We use cookies to ensure our website works properly and to personalise your experience. Cookies policy
Department of Chemistry, M.L.V. Government College, Bhilwara – 311001, Rajasthan, India
In the semi-arid industrial basin of Bhilwara, Rajasthan, effluent discharge from textile wet-processing, dyeing, and finishing units contaminates ephemeral drainage channels and unconfined aquifers. This investigation quantifies toxic trace heavy metal concentrations (Cd, Cr, Pb) across the irrigation water–soil–crop continuum under a factorial field design () comparing an unamended groundwater control (C1–C4), vermicompost-amended organic management (OS1–OS4), and composite textile effluent irrigation (TS1–TS4) across four contrasting economic taxa: Wheatgrass (Triticum aestivum L.), Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.), Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), and Spearmint (Mentha spicata L.). Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) following matrix-specific wet acid digestions revealed high contaminant loadings in composite textile wastewater: Pb (), Cr (), and Cd (), exceeding permissible national irrigation thresholds (CPCB/BIS) by -, -, and -fold, respectively. In harvested foliar biomass, trace metal bioaccumulation followed the species-dependent hierarchy: . Foliar lead levels in S. oleracea and M. spicata reached and dry weight, substantially exceeding the international WHO/FAO benchmark () and the national Indian FSSAI statutory threshold (). Cadmium exhibited high soil-to-plant transfer efficiency, yielding Bioaccumulation Factors () greater than unity () in all effluent-irrigated crops. In contrast, foliar metal levels in organic control treatments remained below the solid-phase Limit of Quantification for Cd () and within safe baselines for Pb and Cr. Human dietary risk assessments yielded Target Hazard Quotients () of for Pb and for Cd in S. oleracea, demonstrating serious non-carcinogenic health hazards through the food chain. These findings confirm that untreated textile wastewater serves as a potent vector for heavy metal accumulation in leafy produce, while vermicompost-based organic management mitigates toxic metal entry into the agricultural food chain.
Agricultural intensification across semi-arid urbanizing regions increasingly encounters severe environmental constraints linked to industrial wastewater reuse. The textile manufacturing sector represents a major consumer of freshwater and a primary producer of chemically complex wastewater containing refractory dyestuffs, finishing reagents, dissolved salts, and toxic transition metals (Al-Tohamy et al., 2022; Bhagat & Tiyasha, 2013). In Bhilwara district, recognized as the "Textile City of Rajasthan," more than 500 wet-processing, dyeing, and rotary printing establishments discharge 20 to 30 million liters per day (MLD) of industrial wastewater into municipal drainage networks like the Guwardi Drain and ephemeral riverbeds of the Kothari and Banas basins (Dhaker & Mehta, 2020; Pareek & Srivastava, 2025; Sharma, 2024; Singh et al., 2025). Under conditions of chronic freshwater scarcity, peri-urban farmers frequently divert these wastewater-impacted surface flows to irrigate food and fodder crops (Dhaker et al., 2025; Kaur et al., 2019).
Heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), and lead (Pb) are non-biodegradable and persist in the agro-ecosystem (Atta et al., 2023; Hassan et al., 2024; Khaliq et al., 2022; Waheed et al., 2019). Continuous application of metal-laden wastewater promotes the translocation of free divalent cations and organic complexes across root membranes into edible vegetative organs (Bonanno et al., 2016; Souri et al., 2019). Broad-leaved succulent vegetables (e.g., Spinacia oleracea) and perennial aromatic herbs (e.g., Mentha spicata) possess high transpiration rates and large root-surface-area-to-biomass ratios, predisposing them to elevated metal uptake compared to fibrous-rooted monocotyledonous grasses (Bonanno et al., 2016; Souri et al., 2019). Ingestion of produce contaminated with non-essential metals like Pb and Cd poses well-documented chronic health hazards, including nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, skeletal demineralization, and cardiovascular impairment (Alsafran et al., 2021; Ojekunle et al., 2022; Sultana et al., 2022).
Conversely, restorative organic soil management utilizing composted bio-fertilizers and vermicompost introduces stabilized humic and fulvic substances capable of chelating transition metals on functional carboxyl and phenolic surfaces, immobilizing them within the soil matrix and reducing phytoavailability (Aslam et al., 2019; Duddigan et al., 2023; Oyege & Bhaskar, 2023; Xu & Mou, 2016). To establish the environmental and health impacts of these contrasting agronomic practices, this paper presents a detailed flame atomic absorption spectroscopic (AAS) investigation evaluating the uptake, soil-to-plant transfer kinetics (BAF), and dietary health risks (EDI, THQ) of Cd, Cr, and Pb in four economically important crops under field conditions in Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Study Area, Experimental Design, and Treatment Matrix
The field experiment was performed at the experimental farm of Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Agarpura Chouraha, Bhilwara (25.345132° N, 74.717118° E), situated in the semi-arid agro-climatic Zone IV-A of Rajasthan. The soil was an uncultivated clay loam with no prior history of synthetic fertilizer or industrial wastewater application.
