View Article

  • Mouth Dissolving Tablets as an Effective Drug Delivery Approach for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV)

  • PDEA’s Shankarrao Ursal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research Centre, Kharadi, Pune

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains one of the most common and distressing adverse effects experienced by cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic therapy. Despite the availability of effective antiemetic agents, challenges such as poor patient compliance, difficulty in swallowing conventional oral dosage forms, and delayed onset of action continue to limit optimal therapeutic outcomes. Mouth dissolving tablets (MDTs), also referred to as orally disintegrating tablets, have emerged as a patient-centric drug delivery system designed to rapidly disintegrate in the oral cavity without the need for water. This characteristic makes MDTs particularly advantageous for patients suffering from nausea, vomiting, dysphagia, or oral discomfort associated with chemotherapy.This review provides a comprehensive overview of the role of mouth dissolving tablets as an effective drug delivery approach for the management of CINV. The pathophysiology and classification of CINV are briefly discussed, followed by an in-depth analysis of MDT technology, formulation strategies, and excipient selection. Emphasis is placed on commonly used antiemetic drugs such as ondansetron, granisetron, and other 5-HT? receptor antagonists formulated as MDTs. Clinical evidence supporting the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of MDT-based antiemetic therapy is critically evaluated. Additionally, the advantages, limitations, and formulation challenges associated with MDTs are highlighted, along with future perspectives for improving therapeutic effectiveness through novel formulation approaches. Overall, mouth dissolving tablets represent a promising and effective alternative to conventional oral dosage forms, offering improved patient compliance and enhanced management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Keywords

Mouth dissolving tablets; Orally disintegrating tablets; Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; CINV; Antiemetic drug delivery; Patient compliance; 5-HT? receptor antagonists

Introduction

Chemotherapy remains one of the most effective therapeutic approaches for the treatment and management of various malignancies; however, its clinical usefulness is often limited by a range of adverse effects, among which chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most distressing and debilitating. CINV not only affects the physical well-being of patients but also significantly compromises their psychological health, nutritional status, and overall quality of life. In severe cases, uncontrolled nausea and vomiting may lead to dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, weight loss, and may even result in discontinuation or refusal of further chemotherapy cycles. Despite significant advances in antiemetic pharmacotherapy, CINV continues to pose a major clinical challenge. The incidence and severity of CINV depend on multiple factors, including the emetogenic potential of chemotherapeutic agents, dosage, treatment regimen, and patient-specific variables such as age, gender, and previous experience with chemotherapy. Although modern antiemetic guidelines recommend the use of serotonin (5-HT?) receptor antagonists, neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids, optimal control of CINV is not always achieved in clinical practice. Conventional oral dosage forms such as tablets and capsules are widely used for the administration of antiemetic drugs. However, these dosage forms may not be suitable for patients experiencing acute nausea, vomiting, dysphagia, or oral mucositis following chemotherapy. Difficulty in swallowing, fear of vomiting after ingestion, and the need for water intake further reduce patient compliance with conventional oral formulations. Parenteral routes, although effective, are invasive, costly, and less convenient for long-term or outpatient use. Therefore, there is a growing need for patient-friendly, non-invasive drug delivery systems that can provide rapid onset of action and improve adherence to antiemetic therapy. Mouth dissolving tablets (MDTs), also known as orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs), have emerged as a promising alternative to conventional oral dosage forms. MDTs are solid dosage forms designed to disintegrate rapidly in the oral cavity, usually within a few seconds, without the need for water. Upon contact with saliva, the tablet breaks down and releases the drug, which is subsequently swallowed or partially absorbed through the oral mucosa. This unique characteristic makes MDTs particularly suitable for patients who have difficulty swallowing or who experience nausea and vomiting, such as those undergoing chemotherapy. The advantages of MDTs include ease of administration, rapid disintegration, faster onset of therapeutic action, and improved patient compliance. Additionally, MDTs may allow partial pregastric absorption of the drug, potentially reducing first-pass metabolism and enhancing bioavailability. From a patient-centric perspective, MDTs offer greater convenience and acceptability, especially in vulnerable populations such as pediatric, geriatric, and oncology patients. These benefits have led to increasing interest in the development of MDT formulations for a variety of therapeutic agents, including antiemetics. Several antiemetic drugs commonly used in the management of CINV, such as ondansetron, granisetron, and other 5-HT? receptor antagonists, possess physicochemical properties that make them suitable candidates for formulation as mouth dissolving tablets. Clinical studies have demonstrated that orally disintegrating formulations of these agents provide efficacy comparable to conventional oral tablets while offering superior patient convenience and compliance. Furthermore, advancements in formulation technologies, including the use of super-disintegrants, taste-masking techniques, and optimized excipient combinations, have enhanced the performance and stability of MDTs. In this context, the present review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of mouth dissolving tablets as an effective drug delivery approach for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The review discusses the pathophysiology of CINV, the rationale for selecting MDTs as a suitable dosage form, formulation strategies, and available clinical evidence supporting their use. Additionally, the challenges and limitations associated with MDT development, as well as future perspectives in the field of antiemetic drug delivery, are highlighted to emphasize the potential of MDTs in improving supportive care for cancer patients. Cancer chemotherapy has transformed the prognosis of many malignant diseases; however, its therapeutic success is frequently accompanied by undesirable adverse effects that compromise patient comfort and treatment continuity. Among these, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains one of the most feared complications, despite significant progress in antiemetic therapy. CINV not only causes physical discomfort but also contributes to anxiety, nutritional deficiencies, dehydration, and a substantial decline in overall quality of life. Inadequate control of nausea and vomiting may result in dose reduction, treatment delays, or complete discontinuation of chemotherapy, thereby negatively affecting clinical outcomes.

