Smart Bridge Infrastructure: Automatic Height Adjustment for Flood Resilience and Intelligent Monitoring

Abstract

Bridges are vital transportation infrastructure components, but aging structures and climate-related risks have created an urgent need for improved safety and maintenance practices. This paper introduces the concept of smart bridges—structures that can automatically adapt to environmental changes such as floods and seismic activity through advanced technologies. We explore the integration of IoT-based monitoring, Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), flood early warning systems, and seismic isolation techniques like Lead Rubber Bearings (LRBs) and Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs). We also present case studies and simulation models to demonstrate how smart bridges can reduce disaster risks and enhance resilience. The study concludes by discussing challenges in implementation and offers future directions for smart bridge development.

Keywords

Introduction

Bridges serve as critical links in transportation networks, enabling movement, economic activity, and regional development. However, many bridges worldwide are aging and increasingly vulnerable to natural disasters such as floods and earthquakes. Traditional bridge management techniques, which depend heavily on manual inspections and periodic maintenance, often fall short of ensuring real-time safety and structural performance. The increasing frequency and severity of weather-related disasters further highlight the inadequacy of conventional approaches. In this context, the development of smart bridge systems is becoming increasingly important. Smart bridges utilize IoT devices, SHM systems, and adaptive engineering materials to monitor their conditions and even take preventive or corrective actions without human intervention. For example, a smart bridge might use sensors to monitor rising floodwaters and trigger actuators that raise the bridge deck to avoid submersion. These technologies not only extend the lifespan of bridge infrastructure but also improve safety, reduce maintenance costs, and support smart city development.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Recent research on smart bridge systems has focused on integrating technologies like IoT, artificial intelligence, and advanced materials to create self-monitoring and adaptive infrastructure. The idea of bridge monitoring their condition dates back to the early 2000s with the lifetime network in Europe, which introduced intelligent bridges that could assess structural performance in real time. Several countries have reported critical bridge failures due to inadequate maintenance and natural disasters. For instance, reports show that 25% of bridges in Canada are in poor or very poor condition, while the United States has over 56,000 structurally deficient bridges. Similar concerns have been raised in China and the United Kingdom, highlighting the global need for better bridge monitoring systems. Modern technologies like Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), fiber optic sensors, and wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are enabling real-time data collection and analysis. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems now help engineers detect cracks, strain, or vibrations early, leading to quicker interventions and lower maintenance costs.

3. Smart Bridge System Architecture

Smart bridge infrastructure relies on an integrated network of components that allow the structure to monitor, analyze, and respond to internal and external conditions. These systems are typically composed of the following three key elements:

1. Sensors – Installed throughout the bridge, sensors collect real-time data on water levels. Common types include MEMS sensors, fiber optic sensors, and piezoelectric sensors.
2. Data Processing Units – These include onboard microcontrollers and centralized computing platforms that analyze the collected data. Advanced models use machine learning to detect abnormalities such as dangerous flood levels.
3. Actuators and Control Mechanisms – In bridges designed for dynamic responses, actuators can lift the deck. For instance, if water levels rise to a critical point, actuators can raise the bridge surface to prevent submersion.

5. Flood Resilience Strategies

Floods are one of the leading causes of bridge failure worldwide. Sudden increases in water levels, strong currents, and erosion (scour) around piers can severely compromise structural integrity. Smart bridges incorporate several strategies to address these threats:

• Real-Time Water Level Monitoring: Sensors placed in riverbeds or piers track water rise and send alerts during critical events. If integrated with flood forecasting models, these can predict dangerous scenarios hours in advance.
• Elevating Mechanisms: Bridges can be designed to elevate when sensors detect high flood risk. This automatic height increase helps prevent damage from floodwaters and floating debris.
• Hydrodynamic Design: Bridges are shaped to allow water to pass around or under them efficiently, reducing resistance and damage during high-flow events.

DISCUSSION

Smart bridge technologies represent a major advancement in infrastructure engineering. Their ability to respond in real-time to environmental changes makes them vital for flood-prone or seismically active areas.

However, challenges include:

1. Cost of implementation, especially in low-income regions.
2. Integration complexity, as smart systems must work seamlessly across software, hardware, and communication protocols.
3. Data security and privacy, since cloud-based systems are vulnerable to cyberattacks.

To overcome these challenges, future research should focus on developing modular and low-cost sensor kits, standardized communication protocols, and AI algorithms that can run on low-power devices. Governments should also support smart bridge retrofitting as part of climate adaptation strategies.

