADR monitoring and reporting. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1995; 52:417– 419.  
  18. Patel TK, et al. Role of Pharmacist in Pharmacovigilance. J Young Pharm. 2010;2(3):302–306.  
  19. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP).  Pharmacist’s role in ADR monitoring and reporting. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1995; 52:417–419.  
  20. CDSCO. Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI). Government of India, 2010.
  21. Kalaiselvan V, et al. Pharmacovigilance Programme of India: Recent developments and future perspectives. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2014;7(3):7–12.
  22. PvPI, IPC. Guidelines for ADR reporting. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, 2014.  
  23. WHO Uppsala Monitoring Centre. VigiBase: the WHO global database of individual case safety reports.  
  24. Rajmane A, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance. Perspect Clin Res. 2021;12(4):180–184.  
  25. Sakaeda T, Tamon A, Kadoyama K, Okuno Y. Data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10(7):796– 803.  
  26. Lopez-Gonzalez E, Herdeiro MT, Figueiras A. Determinants of underreporting of adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf. 2009;32(1):19–31.  
  27. Badyal DK, Bala S. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A challenge for pharmacovigilance in India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2010;42(6):383–384.  
  28. Inman WH. Attitudes to adverse drug reaction reporting. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;41(5):433–435. 
  29. WHO. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance (2002).

Reference

  1. Soni R, Kesari B. A Review on Pharmacovigilance. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res.; c2014 May-Jun;26(2):237-241.
  2. WHO. Pharmacovigilance: Ensuring the Safe Use of Medicines.Geneva: WHO; 2004.
  3. Health Organization. The Importance of pharmacovigilance – safety Monitoring of medicinal products. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002.
  4. Campbell JE, Gossell-Williams M, Lee MG. A Review Of Pharmacovigilance. West Indian Med J. 2014;63(7):771.
  5. Shuka SS, Gidwani Bina, Pandey R, Rao SP, Singh V and Vyas Amber, “Importance of Pharmacovigilance in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry”, Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Science, 2, 2012, 04-08.
  6. WHO. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance (2002).
  7. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000; 356:1255–1259.
  8. PvPI, CDSCO. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India.
  9. Edwards, I.R. and Aronson, J.K., 2000. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, Diagnosis, and management. The Lancet, 356(9237), pp.1255-1259.
  10. 10.World Health Organization. (2002). The importance of pharmacovigilance: Safety monitoring of medicinal products. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9532191 
  11. European Medicines Agency. (2023). Pharmacovigilance overview. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatoryoverview/pharmacovigilance-overview
  12. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Education & Research. (2011). Pharmacovigilance: Needs and objectives. Retrieved from https://japer.in/storage/models/article/wkBGGOw52pgChzf4nV P3j5U2BLIr4XbpPc6Iu2W6KGCWVRAjxYtO9ghn9tOR/pharmaco vigilance-needs-and-objectives.pdf
  13. MedWin Publishers. (2022). Advancing pharmacovigilance: Safeguarding drug safety and enhancing public health. Retrieved from https://medwinpublishers.com/APCT/advancingpharmacovigilance-safeguarding-drug-safety-and-enhancingpublic-health.pdf
  14. World Health Organization. (2023). Pharmacovigilance. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/teams/regulationprequalification/regulation-and-safety/pharmacovigilance
  15. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. (2025). Transformative education: Enhancing pharmacovigilance knowledge and ADR reporting confidence among healthcare Professionals. Retrieved from

https://journals.lww.com/jfmpc/fulltext/2025/05000/transform ative_education__enhancing.65.aspx