The development of CINV Is complex and multifactorial, involving both central and peripheral mechanisms. Chemotherapeutic agents stimulate the release of neurotransmitters such as serotonin from enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal tract, which in turn activate vagal afferents and the chemoreceptor trigger zone, leading to stimulation of the vomiting center in the brain. Based on the time of onset, CINV is categorized into acute, delayed, anticipatory, breakthrough, and refractory types, each presenting unique management challenges. Although current antiemetic guidelines have improved symptom control, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience nausea, particularly in delayed and breakthrough phases. Oral administration remains the most preferred route for antiemetic therapy due to its convenience and non-invasiveness. However, the effectiveness of conventional oral dosage forms such as tablets and capsules is often limited in patients receiving chemotherapy. Severe nausea, repeated vomiting, oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dysphagia can make swallowing difficult and unpleasant. Additionally, the requirement of water intake for conventional tablets may further aggravate nausea, leading to poor adherence and suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. These limitations highlight the need for innovative oral drug delivery systems that can be administered easily and provide rapid symptomatic relief. Mouth dissolving tablets (MDTs) have gained considerable attention as a novel oral drug delivery system designed to overcome the shortcomings of traditional solid dosage forms. MDTs are formulated to disintegrate or dissolve rapidly in the saliva when placed on the tongue, eliminating the need for water and active swallowing. This feature is particularly advantageous for oncology patients experiencing nausea, gag reflex sensitivity, or difficulty in swallowing. Furthermore, rapid disintegration may facilitate faster drug availability, which is critical in the prompt management of acute nausea and vomiting. From a formulation perspective, MDTs combine the advantages of solid dosage forms with the convenience of liquid formulations. Advances in pharmaceutical technology, including the use of super-disintegrants, porous matrices, and taste-masking techniques, have enabled the development of MDTs with acceptable mechanical strength, palatability, and stability. Several antiemetic agents, especially 5-HT? receptor antagonists such as ondansetron and granisetron, are well suited for MDT formulation due to their low dose requirements and favorable pharmacokinetic profiles. Given the growing emphasis on patient-centric drug delivery and supportive cancer care, mouth dissolving tablets represent a promising strategy for improving the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This review aims to critically examine the relevance of MDTs in CINV therapy, highlighting their formulation aspects, clinical potential, advantages, limitations, and future prospects. By addressing both pharmaceutical and clinical considerations, this review seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of MDTs as an effective and patient-friendly antiemetic drug delivery approach.