The trial employed a 3×4×3 completely randomized block design yielding 36 experimental plots (6ft×8ft each; 4.46m2). Four economically and medicinally important crops were cultivated:
Treatments comprised:
2.2 Sample Digestion Protocols and Dilution Formulations
Sample preparation and wet acid digestions followed standardized analytical protocols:
FoliarMetal(mgkg-1drywt.)=Cinst(mgL-1)×0.100L/0.010kg=Cinst×10
SoilMetal(mgkg-1drywt.)=Cinst(mgL-1)×0.050L/0.001kg=Cinst×50
WastewaterMetal(mgL-1)=Cinst×1.0
2.3 Spectroscopic Instrumentation and Quality Control
Heavy metal determinations (Cd, Cr, Pb) were executed on a PG Instruments AA500 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer equipped with element-specific hollow-cathode lamps and deuterium background correction at the Materials Research Centre (MRC), MNIT Jaipur. Calibration curves were constructed from multi-point certified elemental standards (0.0--10.0mgL-1, r2≥0.998). Solid-phase Limits of Quantification (LOQ) were established as:
Values falling below these thresholds are designated as Below Limit of Quantification (BLQ).
2.4 Bioaccumulation and Dietary Risk Assessment Formulations
Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF): Quantifies transfer efficiency from soil to foliar biomass:
BAF=(Cplant(mgkg-1drywt.))/(Csoil(mgkg-1drywt.))
1. where Csoil represents baseline soil concentrations: Cd0.350mgkg-1, Cr6.050mgkg-1, and Pb7.650mgkg-1.
Estimated Daily Intake ():
EDI=(Cplant×IR×EF×ED)/(BW×AT)
2. where IR is daily adult intake of leafy greens (0.345kgperson-1day-1); EF is exposure frequency (365daysyear-1); ED is exposure duration (70years); BW is average adult body weight (70kg); and AT is averaging time for non-carcinogens (25,550days).
Target Hazard Quotient ():
3. where oral reference doses (RfD) are 0.0035mgkg-1day-1 for Pb, 0.001mgkg-1day-1 for Cd, and 0.003mgkg-1day-1 for Cr (US EPA). A THQ>1.0 indicates potential non-carcinogenic health hazards.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Trace Heavy Metal Burden in Irrigation Matrices and Baseline Soil
The composite textile wastewater (TW) carried high heavy metal concentrations: Pb(4.332mgL-1), Cr(3.388mgL-1), and Cd(1.492mgL-1). These levels substantially exceeded the Indian Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS: IS 2296) irrigation limits (0.10mgL-1 for Pb, 0.10mgL-1 for Cr, and 0.01mgL-1 for Cd) by factors of 43.3×, 33.9×, and 149.2×, respectively. The metal burden reflects the widespread use of lead chromate pigments, potassium dichromate oxidizing agents, and cadmium-stabilized complex azo dyestuffs in Bhilwara textile units (Dagne, 2020; Meena & Meena, 2020; Odipe et al., 2019). In contrast, local groundwater used for the control and organic treatments exhibited non-detectable metal levels (<0.001mgL-1).
AAS instrumental readouts and calculated concentrations are compiled in Table 1.
Table 1: AAS Instrumental Parameters, Raw Absorbances, Dilution Factors, and Converted Elemental Concentrations *Values with an asterisk fall below the established Limit of Quantification (LOQ: Cd = 0.25 mg/kg; Cr = 1.00 mg/kg; Pb = 1.00 mg/kg).