  1. WHO. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance (2002).
  2. Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC). Pharmacovigilance Toolkit. 2015.
  3. Gupta SK. Textbook of Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Research. Jaypee, 2011.  
  4. WHO. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance (2002).
  5. Rawlins MD, Thompson JW. Pathogenesis of adverse drug reactions. In: Davies DM, editor. Textbook of Adverse Drug Reactions. Oxford University Press, 1991.
  6. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM. Pharmacology. 7th ed. Churchill Livingstone, 2012.
  7. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: Definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255-9. Doi:10.1016/S01406736(00)02799-9
  8. WHO. Handbook: Monitoring the safety of medicinal products. Geneva: WHO, 2000.
  9. PvPI, IPC. Guidelines for ADR reporting. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, 2014.
  10. PvPI, CDSCO. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India.
  11. WHO. Handbook: Monitoring the safety of medicinal products. Geneva: WHO, 2000.
  12. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Post-Approval Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting (E2D). 2003. Available from: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E2D_Guideline.pdf
  13. European Medicines Agency. Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP) Module V: Risk management systems. 2017.Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/humanregulatory/post-authorisation/pharmacovigilance/goodpharmacovigilance-practices
  14. Current Challenges in Pharmacovigilance: Pragmatic Approaches (Report of CIOMS Working Group V), 2001 Geneva.
  15. Mackenzie SG, Lippman A (January 1989). “An investigation of report bias in a case-control study of pregnancy outcome”. American Journal of Epidemiology. 129 (1): 65–75.

Doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115125. PMID 2910073.

  1. MedDRA MSSO | MedDRA”. www.meddra.org. Retrieved March 16, 2020 
  2. Current Challenges in Pharmacovigilance: Pragmatic Approaches (Report of CIOMS Working Group V), 2001 Geneva.
  3. Lindquist M. Vigibase, the WHO Global ICSR Database System: Basic Facts. Drug Information Journal, 2008, 42:409419.
  4. Barry, A. R. (2014). Adverse drug reactions: The importance of maintaining pharmacovigilance. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67(5), 367-369.
  5. Shalansky, S. J., & Vu, T. T. (2018). Adverse drug reaction reporting: Opportunities to improve. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 71(5), 313-319.
  6. Khalid, J., et al. (2025). Hospital pharmacists’ perspectives on adverse drug reaction reporting. Pharmacy (MDPI), 13(4), 103.
  7. Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Hospital Pharmacists: Key Roles and Responsibilities. London: RPS, 2019.
  8. Abramson, Brian Dean (2025). “Ch. 12-Reporting Requirements”. Vaccine, Vaccination, and Immunization Law, Third Edition. Bloomberg Law. P. 13. ISBN 979-8-34170-407-7.
  9. NHS Health Careers. Pharmacist, Hospital Pharmacist Job Role and Responsibilities. National Health Service, UK, 2021.
  10. General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC). Standards for Pharmacy Professionals. London: GPhC, 2017.
  11. World Health Organization (WHO). The Role of the Pharmacist in the Health Care System: Preparing the Future Pharmacist. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
  12. Smith, J., & Brown, A. (2018). Hospital Pharmacy Practice: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 79(6), 320–325.
  13. Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Hospital Pharmacist – Roles and Responsibilities. London: RPS Publications; 2020.
  14. Anderson, R. (2019). Clinical Roles of Hospital Pharmacists in Optimizing Patient Safety. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 41(5), 1200–1207.
  15. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). Pharmacist’s role in ADR monitoring and reporting. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1995; 52:417– 419.  
  16. Patel TK, et al. Role of Pharmacist in Pharmacovigilance. J Young Pharm. 2010;2(3):302–306.  
  17. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). Pharmacist’s role in ADR monitoring and reporting. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1995; 52:417– 419.  
  18. Patel TK, et al. Role of Pharmacist in Pharmacovigilance. J Young Pharm. 2010;2(3):302–306.  
  19. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP).  Pharmacist’s role in ADR monitoring and reporting. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1995; 52:417–419.  
  20. CDSCO. Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI). Government of India, 2010.
  21. Kalaiselvan V, et al. Pharmacovigilance Programme of India: Recent developments and future perspectives. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2014;7(3):7–12.
  22. PvPI, IPC. Guidelines for ADR reporting. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, 2014.  
  23. WHO Uppsala Monitoring Centre. VigiBase: the WHO global database of individual case safety reports.  
  24. Rajmane A, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance. Perspect Clin Res. 2021;12(4):180–184.  
  25. Sakaeda T, Tamon A, Kadoyama K, Okuno Y. Data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10(7):796– 803.  
  26. Lopez-Gonzalez E, Herdeiro MT, Figueiras A. Determinants of underreporting of adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf. 2009;32(1):19–31.  
  27. Badyal DK, Bala S. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A challenge for pharmacovigilance in India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2010;42(6):383–384.  
  28. Inman WH. Attitudes to adverse drug reaction reporting. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;41(5):433–435. 
  29. WHO. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance (2002).