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Pathophysiology and Clinical Challenges

Pathophysiology of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a complex physiological process involving both peripheral and central nervous system pathways. It occurs due to the stimulation of specific neurotransmitters and receptors following the administration of chemotherapeutic agents. The severity and onset of CINV depend on the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy regimen, dose, schedule, and patient-related factors. At the peripheral level, chemotherapeutic drugs cause damage to the gastrointestinal mucosa, particularly the enterochromaffin cells of the small intestine. This damage leads to the excessive release of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT). The released serotonin activates 5-HT? receptors located on vagal afferent nerves, which transmit signals to the vomiting center in the brainstem. At the central level, the emetic signals are processed in the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ), located in the area postrema of the medulla oblongata. The CTZ lacks a complete blood–brain barrier, making it highly sensitive to circulating emetogenic substances such as chemotherapeutic agents and their metabolites. Neurotransmitters including serotonin, dopamine, substance P, and neurokinin-1 (NK1) play a crucial role in stimulating the CTZ and vomiting center. Based on the timing and mechanism, CINV is classified into different types:

  • Acute CINV, occurring within the first 24 hours of chemotherapy, mainly mediated by serotonin release.
  • Delayed CINV, occurring after 24 hours and lasting several days, predominantly associated with substance P and NK1 receptor activation.
  • Anticipatory CINV, a conditioned response triggered by prior negative chemotherapy experiences.
  • Breakthrough CINV, occurring despite prophylactic antiemetic therapy.
  • Refractory CINV, persisting even after aggressive antiemetic treatment.

The involvement of multiple neurotransmitter pathways explains why CINV is difficult to control using a single pharmacological agent and often requires combination therapy.

Clinical Challenges in the Management of CINV

Despite advancements in antiemetic therapy and evidence-based clinical guidelines, effective management of CINV remains challenging. One of the major clinical issues is incomplete symptom control, particularly nausea, which is often more difficult to manage than vomiting. While vomiting episodes may be reduced, persistent nausea continues to significantly affect patient comfort and quality of life. Another major challenge is patient non-compliance with oral antiemetic therapy. Patients undergoing chemotherapy often experience severe nausea, repeated vomiting, oral mucositis, dysphagia, xerostomia, and gag reflex sensitivity. These conditions make swallowing conventional oral tablets difficult and unpleasant. Additionally, the requirement of water intake for tablet administration may worsen nausea, leading to skipped doses and reduced therapeutic effectiveness.

The delayed phase of CINV presents further clinical difficulty, as symptoms may occur after the patient has left the healthcare setting, reducing adherence to prescribed antiemetic regimens. Moreover, anticipatory nausea and vomiting are influenced by psychological factors such as anxiety and previous treatment experiences, making pharmacological control alone insufficient. Interindividual variability in response to chemotherapy and antiemetic drugs also complicates CINV management. Factors such as age, gender, alcohol consumption history, and prior chemotherapy exposure influence susceptibility to CINV and response to treatment. Furthermore, parenteral antiemetic administration, though effective, is invasive, costly, and impractical for long-term or outpatient use. These clinical challenges highlight the need for patient-friendly, rapidly acting, and easily administrable drug delivery systems. In this context, alternative oral dosage forms such as mouth dissolving tablets offer a promising approach by improving ease of administration, enhancing patient compliance, and potentially providing faster symptom relief in patients suffering from chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Mouth Dissolving Tablets (MDTs)

Mouth dissolving tablets (MDTs), also known as orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs), are solid oral dosage forms designed to disintegrate or dissolve rapidly in the oral cavity without the need for water, usually within a few seconds to a minute. This allows the drug to be swallowed easily with saliva or partially absorbed through the oral mucosa, providing faster onset of action and improved patient compliance. MDTs are particularly useful for pediatric, geriatric, and oncology patients who experience difficulty in swallowing conventional tablets due to nausea, vomiting, or dysphagia.

Mechanism of Action

The mechanism of MDTs involves the following steps:

  1. Tablet Placement: The MDT is placed on the tongue or in the oral cavity.
  2. Saliva Penetration: Saliva rapidly penetrates the porous matrix of the tablet.
  3. Disintegration: Super-disintegrants within the tablet absorb saliva, swell, and cause rapid breakdown of the tablet into fine particles.
  4. Drug Release: The drug is either: Partially absorbed through the oral mucosa, bypassing first-pass metabolism for faster systemic effects. Swallowed with saliva for gastrointestinal absorption.
  5. Therapeutic Effect: The released drug acts systemically to relieve the target condition (e.g., antiemetic effect in CINV).

Advantages of MDTs

  1. Ease of administration – No need for water; ideal for patients with nausea, vomiting, or dysphagia.
  2. Rapid onset of action – Faster drug availability due to pregastric absorption.
  3. Improved patient compliance – Particularly in pediatric, geriatric, and oncology patients.
  4. Convenient for outpatient use – Portable, simple, and easy to store.
  5. Reduced risk of choking – Compared to conventional tablets in vulnerable populations.
  6. Better taste masking – Modern formulations can mask unpleasant drug taste for better acceptability.