| Sample Code | Matrix Description | Cd Inst. (ppm) | Cd Converted (mg/kg) | Cr Inst. (ppm) | Cr Converted (mg/kg) | Pb Inst. (ppm) | Pb Converted (mg/kg) | QA/QC Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TW | Textile Effluent | 1.492 | 1.492 mg/L | 3.388 | 3.388 mg/L | 4.332 | 4.332 mg/L | >Permissible Standard |
| SS | Baseline Soil | 0.007 | 0.350 mg/kg | 0.121 | 6.050 mg/kg | 0.153 | 7.650 mg/kg | Baseline Soil Burden |
| C1 | Wheatgrass (Control) | 0.013 | 0.130 mg/kg* | 0.121 | 1.210 mg/kg | 0.153 | 1.530 mg/kg | Baseline Trace Level |
| OS1 | Wheatgrass (Organic) | 0.003 | 0.030 mg/kg* | 0.121 | 1.210 mg/kg | 0.076 | 0.760 mg/kg* | Below LOQ Threshold |
| TS1 | Wheatgrass (Textile) | 0.216 | 2.160 mg/kg | 0.344 | 3.440 mg/kg | 0.538 | 5.380 mg/kg | Bioaccumulated |
| C2 | Fenugreek (Control) | 0.010 | 0.100 mg/kg* | 0.121 | 1.210 mg/kg | 0.076 | 0.760 mg/kg* | Below LOQ Threshold |
| OS2 | Fenugreek (Organic) | 0.003 | 0.030 mg/kg* | 0.121 | 1.210 mg/kg | 0.076 | 0.760 mg/kg* | Below LOQ Threshold |
| TS2 | Fenugreek (Textile) | 0.204 | 2.040 mg/kg | 0.269 | 2.690 mg/kg | 0.923 | 9.230 mg/kg | Bioaccumulated |
| C3 | Spinach (Control) | 0.010 | 0.100 mg/kg* | 0.195 | 1.950 mg/kg | 0.076 | 0.760 mg/kg* | Below LOQ Threshold |
| OS3 | Spinach (Organic) | 0.010 | 0.100 mg/kg* | 0.121 | 1.210 mg/kg | 0.153 | 1.530 mg/kg | Baseline Trace Level |
| TS3 | Spinach (Textile) | 0.283 | 2.830 mg/kg | 0.492 | 4.920 mg/kg | 1.461 | 14.610 mg/kg | Hyper-accumulator |
| C4 | Spearmint (Control) | 0.007 | 0.070 mg/kg* | 0.195 | 1.950 mg/kg | 0.153 | 1.530 mg/kg | Baseline Trace Level |
| OS4 | Spearmint (Organic) | 0.007 | 0.070 mg/kg* | 0.195 | 1.950 mg/kg | 0.230 | 2.300 mg/kg | Baseline Trace Level |
| TS4 | Spearmint (Textile) | 0.246 | 2.460 mg/kg | 0.492 | 4.920 mg/kg | 1.307 | 13.070 mg/kg | Hyper-accumulator |
3.2 Foliar Heavy Metal Bioaccumulation Across Botanical Taxa
In foliar biomass harvested from effluent plots (TS1–TS4), trace metal accumulation was significantly elevated over controls, following the species order:
Spinach(TS3)≈Spearmint(TS4)>Fenugreek(TS2)>Wheatgrass(TS1)
The observed accumulation differences reflect plant anatomical characteristics. Broad-leaved dicots (S. oleracea) and perennial herbs (M. spicata) maintain higher stomatal conductance and transpiration rates, driving substantial mass-flow xylem transport of divalent cations into foliar tissues (Bonanno et al., 2016; Souri et al., 2019). Conversely, monocotyledonous wheatgrass (T. aestivum) develops an endodermal Casparian strip with suberized secondary thickenings that restricts apoplastic radial ion flux into the stele, limiting heavy metal translocation to above-ground parts (Bonanno et al., 2016; Souri et al., 2019).
3.3 Soil-to-Plant Partitioning and Bioaccumulation Factors (BAF)
Soil-to-shoot transfer efficiencies were determined against pre-cultivation baseline soil concentrations (Table 2).
Cadmium exhibited Bioaccumulation Factors well above unity (BAF=5.83--8.09) across all effluent-irrigated crops. The high mobility of Cd2+ stems from its chemical resemblance to divalent cations (Ca2+, Fe2+), facilitating entry into root symplasts via ZIP-family permeases and non-selective cation channels (Bankole et al., 2024; Orosun et al., 2020). Under sodic conditions (SAR=15.43), high Na+ loads displace Cd2+ from soil exchange sites into the soil solution, enhancing bioaccumulation (Bankole et al., 2024; Siddique et al., 2021).
Lead concentrated preferentially in spinach (BAF=1.91) and spearmint (BAF=1.71). Conversely, chromium exhibited BAF<1.0 (0.44--0.81) in all taxa. In well-aerated alkaline soils (pH8.5--9.0), soluble hexavalent chromate reduces to trivalent chromium (Cr3+), precipitating as insoluble chromium hydroxide [Cr(OH)3] or binding to mineral lattices, moderating translocation into edible foliage (Bankole et al., 2024; Chen & Lena, 2001; Gaudino et al., 2007).