CONCLUSION

Smart bridges are transforming the way we think about infrastructure safety and resilience. Through intelligent monitoring, adaptive components, and predictive analytics, these structures can withstand floods, earthquakes, and heavy traffic far better than traditional bridges. This paper has reviewed key technologies, real-world applications, and simulation results supporting the use of smart bridges. By combining flood prediction models, SHM, and IoT systems, we can ensure safer roads and quicker recovery after disasters. Investing in smart bridge technology today means building infrastructure that will last longer, cost less to maintain, and protect more lives tomorrow.

REFERENCE

1. Rusi Chu, Dewen Kong, Lishan Sun, Yan Xu, Yue Liu, Longxiang He, Yuchang Wu, Research on the application scenarios of a smart bridge management platform: An analysis of mapping knowledge domain based on bridge management, Measurement Volume 246, 2025, 116756.
2. Yali Jiang, Gang Yang, Haijiang Li, Tian Zhan, Knowledge driven approach for smart bridge maintenance using big data mining, Automation in construction 146 (2023) 104673.
3. Zhaochao Li, Fujian Tang, Yizheng Chen, Xiuyan Hu, Genda Chen, Yan Tang, Field experiment and numerical verification of the local scour depth of bridge pier with two smart rocks, Engineering Structures 249 (2021) 113345.
4. Sahar Hassania, Mohsen Mousavib, and Zahra Sharif-Khodaeic, Smart bridge monitoring.
5. Mahdi Bitarafana, Shahin Lale Arefib, Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfanic, Amir Mahmoudzadehd, Selecting the Best Design Scenario of the Smart Structure of Bridges for Probably Future Earthquakes, ProcediaEngineering57 (2013)193-199.
6. Tong Wu, Gangping Fan, Chuandong Dou, Xing Li, Chunyang Dou, Jian Che, Tianzhuo Wang, Jincheng Rao, Simulation study on damage behaviour of a shallow-buried Foundation bridge under combined action of flood scouring and heavy vehicle load, Ocean Engineering 323 (2025) 120410.
7. Beaver E and Mitoulis S-A Evidence-based flood resilience models for bridges. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers– Bridge Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.24.00039
8. Anup Shrestha Maija Taka, Anise McCrone, Olli Varis, bridging gaps, saving lives: Integrating communities’ voices and impact mapping into flood early warning systems in rural Nepal, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Volume 118, 15 February 2025, 105238.
9. Dona Maria a, Laxmi Sushama Van-Thanh-Van Nguyen, Husham Almansour, Luc Chouinard, Muhammad Naveed Khaliq, Future flood envelope curves for the estimation of design flood magnitudes for highway bridges at river crossings, Results in Engineering, Volume 22, June 2024, 102038.
10. Xuan Nan, Xinxin Liu, Liang Chen, Qin Yan, Jing Li, Study of the bridge damage during flooding based on a coupled VOF-FSI method, Journal of Engineering Research, Volume 11, Issue 3, September 2023, Pages 51-61.
11. Marianna Lolia, George Kefalas, Stavros Dafis, Stergios A. Mitoulise, Franziska Schmidtf, Bridge-specific flood risk assessment of transport networks using GIS and remotely sensed data, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 850, 1 December 2022, 157976.
12. Ayaho Miyamoto, Akito Yabe, Petr Hradil & Ilkka Hakola (2024) Feasibility study on intelligent bridge combined with smart monitoring techniques, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 20:7-8, 1133-1148, DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2023.2276896.
13. Farshad Hedayati Dezfuli & M. Shahria Alam (2018) Smart Lead Rubber Bearings Equipped with Ferrous Shape Memory Alloy Wires for Seismically Isolating Highway Bridges, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22:6, 1042-1067, DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1269692.
14. Isabel Heykoop, Neil Hoult, Joshua E. Woods, Heshan Fernando, Development and field evaluation of a low-cost bridge bearing movement monitoring system, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring (2024) 14:931–946 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-024-00771-3.
15. Chung-Bang Yun, Soojin Cho, Hyun-Jun Park, Jiyoung Min & Jong-Woong Park (2014) Smart wireless sensing and assessment for civil infrastructure, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10:4, 534-550, DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2013.769011.
16. Niusha Navabian, Sherif Beskhyroun & Justin Matulich (2022) Development of wireless smart sensor network for vibration-based structural health monitoring of civil structures, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 18:3, 345-361, DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1850801.