Clinical Applications

  1. Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV): Ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron MDTs.
  2. Pediatric therapy: Analgesics, antipyretics, antibiotics.
  3. Geriatric patients: Cardiovascular drugs, antiemetics, vitamins.
  4. Emergency and ambulatory care: Drugs requiring rapid onset of action like anti-allergic medications or analgesics.

Limitations of MDTs

  • Mechanical fragility: Tablets are often soft and require careful handling and packaging
  • Hygroscopicity: Moisture-sensitive; improper storage can lead to degradation.
  • Taste masking requirement: Bitter drugs need additional excipients to improve palatability.
  • Dose limitation: Typically, suitable for low-dose drugs due to size constraints.
  • Cost: Manufacturing MDTs may be more expensive than conventional tablets due to advanced excipients and technologies.

Formulation Strategies for MDTs in CINV

To formulate effective MDTs for antiemetic therapy:

  • Super-disintegrants (e.g., crospovidone) are used to facilitate rapid disintegration.
  • Taste-masking agents (flavors, sweeteners) improve palatability.
  • Excipients should support mechanical integrity while allowing rapid dissolution.

Popular antiemetic drugs explored for fast dissolving delivery include ondansetron, tropisetron, and domperidone, either as tablets, films, or strips.

Clinical Evidence for MDTs in CINV and Related Conditions

  1. Ondansetron Orally Soluble Pellicle:

A clinical study on ondansetron orally soluble pellicles demonstrated a high efficacy rate in preventing moderate-to-high-emetic risk CINV, with 98.1 % major efficacy for vomiting and 96.3 % for nausea. Adverse events were generally mild.

  1. Oral Disintegrating Buccal Tablets:

Earlier clinical trials showed that disintegrating buccal tablets for antiemetic drugs like granisetron had control rates similar to conventional tablets in preventing acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting.

  1. Related Fast Dissolving Systems:

While focused on different dosage forms like films and wafers, studies on tropisetron and ondansetron fast dissolving films/strips suggest rapid disintegration and enhanced patient convenience — concepts directly relevant to MDT development

Advantages of MDTs in CINV Management

  1. Rapid disintegration and faster onset of antiemetic action
  2. No requirement of water for administration
  3. Improved patient compliance during nausea and vomiting episodes
  4. Ease of administration in dysphagic and debilitated patients
  5. Better suitability for outpatient and home-based chemotherapy care
  6. Reduced risk of vomiting immediately after drug intake
  7. Enhanced patient comfort and acceptability
  8. Potential for partial pregastric absorption

Future Perspectives and Research Directions

  1. Development of MDTs with enhanced taste-masking technologies
  2. Exploration of novel superdisintegrants and excipients
  3. Formulation of MDTs containing combination antiemetic therapies
  4. Application of nanotechnology-based MDT formulations
  5. Optimization of MDTs for delayed and breakthrough CINV
  6. Long-term clinical trials comparing MDTs with conventional dosage forms
  7. Improved stability and moisture-resistant packaging solutions

CONCLUSION:

Mouth dissolving tablets (MDTs) offer an effective and patient-friendly approach for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Their rapid disintegration, ease of administration without water, and improved patient compliance make them especially suitable for oncology patients. Overall, MDTs represent a promising alternative to conventional oral antiemetic formulations in supportive cancer care.