Table 2: Soil-to-Shoot Bioaccumulation Factors (BAF) and Regulatory Limit Comparisons
| Crop Taxon | Sample Code & Regime | Tissue Cd (mg/kg) | BAF-Cd | Tissue Cr (mg/kg) | BAF-Cr | Tissue Pb (mg/kg) | BAF-Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triticum aestivum L. | TS1 (Effluent) | 2.160 | 6.17 | 3.440 | 0.57 | 5.380 | 0.70 |
| Trigonella foenum-graecum L. | TS2 (Effluent) | 2.040 | 5.83 | 2.690 | 0.44 | 9.230 | 1.21 |
| Spinacia oleracea L. | TS3 (Effluent) | 2.830 | 8.09 | 4.920 | 0.81 | 14.610 | 1.91 |
| Mentha spicata L. | TS4 (Effluent) | 2.460 | 7.03 | 4.920 | 0.81 | 13.070 | 1.71 |
| All Crops Baseline | OS1–OS4 (Organic) | < 0.25 (BLQ) | — | 1.210–1.950 | 0.20–0.32 | < 1.00–2.300 | 0.10–0.30 |
| WHO/FAO Permissible Limit | Edible Vegetable Benchmark | 0.20 mg/kg | — | 2.30 mg/kg | — | 0.30 mg/kg | — |
| Indian FSSAI Limit | National Food Safety Standard | 1.50 mg/kg | — | 20.00 mg/kg | — | 2.50 mg/kg | — |
3.4 Dietary Human Health Risk Assessment (EDI and THQ)
Dietary exposure metrics and non-carcinogenic health hazards calculated for adult consumers are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Dietary Exposure (EDI) and Non-Carcinogenic Target Hazard Quotients (THQ) for Adult Consumers
| Exposure Scenario | Cd EDI (mg/kg/day) | THQ-Cd | Pb EDI (mg/kg/day) | THQ-Pb | Cumulative Hazard Index (HI = ΣTHQ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS1 Wheatgrass (T. aestivum) | 0.0106 | 10.64 | 0.0265 | 7.57 | 18.21 |
| TS2 Fenugreek (T. foenum-graecum) | 0.0100 | 10.05 | 0.0455 | 12.99 | 23.04 |
| TS3 Spinach (S. oleracea) | 0.0139 | 13.94 | 0.0720 | 20.57 | 34.51 |
| TS4 Spearmint (M. spicata) | 0.0121 | 12.12 | 0.0644 | 18.40 | 30.52 |
| Safe Toxicological Threshold | — | ≤ 1.0 | — | ≤ 1.0 | ≤ 1.0 (No Significant Non-Carcinogenic Risk) |
Target Hazard Quotients for both lead and cadmium exceeded the safe threshold (THQ>1.0) across all crops receiving untreated textile wastewater. In Spinacia oleracea, THQ-Pb reached 20.57 and THQ-Cd reached 13.94, yielding a cumulative Hazard Index of 34.51. In Mentha spicata, the cumulative Hazard Index was 30.52. Because leafy vegetables are dietary staples consumed with minimal processing, irrigating peri-urban fields with untreated textile wastewater presents potential food-chain contamination risks for local populations (Alsafran et al., 2021; Ojekunle et al., 2022; Sultana et al., 2022).
CONCLUSION
Flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry confirmed that composite textile industrial wastewater in Bhilwara contains high concentrations of toxic heavy metals (Pb4.332mgL-1, Cr3.388mgL-1, Cd1.492mgL-1), substantially exceeding permissible discharge and agricultural reuse limits. Irrigation with this wastewater led to significant metal accumulation in edible foliar biomass, following the hierarchy: Spinach≈Spearmint>Fenugreek>Wheatgrass.
Foliar lead in S. oleracea reached 14.610mgkg-1 dry weight, exceeding the WHO/FAO permissible food safety threshold by nearly 48-fold and yielding a Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) of 20.57. Cadmium demonstrated net soil-to-plant bioaccumulation (BAF5.83--8.09) in all effluent-irrigated crops. In contrast, vermicompost-amended organic management maintained foliar cadmium levels below the analytical quantification limit (<0.25mgkg-1) and kept lead and chromium within safe baselines. These findings underscore the importance of enforcing industrial effluent treatment standards in the Kothari and Banas river basins and support the adoption of organic soil management and appropriate crop choices to reduce heavy metal entry into peri-urban food systems.
REFERENCES
Shubham Ojha, Avnish Sharma, Spectroscopic Quantification of Heavy Metal Bioaccumulation, Soil-to-Plant Partitioning, and Dietary Toxicity in Four Economic Crops Irrigated with Textile Industrial Wastewater in Bhilwara, Semi-Arid Rajasthan, Int. J. Sci. R. Tech., 2026, 3 (10), 1222-1230. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23661000
10.5281/zenodo.23661000