Photo
Yogita Chaudhari
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmacy, S.N.D College of Pharmacy

Photo
Manoj Garad
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, S.N.D College of Pharmacy

Photo
Harshada Bangar
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, S.N.D College of Pharmacy

Photo
Komal Kute
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, S.N.D College of Pharmacy

Yogita Chaudhari*, Manoj Garad, Harshada Bangar, Komal Kute, Importance in Ensuring Patient Safety, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2025, 2 (11), 564-571. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17667696

More related articles
From Pollution to Prediction: The Role of Air poll...
NVL Suvarchala Reddy, M. Ganga Raju, Nisha Shri C., N. Maheswari,...
Design and Treatability Studies of Low-Cost Bio Fi...
Dr. Pranab Jyoti Barman, Rhishikesh Gogoi, Biswajit Saikia, Mukta...
Geospatial Assessment of Agricultural Land Suitabi...
Omisore Oyelola, Oluwasegun A. John, Ojetade Olayinka Julius, Joh...
A Review of Structural Design of G+1 Residential Building...
Pushkal Dewangan, Debankar Chatterjee, Himanshi Verma, Prakriti Bijaura, Dr. Ajay Kumar Garg, ...
Capturing the Sky: Exploring Aerial Photography Through Drone Technology...
Nilam Khandelwal, Sanyukta Karajgar, Iramnaz Akhtarhusein Ganjihal, Pranjal Farakte, ...
Related Articles
The Effects of Money Laundering on The Performance of Banks: An Analytical Study...
Naji Afrasyaw Fatah, Kawthar AbdulRahim AbdulRahman, Payam Farhad Ali, ...
Advancing Venous Interventions: In-Vitro Evaluation of a Novel Self-Expanding Ve...
Bhatvedekar Neha, Kothwala Dr. Deveshkumar, Patel Hemant, ...
From Pollution to Prediction: The Role of Air pollution and Artificial intellige...
NVL Suvarchala Reddy, M. Ganga Raju, Nisha Shri C., N. Maheswari, D. Krishnaveni, P. Saritha, ...
More related articles
From Pollution to Prediction: The Role of Air pollution and Artificial intellige...
NVL Suvarchala Reddy, M. Ganga Raju, Nisha Shri C., N. Maheswari, D. Krishnaveni, P. Saritha, ...
Design and Treatability Studies of Low-Cost Bio Filter In Water Treatment...
Dr. Pranab Jyoti Barman, Rhishikesh Gogoi, Biswajit Saikia, Muktar Ali, ...
Geospatial Assessment of Agricultural Land Suitability in IFE South, Osun State,...
Omisore Oyelola, Oluwasegun A. John, Ojetade Olayinka Julius, John A. Eyinade, ...
From Pollution to Prediction: The Role of Air pollution and Artificial intellige...
NVL Suvarchala Reddy, M. Ganga Raju, Nisha Shri C., N. Maheswari, D. Krishnaveni, P. Saritha, ...
Design and Treatability Studies of Low-Cost Bio Filter In Water Treatment...
Dr. Pranab Jyoti Barman, Rhishikesh Gogoi, Biswajit Saikia, Muktar Ali, ...
Geospatial Assessment of Agricultural Land Suitability in IFE South, Osun State,...
Omisore Oyelola, Oluwasegun A. John, Ojetade Olayinka Julius, John A. Eyinade, ...