REFERENCE

  1. Hesketh PJ. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(23):2482–2494.
  2. Navari RM. Management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: Focus on newer agents and new uses for older agents. Drugs. 2013;73(3):249–262.
  3. Gralla RJ, Hesketh PJ, et al. Antiemetic therapy: Evolving strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(2):422–429.
  4. Gupta DK, Bajpai M, Chatterjee DP. Fast dissolving oral tablets: A review. Indian Drugs. 2004;41(2):69–75.
  5. Seager H. Drug-delivery products and the Zydis fast-dissolving dosage form. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998;50(4):375–382.
  6. Mishra B, Panigrahi D. Mouth dissolving tablets: An overview of formulation technology. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 2005;8(1):19–25.
  7. Fu Y, Yang S, Jeong SH, Kimura S, Park K. Orally fast disintegrating tablets: Developments, technologies, taste-masking and clinical studies. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2004;21(6):433–476.
  8. Siddiqui MN, Garg G, Sharma PK. A short review on fast dissolving tablets. J Pharm Res. 2010;3(2):282–286.
  9. Bandari S, Mittapalli RK, Gannu R, Rao YM. Orodispersible tablets: An overview. Asian J Pharm. 2008;2(1):2–11.
  10. Biradar SS, Bhagavati ST, Kuppasad IJ. Fast dissolving drug delivery systems: A brief overview. Internet J Pharmacol. 2006;4(2):1–7.
  11. Indurwade NH, Rajyaguru TH, Nakhat PD. Novel approach – fast dissolving tablets. Indian Drugs. 2002;39(8):405–409.
  12. Velmurugan S, Sundar V. Oral disintegrating tablets: An overview. Int J Chem Pharm Sci. 2010;1(2):1–12.
  13. Dobetti L. Fast-melting tablets: Developments and technologies. Pharm Technol. 2001;25(9):44–50.
  14. Hannan PA, Khan JA, Khan A, Safiullah S. Oral dispersible system: A new approach in drug delivery system. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2016;78(1):2–7.
  15. Brown J. Clinical pharmacology of ondansetron and granisetron. Cancer Treat Rev. 1994;20(Suppl A):1–12.
  16. Kris MG, Gralla RJ. Antiemetic therapy. Support Care Cancer. 1993;1(2):63–69.
  17. Sun L, Ma J, Zhou Y, et al. Efficacy of orally soluble ondansetron in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. BMC Cancer. 2025; 25:16.
  18. Kovac AL, O’Connor TA, Pearman MH. Comparison of oral granisetron formulations for CINV. Support Care Cancer. 2000; 8:145–150.
  19. Navari RM, Aapro M. Antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1356–1367.
  20. Reddy LH, Murthy RSR. Fast dissolving tablets: A review. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(4):331–336.
  21. Dixit RP, Puthli SP. Oral strip technology: Overview and future potential. J Control Release. 2009;139(2):94–107.
  22. Bhushan SY, Sambhaji SP, Anant PR, Kakade SV. New drug delivery system for elderly. Indian Drugs. 2000;37(7):312–318.
  23. Shukla D, Chakraborty S, Singh S, Mishra B. Mouth dissolving tablets: An overview of formulation technology. Sci Pharm. 2009;77(2):309–326.
  24. Arya A, Chandra A, Sharma V, Pathak K. Fast dissolving oral films: An innovative drug delivery system. Int J ChemTech Res. 2010;2(1):576–583.
  25. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, Flower RJ. Pharmacology of antiemetic drugs. Churchill Livingstone; 2015.

Reference

  1. Hesketh PJ. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(23):2482–2494.
  2. Navari RM. Management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: Focus on newer agents and new uses for older agents. Drugs. 2013;73(3):249–262.
  3. Gralla RJ, Hesketh PJ, et al. Antiemetic therapy: Evolving strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(2):422–429.
  4. Gupta DK, Bajpai M, Chatterjee DP. Fast dissolving oral tablets: A review. Indian Drugs. 2004;41(2):69–75.
  5. Seager H. Drug-delivery products and the Zydis fast-dissolving dosage form. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998;50(4):375–382.
  6. Mishra B, Panigrahi D. Mouth dissolving tablets: An overview of formulation technology. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 2005;8(1):19–25.
  7. Fu Y, Yang S, Jeong SH, Kimura S, Park K. Orally fast disintegrating tablets: Developments, technologies, taste-masking and clinical studies. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2004;21(6):433–476.
  8. Siddiqui MN, Garg G, Sharma PK. A short review on fast dissolving tablets. J Pharm Res. 2010;3(2):282–286.
  9. Bandari S, Mittapalli RK, Gannu R, Rao YM. Orodispersible tablets: An overview. Asian J Pharm. 2008;2(1):2–11.
  10. Biradar SS, Bhagavati ST, Kuppasad IJ. Fast dissolving drug delivery systems: A brief overview. Internet J Pharmacol. 2006;4(2):1–7.
  11. Indurwade NH, Rajyaguru TH, Nakhat PD. Novel approach – fast dissolving tablets. Indian Drugs. 2002;39(8):405–409.
  12. Velmurugan S, Sundar V. Oral disintegrating tablets: An overview. Int J Chem Pharm Sci. 2010;1(2):1–12.
  13. Dobetti L. Fast-melting tablets: Developments and technologies. Pharm Technol. 2001;25(9):44–50.
  14. Hannan PA, Khan JA, Khan A, Safiullah S. Oral dispersible system: A new approach in drug delivery system. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2016;78(1):2–7.
  15. Brown J. Clinical pharmacology of ondansetron and granisetron. Cancer Treat Rev. 1994;20(Suppl A):1–12.
  16. Kris MG, Gralla RJ. Antiemetic therapy. Support Care Cancer. 1993;1(2):63–69.
  17. Sun L, Ma J, Zhou Y, et al. Efficacy of orally soluble ondansetron in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. BMC Cancer. 2025; 25:16.
  18. Kovac AL, O’Connor TA, Pearman MH. Comparison of oral granisetron formulations for CINV. Support Care Cancer. 2000; 8:145–150.
  19. Navari RM, Aapro M. Antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1356–1367.
  20. Reddy LH, Murthy RSR. Fast dissolving tablets: A review. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(4):331–336.
  21. Dixit RP, Puthli SP. Oral strip technology: Overview and future potential. J Control Release. 2009;139(2):94–107.
  22. Bhushan SY, Sambhaji SP, Anant PR, Kakade SV. New drug delivery system for elderly. Indian Drugs. 2000;37(7):312–318.
  23. Shukla D, Chakraborty S, Singh S, Mishra B. Mouth dissolving tablets: An overview of formulation technology. Sci Pharm. 2009;77(2):309–326.
  24. Arya A, Chandra A, Sharma V, Pathak K. Fast dissolving oral films: An innovative drug delivery system. Int J ChemTech Res. 2010;2(1):576–583.
  25. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, Flower RJ. Pharmacology of antiemetic drugs. Churchill Livingstone; 2015.

Photo
Kanchan Choudhari
Corresponding author

PDEA’s Shankarrao Ursal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research Centre, Kharadi, Pune

Photo
Dr. Jitendra Shinde
Co-author

PDEA’s Shankarrao Ursal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research Centre, Kharadi, Pune

Kanchan Choudhari*, Dr. Jitendra Shinde, Mouth Dissolving Tablets as an Effective Drug Delivery Approach for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV), Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (1), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18296149

More related articles
Analyze the Impact of Fintech on Traditional Banki...
Dr. R. Chandhrasekaran , Mathumitha S., ...
Indian Shipping Industry – Vital for The India S...
Pinninti Sai Srinivas Uday Kiran, ...
A Review on Herbal Drug Nanotechnology...
Suraj Kedar, Divya Palande, Aradhya Sase, Bhavesh Mohape, Pravin ...
Physico Chemical Analysis of Water in Aquaponds In Devaguptam Village in Allavar...
A. V. V. S. Swamy, Parvathi Gosangi, Vudata. Subhashini, ...
Multiple Bilateral Supplemental Premolars in Non-Syndromic Patients- Report of T...
Dr. Shilpi Srivastava, Dr. Durga Shankar Gupta, Dr. Shilpi Srivastava, ...
Advancements in Immunomodulatory Therapies for Autoimmune Disease...
Shrushti Shahane , Utkarsha Sawant, Pratiksha Ghodake , Swapnil Kale, Sneha Kanase, ...
Related Articles
Development Of LiquiSolid Systems For Pioglitazone: A Strategy To Overcome Solub...
Priya Chandrashekhar Patil, Sudarshan Sunil Mirgal, Dr. Bharat Tekade, ...
Ficus Sycomorus: Ecological, Cultural, And Medicinal Insights into A Timeless Tr...
Eunice Wothaya Muthee, Mathew Ngugi, Stephen Gitahi, Alex Machocho, ...
Analyze the Impact of Fintech on Traditional Banking...
Dr. R. Chandhrasekaran , Mathumitha S., ...
More related articles
Analyze the Impact of Fintech on Traditional Banking...
Dr. R. Chandhrasekaran , Mathumitha S., ...
A Review on Herbal Drug Nanotechnology...
Suraj Kedar, Divya Palande, Aradhya Sase, Bhavesh Mohape, Pravin Gaykar, Pratiksha Sonawane, ...
Analyze the Impact of Fintech on Traditional Banking...
Dr. R. Chandhrasekaran , Mathumitha S., ...
A Review on Herbal Drug Nanotechnology...
Suraj Kedar, Divya Palande, Aradhya Sase, Bhavesh Mohape, Pravin Gaykar, Pratiksha Sonawane, ...